| rfc9907.original.xml | rfc9907.xml | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> | <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> | |||
| <!DOCTYPE rfc [ | <!DOCTYPE rfc [ | |||
| <!ENTITY nbsp " "> | <!ENTITY nbsp " "> | |||
| <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | |||
| <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | |||
| <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | |||
| ]> | ]> | |||
| <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?> | ||||
| <!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.29 (Ruby 3.4. | <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft | |||
| 4) --> | -ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28" number="9907" category="bcp" consensus="true" submis | |||
| <?rfc strict="yes"?> | sionType="IETF" obsoletes="8407" updates="8126" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true | |||
| <?rfc comments="yes"?> | " symRefs="true" version="3" xml:lang="en"> | |||
| <?rfc docmapping="yes"?> | ||||
| <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft | ||||
| -ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28" category="bcp" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF | ||||
| " obsoletes="8407" updates="8126" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="tru | ||||
| e" version="3"> | ||||
| <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.28.1 --> | ||||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title abbrev="Guidelines for YANG Documents">Guidelines for Authors and Rev iewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models</title> | <title abbrev="Guidelines for YANG Documents">Guidelines for Authors and Rev iewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models</title> | |||
| <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28"/> | <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9907"/> | |||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="216"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="Andy Bierman"> | <author fullname="Andy Bierman"> | |||
| <organization>YumaWorks</organization> | <organization>YumaWorks</organization> | |||
| <address> | <address> | |||
| <postal> | <postal> | |||
| <country>USA</country> | <country>United States of America</country> | |||
| </postal> | </postal> | |||
| <email>andy@yumaworks.com</email> | <email>andy@yumaworks.com</email> | |||
| </address> | </address> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" role="editor"> | <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" role="editor"> | |||
| <organization>Orange</organization> | <organization>Orange</organization> | |||
| <address> | <address> | |||
| <postal> | <postal> | |||
| <country>France</country> | <country>France</country> | |||
| </postal> | </postal> | |||
| skipping to change at line 45 ¶ | skipping to change at line 43 ¶ | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <author fullname="Qin Wu"> | <author fullname="Qin Wu"> | |||
| <organization>Huawei</organization> | <organization>Huawei</organization> | |||
| <address> | <address> | |||
| <postal> | <postal> | |||
| <country>China</country> | <country>China</country> | |||
| </postal> | </postal> | |||
| <email>bill.wu@huawei.com</email> | <email>bill.wu@huawei.com</email> | |||
| </address> | </address> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date year="2025" month="June" day="05"/> | <date year="2026" month="January"/> | |||
| <area>Operations and Management</area> | <area>OPS</area> | |||
| <workgroup>Network Modeling</workgroup> | <workgroup>netmod</workgroup> | |||
| <keyword>NETCONF</keyword> | <keyword>NETCONF</keyword> | |||
| <keyword>RESTCONF</keyword> | <keyword>RESTCONF</keyword> | |||
| <keyword>Automation</keyword> | <keyword>Automation</keyword> | |||
| <abstract> | <abstract> | |||
| <?line 137?> | <t>This document provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of | |||
| specifications containing YANG data models, including IANA-maintained YANG mo | ||||
| <t>This document provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of | dules. Recommendations and | |||
| specifications containing YANG data models, including IANA-maintained modules | ||||
| . Recommendations and | ||||
| procedures are defined, which are intended to increase | procedures are defined, which are intended to increase | |||
| interoperability and usability of Network Configuration Protocol | interoperability and usability of Network Configuration Protocol | |||
| (NETCONF) and RESTCONF Protocol implementations that utilize YANG | (NETCONF) and RESTCONF protocol implementations that utilize YANG | |||
| modules. This document obsoletes RFC 8407.</t> | modules.</t> | |||
| <t>Also, this document updates RFC 8126 by | <t>This document obsoletes RFC 8407; it also updates RFC 8126 by | |||
| providing additional guidelines for writing the IANA considerations | providing additional guidelines for writing the IANA considerations | |||
| for RFCs that specify IANA-maintained modules.</t> | for RFCs that specify IANA-maintained YANG modules.</t> | |||
| </abstract> | </abstract> | |||
| <note removeInRFC="true"> | ||||
| <name>Discussion Venues</name> | ||||
| <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the | ||||
| Network Modeling Working Group mailing list (netmod@ietf.org), | ||||
| which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ | ||||
| netmod/"/>.</t> | ||||
| <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at | ||||
| <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/rfc8407bis"/>.</t> | ||||
| </note> | ||||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| <middle> | <middle> | |||
| <?line 150?> | ||||
| <section anchor="introduction"> | <section anchor="introduction"> | |||
| <name>Introduction</name> | <name>Introduction</name> | |||
| <t>The standardization of network configuration interfaces for use with | <t>The standardization of network configuration interfaces for use with | |||
| network configuration management protocols, such as the Network | network configuration management protocols, such as the Network | |||
| Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) <xref target="RFC6241"/> and the RESTCONF Pr otocol <xref target="RFC8040"/>, | Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) <xref target="RFC6241"/> and RESTCONF <xref target="RFC8040"/>, | |||
| requires a modular set of data models that can be reused and extended | requires a modular set of data models that can be reused and extended | |||
| over time.</t> | over time.</t> | |||
| <t>This document defines a set of guidelines for documents | <t>This document defines a set of guidelines for documents | |||
| containing YANG 1.1 <xref target="RFC7950"/> and YANG 1.0 <xref target="RFC60 20"/> data models, including IANA-maintained modules. | containing YANG 1.1 <xref target="RFC7950"/> and YANG 1.0 <xref target="RFC60 20"/> data models, including IANA-maintained YANG modules. | |||
| YANG is used to define the data structures, protocol operations, and | YANG is used to define the data structures, protocol operations, and | |||
| notification content used within a NETCONF and/or RESTCONF server. | notification content used within a NETCONF and/or RESTCONF server. | |||
| YANG is also used to define abstract data structures <xref target="RFC8791"/> . | YANG is also used to define abstract data structures <xref target="RFC8791"/> . | |||
| A NETCONF or RESTCONF server that supports a particular YANG module | A NETCONF or RESTCONF server that supports a particular YANG module | |||
| will support client NETCONF and/or RESTCONF operation requests, as | will support client NETCONF and/or RESTCONF operation requests, as | |||
| indicated by the specific content defined in the YANG module.</t> | indicated by the specific content defined in the YANG module.</t> | |||
| <t>Many YANG constructs are defined as optional to use, such as the | <t>Many YANG constructs are defined as optional to use, such as the | |||
| "description" statement. However, in order to make YANG modules more | "description" statement. However, in order to make YANG modules more | |||
| readable and interoperable, it is desirable to define a set of descriptive us age guidelines that | readable and interoperable, it is desirable to define a set of descriptive us age guidelines that | |||
| entails a higher level of compliance than the minimum level defined | entails a higher level of compliance than the minimum level defined | |||
| in the YANG specification <xref target="RFC7950"/>.</t> | in the YANG specification <xref target="RFC7950"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>In addition, YANG allows constructs such as infinite length | <t>In addition, YANG allows constructs such as infinite length | |||
| identifiers and string values, or top-level mandatory nodes, that a | identifiers and string values, or top-level mandatory nodes, that a | |||
| compliant server is not required to support. Only constructs that | compliant server is not required to support. Only constructs that | |||
| all servers are required to support can be used in IETF YANG modules.</t> | all servers are required to support can be used in IETF YANG modules.</t> | |||
| <!-- [rfced] Note: [RFC6421] uses "Operations layer" and "Content | ||||
| layer" rather than "operations layer" and "content layer". | ||||
| Please let us know if/how to update for consistency. | ||||
| Current: | ||||
| This document defines usage guidelines related to the NETCONF | ||||
| operations layer and NETCONF content layer, as defined in [RFC6241], | ||||
| and the RESTCONF methods and RESTCONF resources, as defined in | ||||
| [RFC8040]. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>This document defines usage guidelines related to the NETCONF | <t>This document defines usage guidelines related to the NETCONF | |||
| operations layer and NETCONF content layer, as defined in <xref target="RFC62 41"/>, | operations layer and NETCONF content layer, as defined in <xref target="RFC62 41"/>, | |||
| and the RESTCONF methods and RESTCONF resources, as defined in | and the RESTCONF methods and RESTCONF resources, as defined in | |||
| <xref target="RFC8040"/>.</t> | <xref target="RFC8040"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>These guidelines are intended to be used by authors and reviewers to | <t>These guidelines are intended to be used by authors and reviewers to | |||
| improve the readability and interoperability of published YANG data | improve the readability and interoperability of published YANG data | |||
| models. These guidelines can be used independent of the IETF publication | models. These guidelines can be used independent of the IETF Stream of public | |||
| stream or even by other organizations.</t> | ation or even by other organizations.</t> | |||
| <t>YANG 1.0 modules have to conform to <xref target="RFC6020"/> while YANG | <t>YANG 1.0 modules have to conform to <xref target="RFC6020"/> while YANG | |||
| 1.1 modules have to conform to <xref target="RFC7950"/>. | 1.1 modules have to conform to <xref target="RFC7950"/>; | |||
| This document adds usage guidelines in addition to these YANG RFCs.</t> | this document adds usage guidelines in addition to these RFCs.</t> | |||
| <t><xref target="sec-iana-mm"/> updates <xref target="RFC8126"/> by provid ing guidance for writing the | <t><xref target="sec-iana-mm"/> updates <xref target="RFC8126"/> by provid ing guidance for writing the | |||
| IANA considerations for RFCs that specify IANA-maintained modules.</t> | IANA Considerations sections for RFCs that specify IANA-maintained YANG modul | |||
| <t>Note that this document is not a YANG tutorial, and the reader is | es.</t> | |||
| <t>Note that this document is not a YANG tutorial; the reader is | ||||
| expected to know the YANG data modeling language before implementing | expected to know the YANG data modeling language before implementing | |||
| the guidance in this document.</t> | the guidance in this document.</t> | |||
| <ul empty="true"> | ||||
| <li> | ||||
| <t>Note to the RFC Editor: Please replace "AAAA" through the document | ||||
| with the RFC number assigned to this document.</t> | ||||
| </li> | ||||
| </ul> | ||||
| <section anchor="changes-since-rfc-8407"> | <section anchor="changes-since-rfc-8407"> | |||
| <name>Changes Since RFC 8407</name> | <name>Changes Since RFC 8407</name> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Would you like to move the "Changes Since RFC 8407" section to | ||||
| an appendix? That placement would be more consistent with other RFCs. | ||||
| (Perhaps this was already considered, as we see this was suggested on | ||||
| https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/0Fj8uYw4Tz9GjxOzNoOxYOzJYFQ/) | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The following changes have been made to the guidelines published in | <t>The following changes have been made to the guidelines published in | |||
| <xref target="RFC8407"/>:</t> | <xref target="RFC8407"/>:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Implemented errata 5693, 5800, 6899, and 7416.</t> | ||||
| <t>Implemented the following errata reports: <xref target="Err5693"/>, <xref tar | ||||
| get="Err5800"/>, <xref target="Err6899"/>, and <xref target="Err7416"/>.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the terminology.</t> | <t>Updated the terminology.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a note about notation conventions.</t> | <t>Added a note about notation conventions.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the URL of the IETF authors guidelines.</t> | <t>Updated the reference information of the IETF author guidelines.< /t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the guidance so that the "file name" after the <tt><CO DE BEGINS></tt> tag is mandatory.</t> | <t>Updated the guidance so that the "file name" after the <tt><CO DE BEGINS></tt> tag is mandatory.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added code markers for the security template.</t> | <t>Added code markers for the security template.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the YANG security considerations template to better insis t on the key secure transport features.</t> | <t>Updated the YANG security considerations template to better insis t on the key secure transport features.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <!--[rfced] There is a slight difference between the text in the | ||||
| change log and the text in the document with regard to how RFC 7952 | ||||
| is listed (i.e., is it an example of an RFC that might | ||||
| disqualify a document from needing the Security Considerations | ||||
| template, or are RFC 8791 and 7952 the only RFCs that would do | ||||
| that?). | ||||
| Change log (Original): | ||||
| * Added statements that the security template is not required for | ||||
| modules that follow [RFC8791] or [RFC7952]. | ||||
| Section 3.7 (Original): | ||||
| Unless the modules comply with [RFC8791] or define YANG extensions | ||||
| (e.g., [RFC7952]),... | ||||
| and | ||||
| Documents that exclusively define modules that follow the extension | ||||
| in [RFC8791] are not required to include the security template in | ||||
| Section 3.7.1. Likewise, following the template is not required for | ||||
| modules that define YANG extensions such as [RFC7952]. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Added statements that the security template is not required for m odules that follow <xref target="RFC8791"/> or <xref target="RFC7952"/>.</t> | <t>Added statements that the security template is not required for m odules that follow <xref target="RFC8791"/> or <xref target="RFC7952"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a statement about how to cite the RFCs that are listed in t he security template.</t> | <t>Added a statement about how to cite the RFCs that are listed in t he security template.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a template for IANA registrations.</t> | <t>Added a template for IANA registrations.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a note that folding of the examples should be done as per < xref target="RFC8792"/> conventions.</t> | <t>Added a note that folding of the examples should be done as per t he conventions described in <xref target="RFC8792"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a recommendation about long trees.</t> | <t>Added a recommendation about long trees.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Fixed a reference bug in <xref target="sec-module-naming-conventi ons"/>.</t> | <t>Fixed a reference bug in <xref target="sec-module-naming-conventi ons"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a recommendation for the use of meaningful prefix values.</ t> | <t>Added a recommendation for the use of meaningful prefix values.</ t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a note that RFC8792-folding of YANG modules can be used if and only if built-in YANG features (e.g., break line, "+") are not sufficient.</ t> | <t>Added a note that folding of YANG modules as described in RFC 879 2 can be used if and only if built-in YANG features (e.g., break line, "+") are not sufficient.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added tool validation checks to ensure that YANG modules fit into the line limits of an I-D.</t> | <t>Added tool validation checks to ensure that YANG modules fit into the line limits of an I-D.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added tool validation checks of JSON-encoded examples.</t> | <t>Added tool validation checks of JSON-encoded examples.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a recommendation to ease extracting and validating examples .</t> | <t>Added a recommendation to ease extracting and validating examples .</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated many examples to be aligned with the consistent indentati on recommendation (internal consistency).</t> | <t>Updated many examples to be aligned with the consistent indentati on recommendation (internal consistency).</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the IANA considerations to encourage registration request | ||||
| s to indicate whether a module is maintained by IANA or not.</t> | <!--[rfced] Would the following update be agreeable? | |||
| Original: | ||||
| * Updated the IANA considerations to encourage registration requests | ||||
| to indicate whether a module is maintained by IANA or not. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| * Updated the guidance for writing IANA Considerations sections to | ||||
| encourage registration requests to indicate whether or not a module is | ||||
| maintained by IANA. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Updated the IANA considerations to encourage registration request | ||||
| s to indicate whether or not a module is maintained by IANA.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added guidelines for IANA-maintained modules.</t> | <t>Added guidelines for IANA-maintained modules.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added guidelines about the use of "YANG module" and "YANG data mo del".</t> | <t>Added guidelines about the use of the terms "YANG module" and "YA NG data model".</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Elaborated the guidance for the use of values reserved for docume ntation in examples.</t> | <t>Elaborated the guidance for the use of values reserved for docume ntation in examples.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Recommended the use of "example:" for URI examples.</t> | <t>Recommended the use of "example:" for URI examples.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a new section "Defining Standard Tags" (<xref target="sec-t ags"/>) to echo the guidance in <xref target="RFC8819"/>.</t> | <t>Added a new section "Defining Standard Tags" (<xref target="sec-t ags"/>) to echo the guidance in <xref target="RFC8819"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Recommended against the use of "case + when" construct in some ca ses.</t> | <t>Recommended against the use of "case + when" construct in some ca ses.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a discussion about the prefix pattern to use for example mo dules.</t> | <t>Added a discussion about the prefix pattern to use for example mo dules.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the NMDA guidance in the narrative text to highlight modu les that are not NMDA-compliant.</t> | <t>Updated the NMDA guidance in the narrative text to highlight modu les that are not compliant with NMDA.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a new section about YANG module classification.</t> | <t>Added a new section about the classification of YANG modules.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Fixed an inconsistency in Section 4.6.2 where the example mention s identities, but uses them without their prefix as per Section 4.6.4.</t> | <t>Fixed an inconsistency in Section <xref target="RFC8407" section= "4.6.2" sectionFormat="bare"/> where the example mentions identities but uses th em without their prefix as per Section <xref target="RFC8407" section="4.6.4" se ctionFormat="bare"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Fixed an inconsistency in Section 4.6.4 which fails to use "deriv ed-from-or-self()" mentioned back in Section 4.6.2.</t> | <t>Fixed an inconsistency in Section <xref target="RFC8407" section= "4.6.4" sectionFormat="bare"/> that failed to use "derived-from-or-self()" menti oned back in <xref target="function-library"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a new section for modeling abstract data structures.</t> | <t>Added a new section for modeling abstract data structures.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a discussion about "must + error-message" constructs for st ate data.</t> | <t>Added a discussion about "must + error-message" constructs for st ate data.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added text about summary of changes in revision statements.</t> | <t>Added text about summary of changes in revision statements.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added a template for IANA-maintained modules.</t> | <t>Added a template for IANA-maintained modules.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Updated the wiki URLs to use the new structure instead of the old trac.</t> | <t>Updated the wiki URLs to use the new structure.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Added anydata to the list of statements with mandatory descriptio n (<xref target="sec-data-def"/>).</t> | <t>Added anydata to the list of statements with mandatory descriptio n(s) (<xref target="sec-data-def"/>).</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Fixed an error (invalid statements) in Section 4.24.</t> | <t>Fixed an error (invalid statements) in Section <xref target="RFC8 407" section="4.24" sectionFormat="bare"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Soften generic I-Ds authorship guidance.</t> | <t>Softened generic I-D authorship guidance.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="terminology-notation-conventions"> | <section anchor="terminology-notation-conventions"> | |||
| <name>Terminology & Notation Conventions</name> | <name>Terminology and Notation Conventions</name> | |||
| <t>Some of the templates defined in the document use "--" to easily identi fy | <t>Some of the templates defined in the document use "--" to easily identi fy | |||
| specific instructions to the authors. Text prefixed with "--" must not be | specific instructions to the authors. Text prefixed with "--" must not be | |||
| copied as such when using a template. Note that for YANG templates, "//" | copied as such when using a template. Note that for YANG templates, "//" | |||
| is used to convey such instructions.</t> | is used to convey such instructions.</t> | |||
| <t>RFC IIII is used to refer to an RFC that defines an initial version of an IANA-maintained module.</t> | <t>RFC IIII is used to refer to an RFC that defines an initial version of an IANA-maintained module.</t> | |||
| <t>The following terms are used throughout this document:</t> | <t>The following terms are used throughout this document:</t> | |||
| <dl> | <dl spacing="normal" newline="false"> | |||
| <dt>IANA-maintained module:</dt> | <dt>IANA-maintained module:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A YANG module that is maintained by IANA and has an IANA registry a ssociated with it (e.g., "iana-tunnel-type" <xref target="RFC8675"/> or "iana-ps eudowire-types" <xref target="RFC9291"/>).</t> | <t>A YANG module that is maintained by IANA and has an IANA registry a ssociated with it (e.g., "iana-tunnel-type" <xref target="RFC8675"/> or "iana-ps eudowire-types" <xref target="RFC9291"/>).</t> | |||
| </dd> | ||||
| <dt/> | ||||
| <dd> | ||||
| <t>Once an IANA-maintained module is initialized, new values are not d irectly added to the module. These values are instead added to the companion reg istry.</t> | <t>Once an IANA-maintained module is initialized, new values are not d irectly added to the module. These values are instead added to the companion reg istry.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Section 2: We have the following questions related to the | ||||
| terminology in this section: | ||||
| a) Please review our updates to the following text; based on the text | ||||
| that follows defining "published" and "unpublished", please confirm | ||||
| that this update is accurate (i.e., can an IETF module not exist in an | ||||
| I-D, "IETF module" would only be the terminology used for a published | ||||
| RFC). | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| IETF module: A YANG module that is published by the IETF and that is | ||||
| not maintained by IANA. | ||||
| Current: | ||||
| IETF module: A YANG module that is published as an RFC from the IETF | ||||
| Stream and that is not maintained by IANA. | ||||
| b) Is it possible to have a YANG module that is not IANA-maintained | ||||
| and not an IETF module? If so, should their be some kind of | ||||
| terminology to address that? | ||||
| c) In the following definition of "unpublished", might "unstable | ||||
| publication" be a bit contradictory? Perhaps | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| unpublished: An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | ||||
| example the "Internet-Draft" described in Section 2.2 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered an unstable publication that is a work in progress, | ||||
| subject to change at any time. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| unpublished: An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | ||||
| example, the "Internet-Draft" described in Section 2.2 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered an unstable work in progress, subject to change at any time. | ||||
| d) In the "published" and "unpublished" definitions, it seems a bit | ||||
| odd to expand RFC and put Request for Comments and Internet-Draft in | ||||
| quotes. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| published: A stable release of a module or submodule. For example, | ||||
| the "Request for Comments" described in Section 2.1 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered a stable publication. | ||||
| unpublished: An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | ||||
| example the "Internet-Draft" described in Section 2.2 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered an unstable publication that is a work in progress, | ||||
| subject to change at any time. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| published: A stable release of a module or submodule. For example, | ||||
| the Request for Comments Series described in Section 2.1 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered a stable publication. | ||||
| unpublished: An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | ||||
| example, the Internet-Draft described in Section 2.2 of [RFC2026] | ||||
| is considered an unstable work in progress, subject to change at any time. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <dt>IETF module:</dt> | <dt>IETF module:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A YANG module that is published by the IETF and that is not maintai ned by IANA.</t> | <t>A YANG module that is published as an RFC from the IETF Stream and that is not maintained by IANA.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>published:</dt> | <dt>published:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A stable release of a module or submodule. For | <t>A stable release of a module or submodule. For | |||
| example, the "Request for Comments" described in | example, the "Request for Comments" described in | |||
| <xref section="2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC2026"/> is considered a stabl e publication.</t> | <xref section="2.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC2026"/> is considered a stabl e publication.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>unpublished:</dt> | <dt>unpublished:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | <t>An unstable release of a module or submodule. For | |||
| example the "Internet-Draft" described in <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of | example, the "Internet-Draft" described in <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="o | |||
| " target="RFC2026"/> | f" target="RFC2026"/> | |||
| is considered an unstable publication that is a work in progress, | is considered an unstable publication that is a work in progress and is | |||
| subject to change at any time.</t> | subject to change at any time.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>YANG fragment:</dt> | <dt>YANG fragment:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A set of YANG statements that are not intended to | <t>A set of YANG statements that is not intended to | |||
| represent a complete YANG module or submodule. These statements | represent a complete YANG module or submodule. These statements | |||
| are not intended for actual use, except to provide an example of | are not intended for actual use, except to provide an example of | |||
| YANG statement usage. The invalid syntax "..." is sometimes used | YANG statement usage. The invalid syntax "..." is sometimes used | |||
| to indicate that additional YANG statements would be present in a | to indicate that additional YANG statements would be present in a | |||
| real YANG module.</t> | real YANG module.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>YANG tree diagram:</dt> | <dt>YANG tree diagram:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A diagram representing the contents of a YANG | <t>A diagram representing the contents of a YANG | |||
| module, as defined in <xref target="RFC8340"/>. It is also called a "tree | module, as defined in <xref target="RFC8340"/>. It is also called a "tree | |||
| diagram".</t> | diagram".</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| </dl> | </dl> | |||
| <section anchor="netconf-terms"> | <section anchor="netconf-terms"> | |||
| <name>NETCONF Terms</name> | <name>NETCONF Terms</name> | |||
| <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC6241"/> and are n ot redefined | <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC6241"/> and are n ot redefined | |||
| here:</t> | here:</t> | |||
| <!-- [rfced] FYI - we note that [RFC6241] defines "capability" rather | ||||
| than "capabilities" and "protocol operation" rather than | ||||
| "operation". Please let us know if/how to update for consistency. | ||||
| Current: | ||||
| The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are not redefined | ||||
| here: | ||||
| * capabilities | ||||
| * client | ||||
| * operation | ||||
| * server | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are not redefined | ||||
| here: | ||||
| * capability | ||||
| * client | ||||
| * protocol operation (or simply "operation") | ||||
| * server | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>capabilities</t> | <t>capabilities</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>client</t> | <t>client</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>operation</t> | <t>operation</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| skipping to change at line 341 ¶ | skipping to change at line 466 ¶ | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>version</t> | <t>version</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>YANG</t> | <t>YANG</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>YIN</t> | <t>YIN</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Note that the term 'module' may be used as a generic term for a YANG | <t>Note that the term "module" may be used as a generic term for a YANG | |||
| module or submodule. When describing properties that are specific to | module or submodule. When describing properties that are specific to | |||
| submodules, the term 'submodule' is used instead.</t> | submodules, the term "submodule" is used instead.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="network-management-datastore-architecture-nmda-terms"> | <section anchor="network-management-datastore-architecture-nmda-terms"> | |||
| <name>Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) Terms</name> | <name>Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) Terms</name> | |||
| <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC8342"/> and are n ot redefined | <t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC8342"/> and are n ot redefined | |||
| here:</t> | here:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>configuration</t> | <t>configuration</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| skipping to change at line 368 ¶ | skipping to change at line 493 ¶ | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>operational state</t> | <t>operational state</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>operational state datastore</t> | <t>operational state datastore</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="requirements-notation"> | <section anchor="requirements-notation"> | |||
| <name>Requirements Notation</name> | ||||
| <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp | ||||
| 14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL | ||||
| NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECO | ||||
| MMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", | ||||
| "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be i | ||||
| nterpreted as | ||||
| described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and | ||||
| only when, they | ||||
| appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t> | ||||
| <?line -18?> | ||||
| </section> | <!--[rfced] Might it be possible to swap Sections 2.4 and 2.5? | |||
| Reasoning: Sections 2.1 - 2.3 are all YANG-terminology related, and | ||||
| so is Section 2.5. The boilerplate in Section 2.4 seems to | ||||
| interrupt that. | ||||
| Suggested: | ||||
| 2. Terminology and Notation Conventions | ||||
| 2.1. NETCONF Terms | ||||
| 2.2. YANG Terms | ||||
| 2.3. Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) Terms | ||||
| 2.4. YANG Data Model versus YANG Module | ||||
| 2.5. Requirements Notation | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <name>Requirements Notation</name> | ||||
| <t> | ||||
| The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQU | ||||
| IRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL | ||||
| NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14> | ||||
| RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", | ||||
| "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to | ||||
| be interpreted as | ||||
| described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> | ||||
| when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. | ||||
| </t> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| <section anchor="yang-data-model-vs-yang-module"> | <section anchor="yang-data-model-vs-yang-module"> | |||
| <name>YANG Data Model vs. YANG Module</name> | <name>YANG Data Model versus YANG Module</name> | |||
| <t>Both <xref target="RFC6020"/> and <xref target="RFC7950"/> make a dis tinction between the following concepts:</t> | <t>Both <xref target="RFC6020"/> and <xref target="RFC7950"/> make a dis tinction between the following concepts:</t> | |||
| <dl> | <dl spacing="normal" newline="false"> | |||
| <dt>data model:</dt> | <dt>data model:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Describes how data is represented and accessed.</t> | <t>Describes how data is represented and accessed.</t> | |||
| </dd> | ||||
| <dt/> | ||||
| <dd> | ||||
