| rfc9928v1.txt | rfc9928.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| skipping to change at line 19 ¶ | skipping to change at line 19 ¶ | |||
| February 2026 | February 2026 | |||
| DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 with Relay Agent Support | DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 with Relay Agent Support | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document describes a mechanism for networks with legacy | This document describes a mechanism for networks with legacy | |||
| IPv4-only clients to use services provided by DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 in a | IPv4-only clients to use services provided by DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 in a | |||
| Relay Agent. RFC 7341 specifies the use of DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 in the | Relay Agent. RFC 7341 specifies the use of DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 in the | |||
| client only. This document specifies an approach based on RFC 7341 | client only. This document specifies an approach based on RFC 7341 | |||
| that allows a Relay Agent to implement the DHCP 4o6 encapsulation and | that allows a Relay Agent to implement the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 | |||
| decapsulation of DHCPv4 messages in DHCPv6 messages on behalf of a | encapsulation and decapsulation of DHCPv4 messages in DHCPv6 messages | |||
| DHCPv4 client. | on behalf of a DHCPv4 client. | |||
| Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
| This is an Internet Standards Track document. | This is an Internet Standards Track document. | |||
| This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force | This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force | |||
| (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has | (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has | |||
| received public review and has been approved for publication by the | received public review and has been approved for publication by the | |||
| Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on | Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on | |||
| Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. | Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. | |||
| skipping to change at line 82 ¶ | skipping to change at line 82 ¶ | |||
| [RFC7341] describes a transport mechanism for carrying DHCPv4 | [RFC7341] describes a transport mechanism for carrying DHCPv4 | |||
| [RFC2131] messages using DHCPv6 [RFC9915] for dynamic provisioning of | [RFC2131] messages using DHCPv6 [RFC9915] for dynamic provisioning of | |||
| IPv4 addresses and other DHCPv4-specific configuration parameters | IPv4 addresses and other DHCPv4-specific configuration parameters | |||
| across IPv6-only networks. The deployment of [RFC7341] requires | across IPv6-only networks. The deployment of [RFC7341] requires | |||
| support in DHCP clients and at the DHCPv6 server. However, if a | support in DHCP clients and at the DHCPv6 server. However, if a | |||
| client is embedded in a host that only supports IPv4 and cannot | client is embedded in a host that only supports IPv4 and cannot | |||
| easily be replaced or updated (which could be due to any number of | easily be replaced or updated (which could be due to any number of | |||
| technical or business reasons), this approach does not work. | technical or business reasons), this approach does not work. | |||
| Similarly, the specifications for DHCPv6 Relay Agents such as | Similarly, the DHCPv6 Relay Agent specification defined in [RFC9915], | |||
| Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA) [RFC6221] or DHCPv6 Relay Agent | which also refers to [RFC6221] for the Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent | |||
| (L3RA) [RFC9915] do not foresee the possibility to handle legacy | (LDRA) behavior, does not provide any mechanism to handle legacy | |||
| DHCPv4, other than implementing DHCP 4o6 in the client. | DHCPv4, except by requiring the client to implement the DHCPv4-over- | |||
| DHCPv6 encapsulation and decapsulation. | ||||
| This document specifies a solution based on [RFC7341] that can be | This document specifies a solution based on [RFC7341] that can be | |||
