Transport Layer Security
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Salz
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 9851 Akamai Technologies
Intended status:
Category: Standards Track N. Aviram
Expires: 5 October 2025 3 April 2025
ISSN: 2070-1721 January 2026
TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze
draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08
Abstract
Use of TLS 1.3, which fixes some known deficiencies in TLS 1.2, is
growing. This document specifies that no changes will be approved
for TLS 1.2 outside of urgent security fixes (as determine determined by TLS WG
Working Group consensus), new TLS Exporter Labels, or and new
Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs, no
changes will be approved for TLS 1.2. IDs. This prescription
applies to TLS only; it does not
pertain apply to DTLS (in any DTLS version); it pertains to TLS only.
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Status information for this document may be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen/.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Transport Layer
Security Working Group mailing list (mailto:tls@ietf.org), which is
archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/. Subscribe
at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/tlswg/tls12-frozen. version).
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list It represents the consensus of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for a maximum publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of six months RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 5 October 2025.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9851.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info)
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Implications for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) . . . . . . 3
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1. Introduction
Use of
TLS 1.3 [TLS13] is growing, and it fixes most known deficiencies with TLS 1.2 [TLS12]. Examples [TLS12]
and its use is growing. Some examples of this the fixes include
encrypting more of the traffic so that it is not readable by
outsiders and removing most cryptographic primitives that are now
considered weak. Importantly, TLS 1.3 enjoys robust security proofs.
Both versions have several extension points. Items like new
cryptographic algorithms, new supported groups (formerly "named
curves"), etc., can be added without defining a new protocol. This
document specifies that no changes will be approved for TLS 1.2
outside of urgent security fixes (as
determine determined by TLS WG consensus), Working Group
consensus) and the exceptions listed in Section 4, no changes will be approved for TLS 1.2. 4.
This prescription pertains applies to TLS only. As such, it does not pertain apply to DTLS, in any
DTLS version.
2. Implications for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
Cryptographically relevant quantum computers, once available, are
likely to greatly lessen the time and effort needed to break RSA,
finite-field-based Diffie-Hellman (FFDH), or Elliptic Curve
Cryptography (ECC) which are currently used in TLS. In 2016, the US
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started a
multi-year effort to standardize algorithms that will be "safe" once
quantum computers are feasible [PQC]. First Initial discussions in the
IETF community happened around the same time [CFRGSLIDES].
In 2024 2024, NIST released standards for [ML-KEM], [ML-DSA], and
[SLH-DSA]. Many other countries and organizations are publishing
their roadmaps, including the multi-national standards organization
ETSI,
ETSI [ETSI].
While the industry was waiting for NIST to finish standardization,
the IETF has had several efforts underway. A working group was
formed in early 2023 to work on the use of Post-Quantum Cryptography
(PQC) in IETF protocols [PQUIPWG]. Several other working groups,
including TLS [TLSWG], are working on specifications to support
hybrid algorithms and identifiers, for use during a transition from
classic to a post-quantum world.
It is important to note that the focus of efforts effort within the TLS Working Group is
focused exclusively on TLS 1.3 or later. Put bluntly, PQC for TLS
1.2 will not be specified (see Section 4) at any time and time; anyone wishing
to deploy PQC should expect to be using use TLS 1.3.
3. Security Considerations
This entire document is about security, security and provides post-quantum
security concerns as an additional reason to upgrade to TLS 1.3.
4. IANA Considerations
No TLS registries [TLS13REG] are being closed by this document.
Rather, this document modifies the instructions to IANA and the TLS
Designed
Designated Experts to constrain what the type of entries that can be added
to existing registries.
This document does not introduce any new limits limitations on the
registrations for either of the following two registries:
* TLS Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs
* TLS Exporter Labels
All other TLS registries should have this Note
The following note has been added to them: the other TLS registries:
| Any TLS entry added after the IESG approves publication of {THIS RFC} RFC
| 9851 is intended for TLS 1.3 or later, and makes no similar
| requirement on DTLS. Such entries should have an informal
| indication like "For TLS 1.3 or later" in that entry, such as the
| "Comment" column.
At the time of publication, the list of other note has been added to the following
TLS registries is as
follows: registries:
* TLS Alerts
* TLS Authorization Data Formats
* TLS CachedInformationType Values
* TLS Certificate Compression Algorithm IDs
* TLS Certificate Status Types
* TLS Certificate Types
* TLS Cipher Suites
* TLS ClientCertificateType Identifiers
* TLS ContentType
* TLS EC Curve Types
* TLS EC Point Formats
* TLS ExtensionType Values
* TLS HandshakeType
* TLS HashAlgorithm
* TLS Heartbeat Message Types
* TLS Heartbeat Modes
* TLS KDF Identifiers
* TLS PskKeyExchangeMode
* TLS SignatureAlgorithm
* TLS SignatureScheme
* TLS Supplemental Data Formats (SupplementalDataType)
* TLS Supported Groups
* TLS UserMappingType Values
Any TLS registry created after this document is approved for
publication should indicate whether the actions defined here are
applicable.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[TLS12] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5246>.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
[TLS13] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-12, 17 February 2025,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-
rfc8446bis-12>. RFC 9846, DOI 10.17487/RFC9846, January
2026, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9846>.
[TLS13REG] Salowey, J. A. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS
and DTLS", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11, 11 March RFC 9847, DOI 10.17487/RFC9847, December 2025,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-
rfc8447bis-11>.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9847>.
5.2. Informative References
[CFRGSLIDES]
McGrew, D., "Post Quantum Secure Cryptography Discussion",
n.d., <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-
95-cfrg-4.pdf>.
IETF 95 Proceedings, April 2016,
<https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-
cfrg-4.pdf>.
[ETSI] ETSI, "CYBER; Migration strategies and recommendations to
Quantum Safe schemes", n.d., Version 1.1.1, ETSI TR 103 619,
July 2020, <https://www.etsi.org/deliver/
etsi_tr/103600_103699/103619/01.01.01_60/
tr_103619v010101p.pdf>.
[ML-DSA] NIST, "Module-Lattice-Based Key Digital Signature Standard",
NIST FIPS 204, DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204, August 2024,
<https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final>.
[ML-KEM] NIST, "Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
Standard", NIST FIPS 203, DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203,
August 2024, <https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final>.
[PQC] NIST, "Post-Quantum Cryptography", Cryptography (PQC)", January 2017,
<https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-
cryptography>.
[PQUIPWG] IETF, "Post-Quantum Use in Protocols", n.d.,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pquip/about/>.
[SLH-DSA] NIST, "Stateless Hash-Based Key-Digital Digital Signature Standard",
NIST FIPS 205, DOI 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205, August 2024,
<https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final>.
[TLSWG] IETF, "Transport Layer Security", n.d.,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tls/about/>.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Amanda Baber, David Dong, and Sabrina
Tanamal of IANA for their help in revising and clarifying Section 4.
Authors' Addresses
Rich Salz
Akamai Technologies
Email: rsalz@akamai.com
Nimrod Aviram
Email: nimrod.aviram@gmail.com