| <t>YANG structures data models into modules for ease of use <xref ta rget="RFC8309"/>.</t> | <t>YANG structures data models into modules for ease of use <xref ta rget="RFC8309"/>.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>module:</dt> | <dt>module:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Defines hierarchies of schema nodes to make a self-contained and compilable block of YANG definitions and inclusions.</t> | <t>Defines hierarchies of schema nodes to make a self-contained and compilable block of YANG definitions and inclusions.</t> | |||
| </dd> | ||||
| <dt/> | ||||
| <dd> | ||||
| <t>A YANG module is typically a single ".yang" file, starting with a "module" statement.</t> | <t>A YANG module is typically a single ".yang" file, starting with a "module" statement.</t> | |||
| </dd> | ||||
| <dt/> | ||||
| <dd> | ||||
| <t>A YANG module may include any number of submodules that are store d in separate ".yang" files starting with a "submodule" statement. Regardless of the presence of submodules, the module and its submodules are externally viewed as a single YANG module.</t> | <t>A YANG module may include any number of submodules that are store d in separate ".yang" files starting with a "submodule" statement. Regardless of the presence of submodules, the module and its submodules are externally viewed as a single YANG module.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| </dl> | </dl> | |||
| <t>A YANG data model can consist (1) of a single YANG module (e.g., <xre | ||||
| f target="RFC9129"/>) or (2) multiple YANG modules (e.g., <xref target="RFC7407" | <t>A YANG data model can consist of:</t> | |||
| />).</t> | <ol> | |||
| <t>Note that the term "YANG model" is sometimes used as an abbreviation | <li>a single YANG module (e.g., <xref target="RFC9129"/>) or</li> | |||
| of YANG data model. However, that term should be avoided in favor of YANG data m | <li>multiple YANG modules (e.g., <xref target="RFC7407"/>).</li></ol> | |||
| odel. | <t>Note that the term "YANG model" is sometimes used as an abbreviation | |||
| of "YANG data model". However, that term should be avoided in favor of "YANG dat | ||||
| a model". | ||||
| Likewise, "YANG data module" has no meaning and must be avoided.</t> | Likewise, "YANG data module" has no meaning and must be avoided.</t> | |||
| <t>Even if a YANG data model is structured as a single YANG module, YANG data model term should be used in the title, abstract, and in the body of the d ocument where the overall design is described. "YANG module" should be used when a specific "*.yang" file is referenced. Likewise, "YANG module" should be used when using terms related to YANG module specifications (e.g., augmentation or de viation). However, when extending the concepts embodied in a YANG module, author s should refer to those as an extension to the "YANG data model".</t> | <t>Even if a YANG data model is structured as a single YANG module, the term "YANG data model" should be used in the title, abstract, and in the body of the document where the overall design is described. "YANG module" should be use d when a specific "*.yang" file is referenced. Likewise, "YANG module" should be used when using terms related to YANG module specifications (e.g., augmentation or deviation). However, when extending the concepts embodied in a YANG module, authors should refer to those as an extension to the "YANG data model".</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="general-documentation-guidelines"> | <section anchor="general-documentation-guidelines"> | |||
| <name>General Documentation Guidelines</name> | <name>General Documentation Guidelines</name> | |||
| <t>YANG modules under review are likely to be contained in Internet-Drafts | ||||
| (I-Ds). Guidelines for I-D authors can be found at <xref target="ID-Guidelines | <!--[rfced] Would you like to clarify "under review" here, or | |||
| "/>. | mention (anywhere in the document) who is reviewing the YANG module? | |||
| We note that Appendix A mentions being reviewed for | ||||
| "technical correctness and adherence to IETF documentation requirements". | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| YANG modules under review are likely to be contained in | ||||
| Internet-Drafts (I-Ds). | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| YANG modules being considered for publication in an RFC | ||||
| are contained in Internet-Drafts (I-Ds). | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>YANG modules under review are likely to be contained in Internet-Drafts (I-Ds | ||||
| ). Guidelines for authoring an I-D can be found at <xref target="ID-Guidelines" | ||||
| />. | ||||
| These guidelines are not repeated here.</t> | These guidelines are not repeated here.</t> | |||
| <t>The following sections <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present in an I-D or RFC containing a YANG module:</t> | <t>The following sections <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present in an I-D or RFC containing a YANG module:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Narrative sections (<xref target="sec-narrative"/>)</t> | <t>Narrative sections (<xref target="sec-narrative"/>)</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Definitions section (<xref target="sec-def"/>)</t> | ||||
| <!--[rfced] Should this text be updated to indicate that there can | ||||
| be more than one definitions section? (e.g., RFC 8776 contains | ||||
| modules in Sections 4 and 5.) | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| The following sections MUST be present in an I-D or RFC containing a | ||||
| YANG module: | ||||
| * Narrative sections (Section 3.5) | ||||
| * Definitions section (Section 3.6) | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| The following sections MUST be present in an I-D or RFC containing | ||||
| one or more YANG modules: | ||||
| * Narrative sections (Section 3.5) | ||||
| * Definitions section(s) (Section 3.6) | ||||
| In Section 3.6: | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| This section contains the module(s) defined by the specification. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| One or more sections contain the module(s) defined by the specification. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>A Definitions section (<xref target="sec-def"/>)</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Additional YANG-specific considerations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included for the following sections:</t> | <t>Additional YANG-specific considerations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included for the following sections:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Security Considerations section (<xref target="sec-sec-cons-sec"/>) </t> | <t>Security Considerations (<xref target="sec-sec-cons-sec"/>)</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>IANA Considerations section (<xref target="sec-iana-cons"/>)</t> | <t>IANA Considerations (<xref target="sec-iana-cons"/>)</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>References section (<xref target="sec-ref"/>)</t> | <t>References (<xref target="sec-ref"/>)</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>There are three usage scenarios for YANG that can appear in an I-D or | <t>There are three usage scenarios for YANG that can appear in an I-D or | |||
| RFC:</t> | RFC:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>normative module or submodule</t> | <t>normative module or submodule</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>example module or submodule</t> | <t>example module or submodule</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>example YANG fragment not part of any module or submodule</t> | <t>example YANG fragment that is not part of any module or submodule</ t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Will the reader know when the guidelines are applicable to | ||||
| example modules and fragments? If not, where can they get more | ||||
| information to guide them? | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| The guidelines in this document refer mainly to a normative module | ||||
| or submodule but may be applicable to example modules and YANG | ||||
| fragments as well. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The guidelines in this document refer mainly to a normative module or | <t>The guidelines in this document refer mainly to a normative module or | |||
| submodule but may be applicable to example modules and YANG fragments | submodule, but they may be applicable to example modules and YANG fragments | |||
| as well.</t> | as well.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="module-copyright"> | <section anchor="module-copyright"> | |||
| <name>Module Copyright</name> | <name>Module Copyright</name> | |||
| <t>The module "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a refe rence to the | <t>The module "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a refe rence to the | |||
| latest approved IETF Trust Copyright statement, which is available | latest approved IETF Trust Copyright statement, which is available | |||
| online at:</t> | at: <eref target="https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/" brackets="angle"/>. | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | </t> | |||
| <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="code-components"> | <section anchor="code-components"> | |||
| <name>Code Components</name> | <name>Code Components</name> | |||
| <t>Each normative YANG module or submodule contained within an I-D or | <t>Each normative YANG module or submodule contained within an I-D or | |||
| RFC is considered to be a code component. The strings <tt>"<CODE | RFC is considered to be a code component. The strings <tt>"<CODE | |||
| BEGINS>" and "<CODE ENDS>"</tt> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to ident ify each code | BEGINS>" and "<CODE ENDS>"</tt> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to ident ify each code | |||
| component.</t> | component.</t> | |||
| <t>The <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</tt> tag <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be followe d by a string identifying | <t>The <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</tt> tag <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be followe d by a string identifying | |||
| the file name specified in <xref section="5.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC 7950"/>. The name string | the file name specified in <xref section="5.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC 7950"/>. The name string | |||
| form that includes the revision date <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used. The revi sion | form that includes the revision date <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used. The revi sion | |||
| date <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the date used in the most recent revision of t he | date <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the date used in the most recent revision of t he | |||
| module.</t> | module.</t> | |||
| <t>The following example is for the "2016-03-20" revision of the | <t>The following example is for the "2016-03-20" revision of the | |||
| "ietf-foo" module:</t> | "ietf-foo" module:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang" markers="true"><![CDATA[ | |||
| <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo@2016-03-20.yang" | file "ietf-foo@2016-03-20.yang" | |||
| module ietf-foo { | module ietf-foo { | |||
| namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-foo"; | namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-foo"; | |||
| prefix "foo"; | prefix "foo"; | |||
| organization "..."; | organization "..."; | |||
| contact "..."; | contact "..."; | |||
| description "..."; | description "..."; | |||
| revision 2016-03-20 { | revision 2016-03-20 { | |||
| description "Latest revision"; | description "Latest revision"; | |||
| reference "RFC FFFF: Foo Protocol"; | reference "RFC FFFF: Foo Protocol"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| // ... more statements | // ... more statements | |||
| } | } | |||
| <CODE ENDS> | ||||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <section anchor="example-modules"> | <section anchor="example-modules"> | |||
| <name>Example Modules</name> | <name>Example Modules</name> | |||
| <t>Example modules are not code components. The <tt><CODE BEGINS&g t;</tt> | <t>Example modules are not code components. The <tt><CODE BEGINS&g t;</tt> | |||
| convention <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used for example modules. However, example modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be validated (<xref target="sec-tools"/>).</t> | convention <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used for example modules. However, example modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be validated (<xref target="sec-tools"/>).</t> | |||
| <t>An example module <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be named using the term "ex ample", followed | <t>An example module <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be named using the term "ex ample", followed | |||
| by a hyphen, followed by a descriptive name, e.g., "example-toaster".</t> | by a hyphen, followed by a descriptive name, e.g., "example-toaster".</t> | |||
| <t>See <xref target="sec-namespace-assignments"/> regarding the namesp ace guidelines for example | <t>See <xref target="sec-namespace-assignments"/> regarding the namesp ace guidelines for example | |||
| modules.</t> | modules.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="terminology-section"> | <section anchor="terminology-section"> | |||
| <name>Terminology Section</name> | <name>Terminology Section</name> | |||
| <t>A terminology section <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present if any terms are defined in the | <t>A terminology section <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present if any terms are defined in the | |||
| document or if any terms are imported from other documents.</t> | document or if any terms are imported from other documents.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="tree-diagrams"> | <section anchor="tree-diagrams"> | |||
| <name>Tree Diagrams</name> | <name>Tree Diagrams</name> | |||
| <t>YANG tree diagrams provide a concise representation of a YANG module | <t>YANG tree diagrams provide a concise representation of a YANG module | |||
| and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included to help readers understand YANG module | and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included to help readers understand YANG module | |||
| structure. Guidelines on tree diagrams can be found in <xref section="3" secti onFormat="of" target="RFC8340"/>. | structure. Guidelines on tree diagrams can be found in <xref section="3" secti onFormat="of" target="RFC8340"/>. | |||
| Tree diagrams longer than one page <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included | Tree diagrams longer than one page <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included | |||
| in an appendix, i.e., not in the main body of the document.</t> | in an appendix, i.e., not in the main body of the document.</t> | |||
| <t>If YANG tree diagrams are used, then an informative reference to the | <t>If YANG tree diagrams are used, then an informative reference to the | |||
| YANG tree diagrams specification <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included in the document . | YANG tree diagrams specification <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included in the document . | |||
| Refer to <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8349"/> for an exampl e of such a reference.</t> | Refer to <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8349"/> for an exampl e of such a reference.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-narrative"> | <section anchor="sec-narrative"> | |||
| <!--[rfced] May we update "narrative part" to "narrative sections" in | ||||
| the following for consistency? | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| The narrative part MUST include an overview section that describes | ||||
| the scope and field of application of the data model(s) defined by | ||||
| the specification and that specifies the relationship (if any) of | ||||
| these data models to other standards, particularly to standards | ||||
| containing other YANG data models. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| The narrative sections MUST include an overview section that describes | ||||
| the scope and field of application of the data model(s) defined by | ||||
| the specification and that specifies the relationship (if any) of | ||||
| these data models to other standards, particularly to standards | ||||
| containing other YANG data models. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <name>Narrative Sections</name> | <name>Narrative Sections</name> | |||
| <t>The narrative part <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an overview section th at describes | <t>The narrative part <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an overview section th at describes | |||
| the scope and field of application of the data model(s) defined by the | the scope and field of application of the data model(s) defined by the | |||
| specification and that specifies the relationship (if any) of these | specification and that specifies the relationship (if any) of these | |||
| data models to other standards, particularly to standards containing | data models to other standards, particularly to standards containing | |||
| other YANG data models. The narrative part <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include one or more | other YANG data models. The narrative part <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include one or more | |||
| sections to briefly describe the structure of the data models defined in | sections to briefly describe the structure of the data models defined in | |||
| the specification.</t> | the specification.</t> | |||
| <!--[rfced] The subject/verb agreement here is difficult to follow. | ||||
| Would the suggested update below correctly convey your meaning? | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| If the module or modules defined by the specification imports | ||||
| definitions from other modules (except for those defined in [RFC7950] | ||||
| or [RFC6991]) or are always implemented in conjunction with other | ||||
| modules, then those facts MUST be noted in the overview section; any | ||||
| special interpretations of definitions in other modules MUST be noted | ||||
| as well. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| If the module (or modules) defined by the specification imports | ||||
| definitions from other modules (except for those defined in | ||||
| [RFC7950] or [RFC6991]) or is always implemented in conjunction | ||||
| with other modules, then those facts MUST be noted in the overview | ||||
| section; any special interpretations of definitions in other | ||||
| modules MUST be noted as well. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>If the module or modules defined by the specification imports | <t>If the module or modules defined by the specification imports | |||
| definitions from other modules (except for those defined in <xref target="RFC795 0"/> | definitions from other modules (except for those defined in <xref target="RFC795 0"/> | |||
| or <xref target="RFC6991"/>) or are always implemented in conjunction with other | or <xref target="RFC6991"/>) or are always implemented in conjunction with other | |||
| modules, then those facts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be noted in the overview section; any | modules, then those facts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be noted in the overview section; any | |||
| special interpretations of definitions in other modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be n oted | special interpretations of definitions in other modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be n oted | |||
| as well. Refer to <xref section="2.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8349"/> for an example of this | as well. Refer to <xref section="2.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8349"/> for an example of this | |||
| overview section.</t> | overview section.</t> | |||
| <t>If the document contains major Network Management Datastore Architect ure (NMDA) exceptions or include a temporary non-NMDA module <xref target="RFC83 42"/>, then the Introduction | <t>If the document contains major Network Management Datastore Architect ure (NMDA) exceptions or includes a temporary non-NMDA module <xref target="RFC8 342"/>, then the Introduction | |||
| section <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> mention this fact with the reasoning that motivate d that design. | section <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> mention this fact with the reasoning that motivate d that design. | |||
| Refer to <xref target="sec-op-state"/> for more NMDA-related guidance. Specifica lly, <xref target="sec-4.23.2"/> includes a recommendation for designers to desc ribe and justify any NMDA exceptions in detail as part of the module itself.</t> | Refer to <xref target="sec-op-state"/> for more NMDA-related guidance. Specifica lly, <xref target="sec-4.23.2"/> includes a recommendation for designers to desc ribe and justify any NMDA exceptions in detail as part of the module itself.</t> | |||
| <t>Consistent indentation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for all examples , including | <t>Consistent indentation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for all examples , including | |||
| YANG fragments and protocol message instance data. If line wrapping | YANG fragments and protocol message instance data. If line wrapping | |||
| is done for formatting purposes, then this <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be indicated pe r the guidance in <xref target="RFC8792"/>, as shown | is used for formatting purposes, then this <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be indicated pe r the guidance in <xref target="RFC8792"/>, as shown | |||
| in the following example:</t> | in the following example:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
| =============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ================ | =============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ================ | |||
| <myleaf xmlns="tag:example.com,2017:example-two">this is a long \ | <myleaf xmlns="tag:example.com,2017:example-two">this is a long \ | |||
| value so the line needs to wrap to stay within 72 characters</myleaf> | value so the line needs to wrap to stay within 72 characters</myleaf> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
| <t>Built-in YANG features (e.g., breaking line, "+") <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be used to fit a module into the line limits. | <t>Built-in YANG features (e.g., breaking line, "+") <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be used to fit a module into the line limits. | |||
| Exceptionally, RFC8792-folding of YANG modules <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used if and | Exceptionally, YANG modules <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be folded as described in RFC 879 | |||
| only if built-in YANG features are not sufficient. | 2 if and only if built-in YANG features are not sufficient. | |||
| A similar approach (e.g., use "--tree-line-length 69" or split a tree into subtr | A similar approach (e.g., using "--tree-line-length 69" or splitting a tree into | |||
| ees) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be followed for tree diagrams.</t> | subtrees) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be followed for tree diagrams.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="yang-module-classification"> | <section anchor="yang-module-classification"> | |||
| <name>YANG Module Classification</name> | <name>YANG Module Classification</name> | |||
| <t>The narrative section <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include a mention about the classification | <t>The narrative section <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include a mention of th e classification | |||
| of a given model. Such a mention is meant to ease positioning the | of a given model. Such a mention is meant to ease positioning the | |||
| module in the overall operational ecosystem. Specifically, the following types | module in the overall operational ecosystem. Specifically, the following types | |||
| from <xref target="RFC8309"/> and <xref target="RFC8969"/> can be used:</t> | from <xref target="RFC8309"/> and <xref target="RFC8969"/> can be used:</t> | |||
| <dl> | <dl> | |||
| <dt>Service Model:</dt> | <dt>Service Model:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Describes a service and the parameters of the service in a | <t>Describes a service and the parameters of the service in a | |||
| portable way that can be used uniformly and independent of the | portable way that can be used uniformly and independent of the | |||
| equipment and operating environment.</t> | equipment and operating environment.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt/> | <dt/> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Examples of service models are the L3VPN Service Model (L3SM) < xref target="RFC8299"/> and the L2VPN Service Model (L2SM) <xref target="RFC8466 "/>.</t> | <t>Examples of service models are the L3VPN Service Model (L3SM) < xref target="RFC8299"/> and the L2VPN Service Model (L2SM) <xref target="RFC8466 "/>.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>Network Model:</dt> | <dt>Network Model:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Describes a network-level abstraction (or a subset of aspects o f a network infrastructure), including devices and their subsystems, and relevan t protocols operating at the link and network layers across multiple devices. Th is model corresponds to the network configuration model discussed in <xref targe t="RFC8309"/>.</t> | <t>Describes a network-level abstraction (or a subset of aspects o f a network infrastructure), including devices and their subsystems, and relevan t protocols operating at the link and network layers across multiple devices. Th is model corresponds to the network configuration model discussed in <xref targe t="RFC8309"/>.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt/> | <dt/> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>It can be used by a network operator to allocate resources (e.g ., tunnel resource, topology resource) for the service or schedule resources to meet the service requirements defined in a service model.</t> | <t>This model can be used by a network operator to allocate resour ces (e.g., a tunnel resource or a topology resource) for the service or to sched ule resources to meet the service requirements defined in a service model.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt/> | <dt/> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Examples of network models are the L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) < xref target="RFC9182"/> or the L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) <xref target="RFC9291" />.</t> | <t>Examples of network models are the L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) < xref target="RFC9182"/> or the L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) <xref target="RFC9291" />.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt>Device Model:</dt> | <dt>Device Model:</dt> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Refers to the Network Element YANG data model described in <xre f target="RFC8199"/> or the device configuration model discussed in <xref target ="RFC8309"/>.</t> | <t>Refers to the Network Element YANG data model described in <xre f target="RFC8199"/> or the device configuration model discussed in <xref target ="RFC8309"/>.</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt/> | <dt/> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>Device models are also used to model a function embedded in a d evice (e.g., Access Control Lists (ACLs) <xref target="RFC8519"/>).</t> | <t>Device models are also used to model a function embedded in a d evice (e.g., Access Control Lists (ACLs) <xref target="RFC8519"/>).</t> | |||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| <dt/> | <dt/> | |||
| <dd> | <dd> | |||
| <t>A comprehensive list of device models is provided in Appendix 4 | <!-- [rfced] FYI, we updated "4.2" to "A.4.2" here, as [RFC8969] does not | |||
| .2 of <xref target="RFC8969"/>.</t> | have an Appendix 4.2, but does have an Appendix A.4.2. Please let us | |||
| know if this is not accurate. | ||||
| We note that A.4.2 (Device Management) uses 'YANG modules' rather than 'models'. | ||||
| Perhaps A.4.4 (Some Device Model Examples) was intended? However, it notes | ||||
| notes the list is not comprehensive. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| A comprehensive list of device models is provided in Appendix 4.2 | ||||
| of [RFC8969]. | ||||
| Current: | ||||
| A comprehensive list of device models is provided in | ||||
| Appendix A.4.2 of [RFC8969]. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| A non-comprehensive list of device models is provided in | ||||
| Appendix A.4.4 of [RFC8969]. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>A comprehensive list of device models is provided in <xref targ | ||||
| et="RFC8969" section="A.4.2"/>.</t> | ||||
| </dd> | </dd> | |||
| </dl> | </dl> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-def"> | <section anchor="sec-def"> | |||
| <name>Definitions Section</name> | <name>Definitions Section</name> | |||
| <t>This section contains the module(s) defined by the specification. | <t>This section contains the module(s) defined by the specification. | |||
| These modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be written using the YANG 1.1 <xref target=" RFC7950"/> syntax. | These modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be written using the YANG 1.1 <xref target=" RFC7950"/> syntax. | |||
| YANG 1.0 <xref target="RFC6020"/> syntax <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used if no YANG 1 .1 constructs or | YANG 1.0 <xref target="RFC6020"/> syntax <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used if no YANG 1 .1 constructs or | |||
| semantics are needed in the module. If any of the imported YANG | semantics are needed in the module. If any of the imported YANG | |||
| modules are written using YANG 1.1, then the module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be writt en | modules are written using YANG 1.1, then the module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be writt en | |||
| using YANG 1.1.</t> | using YANG 1.1.</t> | |||
| <t>A YIN syntax version (<xref section="13" sectionFormat="of" target="R FC7950"/>) of the module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also be present in the | <t>A YANG Independent Notation (YIN) syntax version (<xref section="13" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/>) of the module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also be present in the | |||
| document. There <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also be other types of modules present in th e | document. There <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also be other types of modules present in th e | |||
| document, such as Structure of Management Information Version 2 | document, such as Structure of Management Information Version 2 | |||
| (SMIv2), which are not affected by these guidelines.</t> | (SMIv2), which are not affected by these guidelines.</t> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Regarding the statements about keywords from BCP 14, | ||||
| may we update the second part to use the same term ("keywords")? | ||||
| Specifically, may we replace "all-uppercase reserved words" with "keywords"? | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| ...within a YANG module are considered normative. The use of keywords | ||||
| defined in [RFC2119] and [RFC8174] apply to YANG "description" | ||||
| statements in normative modules exactly as they would in any other | ||||
| normative section. | ||||
| and | ||||
| Example YANG modules and example YANG fragments MUST NOT contain any | ||||
| normative text, including any all-uppercase reserved words from | ||||
| [RFC2119] and [RFC8174]. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| Example YANG modules and example YANG fragments MUST NOT contain any | ||||
| normative text, including any keywords from [RFC2119] and [RFC8174]. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Note that if the module itself is considered normative and not an | <t>Note that if the module itself is considered normative and not an | |||
| example module or example YANG fragment, then all YANG statements | example module or example YANG fragment, then all YANG statements | |||
| within a YANG module are considered normative. The use of keywords | within a YANG module are considered normative. The use of keywords | |||
| defined in <xref target="RFC2119"/> and <xref target="RFC8174"/> apply to YANG " description" | defined in <xref target="RFC2119"/> and <xref target="RFC8174"/> apply to YANG " description" | |||
| statements in normative modules exactly as they would in any other | statements in normative modules exactly as they would in any other | |||
| normative section.</t> | normative section.</t> | |||
| <t>Example YANG modules and example YANG fragments <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp1 4> contain any | <t>Example YANG modules and example YANG fragments <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp1 4> contain any | |||
| normative text, including any all-uppercase reserved words from | normative text, including any all-uppercase reserved words from | |||
| <xref target="RFC2119"/> and <xref target="RFC8174"/>.</t> | <xref target="RFC2119"/> and <xref target="RFC8174"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>Consistent indentation and formatting (e.g., folding) <bcp14>SHOULD</ bcp14> be used in all YANG | <t>Consistent indentation and formatting (e.g., folding) <bcp14>SHOULD</ bcp14> be used in all YANG | |||
| statements within a module.</t> | statements within a module.</t> | |||
| <t>See <xref target="sec-usage-guidelines"/> for guidelines on YANG usag e.</t> | <t>See <xref target="sec-usage-guidelines"/> for guidelines on YANG usag e.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-sec-cons-sec"> | <section anchor="sec-sec-cons-sec"> | |||
| <name>Security Considerations Section</name> | <name>Security Considerations Section</name> | |||
| <t>Each specification that defines one or more modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp1 4> contain a | <t>Each specification that defines one or more modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp1 4> contain a | |||
| section that discusses security considerations relevant to those | section that discusses security considerations relevant to those | |||
| modules.</t> | modules.</t> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Regarding Section 3.7: | ||||
| a) This text seems redundant. Please let us know if/how this | ||||
| section should be updated. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| Unless the modules comply with [RFC8791] or define YANG extensions | ||||
| (e.g., [RFC7952]), the security section MUST be modeled after the | ||||
| latest approved template (available at | ||||
| <https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines>). | ||||
| and | ||||
| Documents that exclusively define modules that follow the extension | ||||
| in [RFC8791] are not required to include the security template in | ||||
| Section 3.7.1. Likewise, following the template is not required for | ||||
| modules that define YANG extensions such as [RFC7952]. | ||||
| b) Looking at the citations to RFC 7952 in Section 3.7, the first | ||||
| mention calls it an example, while the later mention and the related | ||||
| entry in the change log seem more definitive. Are there other RFCs | ||||
| that define YANG extensions or should the example indication be | ||||
| removed? Please review and advise. | ||||
| Section 3.7 (Original): | ||||
| Unless the modules comply with [RFC8791] or define YANG extensions | ||||
| (e.g., [RFC7952]),... | ||||
| and | ||||
| Documents that exclusively define modules that follow the extension | ||||
| in [RFC8791] are not required to include the security template in | ||||
| Section 3.7.1. Likewise, following the template is not required for | ||||
| modules that define YANG extensions such as [RFC7952]. | ||||
| Change log (Original): | ||||
| * Added statements that the security template is not required for | ||||