| implemented in intermediate nodes such as switches or routers, | implemented in intermediate nodes such as switches or routers, | |||
| without putting any requirements on clients. No new protocols or | without putting any requirements on clients. No new protocols or | |||
| extensions are needed; instead, this document specifies a new use | extensions are needed; instead, this document specifies a new use | |||
| case for [RFC7341] that allows a Relay Agent to perform the DHCP 4o6 | case for [RFC7341] that allows a Relay Agent to perform the DHCPv4- | |||
| encapsulation and decapsulation instead of the client. | over-DHCPv6 encapsulation and decapsulation instead of the client. | |||
| 1.1. Applicability Scope | 1.1. Applicability Scope | |||
| The mechanisms described in this document apply to the configuration | The mechanisms described in this document apply to the configuration | |||
| phase of hosts that need to receive an IPv4 address when a DHCP | phase of hosts that need to receive an IPv4 address when a DHCP | |||
| server for IPv4 [RFC2131] is not reachable directly from the host. | server for IPv4 [RFC2131] is not reachable directly from the host. | |||
| Furthermore, the host is unable to implement a DHCP client conformant | Furthermore, the host is unable to implement a DHCP client conformant | |||
| to [RFC7341], as it is connected to an IPv4-only network. However, | to [RFC7341], as it is connected to an IPv4-only network. However, | |||
| there is a DHCPv6 server that can provide IPv4 addresses by means of | there is a DHCPv6 server that can provide IPv4 addresses by means of | |||
| the mechanisms specified in [RFC7341]. | the mechanisms specified in [RFC7341]. | |||
| 2. Conventions and Definitions | 2. Conventions and Definitions | |||
| The following terms and abbreviations are used in this document: | The following terms and abbreviations are used in this document: | |||
| DHCP: | DHCP: | |||
| If not otherwise specified, DHCP refers to DHCPv4 and/or DHCPv6. | Refers to DHCPv4 and/or DHCPv6 if not otherwise specified. | |||
| DHCP Relay Agent: | ||||
| Refers to a common concept in all of the following protocols, | ||||
| although the details differ between them: the Bootstrap Protocol | ||||
| (BOOTP) [RFC0951] [RFC1542], DHCPv4 [RFC2131] [RFC2132], and | ||||
| DHCPv6 [RFC9915]. | ||||
| DHCPv4: | DHCPv4: | |||
| DHCP as defined in [RFC2131]. | Refers to DHCP as defined in [RFC2131]. | |||
| DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6): | DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6): | |||
| The architecture, the procedures, and the protocols specified in | Refers to the architecture, the procedures, and the protocols | |||
| the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 document [RFC7341]. | specified in the DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 document [RFC7341]. | |||
| DHCP Relay Agent: | DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 Relay Agent (4o6RA): | |||
| This is a concept in all of the following protocols, although the | Refers to a Relay Agent that implements the DHCP 4o6 transport as | |||
| details differ between them: the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) | specified in this document. | |||
| [RFC0951] [RFC1542], DHCPv4 [RFC2131] [RFC2132], and DHCPv6 | ||||
| [RFC9915]. | Layer 3 Relay Agent (L3RA): | |||
| Refers to a DHCP Relay Agent as specified in [RFC9915] that is not | ||||
| a LDRA. | ||||
| Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA): | Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA): | |||
| This is an extension of the original DHCPv6 Relay Agent | Refers to an extension of the original DHCPv6 Relay Agent | |||
| specification, to allow Layer 2 (L2) only devices to perform a | specification, to allow Layer 2 (L2) only devices to perform a | |||
| Relay Agent function [RFC6221]. | Relay Agent function [RFC6221]. | |||
| DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 Relay Agent (4o6RA): | ||||
| Refers to a Relay Agent that implements the 4o6 transport as | ||||
| specified in this document. | ||||
| The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
| "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | |||
| "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in | "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in | |||
| BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | |||
| capitals, as shown here. | capitals, as shown here. | |||
| 3. DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 Relay Agent (4o6RA) | 3. DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6 Relay Agent (4o6RA) | |||
| This document assumes a network where IPv4-only hosts are connected | This document assumes a network where IPv4-only hosts are connected | |||
| to a network that supports IPv6 and limited IPv4 services. | to a network that supports IPv6 and limited IPv4 services. | |||
| skipping to change at line 172 ¶ | skipping to change at line 177 ¶ | |||
| Agent to provide the full DHCP 4o6 support, and the legacy DHCPv4 | Agent to provide the full DHCP 4o6 support, and the legacy DHCPv4 | |||
| client is not aware that it is being served via a DHCP 4o6 service. | client is not aware that it is being served via a DHCP 4o6 service. | |||
| As the 4o6RA acts as a DHCP 4o6 client, all prerequisites and | As the 4o6RA acts as a DHCP 4o6 client, all prerequisites and | |||
| configurations that apply to the DHCP client in Section 5 of | configurations that apply to the DHCP client in Section 5 of | |||
| [RFC7341] are also applied to the 4o6RA. | [RFC7341] are also applied to the 4o6RA. | |||
| As the 4o6RA takes the role of the client in respect to [RFC7341], it | As the 4o6RA takes the role of the client in respect to [RFC7341], it | |||
| is responsible for determining a suitable interface where it acts as | is responsible for determining a suitable interface where it acts as | |||
| a DHCPv6 client, and it is responsible for locating a suitable DHCPv6 | a DHCPv6 client, and it is responsible for locating a suitable DHCPv6 | |||
| server or Relay Agent and obtaining the necessary IPv6 configuration. | server or Relay Agent and obtaining the necessary IPv6 configuration. | |||
| As specified in [RFC7341], the 4o6RA, acting as 4o6 client, therefore | As specified in [RFC7341], the 4o6RA, acting as DHCP 4o6 client, | |||
| has to request the DHCP 4o6 Server Address option from the server by | therefore has to request the DHCP 4o6 Server Address option from the | |||
| sending the Option Request option as described in [RFC9915] before it | server by sending the Option Request option as described in [RFC9915] | |||
| can use the 4o6 transport. | before it can use the DHCP 4o6 transport. | |||
| To maintain interoperability with existing DHCPv6 relays and servers, | To maintain interoperability with existing DHCPv6 relays and servers, | |||
| the message format is unchanged from [RFC9915]. The 4o6RA implements | the message format is unchanged from [RFC9915]. The 4o6RA implements | |||
| the same message types as a DHCPv6 Relay Agent (see Section 6 of | the same message types as a DHCPv6 Relay Agent (see Section 6 of | |||
| [RFC7341]). | [RFC7341]). | |||
| However, in this specification, the 4o6RA, instead of the client, | However, in this specification, the 4o6RA, instead of the client, | |||
| creates the DHCPV4-QUERY message and encapsulates the DHCP request | creates the DHCPV4-QUERY message and encapsulates the DHCP request | |||
| message received from the legacy DHCPv4 client. | message received from the legacy DHCPv4 client. | |||
| When the DHCPV4-RESPONSE message is received by the 4o6 Relay Agent, | When the DHCPV4-RESPONSE message is received by the DHCP 4o6 Relay | |||
| it looks for the DHCPv4 message option within this message. If this | Agent, it looks for the DHCPv4 message option within this message. | |||
| option is not found or the DHCPv4-RESPONSE message is not well- | If this option is not found or the DHCPv4-RESPONSE message is not | |||
| formed, it MUST be discarded. If the DHCPv4 message option is | well-formed, it MUST be discarded. If the DHCPv4 message option is | |||
| present and correct, the 4o6RA MUST extract the DHCPv4 message and | present and correct, the 4o6RA MUST extract the DHCPv4 message and | |||