| modules that follow [RFC8791] or [RFC7952]. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <!--[rfced] Regarding Sections 3.7 and 3.7.1 (Security Considerations Section | ||||
| Template): | ||||
| a) We note the the following text was removed from Section 3.7 between | ||||
| RFC 8407 and this document: | ||||
| Section 3.7.1 contains the security considerations template dated | ||||
| 2013-05-08 and last updated on 2018-07-02. | ||||
| As the template listed at | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines is likely to | ||||
| continue to evolve ("latest approved template"), should there be some | ||||
| mention here that Section 3.7.1 is a snapshot of the template that is | ||||
| available in the wiki at the time of writing in order to avoid author | ||||
| confusion? | ||||
| b) With point (a) in mind, would it make sense to begin Section 3.7.1 | ||||
| (prior to <CODE BEGINS> with a note mentioning that what follows is a | ||||
| snapshot and authors should go to | ||||
| <https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines> for the | ||||
| most up-to-date version (i.e., might someone just look up Section | ||||
| 3.7.1, without seeing 3.7, and not realize there are differences)? | ||||
| c) There are some minor differences between Section 3.7.1 and | ||||
| the wiki page. Should this document be updated to match the wiki? | ||||
| In addition to the differences between square and angle brackets, | ||||
| we see the following: | ||||
| i) Section numbering difference: | ||||
| This document: | ||||
| This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 | ||||
| The wiki: | ||||
| This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7.1 | ||||
| ii) Numbering and textual differences: | ||||
| This document: | ||||
| These YANG-based management protocols (1) have to use a secure | ||||
| transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC | ||||
| [RFC9000]) and (2) have to use mutual authentication. | ||||
| The wiki: | ||||
| These protocols have to use a secure transport layer (e.g., SSH | ||||
| [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual | ||||
| authentication. | ||||
| iii) Use of "reasonably": | ||||
| This document: | ||||
| All writable data nodes are likely to be sensitive or | ||||
| vulnerable in some network environments. | ||||
| The wiki: | ||||
| All writable data nodes are likely to be reasonably sensitive or | ||||
| vulnerable in some network environments. | ||||
| d) Might it make the template in Section 3.7.1 more easily usable to | ||||
| authors if it were numbered? That is: | ||||
| 1. Writable nodes section: | ||||
| 2. Readable nodes section: | ||||
| 3. RPC/action operations section: | ||||
| 4. Reusable groupings from other modules section: | ||||
| 5. No data nodes section: | ||||
| (If added, this numbering would appear in this document and the wiki page, | ||||
| not in the RFCs that make use of the template, as they typically | ||||
| do not include these section names.) | ||||
| e) Is it clear to authors how to approach the security considerations | ||||
| section for documents that contain more than one YANG module that | ||||
| might have different security considerations template applications? | ||||
| Should they include subsections of the Security Considerations section | ||||
| for each module? | ||||
| f) The following abbreviations (that are not denoted as well-known at | ||||
| https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list) are used | ||||
| in the template in Section 3.7.1 and/or at | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines without | ||||
| expansion. | ||||
| As this may be the first use of these abbreviations in a | ||||
| document in which this text is inserted, should they be expanded? | ||||
| NETCONF (a bit odd since RESTCONF has no expansion) | ||||
| SSH | ||||
| RPC | ||||
| g) A formatting question/suggestion inspired by the aesthetics of | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines but also | ||||
| applicable to the template in Section 3.7.1: | ||||
| Should the quoted text like "There are no particularly sensitive | ||||
| writeable data nodes." actually appear under the blue bubble to match | ||||
| the way the text above was formatted (e.g., "There are a number of | ||||
| data nodes defined...")? So that the comments/blue bubbles are saying | ||||
| something like "If X is true, insert:" and the actual text to insert | ||||
| is not in the comment? | ||||
| h) We see the template gives instructions on what to include: | ||||
| -if a YANG module contains something (e.g., writeable nodes), | ||||
| -if the YANG module contains something particularly sensitive, and | ||||
| -if NO data nodes at all are included. | ||||
| However, is there ever a case where just one (or two) of the sections | ||||
| in this template might not apply (e.g., readable nodes exist but no | ||||
| writable ones do)? If so, will it be clear to authors how to handle | ||||
| that case? | ||||
| For example, should an instruction to include something like "There | ||||
| are no writable data nodes in this YANG module." be included? | ||||
| i) Following on with point (h) above, Section 3.7 states that YANG | ||||
| modules that comply with [RFC8791] or define YANG extensions (e.g., | ||||
| [RFC7952]) do not need to model their Security Considerations sections | ||||
| after the template. | ||||
| However, does it make sense to update the template (and | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines) with text | ||||
| instructing authors to overtly mention that the YANG module complies | ||||
| with [RFC8791] or defines YANG extensions and thus the security | ||||
| considerations at | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines do not apply? | ||||
| j) Might it be helpful to move the note (about references) at the end | ||||
| of Section 3.7.1 to match its placement at | ||||
| https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines? | ||||
| k) Is "that" missing in the first sentence of the second comment in | ||||
| the "Readable nodes section:"? That is, if you remove the | ||||
| parenthetical, you would get: | ||||
| "You must evaluate whether the data model contains any readable data | ||||
| nodes [snip] are particularly sensitive..." | ||||
| l) In the "Readable nodes section:", it could be read as the right course of | ||||
| action would be to include: | ||||
| "Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered | ||||
| sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus | ||||
| important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or | ||||
| notification) to these data nodes. Specifically, the following | ||||
| subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/vulnerabilities: | ||||
| There are no particularly sensitive readable data nodes." | ||||
| However, perhaps the intended meaning is to either have the first | ||||
| paragraph or have the last sentence? Or, is it the case that some YANG | ||||
| modules have sensitive data nodes that are not "particularly" | ||||
| sensitive? Please review. | ||||
| m) For the following sentence, a reader may expect "remind" to be a | ||||
| transitive verb (with object). May we rewrite as follows? | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| If the data model reuses groupings from other modules and | ||||
| the document that specifies these groupings also | ||||
| includes those as data nodes, then add this text to remind | ||||
| the specific sensitivity or vulnerability of reused nodes. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| If the data model reuses groupings from other modules and | ||||
| the document that specifies these groupings also | ||||
| includes those as data nodes, then add this text as a reminder of | ||||
| the specific sensitivity or vulnerability of the reused nodes. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Unless the modules comply with <xref target="RFC8791"/> or define YAN G extensions (e.g., <xref target="RFC7952"/>), the security section <bcp14>MUST< /bcp14> | <t>Unless the modules comply with <xref target="RFC8791"/> or define YAN G extensions (e.g., <xref target="RFC7952"/>), the security section <bcp14>MUST< /bcp14> | |||
| be modeled after the latest approved template | be modeled after the latest approved template | |||
| (available at <tt><https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guideline s></tt>). <xref target="sec-security-template"/> contains the security consi derations | (available at <eref target="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-gui delines" brackets="angle"/>). <xref target="sec-security-template"/> contains t he security considerations | |||
| template. Authors | template. Authors | |||
| <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> check the web page at the URL listed above in case there is a | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> check the web page at the URL listed above in case there is a | |||
| more recent version available.</t> | more recent version available.</t> | |||
| <t>In particular:</t> | <t>In particular:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Writable data nodes that could be especially disruptive if abused | <t>Writable data nodes that could be especially disruptive if abused | |||
| <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly listed by name, and the associated security | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly listed by name, and the associated security | |||
| risks <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explained.</t> | risks <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explained.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Readable data nodes that contain especially sensitive information | <t>Readable data nodes that contain especially sensitive information | |||
| or that raise significant privacy concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly | or that raise significant privacy concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly | |||
| listed by name, and the reasons for the sensitivity/privacy | listed by name, and the reasons for the sensitivity/privacy | |||
| skipping to change at line 650 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1135 ¶ | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Operations (i.e., YANG "rpc" statements) that are potentially | <t>Operations (i.e., YANG "rpc" statements) that are potentially | |||
| harmful to system behavior or that raise significant privacy | harmful to system behavior or that raise significant privacy | |||
| concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly listed by name, and the reasons for | concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explicitly listed by name, and the reasons for | |||
| the sensitivity/privacy concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explained.</t> | the sensitivity/privacy concerns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be explained.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Documents that exclusively define modules that follow the extension i n <xref target="RFC8791"/> are not required to include the security template in <xref target="sec-security-template"/>. Likewise, following the template is not required for modules that define YANG extensions such as <xref target="RFC7952"/ >.</t> | <t>Documents that exclusively define modules that follow the extension i n <xref target="RFC8791"/> are not required to include the security template in <xref target="sec-security-template"/>. Likewise, following the template is not required for modules that define YANG extensions such as <xref target="RFC7952"/ >.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-security-template"> | <section anchor="sec-security-template"> | |||
| <name>Security Considerations Section Template</name> | <name>Security Considerations Section Template</name> | |||
| <sourcecode markers="true"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <CODE BEGINS> | ||||
| X. Security Considerations | X. Security Considerations | |||
| This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 | This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 | |||
| of [RFCAAAA]. | of [RFC9907]. | |||
| The "<module-name>" YANG module defines a data model that is | The "<module-name>" YANG module defines a data model that is | |||
| designed to be accessed via YANG-based management protocols, such as | designed to be accessed via YANG-based management protocols, such as | |||
| NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. These YANG-based management | NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. These YANG-based | |||
| protocols (1) have to use a secure transport layer | management protocols (1) have to use a secure transport layer | |||
| (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC [RFC9000]) and (2) have | (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC [RFC9000]) and (2) have | |||
| to use mutual authentication. | to use mutual authentication. | |||
| The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] | The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] | |||
| provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or | provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or | |||
| RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or | RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or | |||
| RESTCONF protocol operations and content. | RESTCONF protocol operations and content. | |||
| -- Writable nodes section: | -- Writable nodes section: | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| skipping to change at line 688 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1175 ¶ | |||
| operations (e.g., edit-config) and delete operations to these data | operations (e.g., edit-config) and delete operations to these data | |||
| nodes without proper protection or authentication can have a negative | nodes without proper protection or authentication can have a negative | |||
| effect on network operations. The following subtrees and data nodes | effect on network operations. The following subtrees and data nodes | |||
| have particular sensitivities/vulnerabilities: | have particular sensitivities/vulnerabilities: | |||
| -- If the data model contains any particularly sensitive data nodes, | -- If the data model contains any particularly sensitive data nodes, | |||
| -- e.g., ones that are protected by a "nacm:default-deny-write" | -- e.g., ones that are protected by a "nacm:default-deny-write" | |||
| -- or a "nacm:default-deny-all" extensions statement, then those | -- or a "nacm:default-deny-all" extensions statement, then those | |||
| -- subtrees and data nodes must be listed, with an explanation of the | -- subtrees and data nodes must be listed, with an explanation of the | |||
| -- associated security risks with a focus on how they can be | -- associated security risks with a focus on how they can be | |||
| -- disruptive if abused. Otherwise, state: | ||||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- "There are no particularly sensitive writable data nodes." | -- "There are no particularly sensitive writable data nodes." | |||
| -- Readable nodes section: | -- Readable nodes section: | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- If the data model contains any readable data nodes (i.e., those | -- If the data model contains any readable data nodes (i.e., those | |||
| -- that are "config false" nodes, but also all other nodes, because | -- that are "config false" nodes, but also all other nodes, because | |||
| -- they can also be read via operations like get or get-config), then | -- they can also be read via operations like get or get-config), then | |||
| -- include the following text: | -- include the following text: | |||
| Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered | Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered | |||
| sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus | sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus | |||
| important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or | important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or | |||
| notification) to these data nodes. Specifically, the following | notification) to these data nodes. Specifically, the following | |||
| subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/ | subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/ | |||
| vulnerabilities: | vulnerabilities: | |||
| -- You must evaluate whether the data model contains any readable | -- You must evaluate whether the data model contains any readable | |||
| -- data nodes (those are all the "config false" nodes, but also all | -- data nodes (those are all the "config false" nodes, but also all | |||
| -- other nodes, because they can also be read via operations like get | -- other nodes, because they can also be read via operations like get | |||
| -- or get-config) are particularly sensitive or vulnerable (e.g., | -- or get-config) are particularly sensitive or vulnerable (e.g., | |||
| -- if they might reveal customer information or violate personal | -- if they might reveal customer information or violate personal | |||
| -- privacy laws). Typically, particularly sensitive readable | ||||
| -- data nodes are ones that are protected by a | -- data nodes are ones that are protected by a | |||
| -- "nacm:default-deny-read" or a "nacm:default-deny-all" extensions | -- "nacm:default-deny-read" or a "nacm:default-deny-all" extensions | |||
| -- statement. | -- statement. | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- Otherwise, state: | -- Otherwise, state: | |||
| -- "There are no particularly sensitive readable data nodes." | -- "There are no particularly sensitive readable data nodes." | |||
| -- RPC/action operations section: | -- RPC/action operations section: | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- If the data model contains any RPC or action operations, then | -- If the data model contains any RPC or action operations, then | |||
| skipping to change at line 747 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1234 ¶ | |||
| -- Reusable groupings from other modules section: | -- Reusable groupings from other modules section: | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- If the data model reuses groupings from other modules and | -- If the data model reuses groupings from other modules and | |||
| -- the document that specifies these groupings also | -- the document that specifies these groupings also | |||
| -- includes those as data nodes, then add this text to remind | -- includes those as data nodes, then add this text to remind | |||
| -- the specific sensitivity or vulnerability of reused nodes. | -- the specific sensitivity or vulnerability of reused nodes. | |||
| This YANG module uses groupings from other YANG modules that | This YANG module uses groupings from other YANG modules that | |||
| define nodes that may be considered sensitive or vulnerable | define nodes that may be considered sensitive or vulnerable | |||
| in network environments. Refer to the Security Considerations | in network environments. Refer to the Security Considerations | |||
| of <RFC-insert-numbers> for information as to which nodes may | of <RFC-insert-numbers> for information as to which nodes may | |||
| be considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. | be considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. | |||
| -- No data nodes section: | -- No data nodes section: | |||
| -- | -- | |||
| -- If the data model does not define any data nodes (i.e., none | -- If the data model does not define any data nodes (i.e., none | |||
| -- of the above sections or readable/writable data nodes or RPCs | -- of the above sections or readable/writable data nodes or RPCs | |||
| -- have been included), then add the following text: | -- have been included), then add the following text: | |||
| The YANG module defines a set of identities, types, and | The YANG module defines a set of identities, types, and | |||
| groupings. These nodes are intended to be reused by other YANG | groupings. These nodes are intended to be reused by other YANG | |||
| modules. The module by itself does not expose any data nodes that | modules. The module by itself does not expose any data nodes that | |||
| are writable, data nodes that contain read-only state, or RPCs. | are writable, data nodes that contain read-only state, or RPCs. | |||
| As such, there are no additional security issues related to | As such, there are no additional security issues related to | |||
| the YANG module that need to be considered. | the YANG module that need to be considered. | |||
| Modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document | Modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document | |||
| should identify the corresponding security considerations. For | should identify the corresponding security considerations. For | |||
| example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related | example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related | |||
| information (e.g., 'node-example'). | information (e.g., 'node-example'). | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | <CODE ENDS> | |||
| <dl> | ]]></artwork> | |||
| <dt>Note:</dt> | ||||
| <dd> | <aside><t>Note: <xref target="RFC8341"/> (or a future RFC that | |||
| <t><xref target="RFC8341"/> (or a future RFC that replaces it) <bc | replaces it) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be listed as a normative | |||
| p14>MUST</bcp14> be listed as a normative reference.</t> | reference.</t> | |||
| </dd> | <t>By default, <xref target="RFC4252"/>, <xref target="RFC6241"/>, | |||
| <dt/> | <xref target="RFC8040"/>, <xref target="RFC8446"/>, <xref | |||
| <dd> | target="RFC9000"/>, and RFC 9907 (or future RFCs that replace any of | |||
| <t>By default, <xref target="RFC4252"/>, <xref target="RFC6241"/>, | them) are listed as informative references unless normatively cited | |||
| <xref target="RFC8040"/>, <xref target="RFC8446"/>, <xref target="RFC9000"/>, a | in other sections of the document that specifies the YANG | |||
| nd RFC AAAA (or future RFCs that replace any of them) are listed as informative | module.</t></aside> | |||
| references unless normatively cited in other sections of the document that speci | ||||
| fies the YANG module.</t> | ||||
| </dd> | ||||
| </dl> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-iana-cons"> | <section anchor="sec-iana-cons"> | |||
| <name>IANA Considerations Section</name> | <name>IANA Considerations Section</name> | |||
| <t>Each normative YANG module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be registered in both the "IETF XML | <t>Each normative YANG module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be registered in both the "IETF XML | |||
| Registry" group <xref target="RFC3688"/> <xref target="IANA-XML"/> and the "YANG Module Names" registry | Registry" group <xref target="RFC3688"/> <xref target="IANA-XML"/> and the "YANG Module Names" registry | |||
| <xref target="RFC6020"/> <xref target="IANA-MOD-NAMES"/>. The registration reque st in the "YANG Module Names" registry | <xref target="RFC6020"/> <xref target="IANA-MOD-NAMES"/>. The registration reque st in the "YANG Module Names" registry | |||
| should indicate whether the module is IANA-maintained or not. This applies to ne w modules and updated | should indicate whether or not the module is IANA-maintained. This applies to ne w modules and updated | |||
| modules. An example of an update registration for the | modules. An example of an update registration for the | |||
| "ietf-template" module can be found in <xref target="sec-iana"/>.</t> | "ietf-template" module can be found in <xref target="sec-iana"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>Additional IANA considerations applicable to IANA-maintained modules (including instructions to maintain them) are provided in <xref target="sec-iana -mm"/>.</t> | <t>Additional IANA considerations applicable to IANA-maintained modules (including instructions to maintain them) are provided in <xref target="sec-iana -mm"/>.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="documents-that-create-a-new-namespace"> | <section anchor="documents-that-create-a-new-namespace"> | |||
| <name>Documents That Create a New Namespace</name> | <name>Documents That Create a New Namespace</name> | |||
| <t>If an I-D defines a new namespace that is to be administered by the | <t>If an I-D defines a new namespace that is to be administered by the | |||
| IANA, then the document <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an IANA Considerations secti on | IANA, then the document <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an IANA Considerations secti on | |||
| that specifies how the namespace is to be administered.</t> | that specifies how the namespace is to be administered.</t> | |||
| <t>Specifically, if any YANG module namespace statement value containe d | <t>Specifically, if any YANG module namespace statement value containe d | |||
| in the document is not already registered with IANA, then a new entry | in the document is not already registered with IANA, then a new entry | |||
| in the "ns" registry within the "IETF XML Registry" group <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be | in the "ns" registry within the "IETF XML Registry" registry group <bcp14>MUST</ bcp14> be | |||
| requested from the IANA.</t> | requested from the IANA.</t> | |||
| <t>A registration template for new YANG modules is provided in <xref t arget="sec-reg-def-iana"/>.</t> | <t>A registration template for new YANG modules is provided in <xref t arget="sec-reg-def-iana"/>.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="documents-that-extend-an-existing-namespace"> | <section anchor="documents-that-extend-an-existing-namespace"> | |||
| <name>Documents That Extend an Existing Namespace</name> | <name>Documents That Extend an Existing Namespace</name> | |||
| <t>It is possible to extend an existing namespace using a YANG submodu le | <t>It is possible to extend an existing namespace using a YANG submodu le | |||
| that belongs to an existing module already administered by IANA. In | that belongs to an existing module already administered by IANA. In | |||
| this case, the document containing the main module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be update d to | this case, the document containing the main module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be update d to | |||
| use the latest revision of the submodule.</t> | use the latest revision of the submodule.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="registration-templates"> | <section anchor="registration-templates"> | |||
| <name>Registration Templates</name> | <name>Registration Templates</name> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-reg-def-iana"> | <section anchor="sec-reg-def-iana"> | |||
| <name>IANA Template for Documents Defining New YANG Modules</name> | <name>IANA Template for Documents Defining New YANG Modules</name> | |||
| <t>A registration template for a new module is provided below:</t> | <t>A registration template for a new module is provided below:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns" | ||||
| registry within the "IETF XML Registry" group [RFC3688]: | ||||
| URI: | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
| Registrant Contact: The IESG. | IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns" | |||
| XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. | registry within the "IETF XML Registry" group [RFC3688]: | |||
| IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG | URI: | |||
| Module Names" registry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" | Registrant Contact: The IESG | |||
| registry group. | XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. | |||
| IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG | ||||
| Module Names" registry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" | ||||
| registry group. | ||||
| Name: | ||||
| Maintained by IANA? Y/N | ||||
| Namespace: | ||||
| Prefix: | ||||
| Reference:]]></artwork> | ||||
| Name: | ||||
| Maintained by IANA? Y/N | ||||
| Namespace: | ||||
| Prefix: | ||||
| Reference: | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="iana-template-for-revising-yang-modules"> | <section anchor="iana-template-for-revising-yang-modules"> | |||
| <name>IANA Template for Revising YANG Modules</name> | <name>IANA Template for Revising YANG Modules</name> | |||
| <t>A registration template for a revised module is provided below:</ t> | <t>A registration template for a revised module is provided below:</ t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| IANA is requested to update the following registration in the "ns" | ||||
| registry within the "IETF XML Registry" group [RFC3688] to | ||||
| reference this document: | ||||
| URI: | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
| Registrant Contact: The IESG. | IANA is requested to update the following registration in the "ns" | |||
| XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. | registry within the "IETF XML Registry" group [RFC3688] to | |||
| reference this document: | ||||
| IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG | URI: | |||
| Module Names" registry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" | Registrant Contact: The IESG | |||
| registry group. | XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. | |||
| IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG | ||||
| Module Names" registry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" | ||||
| registry group. | ||||
| Name: | ||||
| Maintained by IANA? Y/N | ||||
| Namespace: | ||||
| Prefix: | ||||
| Reference:]]></artwork> | ||||
| Name: | ||||
| Maintained by IANA? Y/N | ||||
| Namespace: | ||||
| Prefix: | ||||
| Reference: | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-ref"> | <section anchor="sec-ref"> | |||
| <name>References Sections</name> | <name>References Sections</name> | |||
| <t>For every import or include statement that appears in a module | <t>For every import or include statement that appears in a module | |||
| contained in the specification that identifies a module in a separate | contained in the specification that identifies a module in a separate | |||
| document, a corresponding normative reference to that document <bcp14>MUST</bcp1 4> | document, a corresponding normative reference to that document <bcp14>MUST</bcp1 4> | |||
| appear in the Normative References section. The reference <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> | appear in the Normative References section. The reference <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> | |||
| correspond to the specific module version actually used within the | correspond to the specific module version actually used within the | |||
| skipping to change at line 874 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1365 ¶ | |||
| correspond to the specific module version actually used within the | correspond to the specific module version actually used within the | |||
| specification.</t> | specification.</t> | |||
| <t>For every normative reference statement that appears in a module | <t>For every normative reference statement that appears in a module | |||
| contained in the specification that identifies a separate document, a | contained in the specification that identifies a separate document, a | |||
| corresponding normative reference to that document <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear in | corresponding normative reference to that document <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear in | |||
| the Normative References section. The reference <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> correspon d to | the Normative References section. The reference <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> correspon d to | |||
| the specific document version actually used within the specification. | the specific document version actually used within the specification. | |||
| If the reference statement identifies an informative reference that | If the reference statement identifies an informative reference that | |||
| identifies a separate document, a corresponding informative reference | identifies a separate document, a corresponding informative reference | |||
| to that document <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> appear in the Informative References section .</t> | to that document <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> appear in the Informative References section .</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-tools"> | <section anchor="sec-tools"> | |||
| <name>Validation Tools</name> | <name>Validation Tools</name> | |||
| <t>All modules need to be validated before submission in an I-D. The | <t>All modules need to be validated before submission in an I-D. The | |||
| 'pyang' YANG compiler is freely available from GitHub:</t> | 'pyang' YANG compiler is freely available from GitHub: <eref target="https://git | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | hub.com/mbj4668/pyang" brackets="angle"/>.</t> | |||
| <https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>If the 'pyang' compiler is used to validate a normative module, then | <t>If the 'pyang' compiler is used to validate a normative module, then | |||
| the "--ietf" command-line option <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to identify any IET F | the "--ietf" command-line option <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to identify any IET F | |||
| guideline issues.</t> | guideline issues.</t> | |||
| <t>If the 'pyang' compiler is used to validate an example module, then | <t>If the 'pyang' compiler is used to validate an example module, then | |||
| the "--ietf" command-line option <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to identify any IETF | the "--ietf" command-line option <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to identify any IETF | |||
| guideline issues.</t> | guideline issues.</t> | |||
| <t>To ensure that a module fits into the line limits of an I-D, the comm and | <t>To ensure that a module fits into the line limits of an I-D, the comm and | |||
| "pyang -f yang --keep-comments --yang-line-length 69" should be used.</t> | "pyang -f yang --keep-comments --yang-line-length 69" should be used.</t> | |||
| <t>The "yanglint" program is also freely available from GitHub.</t> | <t>The "yanglint" program is also freely available from GitHub: <eref ta | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | rget="https://github.com/CESNET/libyang" brackets="angle"/>.</t> | |||
| <https://github.com/CESNET/libyang> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>This tool can be used to validate XPath statements within YANG | <t>This tool can be used to validate XPath statements within YANG | |||
| modules.</t> | modules.</t> | |||
| <t>To check that JSON-encoded examples <xref target="RFC7951"/> comply w ith the target data models, | <t>To check that JSON-encoded examples <xref target="RFC7951"/> comply w ith the target data models, | |||
| programs such as "yangson" or "yanglint" should be used. Both programs are freel | programs such as "yangson" or "yanglint" should be used. Both programs are freel | |||
| y available from GitHub.</t> | y available from GitHub: <eref target="https://github.com/CZ-NIC/yangson" bracke | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ts="angle"/> and <eref target="https://github.com/CESNET/libyang" brackets="angl | |||
| <https://github.com/CZ-NIC/yangson> | e"/>.</t> | |||
| <https://github.com/CESNET/libyang> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="module-extraction-tools"> | <section anchor="module-extraction-tools"> | |||
| <name>Module Extraction Tools</name> | <name>Module Extraction Tools</name> | |||
| <t>A version of 'rfcstrip' that will extract YANG modules from an I-D or | <t>A version of 'rfcstrip' that will extract YANG modules from an I-D or | |||
| RFC is available. The 'rfcstrip' tool that supports YANG module | RFC is freely available at: <eref target="https://github.com/mbj4668/rfcstrip" b | |||
| extraction is freely available at:</t> | rackets="angle"/>.</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <https://github.com/mbj4668/rfcstrip> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>This tool can be used to verify that the <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</t t> and <tt>"<CODE | <t>This tool can be used to verify that the <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</t t> and <tt>"<CODE | |||
| ENDS>"</tt> tags are used correctly and that the normative YANG modules | ENDS>"</tt> tags are used correctly and that the normative YANG modules | |||
| can be extracted correctly.</t> | can be extracted correctly.</t> | |||