| forward the encapsulated DHCPv4-RESPONSE to the requesting DHCPv4 | forward the encapsulated DHCPv4-RESPONSE to the requesting DHCPv4 | |||
| client, given that the encapsulated DHCPv4-RESPONSE is correct and | client, given that the encapsulated DHCPv4-RESPONSE is correct and | |||
| can be actually forwarded. | can be actually forwarded. | |||
| Layer 2 (L2) Relay Agents receiving DHCPV4-QUERY or DHCPV4-RESPONSE | Layer 2 (L2) Relay Agents receiving DHCPV4-QUERY or DHCPV4-RESPONSE | |||
| messages MUST handle them as specified in Section 6 of [RFC6221]. | messages MUST handle them as specified in Section 6 of [RFC6221]. | |||
| In any given environment, DHCPv6 servers to which DHCPV4-QUERY | In any given environment, DHCPv6 servers to which DHCPV4-QUERY | |||
| requests are routed are expected to be compliant with 4o6 according | requests are routed are expected to be compliant with DHCP 4o6 | |||
| to [RFC7341]. No additional requirements on DHCPv6 servers are set | according to [RFC7341]. No additional requirements on DHCPv6 servers | |||
| by this specification. | are set by this specification. | |||
| 3.1. Intermediate Relays | 3.1. Intermediate Relays | |||
| Intermediate relays shall behave according to Section 10 of | Intermediate relays shall behave according to Section 10 of | |||
| [RFC7341]. | [RFC7341]. | |||
| 3.2. 4o6RA and Topology Discovery | 3.2. 4o6RA and Topology Discovery | |||
| In some networks, the configuration of a host may depend on the | In some networks, the configuration of a host may depend on the | |||
| topology. However, when a new host attaches to a network, it may be | topology. However, when a new host attaches to a network, it may be | |||
| skipping to change at line 250 ¶ | skipping to change at line 255 ¶ | |||
| When provided, the topology information is available at the DHCPv6 | When provided, the topology information is available at the DHCPv6 | |||
| server in the form of a sequence of the link-address field and | server in the form of a sequence of the link-address field and | |||
| Interface-ID option. | Interface-ID option. | |||
| Then, topology information for the given IP address can be obtained | Then, topology information for the given IP address can be obtained | |||
| from the DHCPv6 server and used for configuration or other purposes. | from the DHCPv6 server and used for configuration or other purposes. | |||
| [RFC7341] enables the client to use DHCPv6 for topology discovery | [RFC7341] enables the client to use DHCPv6 for topology discovery | |||
| even within a DHCPv4 context, as the DHCPv6 Relay Agent knows the | even within a DHCPv4 context, as the DHCPv6 Relay Agent knows the | |||
| interface where the encapsulated DHCP request is received. However, | interface where the encapsulated DHCP request is received. However, | |||
| as shown in Figure 2, the introduction of 4o6 at the edge of the IPv6 | as shown in Figure 2, the introduction of DHCP 4o6 at the edge of the | |||
| network hides the Layer 2 network from the DHCPv6 RA. As such, | IPv6 network hides the Layer 2 network from the DHCPv6 RA. As such, | |||
| moving 4o6 to an intermediate node rather than performing it at the | moving DHCP 4o6 to an intermediate node rather than performing it at | |||
| client breaks the topology propagation, as 4o6RA-only solutions do | the client breaks the topology propagation, as 4o6RA-only solutions | |||
| not provide any interface information in the encapsulated message. | do not provide any interface information in the encapsulated message. | |||
| .-----------------. .-------------------------. | .-----------------. .-------------------------. | |||
| | L2 Network | | IPv6 Network | | | L2 Network | | IPv6 Network | | |||
| +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+---+ +--------+ +-+--------+ | +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+---+ +--------+ +-+--------+ | |||
| | DHCPv4 | | L2 | | 4o6 | | DHCPv6 | | DHCP 4o6 | | | DHCPv4 | | L2 | | 4o6 | | DHCPv6 | | DHCP 4o6 | | |||
| | Client +--+ Switch +--+ Relay +----+ Relay +-------+ Server | | | Client +--+ Switch +--+ Relay +----+ Relay +-------+ Server | | |||
| | | | | | Agent | | Agent | | | | | | | | | Agent | | Agent | | | | |||
| +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+---+ +--------+ +-+--------+ | +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+---+ +--------+ +-+--------+ | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||
| '-----------------' '-------------------------' | '-----------------' '-------------------------' | |||
| skipping to change at line 298 ¶ | skipping to change at line 303 ¶ | |||
| | Client +--+ Switch +--+ Relay + RFC 6221+------+ Server | | | Client +--+ Switch +--+ Relay + RFC 6221+------+ Server | | |||
| | | | | | Agent | | | | | | | | | | Agent | | | | | |||
| +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+--+---------+ +------+---+ | +--------+-+ +---------+ +-+---+--+---------+ +------+---+ | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||
| '-----------------' '------------------------' | '-----------------' '------------------------' | |||
| Figure 3: Topology Information Preserved with LDRA | Figure 3: Topology Information Preserved with LDRA | |||
| In a simple case, where the same node hosts the 4o6RA and the DHCP | In a simple case, where the same node hosts the 4o6RA and the DHCP | |||
| 4o6 server, it might be enough to only use 4o6RA, as shown in | 4o6 server, it might be enough to only use 4o6RA, as shown in | |||
| Figure 4. | Figure 4, where CPE stands for "Customer Premises Equipment". | |||
| .-----------. | .-----------. | |||
| | L2 Network | | | L2 Network | | |||
| +--------+-+ +-+------+----------+ | +--------+-+ +-+------+----------+ | |||
| | DHCP | | 4o6 | DHCP 4o6 | | | DHCP | | 4o6 | DHCP 4o6 | | |||
| | Client +---------+ Relay + Server | | | Client +---------+ Relay + Server | | |||
| | on CPE | | Agent | | | | on CPE | | Agent | | | |||
| +--------+-+ +-+------+----------+ | +--------+-+ +-+------+----------+ | |||
| | | | | | | |||
| '-----------' | '-----------' | |||
| skipping to change at line 325 ¶ | skipping to change at line 330 ¶ | |||
| As clients are unaware of the presence of 4o6RA, the network | As clients are unaware of the presence of 4o6RA, the network | |||
| deployment needs to ensure that all DHCPv4 broadcast and unicast | deployment needs to ensure that all DHCPv4 broadcast and unicast | |||
| messages to and from clients are steered via a 4o6RA. This can be | messages to and from clients are steered via a 4o6RA. This can be | |||
| achieved by placing the 4o6RA in a central position that can | achieved by placing the 4o6RA in a central position that can | |||
| intercept all traffic from the clients or by using Network Address | intercept all traffic from the clients or by using Network Address | |||
| Translation (NAT) with the 4o6RA address for unicast messages. | Translation (NAT) with the 4o6RA address for unicast messages. | |||
| 5. Security Considerations | 5. Security Considerations | |||
| This document specifies the applicability of DHCP 4o6 in a scenario | This document specifies the applicability of DHCP 4o6 in a scenario | |||
| where legacy IPv4 clients are connected to 4o6 DHCP Relay Agents that | where legacy IPv4 clients are connected to DHCP 4o6 Relay Agents that | |||
| perform the encapsulation and decapsulation. This document does not | perform the encapsulation and decapsulation. This document does not | |||
| change anything else in the DHCP 4o6 specification; therefore, the | change anything else in the DHCP 4o6 specification [RFC7341]; | |||
| security considerations of [RFC7341] still apply. Specifically, | therefore, the security considerations of that document still apply. | |||
| since the legacy IPv4 client is not aware of the encapsulation and | Specifically, since the legacy IPv4 client is not aware of the | |||
| decapsulation, 4o6RA has to provide the protections that are | encapsulation and decapsulation, 4o6RA has to provide the protections | |||
| specified in the security considerations in Section 12 of [RFC7341]. | that are specified in the security considerations in Section 12 of | |||
| [RFC7341]. | ||||
| The mechanisms defined here differ from [RFC7341] as they allow the | The mechanisms defined here differ from [RFC7341] as they allow the | |||
| DHCP client to send and receive DHCPv4 messages, whereas in | DHCP client to send and receive DHCPv4 messages, whereas in | |||