| <t>The 'xym' tool is freely available on GitHub and can be used to | <t>The 'xym' tool is freely available on GitHub and can be used to | |||
| extract YANG modules from a document.</t> | extract YANG modules from a document: <eref target="https://github.com/xym-tool/ | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | xym" brackets="angle"/>.</t> | |||
| <https://github.com/xym-tool/xym> | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="module-usage-examples"> | <section anchor="module-usage-examples"> | |||
| <name>Module Usage Examples</name> | <name>Module Usage Examples</name> | |||
| <t>Each specification that defines one or more modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bc p14> contain | <t>Each specification that defines one or more modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bc p14> contain | |||
| usage examples, either throughout the document or in an appendix. | usage examples, either throughout the document or in an appendix. | |||
| This includes example instance document snippets in an appropriate | This includes example instance document snippets in an appropriate | |||
| encoding (e.g., XML and/or JSON) to demonstrate the intended usage of | encoding (e.g., XML and/or JSON) to demonstrate the intended usage of | |||
| the YANG module(s). Examples <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be validated (<xref target="se c-tools"/>). Refer to | the YANG module(s). Examples <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be validated (<xref target="se c-tools"/>). Refer to | |||
| <xref target="sec-tools"/> for tools that validate YANG modules and examples. If IP addresses/prefixes | <xref target="sec-tools"/> for tools that validate YANG modules and examples. If IP addresses/prefixes | |||
| are used, then a mix of either IPv4 and IPv6 addresses/prefixes or IPv6 | are used, then a mix of either IPv4 and IPv6 addresses/prefixes or IPv6 | |||
| skipping to change at line 952 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1428 ¶ | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Reserved domain names for documentation are defined in <xref targ et="RFC2606"/>.</t> | <t>Reserved domain names for documentation are defined in <xref targ et="RFC2606"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>URI examples <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be prefixed with "example:".</t> | <t>URI examples <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be prefixed with "example:".</t> | |||
| <t>In order to ease extraction and validation of examples, it is <bcp14> RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to use code markers.</t> | <t>In order to ease extraction and validation of examples, it is <bcp14> RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to use code markers.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-usage-guidelines"> | <section anchor="sec-usage-guidelines"> | |||
| <name>YANG Usage Guidelines</name> | <name>YANG Usage Guidelines</name> | |||
| <t>Modules in IETF Standards Track specifications <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> comp ly with all | <t>Modules in IETF Standards Track specifications <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> comp ly with all | |||
| syntactic and semantic requirements of YANG 1.1 <xref target="RFC7950"/>. See t he | syntactic and semantic requirements of YANG 1.1 <xref target="RFC7950"/>. See t he | |||
| exception for YANG 1.0 in Section 3.6. The guidelines in this | exception for YANG 1.0 in <xref target="sec-def"/>. The guidelines in this | |||
| section are intended to supplement the YANG specification <xref target="RFC7950" />, | section are intended to supplement the YANG specification <xref target="RFC7950" />, | |||
| which is intended to define a minimum set of conformance | which is intended to define a minimum set of conformance | |||
| requirements.</t> | requirements.</t> | |||
| <t>In order to promote interoperability and establish a set of practices | <t>In order to promote interoperability and establish a set of practices | |||
| based on previous experience, the following sections establish usage | based on previous experience, the following sections establish usage | |||
| guidelines for specific YANG constructs.</t> | guidelines for specific YANG constructs.</t> | |||
| <t>Only guidelines that clarify or restrict the minimum conformance | <t>Only guidelines that clarify or restrict the minimum conformance | |||
| requirements are included here.</t> | requirements are included here.</t> | |||
| <t>A template for IETF modules is provided in <xref target="tem-ietf"/>.</ t> | <t>A template for IETF modules is provided in <xref target="tem-ietf"/>.</ t> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-module-naming-conventions"> | <section anchor="sec-module-naming-conventions"> | |||
| skipping to change at line 996 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1473 ¶ | |||
| RFC containing the module is reclassified to "Historic" status. A | RFC containing the module is reclassified to "Historic" status. A | |||
| module name cannot be changed in YANG, and this would be treated as a | module name cannot be changed in YANG, and this would be treated as a | |||
| new module, not a name change.</t> | new module, not a name change.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="prefixes"> | <section anchor="prefixes"> | |||
| <name>Prefixes</name> | <name>Prefixes</name> | |||
| <t>All YANG definitions are scoped by the module containing the | <t>All YANG definitions are scoped by the module containing the | |||
| definition being referenced. This allows the same name to be used | definition being referenced. This allows the same name to be used | |||
| in multiple modules, even if the names are not unique. In the example | in multiple modules, even if the names are not unique. In the example | |||
| below, the identifier "foo" is used in all three modules:</t> | below, the identifier "foo" is used in all three modules:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <!--[rfced] Regarding the use of code markers: | |||
| a) Please consider whether you want the <CODE BEGINS> | ||||
| and <CODE ENDS> markers to be added to any snippets in this document | ||||
| (i.e., if you want to add markers="true" to the sourcecode elements). | ||||
| We note Section 3.2.1 contains the following, but how it should | ||||
| be applied within this document is not clear: | ||||
| Example modules are not code components. The <CODE BEGINS> | ||||
| convention MUST NOT be used for example modules. However, example | ||||
| modules MUST be validated (Section 3.10). | ||||
| b) In contrast, regarding your note (about Section 3.7.1): | ||||
| * Added code markers for the security template. | ||||
| Why are the code markers being used for the security considerations | ||||
| template? It seems odd because it is prose, not code. | ||||
| c) Similarly, why are code markers used for the templates | ||||
| in Sections 4.30.3.1 and 4.30.3.2? | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| module example-foo { | module example-foo { | |||
| namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-foo"; | namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-foo"; | |||
| prefix f; | prefix f; | |||
| container foo; | container foo; | |||
| } | } | |||
| module example-bar { | module example-bar { | |||
| namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-bar"; | namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-bar"; | |||
| prefix b; | prefix b; | |||
| skipping to change at line 1020 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1518 ¶ | |||
| module example-one { | module example-one { | |||
| namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-one"; | namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-one"; | |||
| prefix one; | prefix one; | |||
| import example-foo { prefix f; } | import example-foo { prefix f; } | |||
| import example-bar { prefix b; } | import example-bar { prefix b; } | |||
| augment "/f:foo" { | augment "/f:foo" { | |||
| leaf foo { type b:foo; } | leaf foo { type b:foo; } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>YANG defines the following rules for prefix usage:</t> | <t>YANG defines the following rules for prefix usage:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Prefixes are never used for built-in data types and YANG keywords .</t> | <t>Prefixes are never used for built-in data types and YANG keywords .</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>A prefix <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used for any external statement ( i.e., a statement defined with the YANG "extension" statement).</t> | <t>A prefix <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used for any external statement ( i.e., a statement defined with the YANG "extension" statement).</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>The proper module prefix <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used for all iden tifiers imported from other modules.</t> | <t>The proper module prefix <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used for all iden tifiers imported from other modules.</t> | |||
| skipping to change at line 1057 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1554 ¶ | |||
| <t>The local module prefix <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used for references to typedefs, groupings, extensions, features, and identities defined in the mod ule.</t> | <t>The local module prefix <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used for references to typedefs, groupings, extensions, features, and identities defined in the mod ule.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Consistent with <xref section="7.1.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7 950"/>, the prefix defined by a module | <t>Consistent with <xref section="7.1.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7 950"/>, the prefix defined by a module | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used when the module is imported, unless there is a con flict.</t> | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used when the module is imported, unless there is a con flict.</t> | |||
| <t>Prefix values <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be short but meaningful to the in tended user. Prefix values <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> conflict with known modules that have been previously published.</t> | <t>Prefix values <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be short but meaningful to the in tended user. Prefix values <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> conflict with known modules that have been previously published.</t> | |||
| <t>For convenience, prefix values of example modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be prefixed with "ex" | <t>For convenience, prefix values of example modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be prefixed with "ex" | |||
| or similar patterns. In doing so, readers of example modules or tree diagrams | or similar patterns. In doing so, readers of example modules or tree diagrams | |||
| that mix both example and standard modules can easily identify example parts.</t > | that mix both example and standard modules can easily identify example parts.</t > | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="identifiers"> | <section anchor="ids"> | |||
| <name>Identifiers</name> | <name>Identifiers</name> | |||
| <t>All YANG identifiers in published modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be betw een 1 and 64 characters in length. These include any construct | <t>All YANG identifiers in published modules <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be betw een 1 and 64 characters in length. These include any construct | |||
| specified as an "identifier-arg-str" token in the ABNF in <xref section="14" sec tionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/>.</t> | specified as an "identifier-arg-str" token in the ABNF in <xref section="14" sec tionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/>.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-id-naming"> | <section anchor="sec-id-naming"> | |||
| <name>Identifier Naming Conventions</name> | <name>Identifier Naming Conventions</name> | |||
| <t>Identifiers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> follow a consistent naming patter n throughout the | <t>Identifiers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> follow a consistent naming patter n throughout the | |||
| module. Only lowercase letters, numbers, and dashes <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be us ed | module. Only lowercase letters, numbers, and dashes <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be us ed | |||
| in identifier names. Uppercase characters, the period character, and | in identifier names. Uppercase characters, the period character, and | |||
| the underscore character <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used if the identifier represents a | the underscore character <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used if the identifier represents a | |||
| well-known value that uses these characters. YANG does not permit | well-known value that uses these characters. YANG does not permit | |||
| skipping to change at line 1136 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1633 ¶ | |||
| </tr> | </tr> | |||
| <tr> | <tr> | |||
| <td align="left">yin-element</td> | <td align="left">yin-element</td> | |||
| <td align="left">false</td> | <td align="left">false</td> | |||
| </tr> | </tr> | |||
| </tbody> | </tbody> | |||
| </table> | </table> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="conditional-statements"> | <section anchor="conditional-statements"> | |||
| <name>Conditional Statements</name> | <name>Conditional Statements</name> | |||
| <t>A module may be conceptually partitioned in several ways, using the | <t>A module may be conceptually partitioned in several ways using the | |||
| "if-feature" and/or "when" statements.</t> | "if-feature" and/or "when" statements.</t> | |||
| <t>Data model designers need to carefully consider all modularity | <t>Data model designers need to carefully consider all modularity | |||
| aspects, including the use of YANG conditional statements.</t> | aspects, including the use of YANG conditional statements.</t> | |||
| <t>If a data definition is optional, depending on server support for a | <t>If a data definition is optional, depending on server support for a | |||
| NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol capability, then a YANG "feature" | NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol capability, then a YANG "feature" | |||
| statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be defined. The defined "feature" statement <bc p14>SHOULD</bcp14> | statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be defined. The defined "feature" statement <bc p14>SHOULD</bcp14> | |||
| then be used in the conditional "if-feature" statement referencing | then be used in the conditional "if-feature" statement referencing | |||
| the optional data definition.</t> | the optional data definition.</t> | |||
| <t>If any notification data, or any data definition, for a non- | <t>If any notification data, or any data definition, for a non- | |||
| configuration data node is not mandatory, then the server may or may | configuration data node is not mandatory, then the server may or may | |||
| not be required to return an instance of this data node. If any | not be required to return an instance of this data node. If any | |||
| conditional requirements exist for returning the data node in a | conditional requirements exist for returning the data node in a | |||
| notification payload or retrieval request, they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be documente d | notification payload or retrieval request, they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be documente d | |||
| somewhere. For example, a "when" or "if-feature" statement could | somewhere. For example, a "when" or "if-feature" statement could | |||
| apply to the data node, or the conditional requirements could be | apply to the data node or the conditional requirements could be | |||
| explained in a "description" statement within the data node or one of | explained in a "description" statement within the data node or one of | |||
| its ancestors (if any).</t> | its ancestors (if any).</t> | |||
| <t>If any "if-feature" statements apply to a list node, then the same | <t>If any "if-feature" statements apply to a list node, then the same | |||
| "if-feature" statements <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> apply to any key leaf nodes for the | "if-feature" statements <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> apply to any key leaf nodes for the | |||
| list. There <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be any "if-feature" statements applied to a ny | list. There <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be any "if-feature" statements applied to a ny | |||
| key leafs that do not also apply to the parent list node.</t> | key leafs that do not also apply to the parent list node.</t> | |||
| <t>There <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be any "when" statements applied to a key leaf node. | <t>There <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be any "when" statements applied to a key leaf node. | |||
| It is possible that a "when" statement for an ancestor node of a key | It is possible that a "when" statement for an ancestor node of a key | |||
| leaf will have the exact node-set result as the key leaf. In such a | leaf will have the exact node-set result as the key leaf. In such a | |||
| case, the "when" statement for the key leaf is redundant and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> | case, the "when" statement for the key leaf is redundant and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> | |||
| be avoided.</t> | be avoided.</t> | |||
| <t>Some modules use "case + when" construct but provide duplicated infor mation (e.g., the "when" statements are constraining a single case in the choice as shown in the example below). | <t>Some modules use a "case + when" construct but provide duplicated inf ormation (e.g., the "when" statements are constraining a single case in the choi ce as shown in the example below). | |||
| Such constructs with duplicated information <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used.</ t> | Such constructs with duplicated information <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used.</ t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf type { | leaf type { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum a; | enum a; | |||
| enum b; | enum b; | |||
| enum c; | enum c; | |||
| } | } | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| } | } | |||
| choice type-choice { | choice type-choice { | |||
| case b { | case b { | |||
| skipping to change at line 1192 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1689 ¶ | |||
| } | } | |||
| case c { | case c { | |||
| container type-c { | container type-c { | |||
| when "../type = 'c'"; | when "../type = 'c'"; | |||
| leaf bar { | leaf bar { | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>The following example removes the duplicated information:</t> | <t>The following example removes the duplicated information:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf type { | leaf type { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum a; | enum a; | |||
| enum b; | enum b; | |||
| enum c; | enum c; | |||
| } | } | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| } | } | |||
| container type-b { | container type-b { | |||
| when "../type = 'b'"; | when "../type = 'b'"; | |||
| leaf foo { | leaf foo { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| container type-c { | container type-c { | |||
| when "../type = 'c'"; | when "../type = 'c'"; | |||
| leaf bar { | leaf bar { | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | <t>Note that the use of "case + when" is still useful in cases where com | |||
| <t>Note that the use of "case + when" is still useful in cases where com | plementary modeling constraints should be expressed. See the example provided be | |||
| plementary modelling constraints should be expressed. See the example provided b | low:</t> | |||
| elow.</t> | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| leaf type { | leaf type { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum a; | enum a; | |||
| enum b; | enum b; | |||
| enum c; | enum c; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| choice second-type { | choice second-type { | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| case foo { | case foo { | |||
| skipping to change at line 1255 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1750 ¶ | |||
| } | } | |||
| case c { | case c { | |||
| container baz { | container baz { | |||
| when "../type = 'c'"; | when "../type = 'c'"; | |||
| leaf baz-attribute { | leaf baz-attribute { | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t><xref section="8.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/> includes pr ovisions for defining constraints | <t><xref section="8.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/> includes pr ovisions for defining constraints | |||
| on state data and specifies that a constraint must be true in a valid state data tree. | on state data and specifies that a constraint must be true in a valid state data tree. | |||
| However, <xref section="5.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8342"/> softens that behavior by allowing semantic | However, <xref section="5.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8342"/> softens that behavior by allowing semantic | |||
| constraints to be violated under some circumstances to help to detect anomalies. | constraints to be violated under some circumstances to help to detect anomalies. | |||
| Relaxing validation constraints on state data is meant to reveal deviations of | Relaxing validation constraints on state data is meant to reveal deviations of | |||
| the observed behavior vs. intended behavior of a managed entity and hopefully | the observed behavior versus intended behavior of a managed entity and hopefully | |||
| trigger corrective actions by a management system. From that perspective, | trigger corrective actions by a management system. From that perspective, | |||
| it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to avoid defining constraints on state data tha t would hinder | it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to avoid defining constraints on state data tha t would hinder | |||
| the detection by a management system of abnormal behaviors of a managed entity.< /t> | the detection by a management system of abnormal behaviors of a managed entity.< /t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="xpath-usage"> | <section anchor="xpath-usage"> | |||
| <name>XPath Usage</name> | <name>XPath Usage</name> | |||
| <t>This section describes guidelines for using the XML Path Language | <t>This section describes guidelines for using the XML Path Language | |||
| (XPath) <xref target="W3C.REC-xpath"/> within YANG modules.</t> | (XPath) <xref target="W3C.REC-xpath"/> within YANG modules.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="xpath-evaluation-contexts"> | <section anchor="xpath-evaluation-contexts"> | |||
| <name>XPath Evaluation Contexts</name> | <name>XPath Evaluation Contexts</name> | |||
| skipping to change at line 1303 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1797 ¶ | |||
| which is the parent of all RPC input parameter definitions.</t> | which is the parent of all RPC input parameter definitions.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>RPC Output: The document root is the conceptual "output" node, | <t>RPC Output: The document root is the conceptual "output" node, | |||
| which is the parent of all RPC output parameter definitions.</t> | which is the parent of all RPC output parameter definitions.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ol> | </ol> | |||
| <t>Note that these XPath contexts cannot be mixed. For example, a | <t>Note that these XPath contexts cannot be mixed. For example, a | |||
| "when" statement in a notification context cannot reference | "when" statement in a notification context cannot reference | |||
| configuration data.</t> | configuration data.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| notification foo { | notification foo { | |||
| leaf mtu { | leaf mtu { | |||
| // NOT okay because when-stmt context is this notification | // NOT okay because when-stmt context is this notification | |||
| when "/if:interfaces/if:interface[name='eth0']"; | when "/if:interfaces/if:interface[name='eth0']"; | |||
| type leafref { | type leafref { | |||
| // Okay because path-stmt has a different context | // Okay because path-stmt has a different context | |||
| path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:mtu"; | path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:mtu"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>It is especially important to consider the XPath evaluation context | <t>It is especially important to consider the XPath evaluation context | |||
| for XPath expressions defined in groupings. An XPath expression | for XPath expressions defined in groupings. An XPath expression | |||
| defined in a grouping may not be portable, meaning it cannot be used | defined in a grouping may not be portable, meaning it cannot be used | |||
| in multiple contexts and produce proper results.</t> | in multiple contexts and produce proper results.</t> | |||
| <t>If the XPath expressions defined in a grouping are intended for a | <t>If the XPath expressions defined in a grouping are intended for a | |||
| particular context, then this context <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be identified in the | particular context, then this context <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be identified in the | |||
| "description" statement for the grouping.</t> | "description" statement for the grouping.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="function-library"> | <section anchor="function-library"> | |||
| <name>Function Library</name> | <name>Function Library</name> | |||
| skipping to change at line 1351 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1844 ¶ | |||
| <t>The "local-name", "namespace-uri", "name", "string", and "number" | <t>The "local-name", "namespace-uri", "name", "string", and "number" | |||
| functions <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used if the argument is a node-set. If s o, | functions <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used if the argument is a node-set. If s o, | |||
| the function result will be determined by the document order of the | the function result will be determined by the document order of the | |||
| node-set. Since this order can be different on each server, the | node-set. Since this order can be different on each server, the | |||
| function results can also be different. Any function call that | function results can also be different. Any function call that | |||
| implicitly converts a node-set to a string will also have this issue.</t> | implicitly converts a node-set to a string will also have this issue.</t> | |||
| <t>The "local-name" function <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used to refe rence local names | <t>The "local-name" function <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used to refe rence local names | |||
| outside of the YANG module that defines the must or when expression | outside of the YANG module that defines the must or when expression | |||
| containing the "local-name" function. Example of a "local-name" | containing the "local-name" function. Example of a "local-name" | |||
| function that should not be used:</t> | function that should not be used:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| /*[local-name()='foo'] | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | /*[local-name()='foo']]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <t>The "derived-from-or-self" function <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used i nstead of an | <t>The "derived-from-or-self" function <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used i nstead of an | |||
| equality expression for identityref values. This allows the | equality expression for identityref values. This allows the | |||
| identities to be conceptually augmented.</t> | identities to be conceptually augmented.</t> | |||
| <t>Example:</t> | <t>Example:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| // assume "ex" is the prefix of the module where the identity | // assume "ex" is the prefix of the module where the identity | |||
| // name-format-null is defined | // name-format-null is defined | |||
| // do not use | // do not use | |||
| when "md-name-format = 'name-format-null'"; | when "md-name-format = 'name-format-null'"; | |||
| // this is preferred | // this is preferred | |||
| when "derived-from-or-self(md-name-format, 'ex:name-format-null')"; | when "derived-from-or-self(md-name-format, 'ex:name-format-null')";]]></sourcec | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ode> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="axes"> | <section anchor="axes"> | |||
| <name>Axes</name> | <name>Axes</name> | |||
| <t>The "attribute" and "namespace" axes are not supported in YANG and | <t>The "attribute" and "namespace" axes are not supported in YANG and | |||
| <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be empty in a NETCONF or RESTCONF server implementation.</ t> | <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be empty in a NETCONF or RESTCONF server implementation.</ t> | |||
| <t>The "preceding" and "following" axes <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be u sed. These | <t>The "preceding" and "following" axes <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be u sed. These | |||
| constructs rely on XML document order within a NETCONF or RESTCONF | constructs rely on XML document order within a NETCONF or RESTCONF | |||
| server configuration database, which may not be supported | server configuration database, which may not be supported | |||
| consistently or produce reliable results across implementations. | consistently or produce reliable results across implementations. | |||
| Predicate expressions based on static node properties (e.g., element | Predicate expressions based on static node properties (e.g., element | |||
| skipping to change at line 1415 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1910 ¶ | |||
| carefully.</t> | carefully.</t> | |||
| <t>Explicit XPath data type conversions <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used (e. g., "string", | <t>Explicit XPath data type conversions <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used (e. g., "string", | |||
| "boolean", or "number" functions), instead of implicit XPath data | "boolean", or "number" functions), instead of implicit XPath data | |||
| type conversions.</t> | type conversions.</t> | |||
| <t>XPath expressions that contain a literal value representing a YANG | <t>XPath expressions that contain a literal value representing a YANG | |||
| identity <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> always include the declared prefix of the modu le | identity <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> always include the declared prefix of the modu le | |||
| where the identity is defined.</t> | where the identity is defined.</t> | |||
| <t>XPath expressions for "when" statements <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> r eference the | <t>XPath expressions for "when" statements <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> r eference the | |||
| context node or any descendant nodes of the context node. They <bcp14>MAY</b cp14> | context node or any descendant nodes of the context node. They <bcp14>MAY</b cp14> | |||
| reference descendant nodes if the "when" statement is contained | reference descendant nodes if the "when" statement is contained | |||
| within an "augment" statement, and the referenced nodes are not | within an "augment" statement and the referenced nodes are not | |||
| defined within the "augment" statement.</t> | defined within the "augment" statement.</t> | |||
| <t>Example:</t> | <t>Example:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| augment "/rt:active-route/rt:input/rt:destination-address" { | augment "/rt:active-route/rt:input/rt:destination-address" { | |||
| when "derived-from-or-self(rt:address-family, " | when "derived-from-or-self(rt:address-family, " | |||
| + "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" { | + "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast."; | "This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast."; | |||
| } | } | |||
| // nodes defined here within the augment-stmt | // nodes defined here within the augment-stmt | |||
| // cannot be referenced in the when-stmt | // cannot be referenced in the when-stmt | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="wildcards"> | <section anchor="wildcards"> | |||
| <name>Wildcards</name> | <name>Wildcards</name> | |||
| <t>It is possible to construct XPath expressions that will evaluate | <t>It is possible to construct XPath expressions that will evaluate | |||
| differently when combined with several modules within a server | differently when combined with several modules within a server | |||
| implementation rather than when evaluated within the single module. | implementation rather than when evaluated within the single module. | |||
| This is due to augmenting nodes from other modules.</t> | This is due to augmenting nodes from other modules.</t> | |||
| <t>Wildcard expansion is done within a server against all the nodes fr om | <t>Wildcard expansion is done within a server against all the nodes fr om | |||
| all namespaces, so it is possible for a "must" or "when" expression | all namespaces, so it is possible for a "must" or "when" expression | |||
| that uses the <tt>'*'</tt> operator to always evaluate to false if processed | that uses the <tt>'*'</tt> operator to always evaluate to false if processed | |||
| within a single YANG module. In such cases, the "description" | within a single YANG module. In such cases, the "description" | |||
| statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> clarify that augmenting objects are expected to | statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> clarify that augmenting objects are expected to | |||
| match the wildcard expansion.</t> | match the wildcard expansion.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| when /foo/services/*/active { | when /foo/services/*/active { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "No services directly defined in this module. | "No services directly defined in this module. | |||
| Matches objects that have augmented the services container."; | Matches objects that have augmented the services container."; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="boolean-expressions"> | <section anchor="boolean-expressions"> | |||
| <name>Boolean Expressions</name> | <name>Boolean Expressions</name> | |||
| <t>The YANG "must" and "when" statements use an XPath boolean expressi on | <t>The YANG "must" and "when" statements use an XPath boolean expressi on | |||
| to define the test condition for the statement. It is important to | to define the test condition for the statement. It is important to | |||
| specify these expressions in a way that will not cause inadvertent | specify these expressions in a way that will not cause inadvertent | |||
| changes in the result if the objects referenced in the expression are | changes in the result if the objects referenced in the expression are | |||
| updated in future revisions of the module.</t> | updated in future revisions of the module.</t> | |||
| <t>For example, the leaf "foo2" must exist if the leaf "foo1" is equal | <t>For example, the leaf "foo2" must exist if the leaf "foo1" is equal | |||
| to "one" or "three":</t> | to "one" or "three":</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf foo1 { | leaf foo1 { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum one; | enum one; | |||
| enum two; | enum two; | |||
| enum three; | enum three; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| leaf foo2 { | leaf foo2 { | |||
| // INCORRECT | // INCORRECT | |||
| must "/f:foo1 != 'two'"; | must "/f:foo1 != 'two'"; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| leaf foo2 { | leaf foo2 { | |||
| // CORRECT | // CORRECT | |||