| [RFC7341], the client only sends DHCPv6 messages. This makes it | [RFC7341], the client only sends DHCPv6 messages. This makes it | |||
| possible that in improperly configured networks where the client is | possible that in improperly configured networks where the client is | |||
| located on the same Layer 2 scope of a DHCPv4 server, DHCPv4 messages | located on the same Layer 2 scope of a DHCPv4 server, DHCPv4 messages | |||
| could reach a DHCPv4 server without using the 4o6RA. While this can | could reach a DHCPv4 server without using the 4o6RA. While this can | |||
| cause erroneous state in both clients and servers and potentially | cause erroneous state in both clients and servers and potentially | |||
| even lead to misconfigurations that impact reachability, this is seen | even lead to misconfigurations that impact reachability, this is seen | |||
| as a deployment error rather than a security concern. Further, even | as a deployment error rather than a security concern. Further, even | |||
| skipping to change at line 409 ¶ | skipping to change at line 415 ¶ | |||
| [RFC7969] Lemon, T. and T. Mrugalski, "Customizing DHCP | [RFC7969] Lemon, T. and T. Mrugalski, "Customizing DHCP | |||
| Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", RFC 7969, | Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", RFC 7969, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC7969, October 2016, | DOI 10.17487/RFC7969, October 2016, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7969>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7969>. | |||
| Appendix A. Example Use Case: Topology Discovery for IPv4-Only Radio | Appendix A. Example Use Case: Topology Discovery for IPv4-Only Radio | |||
| Unit in 3GPP RAN with Switched Fronthaul | Unit in 3GPP RAN with Switched Fronthaul | |||
| In 3GPP mobile network architecture, the User Equipment (UE) is | In 3GPP mobile network architecture, the User Equipment (UE) is | |||
| connected via Radio Access Network (RAN). RAN is built up with | connected via a Radio Access Network (RAN). RAN is built up with | |||
| Baseband Units (BBs) and Radio Units (RUs). Radio Fronthaul Network | Baseband Units (BBUs) and Radio Units (RUs). A radio Fronthaul (FH) | |||
| (FH) connects RUs and BBs. Each RU and BB is an IP host, and they | network connects RUs and BBUs. Each RU and BBU is an IP host, and | |||
| may support IPv4 only, IPv6 only, or both, depending on the vendor | they may support IPv4 only, IPv6 only, or both, depending on the | |||
| and the model. Each RU is unique as it is tied to a set of antennas, | vendor and the model. Each RU is unique as it is tied to a set of | |||
| and each antenna is serving a specific Cell and Sector. Each RU is | antennas, and each antenna is serving a specific Cell and Sector. | |||
| configured by the BB depending on the Cell and Sectors it serves. | Each RU is configured by the BBU depending on the Cell and Sectors it | |||
| However, that dependency is only specified by the cabling between RUs | serves. However, that dependency is only specified by the cabling | |||
| and antennas. BBs can be cabled to RUs directly or via a Layer 2 | between RUs and antennas. BBUs can be cabled to RUs directly or via | |||
| switched network. | a Layer 2 switched network. | |||
| +--------+ | +--------+ | |||
| | RU2 +-----+ | | RU2 +-----+ | |||
| | | | | | | | | |||
| +--------+ | | +--------+ | | |||
| | | | | |||
| +--------+ | | +--------+ | | |||
| | RU3 | | | | RU3 | | | |||
| | +--+ | +-----------+ | | +--+ | +-----------+ | |||
| +--------+ | +--| | | +--------+ | +--| | | |||
| skipping to change at line 441 ¶ | skipping to change at line 447 ¶ | |||
| +--------+ +-----| Unit | | +--------+ +-----| Unit | | |||
| | RU4 +--+ +--| | | | RU4 +--+ +--| | | |||
| | | | +-----------+ | | | | +-----------+ | |||
| +--------+ | | +--------+ | | |||
| | | | | |||
| +--------+ | | +--------+ | | |||
| | RU2 +-----+ | | RU2 +-----+ | |||
| | | | | | | |||
| +--------+ | +--------+ | |||
| Figure 5: 3GPP RAN Where RUs Are Cabled Directly to BB | Figure 5: 3GPP RAN Where RUs Are Cabled Directly to BBUs | |||