| must "/f:foo1 = 'one' or /f:foo1 = 'three'"; | must "/f:foo1 = 'one' or /f:foo1 = 'three'"; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>In the next revision of the module, leaf "foo1" is extended with a | <t>In the next revision of the module, leaf "foo1" is extended with a | |||
| new enum named "four":</t> | new enum named "four":</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| leaf foo1 { | leaf foo1 { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum one; | enum one; | |||
| enum two; | enum two; | |||
| enum three; | enum three; | |||
| enum four; | enum four; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Now the first XPath expression will allow the enum "four" to be | <t>Now the first XPath expression will allow the enum "four" to be | |||
| accepted in addition to the "one" and "three" enum values.</t> | accepted in addition to the "one" and "three" enum values.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="yang-definition-lifecycle-management"> | <section anchor="yang-definition-lifecycle-management"> | |||
| <name>YANG Definition Lifecycle Management</name> | <name>YANG Definition Lifecycle Management</name> | |||
| <t>The YANG status statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present within a def inition if its | <t>The YANG status statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present within a def inition if its | |||
| value is "deprecated" or "obsolete". The status <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be | value is "deprecated" or "obsolete". The status <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be | |||
| changed from "current" directly to "obsolete". An object <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be | changed from "current" directly to "obsolete". An object <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp1 4> be | |||
| available for at least one year after the publication date with a "deprecated " status before it | available for at least one year after the publication date with a "deprecated " status before it | |||
| is changed to "obsolete".</t> | is changed to "obsolete".</t> | |||
| <t>The module or submodule name <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be changed, once the document | <t>The module or submodule name <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be changed once the document | |||
| containing the module or submodule is published.</t> | containing the module or submodule is published.</t> | |||
| <t>The module namespace URI value <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be changed, on ce the document | <t>The module namespace URI value <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be changed onc e the document | |||
| containing the module is published.</t> | containing the module is published.</t> | |||
| <t>The revision date substatement within the import statement <bcp14>SHO ULD</bcp14> be | <t>The revision date substatement within the import statement <bcp14>SHO ULD</bcp14> be | |||
| present if any groupings are used from the external module.</t> | present if any groupings are used from the external module.</t> | |||
| <t>The revision date substatement within the include statement <bcp14>SH OULD</bcp14> be | <t>The revision date substatement within the include statement <bcp14>SH OULD</bcp14> be | |||
| present if any groupings are used from the external submodule.</t> | present if any groupings are used from the external submodule.</t> | |||
| <t>If an import statement is for a module from a stable source (e.g., an | <t>If an import statement is for a module from a stable source (e.g., an | |||
| RFC for an IETF module), then a reference-stmt <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be prese nt | RFC for an IETF module), then a reference-stmt <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be prese nt | |||
| within an import statement.</t> | within an import statement.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| import ietf-yang-types { | import ietf-yang-types { | |||
| prefix yang; | prefix yang; | |||
| reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>If submodules are used, then the document containing the main module | <t>If submodules are used, then the document containing the main module | |||
| <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be updated so that the main module revision date is equal to or | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be updated so that the main module revision date is equal to or | |||
| more recent than the revision date of any submodule that is (directly | more recent than the revision date of any submodule that is (directly | |||
| or indirectly) included by the main module.</t> | or indirectly) included by the main module.</t> | |||
| <t>Definitions for future use <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be specified in a module. Do | <t>Definitions for future use <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be specified in a module. Do | |||
| not specify placeholder objects like the "reserved" example below:</t> | not specify placeholder objects like the "reserved" example below:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf reserved { | leaf reserved { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This object has no purpose at this time, but a future | "This object has no purpose at this time, but a future | |||
| revision of this module might define a purpose | revision of this module might define a purpose | |||
| for this object."; | for this object."; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="module-header-meta-and-revision-statements"> | <section anchor="module-header-meta-and-revision-statements"> | |||
| <name>Module Header, Meta, and Revision Statements</name> | <name>Module Header, Meta, and Revision Statements</name> | |||
| <t>For published modules, the namespace <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a globall y unique URI, | <t>For published modules, the namespace <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a globall y unique URI, | |||
| as defined in <xref target="RFC3986"/>. This value is usually assigned by th e IANA.</t> | as defined in <xref target="RFC3986"/>. This value is usually assigned by th e IANA.</t> | |||
| <t>The "organization" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. If the module is | <t>The "organization" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. If the module is | |||
| contained in a document intended for IETF Standards Track status, | contained in a document intended for IETF Standards Track status, | |||
| then the organization <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be the IETF working group (WG) ch artered | then the organization <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be the IETF working group (WG) ch artered | |||
| to write the document. Exceptions include (but not limited): example modules, IANA-maintained modules, or modules contained in AD-sponsored documents. For ot her standards organizations, a similar | to write the document. Exceptions include (but are not limited to): example m odules, IANA-maintained modules, or modules contained in AD-sponsored documents. For other standards organizations, a similar | |||
| approach is also suggested.</t> | approach is also suggested.</t> | |||
| <t>The "contact" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. If the modul e is contained | <t>The "contact" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. If the modul e is contained | |||
| in a document intended for Standards Track status, then the WG web | in a document intended for Standards Track status, then the WG web | |||
| and mailing information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present, and the main docume nt | and mailing information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present, and the main docume nt | |||
| author or editor contact information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present. If | author or editor contact information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present. If | |||
| additional authors or editors exist, their contact information <bcp14>MAY</bc p14> be | additional authors or editors exist, their contact information <bcp14>MAY</bc p14> be | |||
| present. There is no need to include the contact information for WG | present. There is no need to include the contact information for WG | |||
| Chairs.</t> | Chairs.</t> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Please review our update to the following text to clarify | ||||
| the punctuation and use of the BCP 14 keyword. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| For modules published | ||||
| within IETF documents, the appropriate IETF Trust Copyright text MUST | ||||
| be present, as described in Section 3.1 and contain the following | ||||
| statement: | ||||
| Current: | ||||
| For modules published within IETF documents, | ||||
| the appropriate IETF Trust Copyright text MUST be present, as described | ||||
| in Section 3.1, and MUST contain the following statement: | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. For modu les published | <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present. For modu les published | |||
| within IETF documents, the appropriate IETF Trust Copyright text <bcp14>MUST< /bcp14> | within IETF documents, the appropriate IETF Trust Copyright text <bcp14>MUST< /bcp14> | |||
| be present, as described in Section 3.1 and contain the following statement:< | be present, as described in <xref target="module-copyright"/>, and <bcp14>MUS | |||
| /t> | T</bcp14> contain the following statement:</t> | |||
| <ul empty="true"> | ||||
| <li> | <blockquote><t>All revisions of IETF and IANA published modules can be found | |||
| <t>All revisions of IETF and IANA published modules can be found at | at the "YANG Parameters" registry group: <eref target="https://www.iana.org/assi | |||
| the "YANG Parameters" registry group: https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-para | gnments/yang-parameters" brackets="angle"/>.</t></blockquote> | |||
| meters.</t> | ||||
| </li> | ||||
| </ul> | ||||
| <t>If the module relies on information contained in other documents, | <t>If the module relies on information contained in other documents, | |||
| which are not the same documents implied by the import statements | which are not the same documents implied by the import statements | |||
| present in the module, then these documents <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be identified in the | present in the module, then these documents <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be identified in the | |||
| reference statement.</t> | reference statement.</t> | |||
| <t>A "revision" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present for each publis hed version of | <t>A "revision" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present for each publis hed version of | |||
| the module. The "revision" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have a "reference" | the module. The "revision" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have a "reference" | |||
| substatement. It <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> identify the published document that co ntains | substatement. It <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> identify the published document that co ntains | |||
| the module. Modules are often extracted from their original | the module. Modules are often extracted from their original | |||
| documents, and it is useful for developers and operators to know how | documents, and it is useful for developers and operators to know how | |||
| to find the original source document in a consistent manner. The | to find the original source document in a consistent manner. The | |||
| "revision" statement <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> have a "description" substatement. Fo r convenience, | "revision" statement <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> have a "description" substatement. Fo r convenience, | |||
| the description text of a new published revision may summarize any changes ma de | the description text of a new published revision may summarize any changes ma de | |||
| to a module compared to the previous published revision. Typically, that list | to a module compared to the previous published revision. Typically, that list | |||
| is a YANG-specific subset of the summary of changes listing any changes made from the RFC | is a YANG-specific subset of the summary of changes listing any changes made from the RFC | |||
| being updated or obsoleted as per <xref target="ID-Guidelines"/>.</t> | being updated or obsoleted as per <xref target="ID-Guidelines"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>The following example shows the revision statement for a published | <t>The following example shows the revision statement for a published | |||
| YANG module:</t> | YANG module:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| revision 2010-09-24 { | revision 2010-09-24 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <!--[rfced] We note that RFC 6021 and RFC 6991 have been obsoleted by RFC 9911. | ||||
| Please review mentions in the text and let us know how you would like to update. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The following example shows the revision statements for a published | <t>The following example shows the revision statements for a published | |||
| YANG module that updates a published module. The new revision statement | YANG module that updates a published module. The new revision statement | |||
| summarizes the changes compared to the previous published revision.</t> | summarizes the changes compared to the previous published revision.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| revision 2013-07-15 { | revision 2013-07-15 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This revision adds the following new data types: | "This revision adds the following new data types: | |||
| - yang:yang-identifier | - yang:yang-identifier | |||
| - yang:hex-string | - yang:hex-string | |||
| - yang:uuid | - yang:uuid | |||
| - yang:dotted-quad"; | - yang:dotted-quad"; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2010-09-24 { | revision 2010-09-24 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>For an unpublished module, a complete history of each unpublished | <t>For an unpublished module, a complete history of each unpublished | |||
| module revision is not required. That is, within a sequence of draft | module revision is not required. That is, within a sequence of draft | |||
| versions, only the most recent revision need be recorded in the | versions, only the most recent revision need be recorded in the | |||
| module. Do not remove or reuse a revision statement for a published | module. Do not remove or reuse a revision statement for a published | |||
| module. A new revision date is not required unless the module | module. A new revision date is not required unless the module | |||
| contents have changed. If the module contents have changed, then the | contents have changed. If the module contents have changed, then the | |||
| revision date of that new module version <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be updated to a date | revision date of that new module version <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be updated to a date | |||
| later than that of the previous version.</t> | later than that of the previous version.</t> | |||
| <t>The following example shows the revision statements for an | <t>The following example shows the revision statements for an | |||
| unpublished update to a published YANG module. The latest revision statement | unpublished update to a published YANG module. The latest revision statement | |||
| of the unpublished module summarizes the changes compared to the previous rev ision.</t> | of the unpublished module summarizes the changes compared to the previous rev ision.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| revision 2023-01-23 { | revision 2023-01-23 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This revision adds the following new data types: | "This revision adds the following new data types: | |||
| - yang:date-with-zone-offset | - yang:date-with-zone-offset | |||
| - yang:date-no-zone | - yang:date-no-zone | |||
| - yang:time-with-zone-offset | - yang:time-with-zone-offset | |||
| - yang:time-no-zone | - yang:time-no-zone | |||
| - yang:hours32 | - yang:hours32 | |||
| - yang:minutes32 | - yang:minutes32 | |||
| - yang:seconds32 | - yang:seconds32 | |||
| - yang:centiseconds32 | - yang:centiseconds32 | |||
| - yang:milliseconds32 | - yang:milliseconds32 | |||
| - yang:microseconds32 | - yang:microseconds32 | |||
| - yang:microseconds64 | - yang:microseconds64 | |||
| - yang:nanoseconds32 | - yang:nanoseconds32 | |||
| - yang:nanoseconds64 | - yang:nanoseconds64 | |||
| - yang:language-tag | - yang:language-tag | |||
| The yang-identifier definition has been aligned with YANG 1.1. | The yang-identifier definition has been aligned with YANG 1.1. | |||
| Several pattern statements have been improved."; | Several pattern statements have been improved."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2013-07-15 { | revision 2013-07-15 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This revision adds the following new data types: | "This revision adds the following new data types: | |||
| - yang:yang-identifier | - yang:yang-identifier | |||
| - yang:hex-string | - yang:hex-string | |||
| - yang:uuid | - yang:uuid | |||
| - yang:dotted-quad"; | - yang:dotted-quad"; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2010-09-24 { | revision 2010-09-24 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | "RFC 6021: Common YANG Data Types"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Would you like to add examples of "reference" | ||||
| substatements? The RPC and OPS ADs discussed this topic during | ||||
| IETF 123. The examples would show that the RFC title does not need | ||||
| to be included. (The exception is in the "revision" statement, | ||||
| where the title is typically included.) For example: | ||||
| reference (with section) | ||||
| "RFC 8665, Section 5 | ||||
| RFC 8666, Section 6"; | ||||
| reference (just RFC number) | ||||
| "RFC 8665 | ||||
| RFC 8666"; | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <section anchor="sec-namespace-assignments"> | <section anchor="sec-namespace-assignments"> | |||
| <name>Namespace Assignments</name> | <name>Namespace Assignments</name> | |||
| <t>It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that only valid YANG modules be incl uded in | <t>It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that only valid YANG modules be incl uded in | |||
| documents, whether or not the modules are published yet. This | documents, whether or not the modules are published yet. This | |||
| allows:</t> | allows:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>the module to compile correctly instead of generating disruptive fatal errors.</t> | <t>the module to compile correctly instead of generating disruptive fatal errors.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| skipping to change at line 1682 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2206 ¶ | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>early interoperability testing since independent implementations will use the same XML namespace value.</t> | <t>early interoperability testing since independent implementations will use the same XML namespace value.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Until a URI is assigned by the IANA, a proposed namespace URI <bcp14> MUST</bcp14> be | <t>Until a URI is assigned by the IANA, a proposed namespace URI <bcp14> MUST</bcp14> be | |||
| provided for the namespace statement in a YANG module. A value | provided for the namespace statement in a YANG module. A value | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be selected that is not likely to collide with other YA NG | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be selected that is not likely to collide with other YA NG | |||
| namespaces. Standard module names, prefixes, and URI strings already | namespaces. Standard module names, prefixes, and URI strings already | |||
| listed in the "YANG Module Names" registry group <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be u sed.</t> | listed in the "YANG Module Names" registry group <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be u sed.</t> | |||
| <t>A standard namespace statement value <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have the f ollowing form:</t> | <t>A standard namespace statement value <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have the f ollowing form:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | |||
| <URN prefix string>:<module-name> | <URN prefix string>:<module-name>]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>The following URN prefix string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for pub lished and | <t>The following URN prefix string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for pub lished and | |||
| unpublished YANG modules:</t> | unpublished YANG modules:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | |||
| urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang | urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>The following example URNs would be valid namespace statement values | <t>The following example URNs would be valid namespace statement values | |||
| for Standards Track modules:</t> | for Standards Track modules:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | |||
| urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-partial-lock | urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-partial-lock]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-state | urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-state]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>Note that a different URN prefix string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for modules | <t>Note that a different URN prefix string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used for modules | |||
| that are not Standards Track. The string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be selected | that are not Standards Track. The string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be selected | |||
| according to the guidelines in <xref section="5.3" sectionFormat="of" target= "RFC7950"/>.</t> | according to the guidelines in <xref section="5.3" sectionFormat="of" target= "RFC7950"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>The following URIs exemplify what might be used by modules that are | <t>The following URIs exemplify what might be used by modules that are | |||
| not Standards Track. Note that the domain "example.com" <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14 > be | not Standards Track. Note that the domain "example.com" <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14 > be | |||
| used by example modules in IETF I-Ds. These URIs are not intended to | used by example modules in I-Ds from the IETF Stream. These URIs are not int ended to | |||
| be dereferenced. They are used for module namespace identification | be dereferenced. They are used for module namespace identification | |||
| only.</t> | only.</t> | |||
| <t>Example URIs using URLs per <xref target="RFC3986"/>:</t> | <t>Example URIs using URLs per <xref target="RFC3986"/>:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | |||
| https://example.com/ns/example-interfaces | https://example.com/ns/example-interfaces]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| https://example.com/ns/example-system]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| https://example.com/ns/example-system | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>Example URIs using tags per <xref target="RFC4151"/>:</t> | <t>Example URIs using tags per <xref target="RFC4151"/>:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | |||
| tag:example.com,2017:example-interfaces | tag:example.com,2017:example-interfaces]]></sourcecode> | |||
| <sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| tag:example.com,2017:example-system]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| tag:example.com,2017:example-system | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="top-level-data-definitions"> | <section anchor="top-level-data-definitions"> | |||
| <name>Top-Level Data Definitions</name> | <name>Top-Level Data Definitions</name> | |||
| <t>The top-level data organization <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be considered c arefully, in | <t>The top-level data organization <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be considered c arefully, in | |||
| advance. Data model designers need to consider how the functionality | advance. Data model designers need to consider how the functionality | |||
| for a given protocol or protocol family will grow over time.</t> | for a given protocol or protocol family will grow over time.</t> | |||
| <t>The separation of configuration data and operational state <bcp14>SHO ULD</bcp14> be | <t>The separation of configuration data and operational state <bcp14>SHO ULD</bcp14> be | |||
| considered carefully. It is sometimes useful to define separate top- | considered carefully. It is sometimes useful to define separate top- | |||
| level containers for configuration and non-configuration data. For | level containers for configuration and non-configuration data. For | |||
| some existing top-level data nodes, configuration data was not in | some existing top-level data nodes, configuration data was not in | |||
| skipping to change at line 1761 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2285 ¶ | |||
| <t>Data model designers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use the most appropriate b uilt-in data | <t>Data model designers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use the most appropriate b uilt-in data | |||
| type for the particular application.</t> | type for the particular application.</t> | |||
| <t>The signed numeric data types (i.e., "int8", "int16", "int32", and | <t>The signed numeric data types (i.e., "int8", "int16", "int32", and | |||
| "int64") <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used unless negative values are allowed for | "int64") <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used unless negative values are allowed for | |||
| the desired semantics.</t> | the desired semantics.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-fve"> | <section anchor="sec-fve"> | |||
| <name>Fixed-Value Extensibility</name> | <name>Fixed-Value Extensibility</name> | |||
| <t>If the set of values is fixed and the data type contents are | <t>If the set of values is fixed and the data type contents are | |||
| controlled by a single naming authority (e.g., IANA), then an enumeration dat a | controlled by a single naming authority (e.g., IANA), then an enumeration dat a | |||
| type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used.</t> | type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf foo { | leaf foo { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum one; | enum one; | |||
| enum two; | enum two; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>If distributed extensibility or hierarchical organization of enumer ated values is required, then the | <t>If distributed extensibility or hierarchical organization of enumer ated values is required, then the | |||
| "identityref" data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used instead of an enumerati on or | "identityref" data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used instead of an enumerati on or | |||
| other built-in type.</t> | other built-in type.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| identity foo-type { | identity foo-type { | |||
| description "Base for the extensible type"; | description "Base for the extensible type"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| identity one { | identity one { | |||
| base f:foo-type; | base f:foo-type; | |||
| } | } | |||
| identity two { | identity two { | |||
| base f:foo-type; | base f:foo-type; | |||
| } | } | |||
| leaf foo { | leaf foo { | |||
| type identityref { | type identityref { | |||
| base f:foo-type; | base f:foo-type; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Note that any module can declare an identity with base "foo-type" | <t>Note that any module can declare an identity with base "foo-type" | |||
| that is valid for the "foo" leaf. Identityref values are considered | that is valid for the "foo" leaf. Identityref values are considered | |||
| to be qualified names.</t> | to be qualified names.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="patterns-and-ranges"> | <section anchor="patterns-and-ranges"> | |||
| <name>Patterns and Ranges</name> | <name>Patterns and Ranges</name> | |||
| <t>For string data types, if a machine-readable pattern can be defined | <t>For string data types, if a machine-readable pattern can be defined | |||
| for the desired semantics, then one or more pattern statements <bcp14>SHOULD< /bcp14> | for the desired semantics, then one or more pattern statements <bcp14>SHOULD< /bcp14> | |||
| be present. A single-quoted string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used to specify the | be present. A single-quoted string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used to specify the | |||
| pattern, since a double-quoted string can modify the content. If the | pattern, since a double-quoted string can modify the content. If the | |||
| patterns used in a type definition have known limitations such as | patterns used in a type definition have known limitations such as | |||
| false negative or false positive matches, then these limitations | false negative or false positive matches, then these limitations | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be documented within the typedef or data definition.</t > | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be documented within the typedef or data definition.</t > | |||
| <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | |||
| the "pattern" statement:</t> | the "pattern" statement:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| typedef ipv6-address-no-zone { | typedef ipv6-address-no-zone { | |||
| type inet:ipv6-address { | type inet:ipv6-address { | |||
| pattern '[0-9a-fA-F:\.]*'; | pattern '[0-9a-fA-F:\.]*'; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>For string data types, if the length of the string is required to b e | <t>For string data types, if the length of the string is required to b e | |||
| bounded in all implementations, then a length statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> b e | bounded in all implementations, then a length statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> b e | |||
| present.</t> | present.</t> | |||
| <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | |||
| the "length" statement:</t> | the "length" statement:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| typedef yang-identifier { | typedef yang-identifier { | |||
| type string { | type string { | |||
| length "1..max"; | length "1..max"; | |||
| pattern '[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]*'; | pattern '[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]*'; | |||
| pattern '.|..|[^xX].*|.[^mM].*|..[^lL].*'; | pattern '.|..|[^xX].*|.[^mM].*|..[^lL].*'; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>For numeric data types, if the values allowed by the intended | <t>For numeric data types, if the values allowed by the intended | |||
| semantics are different than those allowed by the unbounded intrinsic | semantics are different than those allowed by the unbounded intrinsic | |||
| data type (e.g., "int32"), then a range statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be pr esent.</t> | data type (e.g., "int32"), then a range statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be pr esent.</t> | |||
| <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | <t>The following typedef from <xref target="RFC6991"/> demonstrates th e proper use of | |||
| the "range" statement:</t> | the "range" statement:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| typedef dscp { | typedef dscp { | |||
| type uint8 { | type uint8 { | |||
| range "0..63"; | range "0..63"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="enumerations-and-bits"> | <section anchor="enumerations-and-bits"> | |||
| <name>Enumerations and Bits</name> | <name>Enumerations and Bits</name> | |||
| <t>For "enumeration" or "bits" data types, the semantics for each "enu m" | <t>For "enumeration" or "bits" data types, the semantics for each "enu m" | |||
| or "bit" <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be documented. A separate "description" state ment | or "bit" <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be documented. A separate "description" state ment | |||
| (within each "enum" or "bit" statement) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | (within each "enum" or "bit" statement) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf foo { | leaf foo { | |||
| // INCORRECT | // INCORRECT | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum one; | enum one; | |||
| enum two; | enum two; | |||
| } | } | |||
| description | description | |||
| "The foo enum... | "The foo enum... | |||
| one: The first enum | one: The first enum | |||
| two: The second enum"; | two: The second enum"; | |||
| skipping to change at line 1872 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2391 ¶ | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum one { | enum one { | |||
| description "The first enum"; | description "The first enum"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| enum two { | enum two { | |||
| description "The second enum"; | description "The second enum"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| description | description | |||
| "The foo enum... "; | "The foo enum... "; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="union-types"> | <section anchor="union-types"> | |||
| <name>Union Types</name> | <name>Union Types</name> | |||
| <t>The YANG "union" type is evaluated by testing a value against each | <t>The YANG "union" type is evaluated by testing a value against each | |||
| member type in the union. The first type definition that accepts a | member type in the union. The first type definition that accepts a | |||
| value as valid is the member type used. In general, member types | value as valid is the member type used. In general, member types | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be ordered from most restrictive to least restrictive t ypes.</t> | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be ordered from most restrictive to least restrictive t ypes.</t> | |||
| <t>In the following example, the "enumeration" type will never be | <t>In the following example, the "enumeration" type will never be | |||
| matched because the preceding "string" type will match everything.</t> | matched because the preceding "string" type will match everything.</t> | |||
| <t>Incorrect:</t> | <t>Incorrect:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| type union { | type union { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum up; | enum up; | |||
| enum down; | enum down; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Correct:</t> | <t>Correct:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| type union { | type union { | |||
| type enumeration { | type enumeration { | |||
| enum up; | enum up; | |||
| enum down; | enum down; | |||
| } | } | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>It is possible for different member types to match, depending on th e | <t>It is possible for different member types to match, depending on th e | |||
| input encoding format. In XML, all values are passed as string | input encoding format. In XML, all values are passed as string | |||
| nodes; but in JSON, there are different value types for numbers, | nodes; but in JSON, there are different value types for numbers, | |||
| booleans, and strings.</t> | booleans, and strings.</t> | |||
| <t>In the following example, a JSON numeric value will always be match ed | <t>In the following example, a JSON numeric value will always be match ed | |||
| by the "int32" type, but in XML the string value representing a | by the "int32" type, but in XML the string value representing a | |||
| number will be matched by the "string" type. The second version will | number will be matched by the "string" type. The second version will | |||
| match the "int32" member type no matter how the input is encoded.</t> | match the "int32" member type no matter how the input is encoded.</t> | |||
| <t>Incorrect:</t> | <t>Incorrect:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| type union { | type union { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| type int32; | type int32; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Correct:</t> | <t>Correct:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| type union { | type union { | |||
| type int32; | type int32; | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="empty-and-boolean"> | <section anchor="empty-and-boolean"> | |||
| <name>Empty and Boolean</name> | <name>Empty and Boolean</name> | |||
| <t>YANG provides an "empty" data type, which has one value (i.e., | <t>YANG provides an "empty" data type, which has one value (i.e., | |||
| present). The default is "not present", which is not actually a | present). The default is "not present", which is not actually a | |||
| value. When used within a list key, only one value can (and must) | value. When used within a list key, only one value can (and must) | |||
| exist for this key leaf. The type "empty" <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used for a | exist for this key leaf. The type "empty" <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used for a | |||
| key leaf since it is pointless.</t> | key leaf since it is pointless.</t> | |||
| <t>There is really no difference between a leaf of type "empty" and a | <t>There is really no difference between a leaf of type "empty" and a | |||
| leaf-list of type "empty". Both are limited to one instance. The | leaf-list of type "empty". Both are limited to one instance. The | |||
| skipping to change at line 1954 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2468 ¶ | |||
| "false"). When used within a list key, two entries can exist for | "false"). When used within a list key, two entries can exist for | |||
| this key leaf. Default values are ignored for key leafs, but a | this key leaf. Default values are ignored for key leafs, but a | |||
| default statement is often used for plain boolean leafs. The | default statement is often used for plain boolean leafs. The | |||
| advantage of the "boolean" type is that the leaf or leaf-list has a | advantage of the "boolean" type is that the leaf or leaf-list has a | |||
| clear representation for both values. The default value is usually | clear representation for both values. The default value is usually | |||
| not returned unless explicitly requested by the client, so no bytes | not returned unless explicitly requested by the client, so no bytes | |||
| are used in a typical representation.</t> | are used in a typical representation.</t> | |||
| <t>In general, the "boolean" data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used i nstead of the | <t>In general, the "boolean" data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used i nstead of the | |||
| "empty" data type, as shown in the example below:</t> | "empty" data type, as shown in the example below:</t> | |||
| <t>Incorrect:</t> | <t>Incorrect:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf flag1 { | leaf flag1 { | |||
| type empty; | type empty; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Correct:</t> | <t>Correct:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| leaf flag2 { | leaf flag2 { | |||
| type boolean; | type boolean; | |||
| default false; | default false; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="reusable-type-definitions"> | <section anchor="reusable-type-definitions"> | |||
| <name>Reusable Type Definitions</name> | <name>Reusable Type Definitions</name> | |||
| <t>If an appropriate derived type exists in any standard module, such as | <t>If an appropriate derived type exists in any standard module, such as | |||
| <xref target="RFC6991"/>, then it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used instead of de fining a new derived | <xref target="RFC6991"/>, then it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used instead of de fining a new derived | |||
| type.</t> | type.</t> | |||
| <t>If an appropriate units identifier can be associated with the desired | <t>If an appropriate units identifier can be associated with the desired | |||
| semantics, then a units statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | semantics, then a units statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <t>If an appropriate default value can be associated with the desired | <t>If an appropriate default value can be associated with the desired | |||
| semantics, then a default statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | semantics, then a default statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <t>If a significant number of derived types are defined, and it is | <t>If a significant number of derived types are defined, and it is | |||
| anticipated that these data types will be reused by multiple modules, | anticipated that these data types will be reused by multiple modules, | |||
| then these derived types <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be contained in a separate mod ule or | then these derived types <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be contained in a separate mod ule or | |||
| submodule, to allow easier reuse without unnecessary coupling.</t> | submodule to allow easier reuse without unnecessary coupling.</t> | |||
| <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <t>If the type definition semantics are defined in an external document | <t>If the type definition semantics are defined in an external document | |||
| (other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement), | (other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement), | |||
| then the reference statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | then the reference statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="reusable-groupings"> | <section anchor="reusable-groupings"> | |||
| <name>Reusable Groupings</name> | <name>Reusable Groupings</name> | |||
| <t>A reusable grouping is a YANG grouping that can be imported by | <t>A reusable grouping is a YANG grouping that can be imported by | |||
| another module and is intended for use by other modules. This is not | another module and is intended for use by other modules. This is not | |||
| the same as a grouping that is used within the module in which it is | the same as a grouping that is used within the module in which it is | |||
| skipping to change at line 2108 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2620 ¶ | |||
| in order, as the first child nodes within the list. The key leafs | in order, as the first child nodes within the list. The key leafs | |||
| <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be in a different order in some cases, e.g., they are defi ned in | <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be in a different order in some cases, e.g., they are defi ned in | |||
| a grouping, and not inline in the list statement.</t> | a grouping, and not inline in the list statement.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="non-presence-containers"> | <section anchor="non-presence-containers"> | |||
| <name>Non-Presence Containers</name> | <name>Non-Presence Containers</name> | |||
| <t>A non-presence container is used to organize data into specific | <t>A non-presence container is used to organize data into specific | |||
| subtrees. It is not intended to have semantics within the data model | subtrees. It is not intended to have semantics within the data model | |||
| beyond this purpose, although YANG allows it (e.g., a "must" | beyond this purpose, although YANG allows it (e.g., a "must" | |||
| statement within the non-presence container).</t> | statement within the non-presence container).</t> | |||
| <t>Example using container wrappers:</t> | <t>Example using container wrappers:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| container top { | container top { | |||
| container foos { | container foos { | |||
| list foo { ... } | list foo { ... } | |||
| } | } | |||
| container bars { | container bars { | |||
| list bar { ... } | list bar { ... } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Example without container wrappers:</t> | <t>Example without container wrappers:</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| container top { | container top { | |||
| list foo { ... } | list foo { ... } | |||
| list bar { ... } | list bar { ... } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>Use of non-presence containers to organize data is a subjective | <t>Use of non-presence containers to organize data is a subjective | |||
| matter similar to use of subdirectories in a file system. Although | matter similar to use of subdirectories in a file system. Although | |||
| these containers do not have any semantics, they can impact protocol | these containers do not have any semantics, they can impact protocol | |||
| operations for the descendant data nodes within a non-presence | operations for the descendant data nodes within a non-presence | |||
| container, so use of these containers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be considered car efully.</t> | container, so use of these containers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be considered car efully.</t> | |||
| <t>The NETCONF and RESTCONF protocols do not currently support the | <t>The NETCONF and RESTCONF protocols do not currently support the | |||
| ability to delete all list (or leaf-list) entries at once. This | ability to delete all list (or leaf-list) entries at once. This | |||
| deficiency is sometimes avoided by use of a parent container (i.e., | deficiency is sometimes avoided by use of a parent container (i.e., | |||
| deleting the container also removes all child entries).</t> | deleting the container also removes all child entries).</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2175 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2685 ¶ | |||
| <section anchor="notification-definitions"> | <section anchor="notification-definitions"> | |||
| <name>Notification Definitions</name> | <name>Notification Definitions</name> | |||
| <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | <t>The "description" statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <t>If the notification semantics are defined in an external document | <t>If the notification semantics are defined in an external document | |||
| (other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement), | (other than another YANG module indicated by an import statement), | |||
| then a reference statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | then a reference statement <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be present.</t> | |||
| <t>If the notification refers to a specific resource instance, then this | <t>If the notification refers to a specific resource instance, then this | |||
| instance <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be identified in the notification data. This is | instance <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be identified in the notification data. This is | |||
| usually done by including "leafref" leaf nodes with the key leaf | usually done by including "leafref" leaf nodes with the key leaf | |||
| values for the resource instance. For example:</t> | values for the resource instance. For example:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| notification interface-up { | notification interface-up { | |||
| description "Sent when an interface is activated."; | description "Sent when an interface is activated."; | |||
| leaf name { | leaf name { | |||
| type leafref { | type leafref { | |||
| path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name"; | path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Note that there are no formal YANG statements to identify any data | <t>Note that there are no formal YANG statements to identify any data | |||
| node resources associated with a notification. The "description" | node resources associated with a notification. The "description" | |||
| statement for the notification <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> specify if and how the | statement for the notification <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> specify if and how the | |||
| notification identifies any data node resources associated with the | notification identifies any data node resources associated with the | |||
| specific event.</t> | specific event.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="feature-definitions"> | <section anchor="feature-definitions"> | |||
| <name>Feature Definitions</name> | <name>Feature Definitions</name> | |||
| <t>The YANG "feature" statement is used to define a label for a set of | <t>The YANG "feature" statement is used to define a label for a set of | |||
| optional functionality within a module. The "if-feature" statement | optional functionality within a module. The "if-feature" statement | |||
| is used in the YANG statements associated with a feature. The | is used in the YANG statements associated with a feature. The | |||
| description-stmt within a feature-stmt <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify any intera ctions | description-stmt within a feature-stmt <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify any intera ctions | |||
| with other features.</t> | with other features.</t> | |||
| <t>The set of YANG features defined in a module should be considered | <t>The set of YANG features defined in a module should be considered | |||
| carefully. Very fine granular features increase interoperability | carefully. Very fine granular features increase interoperability | |||
| complexity and should be avoided. A likely misuse of the feature | complexity and should be avoided. A likely misuse of the feature | |||
| mechanism is the tagging of individual leafs (e.g., counters) with | mechanism is the tagging of individual leafs (e.g., counters) with | |||
| separate features.</t> | separate features.</t> | |||
| <t>If there is a large set of objects associated with a YANG feature, | <t>If there is a large set of objects associated with a YANG feature, | |||
| then consider moving those objects to a separate module, instead of | then consider moving those objects to a separate module instead of | |||
| using a YANG feature. Note that the set of features within a module | using a YANG feature. Note that the set of features within a module | |||
| is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules | is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules | |||
| within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identify. Module | within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identify. Module | |||
| names with a common prefix can help readers identify the set of | names with a common prefix can help readers identify the set of | |||
| related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and | related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and | |||
| installed all the relevant modules.</t> | installed all the relevant modules.</t> | |||
| <t>Another consideration for deciding whether to create a new module or | <t>Another consideration for deciding whether to create a new module or | |||
| add a YANG feature is the stability of the module in question. It | add a YANG feature is the stability of the module in question. It | |||
| may be desirable to have a stable base module that is not changed | may be desirable to have a stable base module that is not changed | |||
| frequently. If new functionality is placed in a separate module, | frequently. If new functionality is placed in a separate module, | |||
| then the base module does not need to be republished. If it is | then the base module does not need to be republished. If it is | |||
| designed as a YANG feature, then the module will need to be | designed as a YANG feature, then the module will need to be | |||
| republished.</t> | republished.</t> | |||
| <t>If one feature requires implementation of another feature, then an | <t>If one feature requires implementation of another feature, then an | |||
| "if-feature" statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used in the dependent "featur e" | "if-feature" statement <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used in the dependent "featur e" | |||
| statement.</t> | statement.</t> | |||
| <t>For example, feature2 requires implementation of feature1:</t> | <t>For example, feature2 requires implementation of feature1:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| feature feature1 { | feature feature1 { | |||
| description "Some protocol feature"; | description "Some protocol feature"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| feature feature2 { | feature feature2 { | |||
| if-feature "feature1"; | if-feature "feature1"; | |||
| description "Another protocol feature"; | description "Another protocol feature"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="yang-data-node-constraints"> | <section anchor="yang-data-node-constraints"> | |||
| <name>YANG Data Node Constraints</name> | <name>YANG Data Node Constraints</name> | |||
| <section anchor="controlling-quantity"> | <section anchor="controlling-quantity"> | |||
| <name>Controlling Quantity</name> | <name>Controlling Quantity</name> | |||
| <t>The "min-elements" and "max-elements" statements can be used to | <t>The "min-elements" and "max-elements" statements can be used to | |||
| control how many list or leaf-list instances are required for a | control how many list or leaf-list instances are required for a | |||
| particular data node. YANG constraint statements <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be us ed to | particular data node. YANG constraint statements <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be us ed to | |||
| identify conditions that apply to all implementations of the data | identify conditions that apply to all implementations of the data | |||
| model. If platform-specific limitations (e.g., the "max-elements" | model. If platform-specific limitations (e.g., the "max-elements" | |||
| skipping to change at line 2281 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2790 ¶ | |||
| statement. The data definition statements <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be added inl ine | statement. The data definition statements <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be added inl ine | |||
| instead.</t> | instead.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="conditional-augment-statements"> | <section anchor="conditional-augment-statements"> | |||
| <name>Conditional Augment Statements</name> | <name>Conditional Augment Statements</name> | |||
| <t>The "augment" statement is often used together with the "when" | <t>The "augment" statement is often used together with the "when" | |||
| statement and/or "if-feature" statement to make the augmentation | statement and/or "if-feature" statement to make the augmentation | |||
| conditional on some portion of the data model.</t> | conditional on some portion of the data model.</t> | |||
| <t>The following example from <xref target="RFC8343"/> shows how a con ditional | <t>The following example from <xref target="RFC8343"/> shows how a con ditional | |||
| container called "ethernet" is added to the "interface" list only for | container called "ethernet" is added to the "interface" list only for | |||
| entries of the type "ethernetCsmacd".</t> | entries of the type "ethernetCsmacd".</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { | augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { | |||
| when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'"; | when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'"; | |||
| container ethernet { | container ethernet { | |||
| leaf duplex { | leaf duplex { | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="conditionally-mandatory-data-definition-statements"> | <section anchor="conditionally-mandatory-data-definition-statements"> | |||
| <name>Conditionally Mandatory Data Definition Statements</name> | <name>Conditionally Mandatory Data Definition Statements</name> | |||
| <t>YANG has very specific rules about how configuration data can be | <t>YANG has very specific rules about how configuration data can be | |||
| updated in new releases of a module. These rules allow an "old | updated in new releases of a module. These rules allow an "old | |||
| client" to continue interoperating with a "new server".</t> | client" to continue interoperating with a "new server".</t> | |||
| <t>If data nodes are added to an existing entry, the old client <bcp14 >MUST NOT</bcp14> | <t>If data nodes are added to an existing entry, the old client <bcp14 >MUST NOT</bcp14> | |||
| be required to provide any mandatory parameters that were not in the | be required to provide any mandatory parameters that were not in the | |||
| original module definition.</t> | original module definition.</t> | |||
| <t>It is possible to add conditional "augment" statements such that th e | <t>It is possible to add conditional "augment" statements such that th e | |||
| skipping to change at line 2319 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2827 ¶ | |||
| so it is not safe to add mandatory augmenting data nodes based on the | so it is not safe to add mandatory augmenting data nodes based on the | |||
| "if-feature" statement.</t> | "if-feature" statement.</t> | |||
| <t>The XPath "when" statement condition <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> refere nce data outside | <t>The XPath "when" statement condition <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> refere nce data outside | |||
| of the target data node because the client does not have any control | of the target data node because the client does not have any control | |||
| over this external data.</t> | over this external data.</t> | |||
| <t>In the following sample, it is okay to augment the "interface" | <t>In the following sample, it is okay to augment the "interface" | |||
| entry with "mandatory-leaf" because the augmentation depends on | entry with "mandatory-leaf" because the augmentation depends on | |||
| support for "some-new-iftype". The old client does not know about | support for "some-new-iftype". The old client does not know about | |||
| this type, so it would never select this type; therefore, it would | this type, so it would never select this type; therefore, it would | |||
| not add a mandatory data node.</t> | not add a mandatory data node.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| module example-module { | module example-module { | |||
| yang-version 1.1; | yang-version 1.1; | |||
| namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-module"; | namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-module"; | |||
| prefix mymod; | prefix mymod; | |||
| import iana-if-type { prefix iana; } | import iana-if-type { prefix iana; } | |||
| import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } | import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } | |||
| identity some-new-iftype { | identity some-new-iftype { | |||
| skipping to change at line 2341 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2849 ¶ | |||
| } | } | |||
| augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { | augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { | |||
| when "if:type = 'mymod:some-new-iftype'"; | when "if:type = 'mymod:some-new-iftype'"; | |||
| leaf mandatory-leaf { | leaf mandatory-leaf { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Note that this practice is safe only for creating data resources. It | <t>Note that this practice is safe only for creating data resources. It | |||
| is not safe for replacing or modifying resources if the client does | is not safe for replacing or modifying resources if the client does | |||
| not know about the new condition. The YANG data model <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be | not know about the new condition. The YANG data model <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be | |||
| packaged in a way that requires the client to be aware of the | packaged in a way that requires the client to be aware of the | |||
| mandatory data nodes if it is aware of the condition for this data. | mandatory data nodes if it is aware of the condition for this data. | |||
| In the example above, the "some-new-iftype" identity is defined in | In the example above, the "some-new-iftype" identity is defined in | |||
| the same module as the "mandatory-leaf" data definition statement.</t> | the same module as the "mandatory-leaf" data definition statement.</t> | |||
| <t>This practice is not safe for identities defined in a common module | <t>This practice is not safe for identities defined in a common module | |||
| such as "iana-if-type" because the client is not required to know | such as "iana-if-type" because the client is not required to know | |||
| about "my-module" just because it knows about the "iana-if-type" | about "my-module" just because it knows about the "iana-if-type" | |||
| skipping to change at line 2378 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2885 ¶ | |||
| modules from regular YANG definitions. This allows the deviations to | modules from regular YANG definitions. This allows the deviations to | |||
| be platform specific and/or temporary.</t> | be platform specific and/or temporary.</t> | |||
| <t>The order that deviation statements are evaluated can affect the | <t>The order that deviation statements are evaluated can affect the | |||
| result. Therefore, multiple deviation statements in the same module, | result. Therefore, multiple deviation statements in the same module, | |||
| for the same target object, <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used.</t> | for the same target object, <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used.</t> | |||
| <t>The "max-elements" statement is intended to describe an architectural | <t>The "max-elements" statement is intended to describe an architectural | |||
| limit to the number of list entries. It is not intended to describe | limit to the number of list entries. It is not intended to describe | |||
| platform limitations. It is better to use a "deviation" statement | platform limitations. It is better to use a "deviation" statement | |||
| for the platforms that have a hard resource limit.</t> | for the platforms that have a hard resource limit.</t> | |||
| <t>Example documenting platform resource limits:</t> | <t>Example documenting platform resource limits:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| Wrong: (max-elements in the list itself) | ||||
| <t>Wrong: (max-elements in the list itself)</t> | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| container backups { | container backups { | |||
| list backup { | list backup { | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| max-elements 10; | max-elements 10; | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| Correct: (max-elements in a deviation) | ||||
| <t>Correct: (max-elements in a deviation)</t> | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| deviation /bk:backups/bk:backup { | deviation /bk:backups/bk:backup { | |||
| deviate add { | deviate add { | |||
| max-elements 10; | max-elements 10; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="extension-statements"> | <section anchor="extension-statements"> | |||
| <name>Extension Statements</name> | <name>Extension Statements</name> | |||
| <t>The YANG "extension" statement is used to specify external | <t>The YANG "extension" statement is used to specify external | |||
| definitions. This appears in the YANG syntax as an | definitions. This appears in the YANG syntax as an | |||
| "unknown-statement". Usage of extension statements in a published | "unknown-statement". Usage of extension statements in a published | |||
| module needs to be considered carefully.</t> | module needs to be considered carefully.</t> | |||
| <t>The following guidelines apply to the usage of YANG extensions:</t> | <t>The following guidelines apply to the usage of YANG extensions:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2476 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2981 ¶ | |||
| <t>The relationship between configuration and operational state has been | <t>The relationship between configuration and operational state has been | |||
| clarified in NMDA <xref target="RFC8342"/>.</t> | clarified in NMDA <xref target="RFC8342"/>.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="use-of-leafref-for-key-correlation"> | <section anchor="use-of-leafref-for-key-correlation"> | |||
| <name>Use of "leafref" for Key Correlation</name> | <name>Use of "leafref" for Key Correlation</name> | |||
| <t>Sometimes it is not practical to augment a data structure. For | <t>Sometimes it is not practical to augment a data structure. For | |||
| example, the correlated data could have different keys or contain | example, the correlated data could have different keys or contain | |||
| mandatory nodes.</t> | mandatory nodes.</t> | |||
| <t>The following example shows the use of the "leafref" data type for | <t>The following example shows the use of the "leafref" data type for | |||
| data correlation purposes:</t> | data correlation purposes:</t> | |||
| <t>Not preferred:</t> | <t>Not preferred:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| list foo { | list foo { | |||
| key name; | key name; | |||
| leaf name { | leaf name { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | } | |||
| list foo-addon { | list foo-addon { | |||
| key name; | key name; | |||
| config false; | config false; | |||
| leaf name { | leaf name { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Preferred:</t> | <t>Preferred:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| list foo { | list foo { | |||
| key name; | key name; | |||
| leaf name { | leaf name { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| } | } | |||
| list foo-addon { | list foo-addon { | |||
| key name; | key name; | |||
| skipping to change at line 2517 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3021 ¶ | |||
| leaf name { | leaf name { | |||
| type leafref { | type leafref { | |||
| path "/foo/name"; | path "/foo/name"; | |||
| require-instance false; | require-instance false; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| leaf addon { | leaf addon { | |||
| type string; | type string; | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-op-state"> | <section anchor="sec-op-state"> | |||
| <name>Operational State</name> | <name>Operational State</name> | |||
| <t>The modeling of operational state with YANG has been refined over | <t>The modeling of operational state with YANG has been refined over | |||
| time. At first, only data that has a "config" statement value of | time. At first, only data that has a "config" statement value of | |||
| "false" was considered to be operational state. This data was not | "false" was considered to be operational state. This data was not | |||
| considered to be part of any datastore, which made the YANG XPath | considered to be part of any datastore, which made the YANG XPath | |||
| definition much more complicated.</t> | definition much more complicated.</t> | |||
| <t>Operational state is now modeled using YANG according to the NMDA | <t>Operational state is now modeled using YANG according to the NMDA | |||
| skipping to change at line 2544 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3047 ¶ | |||
| <t>This section describes some data modeling issues related to | <t>This section describes some data modeling issues related to | |||
| operational state and guidelines for transitioning YANG data model | operational state and guidelines for transitioning YANG data model | |||
| design to be NMDA compatible.</t> | design to be NMDA compatible.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="combining-operational-state-and-configuration-data"> | <section anchor="combining-operational-state-and-configuration-data"> | |||
| <name>Combining Operational State and Configuration Data</name> | <name>Combining Operational State and Configuration Data</name> | |||
| <t>If possible, operational state <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be combined wi th its associated | <t>If possible, operational state <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be combined wi th its associated | |||
| configuration data. This prevents duplication of key leafs and | configuration data. This prevents duplication of key leafs and | |||
| ancestor nodes. It also prevents race conditions for retrieval of | ancestor nodes. It also prevents race conditions for retrieval of | |||
| dynamic entries and allows configuration and operational state to be | dynamic entries and allows configuration and operational state to be | |||
| retrieved together with minimal message overhead.</t> | retrieved together with minimal message overhead.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| container foo { | container foo { | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| // contains "config true" and "config false" nodes that have | // contains "config true" and "config false" nodes that have | |||
| // no corresponding "config true" object (e.g., counters) | // no corresponding "config true" object (e.g., counters) | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-4.23.2"> | <section anchor="sec-4.23.2"> | |||
| <name>Representing Operational Values of Configuration Data</name> | <name>Representing Operational Values of Configuration Data</name> | |||
| <t>If possible, the same data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used to re present the | <t>If possible, the same data type <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used to re present the | |||
| configured value and the operational value, for a given leaf or leaf- | configured value and the operational value, for a given leaf or leaf- | |||
| list object.</t> | list object.</t> | |||
| <t>Sometimes the configured value set is different than the operationa l | <t>Sometimes the configured value set is different than the operationa l | |||
| value set for that object, for example, the "admin-status" and | value set for that object, for example, the "admin-status" and | |||
| "oper-status" leafs in <xref target="RFC8343"/>. In this case, a separate ob ject | "oper-status" leafs in <xref target="RFC8343"/>. In this case, a separate ob ject | |||
| <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to represent the configured and operational values .</t> | <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to represent the configured and operational values .</t> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2595 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3097 ¶ | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be defined to provide the operational value for | <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be defined to provide the operational value for | |||
| configuration nodes, except when the value space of a configured and | configuration nodes, except when the value space of a configured and | |||
| operational value may differ, in which case a distinct "config false" | operational value may differ, in which case a distinct "config false" | |||
| node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be defined to hold the operational value for the | node <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be defined to hold the operational value for the | |||
| configured node.</t> | configured node.</t> | |||
| <t>The following guidelines are meant to help modelers develop YANG | <t>The following guidelines are meant to help modelers develop YANG | |||
| modules that will maximize the utility of the model with both current | modules that will maximize the utility of the model with both current | |||
| and new implementations.</t> | and new implementations.</t> | |||
| <t>New modules and modules that are not concerned with the operational | <t>New modules and modules that are not concerned with the operational | |||
| state of configuration information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> immediately be struc tured | state of configuration information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> immediately be struc tured | |||
| to be NMDA compatible, as described in Section 4.23.1. This | to be NMDA compatible, as described in <xref target="combining-operational-st ate-and-configuration-data"/>. This | |||
| transition <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be deferred if the module does not contain any | transition <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be deferred if the module does not contain any | |||
| configuration datastore objects.</t> | configuration datastore objects.</t> | |||
| <t>The remaining are options that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed durin g the time that | <t>The remaining are options that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed durin g the time that | |||