| In Figure 5, the BB is directly cabled to a set of RUs, and the BB | In Figure 5, the BBU is directly cabled to a set of RUs, and the BBU | |||
| can recognize the relationship between RUs and Cell/Sectors based on | can recognize the relationship between RUs and Cell/Sectors based on | |||
| the cabling between the RUs and antennas. | the cabling between the RUs and antennas. | |||
| When BBs and RUs are connected via a Layer 2 switched network, the | When BBUs and RUs are connected via a Layer 2 switched network, the | |||
| added level of complexity requires the BBs to have a deeper knowledge | added level of complexity requires the BBUs to have a deeper | |||
| of the topology in order to properly configure the RUs, involving | knowledge of the topology in order to properly configure the RUs, | |||
| knowledge of all the cabling in the switched network. | involving knowledge of all the cabling in the switched network. | |||
| Examples for switched networks are shown in Section 3 of [RFC7969] | Examples for switched networks are shown in Section 3 of [RFC7969] | |||
| and demonstrate the different levels of complexity. An example of a | and demonstrate the different levels of complexity. An example of a | |||
| FH is depicted in Figure 6. | FH is depicted in Figure 6. | |||
| +--------+ | +--------+ | |||
| | RU1 | P1 +-+------+ | | | | RU1 | P1 +-+------+ | | | |||
| | +--------| | L2RA | | +----+------+ | | | +--------| | L2RA | | +----+------+ | | |||
| +--------+ | +------+ | | | L3RA | | | +--------+ | +------+ | | | L3RA | | | |||
| | L2 | +--| +------+ | | | L2 | +--| +------+ | | |||
| skipping to change at line 483 ¶ | skipping to change at line 489 ¶ | |||
| | | +--------+ | +-----------+ | | | | +--------+ | +-----------+ | | |||
| +--------+ | | | +--------+ | | | |||
| Figure 6: 3GPP RAN with Layer 2 Switched Fronthaul Example | Figure 6: 3GPP RAN with Layer 2 Switched Fronthaul Example | |||
| If IPv6 is used and all RUs are capable of DHCPv6 in Figure 6, DHCP | If IPv6 is used and all RUs are capable of DHCPv6 in Figure 6, DHCP | |||
| topology knowledge can be used for solving the RU configuration | topology knowledge can be used for solving the RU configuration | |||
| problem. Such solution would use the topology discovery mechanisms | problem. Such solution would use the topology discovery mechanisms | |||
| described in Section 3.2 of [RFC7969]. | described in Section 3.2 of [RFC7969]. | |||
| If RUs are capable of IPv4 only but implement a 4o6 client according | If RUs are capable of IPv4 only but implement a DHCP 4o6 client | |||
| to [RFC7341], the same topology discovery mechanisms are applicable. | according to [RFC7341], the same topology discovery mechanisms are | |||
| applicable. | ||||
| If RUs are capable of IPv4 only and cannot implement a 4o6 client | If RUs are capable of IPv4 only and cannot implement a DHCP 4o6 | |||
| according to [RFC7341], the topology discovery mechanisms described | client according to [RFC7341], the topology discovery mechanisms | |||
| in Section 3.2 of [RFC7969] can be used by introducing 4o6RA in the | described in Section 3.2 of [RFC7969] can be used by introducing | |||
| switches as described in this document. | 4o6RA in the switches as described in this document. | |||
| Acknowledgments | Acknowledgments | |||
| The authors would like to acknowledge interesting discussions in this | The authors would like to acknowledge interesting discussions in this | |||
| problem space with Sarah Gannon, Ines Ramadza, and Siddharth Sharma, | problem space with Sarah Gannon, Ines Ramadza, and Siddharth Sharma, | |||
| as well as reviews and comments provided by Éric Vyncke, Mohamed | as well as reviews and comments provided by Éric Vyncke, Mohamed | |||
| Boucadair, David Lamparter, Michael Richardson, Alan DeKok, Dale | Boucadair, David Lamparter, Michael Richardson, Alan DeKok, Dale | |||
| Worley, Paul Wouters, Deb Cooley, Erik Kline, Ketan Talaulikar, Mike | Worley, Paul Wouters, Deb Cooley, Erik Kline, Ketan Talaulikar, Mike | |||
| Bishop, and Roman Danyliw. | Bishop, and Roman Danyliw. | |||
| End of changes. 22 change blocks. | ||||
| 68 lines changed or deleted | 75 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. | ||||