| NMDA mechanisms are being defined.</t> | NMDA mechanisms are being defined.</t> | |||
| <ol group="bar" spacing="normal" type="(%c)"><li> | <ol group="bar" spacing="normal" type="(%c)"><li> | |||
| <t>Modules that require immediate support for the NMDA features | <t>Modules that require immediate support for the NMDA features | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be structured for NMDA. A temporary non-NMDA version o f | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be structured for NMDA. A temporary non-NMDA version o f | |||
| this type of module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> exist, as either an existing model or a | this type of module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> exist, as either an existing model or a | |||
| model created by hand or with suitable tools that mirror the | model created by hand or with suitable tools that mirror the | |||
| current modeling strategies. Both the NMDA and the non-NMDA | current modeling strategies. Both the NMDA and the non-NMDA | |||
| modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be published in the same document, with NMDA | modules <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be published in the same document, with NMDA | |||
| modules in the document main body and the non-NMDA modules in a | modules in the document main body and the non-NMDA modules in a | |||
| non-normative appendix. The use of the non-NMDA module will | non-normative appendix. The use of the non-NMDA module will | |||
| allow temporary bridging of the time period until NMDA | allow temporary bridging of the time period until NMDA | |||
| implementations are available.</t> | implementations are available.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>For published models, the model should be republished with an | <t>For published models, the model should be republished with an | |||
| NMDA-compatible structure, deprecating non-NMDA constructs. For | NMDA-compatible structure, deprecating non-NMDA constructs. For | |||
| example, the "ietf-interfaces" model in <xref target="RFC7223"/> has been | example, the "ietf-interfaces" model in <xref target="RFC7223"/> has been | |||
| restructured as an NMDA-compatible model in <xref target="RFC8343"/>. The | restructured as an NMDA-compatible model in <xref target="RFC8343"/> (which o bsoletes <xref target="RFC7223"/>). The | |||
| "/interfaces-state" hierarchy has been marked "status | "/interfaces-state" hierarchy has been marked "status | |||
| deprecated". Models that mark their "/foo-state" hierarchy with | deprecated". Models that mark their "/foo-state" hierarchy with | |||
| "status deprecated" will allow NMDA-capable implementations to | "status deprecated" will allow NMDA-capable implementations to | |||
| avoid the cost of duplicating the state nodes, while enabling | avoid the cost of duplicating the state nodes, while enabling | |||
| non-NMDA-capable implementations to utilize them for access to | non-NMDA-capable implementations to utilize them for access to | |||
| the operational values.</t> | the operational values.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>For models that augment models that have not been structured | <t>For models that augment models that have not been structured | |||
| with the NMDA, the modeler will have to consider the structure | with the NMDA, the modeler will have to consider the structure | |||
| of the base model and the guidelines listed above. Where | of the base model and the guidelines listed above. Where | |||
| possible, such models should move to new revisions of the base | possible, such models should move to new revisions of the base | |||
| model that are NMDA compatible. When that is not possible, | model that are NMDA compatible. When that is not possible, | |||
| augmenting "state" containers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be avoided, with the | augmenting "state" containers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be avoided, with the | |||
| expectation that the base model will be re-released with the | expectation that the base model will be re-released with the | |||
| state containers marked as deprecated. It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to | state containers marked as deprecated. It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to | |||
| augment only the "/foo" hierarchy of the base model. Where this | augment only the "/foo" hierarchy of the base model. Where this | |||
| recommendation cannot be followed, then any new "state" elements | recommendation cannot be followed, any new "state" elements | |||
| <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included in their own module.</t> | <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included in their own module.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ol> | </ol> | |||
| <section anchor="temporary-non-nmda-modules"> | <section anchor="temporary-non-nmda-modules"> | |||
| <name>Temporary Non-NMDA Modules</name> | <name>Temporary Non-NMDA Modules</name> | |||
| <t>A temporary non-NMDA module allows a non-NMDA-aware client to acc ess | <t>A temporary non-NMDA module allows a non-NMDA-aware client to acc ess | |||
| operational state from an NMDA-compliant server. It contains the | operational state from an NMDA-compliant server. It contains the | |||
| top-level "config false" data nodes that would have been defined in a | top-level "config false" data nodes that would have been defined in a | |||
| legacy YANG module (before NMDA).</t> | legacy YANG module (before NMDA).</t> | |||
| <t>A server that needs to support both NMDA and non-NMDA clients can | <t>A server that needs to support both NMDA and non-NMDA clients can | |||
| advertise both the new NMDA module and the temporary non-NMDA module. | advertise both the new NMDA module and the temporary non-NMDA module. | |||
| A non-NMDA client can use separate "foo" and "foo-state" subtrees, | A non-NMDA client can use separate "foo" and "foo-state" subtrees, | |||
| except the "foo-state" subtree is located in a different (temporary) | except the "foo-state" subtree is located in a different (temporary) | |||
| module. The NMDA module can be used by a non-NMDA client to access | module. The NMDA module can be used by a non-NMDA client to access | |||
| the conventional configuration datastores and the deprecated <tt><get>< /tt> | the conventional configuration datastores and the deprecated <tt><get>< /tt> | |||
| operation to access nested "config false" data nodes.</t> | operation to access nested "config false" data nodes.</t> | |||
| <t>To create the temporary non-NMDA model from an NMDA model, the | <t>To create the temporary non-NMDA model from an NMDA model, the | |||
| following steps can be taken:</t> | following steps can be taken:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Change the module name by appending "-state" to the original module name</t> | <t>Change the module name by appending "-state" to the original module name.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Change the namespace by appending "-state" to the original na mespace value</t> | <t>Change the namespace by appending "-state" to the original na mespace value.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Change the prefix by appending "-s" to the original prefix va lue</t> | <t>Change the prefix by appending "-s" to the original prefix va lue.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Add an import to the original module (e.g., for typedef defin itions)</t> | <t>Add an import to the original module (e.g., for typedef defin itions).</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Retain or create only the top-level nodes that have a "config " | <t>Retain or create only the top-level nodes that have a "config " | |||
| statement value "false". These subtrees represent "config false" | statement value "false". These subtrees represent "config false" | |||
| data nodes that were combined into the configuration subtree; | data nodes that were combined into the configuration subtree; | |||
| therefore, they are not available to non-NMDA aware clients. Set | therefore, they are not available to non-NMDA-aware clients. Set | |||
| the "status" statement to "deprecated" for each new node.</t> | the "status" statement to "deprecated" for each new node.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>The module description <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> clearly identify the module as a | <t>The module description <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> clearly identify the module as a | |||
| temporary non-NMDA module</t> | temporary non-NMDA module.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="example-create-a-new-nmda-module"> | <section anchor="example-create-a-new-nmda-module"> | |||
| <name>Example: Create a New NMDA Module</name> | <name>Example: Create a New NMDA Module</name> | |||
| <t>Create an NMDA-compliant module, using combined configuration and | <t>Create an NMDA-compliant module, using combined configuration and | |||
| state subtrees, whenever possible.</t> | state subtrees, whenever possible.</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| module example-foo { | module example-foo { | |||
| namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | |||
| prefix "foo"; | prefix "foo"; | |||
| container foo { | container foo { | |||
| // configuration data child nodes | // configuration data child nodes | |||
| // operational value in operational state datastore only | // operational value in operational state datastore only | |||
| // may contain "config false" nodes as needed | // may contain "config false" nodes as needed | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="example-convert-an-old-non-nmda-module"> | <section anchor="example-convert-an-old-non-nmda-module"> | |||
| <name>Example: Convert an Old Non-NMDA Module</name> | <name>Example: Convert an Old Non-NMDA Module</name> | |||
| <t>Do not remove non-compliant objects from existing modules. Inste ad, | <t>Do not remove non-compliant objects from existing modules. Inste ad, | |||
| change the status to "deprecated". At some point, usually after 1 | change the status to "deprecated". At some point, usually after 1 | |||
| year, the status <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be changed to "obsolete".</t> | year, the status <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be changed to "obsolete".</t> | |||
| <t>Old Module:</t> | <t>Old Module:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| module example-foo { | module example-foo { | |||
| namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | |||
| prefix "foo"; | prefix "foo"; | |||
| container foo { | container foo { | |||
| // configuration data child nodes | // configuration data child nodes | |||
| } | } | |||
| container foo-state { | container foo-state { | |||
| config false; | config false; | |||
| // operational state child nodes | // operational state child nodes | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <t>Converted NMDA Module:</t> | |||
| Converted NMDA Module: | ||||
| ]]></artwork> | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| module example-foo { | module example-foo { | |||
| namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo"; | |||
| prefix "foo"; | prefix "foo"; | |||
| container foo { | container foo { | |||
| // configuration data child nodes | // configuration data child nodes | |||
| // operational value in operational state datastore only | // operational value in operational state datastore only | |||
| // may contain "config false" nodes as needed | // may contain "config false" nodes as needed | |||
| // will contain any data nodes from old foo-state | // will contain any data nodes from old foo-state | |||
| } | } | |||
| // keep original foo-state but change status to deprecated | // keep original foo-state but change status to deprecated | |||
| container foo-state { | container foo-state { | |||
| config false; | config false; | |||
| status deprecated; | status deprecated; | |||
| // operational state child nodes | // operational state child nodes | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="example-create-a-temporary-nmda-module"> | <section anchor="example-create-a-temporary-nmda-module"> | |||
| <name>Example: Create a Temporary NMDA Module</name> | <name>Example: Create a Temporary NMDA Module</name> | |||
| <t>Create a new module that contains the top-level operational state | <t>Create a new module that contains the top-level operational state | |||
| data nodes that would have been available before they were combined | data nodes that would have been available before they were combined | |||
| with configuration data nodes (to be NMDA compliant).</t> | with configuration data nodes (to be NMDA compliant).</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| module example-foo-state { | module example-foo-state { | |||
| namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo-state"; | namespace "urn:example:params:xml:ns:yang:example-foo-state"; | |||
| prefix "foo-s"; | prefix "foo-s"; | |||
| // import new or converted module; not used in this example | // import new or converted module; not used in this example | |||
| import example-foo { prefix foo; } | import example-foo { prefix foo; } | |||
| container foo-state { | container foo-state { | |||
| config false; | config false; | |||
| status deprecated; | status deprecated; | |||
| // operational state child nodes | // operational state child nodes | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="performance-considerations"> | <section anchor="performance-considerations"> | |||
| <name>Performance Considerations</name> | <name>Performance Considerations</name> | |||
| <t>It is generally likely that certain YANG statements require more | <t>It is generally likely that certain YANG statements require more | |||
| runtime resources than other statements. Although there are no | runtime resources than other statements. Although there are no | |||
| performance requirements for YANG validation, the following | performance requirements for YANG validation, the following | |||
| information <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be considered when designing YANG data models: </t> | information <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be considered when designing YANG data models: </t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2796 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3294 ¶ | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="open-systems-considerations"> | <section anchor="open-systems-considerations"> | |||
| <name>Open Systems Considerations</name> | <name>Open Systems Considerations</name> | |||
| <t>Only the modules imported by a particular module can be assumed to be | <t>Only the modules imported by a particular module can be assumed to be | |||
| present in an implementation. An open system <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> include any | present in an implementation. An open system <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> include any | |||
| combination of YANG modules.</t> | combination of YANG modules.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="guidelines-for-constructs-specific-to-yang-11"> | <section anchor="guidelines-for-constructs-specific-to-yang-11"> | |||
| <name>Guidelines for Constructs Specific to YANG 1.1</name> | <name>Guidelines for Constructs Specific to YANG 1.1</name> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Is YANG 1.1 still considered "new"? It was published as | ||||
| RFC 7950 in August 2016. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| The set of guidelines for YANG 1.1 will grow as operational experience | ||||
| is gained with the new language features. This section contains an | ||||
| initial set of guidelines for new YANG 1.1 language features. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The set of guidelines for YANG 1.1 will grow as operational | <t>The set of guidelines for YANG 1.1 will grow as operational | |||
| experience is gained with the new language features. This section | experience is gained with the new language features. This section | |||
| contains an initial set of guidelines for new YANG 1.1 language | contains an initial set of guidelines for new YANG 1.1 language | |||
| features.</t> | features.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="importing-multiple-revisions"> | <section anchor="importing-multiple-revisions"> | |||
| <name>Importing Multiple Revisions</name> | <name>Importing Multiple Revisions</name> | |||
| <t>Standard modules <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> import multiple revision s of the same | <t>Standard modules <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> import multiple revision s of the same | |||
| module into a module. This <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be done if independent definit ions | module into a module. This <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be done if independent definit ions | |||
| (e.g., enumeration typedefs) from specific revisions are needed in | (e.g., enumeration typedefs) from specific revisions are needed in | |||
| the importing module.</t> | the importing module.</t> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2849 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3357 ¶ | |||
| data node definition for an interface might have different parameters | data node definition for an interface might have different parameters | |||
| than for a power supply or a VLAN. The same action name <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14 > be | than for a power supply or a VLAN. The same action name <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14 > be | |||
| used to represent similar semantics.</t> | used to represent similar semantics.</t> | |||
| <t>The NETCONF Access Control Model (NACM) <xref target="RFC8341"/> do es not support | <t>The NETCONF Access Control Model (NACM) <xref target="RFC8341"/> do es not support | |||
| parameter-based access control for RPC operations. The user is given | parameter-based access control for RPC operations. The user is given | |||
| permission (or not) to invoke the RPC operation with any parameters. | permission (or not) to invoke the RPC operation with any parameters. | |||
| For example, if each client is only allowed to reset their own | For example, if each client is only allowed to reset their own | |||
| interface, then NACM cannot be used.</t> | interface, then NACM cannot be used.</t> | |||
| <t>For example, NACM cannot enforce access control based on the value of | <t>For example, NACM cannot enforce access control based on the value of | |||
| the "interface" parameter, only the "reset" operation itself:</t> | the "interface" parameter, only the "reset" operation itself:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| rpc reset { | rpc reset { | |||
| input { | input { | |||
| leaf interface { | leaf interface { | |||
| type if:interface-ref; | type if:interface-ref; | |||
| mandatory true; | mandatory true; | |||
| description "The interface to reset."; | description "The interface to reset."; | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>However, NACM can enforce access control for individual interface | <t>However, NACM can enforce access control for individual interface | |||
| instances, using a "reset" action. If the user does not have read | instances, using a "reset" action. If the user does not have read | |||
| access to the specific "interface" instance, then it cannot invoke | access to the specific "interface" instance, then it cannot invoke | |||
| the "reset" action for that interface instance:</t> | the "reset" action for that interface instance:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| container interfaces { | container interfaces { | |||
| list interface { | list interface { | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| action reset { } | action reset { } | |||
| } | } | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="updating-yang-modules-published-versus-unpublished"> | <section anchor="updating-yang-modules-published-versus-unpublished"> | |||
| <name>Updating YANG Modules (Published versus Unpublished)</name> | <name>Updating YANG Modules (Published versus Unpublished)</name> | |||
| <t>YANG modules can change over time. Typically, new data model | <t>YANG modules can change over time. Typically, new data model | |||
| definitions are needed to support new features. YANG update rules | definitions are needed to support new features. YANG update rules | |||
| defined in <xref section="11" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/> <bcp14>MU ST</bcp14> be followed for published | defined in <xref section="11" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7950"/> <bcp14>MU ST</bcp14> be followed for published | |||
| modules. They <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed for unpublished modules.</t> | modules. They <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed for unpublished modules.</t> | |||
| <t>The YANG update rules only apply to published module revisions. Each | <t>The YANG update rules only apply to published module revisions. Each | |||
| organization will have their own way to identify published work that | organization will have their own way to identify published work that | |||
| is considered to be stable and unpublished work that is considered to | is considered to be stable and unpublished work that is considered to | |||
| be unstable. For example, in the IETF, the RFC document is used for | be unstable. For example, in the IETF, an RFC is used for | |||
| published work, and the I-D is used for unpublished work.</t> | published work, and an I-D is used for unpublished work.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-tags"> | <section anchor="sec-tags"> | |||
| <name>Defining Standard Tags</name> | <name>Defining Standard Tags</name> | |||
| <t><xref target="RFC8819"/> specifies a method for associating tags with YANG modules. Tags may | <t><xref target="RFC8819"/> specifies a method for associating tags with YANG modules. Tags may | |||
| be defined and associated at module design time, at implementation time, or via | be defined and associated at the time of module design, at the time of implement ation, or via | |||
| user administrative control. Design-time tags are indicated using the module-tag | user administrative control. Design-time tags are indicated using the module-tag | |||
| extension statement.</t> | extension statement.</t> | |||
| <t>A module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> indicate, using module-tag extension stat ements, a set of | <t>A module <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> indicate, using module-tag extension stat ements, a set of | |||
| tags that are to be automatically associated with it (i.e., not added through co nfiguration).</t> | tags that are to be automatically associated with it (i.e., not added through co nfiguration).</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| module example-module { | module example-module { | |||
| namespace "https://example.com/yang/example"; | namespace "https://example.com/yang/example"; | |||
| prefix "ex"; | prefix "ex"; | |||
| //... | //... | |||
| import module-tags { prefix tags; } | import module-tags { prefix tags; } | |||
| tags:module-tag "ietf:some-new-tag"; | tags:module-tag "ietf:some-new-tag"; | |||
| tags:module-tag "ietf:some-other-tag"; | tags:module-tag "ietf:some-other-tag"; | |||
| // ... | // ... | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Authors can use existing standard tags or use new tags defined in the model definition, | <t>Authors can use existing standard tags or use new tags defined in the model definition, | |||
| as appropriate. For IETF modules, new tags <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be assigned in th e IANA "IETF YANG Module Tags" | as appropriate. For IETF modules, new tags <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be assigned in th e IANA "IETF YANG Module Tags" | |||
| registry within the "YANG Module Tags" registry <xref target="IANA-TAGS"/>.</t> | registry within the "YANG Module Tags" registry group <xref target="IANA-TAGS"/> .</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="modeling-abstract-data-structures"> | <section anchor="modeling-abstract-data-structures"> | |||
| <name>Modeling Abstract Data Structures</name> | <name>Modeling Abstract Data Structures</name> | |||
| <t>For contexts where YANG is used to model abstract data structures (e. | <t>For contexts where YANG is used to model abstract data structures (e. | |||
| g., protocol messages), the use of the "structure" extension statement <xref tar | g., protocol messages), the use of the "structure" extension statement <xref tar | |||
| get="RFC8791"/> is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> compared to the "yang-data" extens | get="RFC8791"/> is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> compared to the "yang-data" extens | |||
| ion statement <xref target="RFC8040"/>.</t> | ion statement <xref target="RFC8040"/>. Examples of modules that rely upon the " | |||
| <ul empty="true"> | structure" extension statement from <xref target="RFC8791"/> can be found in <xr | |||
| <li> | ef target="RFC9132"/> or <xref target="RFC9195"/>.</t> | |||
| <t>Examples of modules that rely upon the "structure" extension stat | <t>Abstract data structures can be augmented using the "augment-structur | |||
| ement <xref target="RFC8791"/> are <xref target="RFC9132"/> or <xref target="RFC | e" statement <xref target="RFC8791"/>. Examples of modules that augment abstract | |||
| 9195"/>.</t> | data structures can be found in <xref target="RFC9244"/> and <xref target="RFC9 | |||
| </li> | 362"/>.</t> | |||
| </ul> | ||||
| <t>Abstract data structures can be augmented using the "augment-structur | ||||
| e" statement <xref target="RFC8791"/>.</t> | ||||
| <ul empty="true"> | ||||
| <li> | ||||
| <t>Examples of modules that augment abstract data structures are <xr | ||||
| ef target="RFC9244"/> and <xref target="RFC9362"/>.</t> | ||||
| </li> | ||||
| </ul> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="iana-maintained-modules"> | <section anchor="iana-maintained-modules"> | |||
| <name>IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | <name>IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | |||
| <section anchor="context"> | <section anchor="context"> | |||
| <name>Context</name> | <name>Context</name> | |||
| <t>IANA maintains a set of registries that are key for interoperabilit y. | <t>IANA maintains a set of registries that are key for interoperabilit y. | |||
| The content of these registries are usually available using various | The content of these registries is usually available using various | |||
| formats (e.g., plain text, XML). However, there were some confusion | formats (e.g., plain text or XML). However, there was some confusion | |||
| in the past about whether the content of some registries is dependent | in the past about whether the content of some registries is dependent | |||
| on a specific representation format. For example, Section 5 of | on a specific representation format. For example, | |||
| <xref target="RFC8892"/> was published to clarify that MIB and YANG modules a | <xref target="RFC8892" section="5"/> was published to clarify that MIB and YA | |||
| re | NG modules are | |||
| merely additional formats in which the "Interface Types (ifType)" and | merely additional formats in which the "Interface Types (ifType)" and | |||
| "Tunnel Types (tunnelType)" registries are available. The MIB | "Tunnel Types (tunnelType)" registries are available. The MIB | |||
| <xref target="RFC2863"/> and YANG modules <xref target="RFC7224"/><xref targe t="RFC8675"/> are not separate | <xref target="RFC2863"/> and YANG modules (<xref target="RFC7224"/> <xref tar get="RFC8675"/>) are not separate | |||
| registries, and the same values are always present in all formats of | registries, and the same values are always present in all formats of | |||
| the same registry.</t> | the same registry.</t> | |||
| <t>A design, in which a YANG module includes parameters and values dir ectly in a | <t>A design in which a YANG module includes parameters and values dire ctly in a | |||
| module that is not maintained by IANA while these are populated in an | module that is not maintained by IANA while these are populated in an | |||
| IANA registry, could lead to ambiguity and maintain stale information. Such a design creates another | IANA registry could lead to ambiguity and maintain stale information. Such a design creates another | |||
| source of information that may deviate from the IANA registry as new | source of information that may deviate from the IANA registry as new | |||
| values are assigned or some values are deprecated.</t> | values are assigned or some values are deprecated.</t> | |||
| <t>For the sake of consistency and ability to support new values while | <t>For the sake of consistency and the ability to support new values w hile | |||
| maintaining IANA registries as the unique authoritative source of | maintaining IANA registries as the unique authoritative source of | |||
| information, this document recommends the use of IANA-maintained modules | information, this document recommends the use of IANA-maintained modules | |||
| as the single source of information.</t> | as the single source of information.</t> | |||
| <t>The following section provides a set of guidelines for YANG module authors | <t>The following section provides a set of guidelines for YANG module authors | |||
| related to the design of IANA-maintained modules. These guidelines | related to the design of IANA-maintained modules. These guidelines | |||
| are meant to leverage existing IANA registries and use YANG as | are meant to leverage existing IANA registries and use YANG as | |||
| another format to present the content of these registries when | another format to present the content of these registries when | |||
| appropriate.</t> | appropriate.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="guidelines-for-iana-maintained-modules"> | <section anchor="guidelines-for-iana-maintained-modules"> | |||
| skipping to change at line 2979 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3474 ¶ | |||
| <t>An IANA-maintained module may use the "identityref" data type (e.g. , <xref target="RFC8675"/>) or | <t>An IANA-maintained module may use the "identityref" data type (e.g. , <xref target="RFC8675"/>) or | |||
| an enumeration data type (e.g., <xref target="RFC9108"/>). See <xref target=" sec-fve"/> for a guidance on which data type to use. The decision about which ty pe to use | an enumeration data type (e.g., <xref target="RFC9108"/>). See <xref target=" sec-fve"/> for a guidance on which data type to use. The decision about which ty pe to use | |||
| should be made based upon | should be made based upon | |||
| specifics related to the intended use of the IANA-maintained module. | specifics related to the intended use of the IANA-maintained module. | |||
| For example, identities are useful if the registry entries are | For example, identities are useful if the registry entries are | |||
| organized hierarchically, possibly including multiple inheritances. | organized hierarchically, possibly including multiple inheritances. | |||
| The reasoning for the design choice <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be | The reasoning for the design choice <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be | |||
| documented in the companion specification that registers an | documented in the companion specification that registers an | |||
| IANA-maintained module. For example, <xref target="RFC9244"/> defines an IANA -maintained | IANA-maintained module. For example, <xref target="RFC9244"/> defines an IANA -maintained | |||
| module that uses enumerations for the following reason:</t> | module that uses enumerations for the following reason:</t> | |||
| <blockquote> | <blockquote> | |||
| <t>The DOTS telemetry module (Section 11.1) uses "enumerations" rath | <t>The DOTS telemetry module (Section <xref target="RFC9244" | |||
| er | section="11.1" sectionFormat="bare"/>) uses "enumerations" rather | |||
| than "identities" to define units, samples, and intervals because | than "identities" to define units, samples, and intervals because | |||
| otherwise the namespace identifier "ietf-dots-telemetry" must be | otherwise the namespace identifier "ietf-dots-telemetry" must be | |||
| included when a telemetry attribute is included (e.g., in a | included when a telemetry attribute is included (e.g., in a | |||
| mitigation efficacy update). The use of "identities" is thus | mitigation efficacy update). The use of "identities" is thus | |||
| suboptimal from the standpoint of message compactness, as message | suboptimal from the standpoint of message compactness, as message | |||
| compactness is one of the key requirements for DOTS signal channel | compactness is one of the key requirements for DOTS signal channel | |||
| messages.</t> | messages.</t> | |||
| </blockquote> | </blockquote> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Section 4.30.2: Would you like to update these | ||||
| two paragraphs to make them more aligned? Or remove some text | ||||
| to reduce redundancy? To paraphrase: | ||||
| (A) says the I-D MAY supply the module or only a script. | ||||
| (B) says the I-D SHOULD supply the module when a script is used. | ||||
| A) Original (paragraph 5): | ||||
| Designers of IANA-maintained modules MAY supply the full initial | ||||
| version of the module in a specification document that registers the | ||||
| module or only a script to be used (including by IANA) for generating | ||||
| the module (e.g., an XSLT stylesheet as in Appendix A of [RFC9108] or | ||||
| a Python script as in [RFC9645]). For both cases, the document that | ||||
| defines an IANA-maintained module MUST include a note indicating that | ||||
| the document is only documenting the initial version of the module | ||||
| and that the authoritative version is to be retrieved from the IANA | ||||
| registry | ||||
| B) Original (paragraph 7): | ||||
| It is RECOMMENDED to include the URL from where to retrieve the | ||||
| recent version of the module. When a script is used, the Internet- | ||||
| Draft that defines an IANA-maintained module have to include an | ||||
| appendix with the full script and SHOULD include an appendix with the | ||||
| initial full version of the module. Including such an appendix in | ||||
| pre-RFC versions is meant to assess the correctness of the outcome of | ||||
| the supplied script. The authors MUST include a note to the RFC | ||||
| Editor requesting that the appendix with the initial version of the | ||||
| module be removed before publication as RFC and that RFC IIII is | ||||
| replaced with the RFC number that is assigned to the document. | ||||
| Also: | ||||
| - May "in pre-RFC versions" be changed to "in Internet-Drafts"? | ||||
| - May the phrases (A) "full initial version" and (B) "initial full version" | ||||
| of the module be made consistent? They seemingly refer to the same concept. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Designers of IANA-maintained modules <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> supply the full initial | <t>Designers of IANA-maintained modules <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> supply the full initial | |||
| version of the module in a specification document that registers the | version of the module in a specification document that registers the | |||
| module or only a script to be used (including by IANA) for generating | module or only a script to be used (including by IANA) for generating | |||
| the module (e.g., an XSLT stylesheet as in Appendix A of <xref target="RFC910 8"/> or a Python script as in <xref target="RFC9645"/>). | the module (e.g., an Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) st ylesheet as in <xref section="A" target="RFC9108"/> or a Python script as in <xr ef target="RFC9645"/>). | |||
| For both cases, the document that defines an IANA-maintained module | For both cases, the document that defines an IANA-maintained module | |||
| <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include a note indicating that the document is only docum enting | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include a note indicating that the document is only docum enting | |||
| the initial version of the module and that the authoritative version | the initial version of the module and that the authoritative version | |||
| is to be retrieved from the IANA registry. Also, the IANA-maintained | is to be retrieved from the IANA registry. Also, the IANA-maintained | |||
| module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include the following note indicating the RFC that | module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include the following note indicating the RFC that | |||
| registered the initial version of the IANA-maintained module:</t> | registered the initial version of the IANA-maintained module:</t> | |||
| <ul empty="true"> | ||||
| <li> | <blockquote><t>The initial version of this YANG module is part of RFC IIII; | |||
| <t>The initial version of this YANG module is part of RFC IIII; | see the RFC itself for full legal notices.</t></blockquote> | |||
| see the RFC itself for full legal notices.</t> | ||||
| </li> | ||||
| </ul> | ||||
| <t>It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to | <t>It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to | |||
| include the URL from where to retrieve the recent version of the | include the URL from where to retrieve the recent version of the | |||
| module. When a script is used, the Internet-Draft that defines an | module. When a script is used, the Internet-Draft that defines an | |||
| IANA-maintained module have to include an appendix with the full script and < bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include an appendix with the initial | IANA-maintained module has to include an appendix with the full script and <b cp14>SHOULD</bcp14> include an appendix with the initial | |||
| full version of the module. Including such an appendix in pre-RFC | full version of the module. Including such an appendix in pre-RFC | |||
| versions is meant to assess the correctness of the outcome of the | versions is meant to assess the correctness of the outcome of the | |||
| supplied script. The authors <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include a note to the RFC E ditor | supplied script. The authors <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include a note to the RFC E ditor | |||
| requesting that the appendix with the initial version of the module be remove d before publication as RFC and | requesting that the appendix with the initial version of the module be remove d before publication as RFC and | |||
| that RFC IIII is replaced with the RFC number that is assigned to the documen t. | that RFC IIII is replaced with the RFC number that is assigned to the documen t. | |||
| Initial versions of IANA-maintained modules that are published in | Initial versions of IANA-maintained modules that are published in | |||
| RFCs may be misused despite the appropriate language to refer to the | RFCs may be misused despite the appropriate language to refer to the | |||
| IANA registry to retrieve the up-to-date module. This is problematic | IANA registry to retrieve the up-to-date module. This is problematic | |||
| for interoperability, e.g., when values are deprecated or are | for interoperability, e.g., when values are deprecated or are | |||
| associated with a new meaning.</t> | associated with a new meaning.</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| Note: [Style] provides XSLT 1.0 stylesheets and other tools for | <aside><t>Note: <xref target="Style"/> provides XSLT 1.0 stylesheets and other | |||
| tools for | ||||
| translating IANA registries to YANG modules. The tools can be | translating IANA registries to YANG modules. The tools can be | |||
| used to generate up-to-date revisions of an IANA-maintained module | used to generate up-to-date revisions of an IANA-maintained module | |||
| based upon the XML representation of an IANA registry. | based upon the XML representation of an IANA registry.</t></aside> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| <t>If an IANA-maintained module is imported by another module, a | <t>If an IANA-maintained module is imported by another module, a | |||
| normative reference with the IANA URL from where to retrieve the | normative reference with the IANA URL from which to retrieve the | |||
| IANA-maintained module <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included. Although not encou raged, | IANA-maintained module <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included. Although not encou raged, | |||
| referencing the RFC that defines the initial version of the IANA | referencing the RFC that defines the initial version of the IANA | |||
| module is acceptable in specific cases (e.g., the imported version is | module is acceptable in specific cases (e.g., the imported version is | |||
| specifically the initial version, the RFC includes useful description | specifically the initial version, the RFC includes useful description | |||
| about the usage of the module).</t> | about the usage of the module).</t> | |||
| <t>Examples of IANA URLs from where to retrieve the latest version of | <!--[rfced] Would you like to update this paragraph about URLs | |||
| an | so that the URLs are shown, rather than in references? (This would | |||
| IANA-maintained module are: <xref target="IANA_BGP-L2_URL"/>, <xref target="I | be a change from xref to eref elements.) | |||
| ANA_PW-Types_URL"/>, | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| Examples of IANA URLs from which to retrieve the latest version of an | ||||
| IANA-maintained module are as follows: [IANA_BGP-L2_URL], | ||||
| [IANA_PW-Types_URL], and [IANA_BFD_URL]. "IANA_FOO_URL" is used in | ||||
| the following to refer to such URLs. These URLs are expected to be | ||||
| sufficiently permanent and stable. Whenever referencing a specific | ||||
| version of an IANA-maintained module is needed, then URLs such as | ||||
| [IANA_BGP-L2_URL-Revision] are used. "IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV" is used | ||||
| in the following to refer to such URLs. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| Examples of IANA URLs from which to retrieve the latest version of an | ||||
| IANA-maintained module are as follows: | ||||
| <https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-bgp-l2-encaps> | ||||
| <https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-pseudowire-types> | ||||
| <https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-bfd-types> | ||||
| "IANA_FOO_URL" is used in the following to refer to such URLs. These | ||||
| URLs are expected to be sufficiently permanent and stable. | ||||
| Whenever referencing a specific version of an IANA-maintained module is | ||||
| needed, then URLs such as the following are used: | ||||
| <https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-bfd-types@ | ||||
| 2021-10-21.yang> | ||||
| "IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV" is used in the following to refer to such URLs. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>Examples of IANA URLs from which to retrieve the latest version of | ||||
| an | ||||
| IANA-maintained module are as follows: <xref target="IANA_BGP-L2_URL"/>, <xre | ||||
| f target="IANA_PW-Types_URL"/>, | ||||
| and <xref target="IANA_BFD_URL"/>. "IANA_FOO_URL" is used in the following to refer | and <xref target="IANA_BFD_URL"/>. "IANA_FOO_URL" is used in the following to refer | |||
| to such URLs. These URLs are expected to be sufficiently permanent | to such URLs. These URLs are expected to be sufficiently permanent | |||
| and stable. Whenever referencing a specific version of an | and stable. Whenever referencing a specific version of an | |||
| IANA-maintained module is needed, then URLs such as <xref target="IANA_BGP-L2 _URL-Revision"/> | IANA-maintained module is needed, then URLs such as <xref target="IANA_BGP-L2 _URL-Revision"/> | |||
| are used. "IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV" is used in the following to refer | are used. "IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV" is used in the following to refer | |||
| to such URLs.</t> | to such URLs.</t> | |||
| <t>A template for IANA-maintained modules is provided in <xref target= "tem-iana"/>.</t> | <t>A template for IANA-maintained modules is provided in <xref target= "tem-iana"/>.</t> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-iana-mm"> | <section anchor="sec-iana-mm"> | |||
| <name>Guidance for Writing the IANA Considerations for RFCs Defining I ANA-Maintained Modules</name> | <name>Guidance for Writing the IANA Considerations for RFCs Defining I ANA-Maintained Modules</name> | |||
| <t>In addition to the IANA considerations in <xref target="sec-iana-co ns"/>, | <t>In addition to the IANA considerations in <xref target="sec-iana-co ns"/>, | |||
| the IANA Considerations Section of an RFC that includes an | the IANA Considerations section of an RFC that includes an | |||
| IANA-maintained module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> provide the required instructions for IANA to | IANA-maintained module <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> provide the required instructions for IANA to | |||
| automatically perform the maintenance of that IANA module. These | automatically perform the maintenance of that IANA module. These | |||
| instructions describe how to proceed with updates to the | instructions describe how to proceed with updates to the | |||
| IANA-maintained module that are triggered by a change to the authoritative | IANA-maintained module that are triggered by a change to the authoritative | |||
| registry. Concretely, the IANA Considerations Section <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> a t least | registry. Concretely, the IANA Considerations section <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> a t least | |||
| provide the following information:</t> | provide the following information:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>A request to IANA to add a note to the page displaying the | <t>A request to IANA to add a note to the page displaying the | |||
| information about the IANA-maintained module that new values must | information about the IANA-maintained module that new values must | |||
| not be directly added to the module. These values should be added to an authorit ative IANA | not be directly added to the module. These values should be added to an authorit ative IANA | |||
| registry.</t> | registry.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>A request to IANA to add a note to the authoritative IANA regis try | <t>A request to IANA to add a note to the authoritative IANA regis try | |||
| skipping to change at line 3072 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3632 ¶ | |||
| the corresponding IANA-maintained module. That is, any changes to the registry m ust be accompanied by an update to the corresponding | the corresponding IANA-maintained module. That is, any changes to the registry m ust be accompanied by an update to the corresponding | |||
| IANA-maintained module.</t> | IANA-maintained module.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Details about the required actions (e.g., add a new "identity" or | <t>Details about the required actions (e.g., add a new "identity" or | |||
| "enum" statement) to update the IANA-maintained module to reflect | "enum" statement) to update the IANA-maintained module to reflect | |||
| changes to an authoritative IANA registry. Typically, these | changes to an authoritative IANA registry. Typically, these | |||
| details have to include the procedure to create a new "identity" | details have to include the procedure to create a new "identity" | |||
| statement name and substatements ("base", "status", | statement name and substatements ("base", "status", | |||
| "description", and "reference") or a new "enum" statement and | "description", and "reference") or a new "enum" statement and | |||
| sub-statements ("value", "status", "description", and "reference"). </t> | substatements ("value", "status", "description", and "reference"). </t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>When creating a new "identity" statement name or a new "enu m" statement, | <t>When creating a new "identity" statement name or a new "enu m" statement, | |||
| it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to use the same name (if present) as recorded i n the IANA registry.</t> | it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to use the same name (if present) as recorded i n the IANA registry.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <!--[rfced] Might this update capture your intended meaning? Note: | ||||
| similar text occurs more than once. | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| Specifically, if the name begins with a number, it is RECOMMENDED to | ||||
| spell out (i.e., write in full) the number when used as an identifier. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| Specifically, if the name begins with a number, it is RECOMMENDED to | ||||
| spell out (i.e., not use a digit) the number when used as an | ||||
| identifier. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>If the name in the IANA registry does not comply with the n aming conventions | <t>If the name in the IANA registry does not comply with the n aming conventions | |||
| listed in <xref target="sec-id-naming"/>, the procedure <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> deta il how IANA | listed in <xref target="sec-id-naming"/>, the procedure <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> deta il how IANA | |||
| can generate legal identifiers from such a name. Specifically, if the name | can generate legal identifiers from such a name. Specifically, if the name | |||
| begins with a number, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to spell out (i.e., write in full) the number when used as an identifier. IANA should be provided with in structions to perform such task. For example, authors of a module with such iden tifiers have to indicate whether: </t> | begins with a number, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to spell out (i.e., write in full) the number when used as an identifier. IANA should be provided with in structions to perform such a task. For example, authors of a module with such id entifiers have to indicate whether: </t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>"3des-cbc" should be "three-des-cbc" or rather "triple- des-cbc" to be consistent with <xref section="6.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RF C4253"/>.</t> | <t>"3des-cbc" should be "three-des-cbc" or rather "triple- des-cbc" to be consistent with <xref section="6.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RF C4253"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>"6to4" should be "sixToFour" as in <xref target="RFC722 4"/> or "sixtofour" as in <xref target="RFC8675"/>.</t> | <t>"6to4" should be "sixToFour" as in <xref target="RFC722 4"/> or "sixtofour" as in <xref target="RFC8675"/>.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>If a new registration uses an identifier that does not comp ly with the naming conventions | <t>If a new registration uses an identifier that does not comp ly with the naming conventions | |||
| listed in <xref target="sec-id-naming"/>, IANA should check if a guidance to gen erate legal identifiers was supplied in the RFC that specified the initial versi on of the module. If no such guidance is available, IANA should check the latest revision of the IANA-maintained module for similar patterns. If all else failed , IANA should seek advice from relevant registry experts (e.g., designated exper ts for a registry with Expert Review policy (<xref section="4.5" sectionFormat=" of" target="RFC8126"/>) or responsible Area Director).</t> | listed in <xref target="sec-id-naming"/>, IANA should check if guidance to gener ate legal identifiers was supplied in the RFC that specified the initial version of the module. If no such guidance is available, IANA should check the latest r evision of the IANA-maintained module for similar patterns. If all else fails, I ANA should seek advice from relevant registry experts (e.g., designated experts for a registry using the Expert Review policy (<xref section="4.5" sectionFormat ="of" target="RFC8126"/>) or responsible area director).</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>A note that unassigned or reserved values must not be present i n | <t>A note that unassigned or reserved values must not be present i n | |||
| the IANA-maintained module.</t> | the IANA-maintained module.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>An instruction whether experimental values should be included i n the | <t>An instruction whether experimental values should be included i n the | |||
| IANA-maintained module. If no instruction is provided, experimental | IANA-maintained module. If no instruction is provided, experimental | |||
| skipping to change at line 3119 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3693 ¶ | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| <t>A template for the IANA Considerations is provided in <xref target= "sec-temp-id"/> for | <t>A template for the IANA Considerations is provided in <xref target= "sec-temp-id"/> for | |||
| IANA-maintained modules with identities and <xref target="sec-temp-enum"/> fo r | IANA-maintained modules with identities and <xref target="sec-temp-enum"/> fo r | |||
| IANA-maintained modules with enumerations. Authors may modify the | IANA-maintained modules with enumerations. Authors may modify the | |||
| template to reflect specifics of their modules (e.g., multiple | template to reflect specifics of their modules (e.g., multiple | |||
| registries can be listed for a single IANA-maintained module, no | registries can be listed for a single IANA-maintained module, no | |||
| explicit description (or name) field is listed under the | explicit description (or name) field is listed under the | |||
| authoritative IANA registry, or the name does not comply with YANG naming con ventions (<xref target="sec-id-naming"/>)).</t> | authoritative IANA registry, or the name does not comply with YANG naming con ventions (<xref target="sec-id-naming"/>)).</t> | |||
| <t>An example of "revision" statements that are generated following th e guidance in <xref target="sec-temp-id"/> | <t>An example of "revision" statements that are generated following th e guidance in <xref target="sec-temp-id"/> | |||
| is provided below:</t> | is provided below:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| revision 2023-11-27 { | revision 2023-11-27 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Registered RR Type RESINFO 261."; | "Registered RR Type RESINFO 261."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | |||
| + "iana-dns-class-rr-type@2023-11-27.yang"; | + "iana-dns-class-rr-type@2023-11-27.yang"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2023-11-08 { | revision 2023-11-08 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| skipping to change at line 3163 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3738 ¶ | |||
| "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | |||
| + "iana-dns-class-rr-type@2022-05-30.yang"; | + "iana-dns-class-rr-type@2022-05-30.yang"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2021-08-31 { | revision 2021-08-31 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 9108: YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record | "RFC 9108: YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record | |||
| Types"; | Types"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>Duplicating the same reference at the high level and at the level o f a new addition might be redundant. For example, the following does not provide access to a specific (OLD) revision of the module when future revisions are mad e <xref target="IANA_Tunnel_Type_URL"/>:</t> | <t>Duplicating the same reference at the high level and at the level o f a new addition might be redundant. For example, the following does not provide access to a specific (OLD) revision of the module when future revisions are mad e <xref target="IANA_Tunnel_Type_URL"/>:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| revision 2021-04-23 { | revision 2021-04-23 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Registered tunnelType 19."; | "Registered tunnelType 19."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2019-11-16 { | revision 2019-11-16 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 8675: A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types"; | "RFC 8675: A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| identity ipsectunnelmode { | identity ipsectunnelmode { | |||
| base ift:tunnel; | base ift:tunnel; | |||
| description | description | |||
| "IpSec tunnel mode encapsulation."; | "IPsec tunnel mode encapsulation."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| <t>The following example shows how to generate the "revision" statemen ts following the guidance in <xref target="sec-temp-id"/>:</t> | <t>The following example shows how to generate the "revision" statemen ts following the guidance in <xref target="sec-temp-id"/>:</t> | |||
| <sourcecode type="yang"><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode name="" type="yang"><![CDATA[ | |||
| revision 2021-04-23 { | revision 2021-04-23 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Registered tunnelType 19."; | "Registered tunnelType 19."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/" | |||
| + "iana-tunnel-type@2021-04-23.yang | + "iana-tunnel-type@2021-04-23.yang | |||
| RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| revision 2019-11-16 { | revision 2019-11-16 { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 8675: A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types"; | "RFC 8675: A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| ... | ... | |||
| identity ipsectunnelmode { | identity ipsectunnelmode { | |||
| base ift:tunnel; | base ift:tunnel; | |||
| description | description | |||
| "IpSec tunnel mode encapsulation."; | "IPsec tunnel mode encapsulation."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | "RFC 4301: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol"; | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | <t>The templates in the following subsections are to be considered in | |||
| <t>The following templates are to be considered in addition to the | addition to the | |||
| required information that is provided in <xref target="sec-iana-cons"/>.</t> | required information that is provided in <xref target="sec-iana-cons"/>.</t> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-temp-id"> | <section anchor="sec-temp-id"> | |||
| <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules with Identities</name> | <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules with Identities</name> | |||
| <sourcecode markers="true"><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
| <CODE BEGINS> | ||||
| This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained | This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained | |||
| "iana-foo" YANG module. The most recent version of the YANG module | "iana-foo" YANG module. The most recent version of the YANG module | |||
| is available from the "YANG Parameters" registry group | is available from the "YANG Parameters" registry group | |||
| [IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS]. | [IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS]. | |||
| IANA is requested to add this note to the registry: | IANA is requested to add this note to the registry: | |||
| New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG | New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG | |||
| module. They must instead be added to the "foo" registry. | module. They must instead be added to the "foo" registry. | |||
| When a value is added to the "foo" registry, a new "identity" | When a value is added to the "foo" registry, a new "identity" | |||
| statement needs to be added to the "iana-foo" YANG module. The name | statement needs to be added to the "iana-foo" YANG module. The name | |||
| of the "identity" MUST be the name as provided in the registry. | of the "identity" MUST be the name as provided in the registry. | |||
| The "identity" statement should have the following | The "identity" statement should have the following | |||
| sub-statements defined: | substatements defined: | |||
| "base": Contains 'name-base-identity-defined-in-foo'. | "base": Contains 'name-base-identity-defined-in-foo'. | |||
| "status": Include only if a registration has been deprecated or | "status": Include only if a registration has been deprecated or | |||
| obsoleted. IANA "deprecated" maps to YANG status | obsoleted. IANA "deprecated" maps to YANG status | |||
| "deprecated", and IANA "obsolete" maps to YANG status | "deprecated", and IANA "obsolete" maps to YANG status | |||
| "obsolete". | "obsolete". | |||
| "description": Replicates the description from the registry. | "description": Replicates the description from the registry. | |||
| "reference": Replicates the reference(s) from the registry with | "reference": Replicates the reference(s) from the registry with | |||
| the title of the document(s) added. | the title of the document(s) added. | |||
| Unassigned or reserved values are not present in the module. | Unassigned or reserved values are not present in the module. | |||
| When the "iana-foo" YANG module is updated, a new "revision" | When the "iana-foo" YANG module is updated, a new "revision" | |||
| statement with a unique revision date must be added in front of the | statement with a unique revision date must be added in front of the | |||
| existing revision statements. The "revision" statement MUST contain | existing "revision" statements. The "revision" statement MUST | |||
| both "description" and "reference" substatements as follows. | contain both "description" and "reference" substatements as follows. | |||
| The "description" substatement captures what changed in the | The "description" substatement captures what changed in the | |||
| revised version. Typically, the description enumerates the changes | revised version. Typically, the description enumerates the changes | |||
| such as udpates to existing entries (e.g., update a description or | such as udpates to existing entries (e.g., update a description or | |||
| a reference) or notes which identities were added or had their status | a reference) or notes which identities were added or had their status | |||
| changed (e.g., deprecated, discouraged, or obsoleted). | changed (e.g., deprecated, discouraged, or obsoleted). | |||
| -- When such a description is not feasible, the description varies | -- When such a description is not feasible, the description varies | |||
| -- on how the update is triggered. | -- on how the update is triggered. | |||
| -- If the update is triggered by an RFC, insert this text: | -- If the update is triggered by an RFC, insert this text: | |||
| The "description" substatement should include this text: | The "description" substatement should include this text: | |||
| skipping to change at line 3281 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3854 ¶ | |||
| -- If the update is triggered following other IANA registration | -- If the update is triggered following other IANA registration | |||
| -- policy (Section 4 of [RFC8126]) but not all the values in the | -- policy (Section 4 of [RFC8126]) but not all the values in the | |||
| -- registry are covered by the same policy, insert this text: | -- registry are covered by the same policy, insert this text: | |||
| The "description" substatement should include this text: | The "description" substatement should include this text: | |||
| "Applied updates as specified by the registration policy | "Applied updates as specified by the registration policy | |||
| <Some_IANA_policy>". | <Some_IANA_policy>". | |||
| The "reference" substatement points specifically to the published | The "reference" substatement points specifically to the published | |||
| module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). It may also point to an | module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). It may also point to an | |||
| authoritative event triggering the update to the YANG module. In all | authoritative event triggering the update to the YANG module. In all | |||
| cases, this event is cited from the underlying IANA registry. If the | cases, this event is cited from the underlying IANA registry. If the | |||
| update is triggered by an RFC, that RFC must also be included in | update is triggered by an RFC, that RFC must also be included in | |||
| the "reference" substatement. | the "reference" substatement. | |||
| -- If a name in the IANA registry does not comply with the | -- If a name in the IANA registry does not comply with the | |||
| -- YANG naming conventions, add details how IANA can generate | -- YANG naming conventions, add details how IANA can generate | |||
| -- legal identifiers. For example, if the name begins with | -- legal identifiers. For example, if the name begins with | |||
| -- a number, indicate a preference to spell out the number when | -- a number, indicate a preference to spell out the number when | |||
| -- used as an identifier. | -- used as an identifier. | |||
| IANA is requested to add this note to [reference-to-the-iana-foo- | IANA is requested to add this note to [reference-to-the-iana-foo- | |||
| registry]: | registry]: | |||
| When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo" | When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo" | |||
| [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII. | [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII. | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | <CODE ENDS> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-temp-enum"> | <section anchor="sec-temp-enum"> | |||
| <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules with Enumerations</name> | <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules with Enumerations</name> | |||
| <sourcecode markers="true"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <CODE BEGINS> | ||||
| This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained | This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained | |||
| "iana-foo" YANG module. The most recent version of the YANG module | "iana-foo" YANG module. The most recent version of the YANG module | |||
| is available from the "YANG Parameters" registry group | is available from the "YANG Parameters" registry group | |||
| [IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS]. | [IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS]. | |||
| IANA is requested to add this note to the registry: | IANA is requested to add this note to the registry: | |||
| New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG | New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG | |||
| module. They must instead be added to the "foo" registry. | module. They must instead be added to the "foo" registry. | |||
| When a value is added to the "foo" registry, a new "enum" statement | When a value is added to the "foo" registry, a new "enum" statement | |||
| must be added to the "iana-foo" YANG module. The "enum" statement, | must be added to the "iana-foo" YANG module. The "enum" statement, | |||
| and sub-statements thereof, should be defined: | and substatements thereof, should be defined: | |||
| "enum": Replicates a name from the registry. | "enum": Replicates a name from the registry. | |||
| "value": Contains the decimal value of the IANA-assigned | "value": Contains the decimal value of the IANA-assigned | |||
| value. | value. | |||
| "status": Is included only if a registration has been | "status": Is included only if a registration has been | |||
| deprecated or obsoleted. IANA "deprecated" maps | deprecated or obsoleted. IANA "deprecated" maps | |||
| to YANG status "deprecated", and IANA "obsolete" | to YANG status "deprecated", and IANA "obsolete" | |||
| maps to YANG status "obsolete". | maps to YANG status "obsolete". | |||
| "description": Replicates the description from the registry. | "description": Replicates the description from the registry. | |||
| "reference": Replicates the reference(s) from the registry with | "reference": Replicates the reference(s) from the registry with | |||
| the title of the document(s) added. | the title of the document(s) added. | |||
| Unassigned or reserved values are not present in the module. | Unassigned or reserved values are not present in the module. | |||
| When the "iana-foo" YANG module is updated, a new "revision" | When the "iana-foo" YANG module is updated, a new "revision" | |||
| statement with a unique revision date needs to be added in front of | statement with a unique revision date needs to be added in front of | |||
| the existing revision statements. The "revision" statement MUST | the existing "revision" statements. The "revision" statement MUST | |||
| contain both "description" and "reference" substatements as follows. | contain both "description" and "reference" substatements as follows. | |||
| The "description" substatement captures what changed in the | The "description" substatement captures what changed in the | |||
| revised version. Typically, the description enumerates the changes | revised version. Typically, the description enumerates the changes | |||
| such as udpates to existing entries (e.g., update a description or | such as udpates to existing entries (e.g., update a description or | |||
| a reference) or notes which "enums" were added or had their status | a reference) or notes which "enums" were added or had their status | |||
| changed (e.g., deprecated, discouraged, or obsoleted). | changed (e.g., deprecated, discouraged, or obsoleted). | |||
| -- When such a description is not feasible, the description varies | -- When such a description is not feasible, the description varies | |||
| -- on how the update is triggered. | -- on how the update is triggered. | |||
| -- If the update is triggered by an RFC, insert this text: | -- If the update is triggered by an RFC, insert this text: | |||
| The "description" substatement should include this text: | The "description" substatement should include this text: | |||
| skipping to change at line 3364 ¶ | skipping to change at line 3941 ¶ | |||
| -- If the update is triggered following other IANA registration | -- If the update is triggered following other IANA registration | |||
| -- policy (Section 4 of [RFC8126]) but not all the values in the | -- policy (Section 4 of [RFC8126]) but not all the values in the | |||
| -- registry are covered by the same policy, insert this text: | -- registry are covered by the same policy, insert this text: | |||
| The "description" substatement should include this text: | The "description" substatement should include this text: | |||
| "Applied updates as specified by the registration policy | "Applied updates as specified by the registration policy | |||
| <Some_IANA_policy>". | <Some_IANA_policy>". | |||
| The "reference" substatement points specifically to the published | The "reference" substatement points specifically to the published | |||
| module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). It may also point to an | module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). It may also point to an | |||
| authoritative event triggering the update to the YANG module. In all | authoritative event triggering the update to the YANG module. In all | |||
| cases, this event is cited from the underlying IANA registry. If the | cases, this event is cited from the underlying IANA registry. If the | |||
| update is triggered by an RFC, that RFC must also be included in | update is triggered by an RFC, that RFC must also be included in | |||
| the "reference" substatement. | the "reference" substatement. | |||
| -- If a name in the IANA registry does not comply with the | -- If a name in the IANA registry does not comply with the | |||
| -- YANG naming conventions, add details how IANA can generate | -- YANG naming conventions, add details how IANA can generate | |||
| -- legal identifiers. For example, if the name begins with | -- legal identifiers. For example, if the name begins with | |||
| -- a number, indicate a preference to spell out the number when | -- a number, indicate a preference to spell out the number when | |||
| -- used as an identifier. | -- used as an identifier. | |||
| IANA is requested to add this note to [reference-to-the-iana-foo- | IANA is requested to add this note to [reference-to-the-iana-foo- | |||
| registry]: | registry]: | |||
| When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo" | When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo" | |||
| [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII. | [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII. | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | <CODE ENDS> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="sec-iana"> | <section anchor="sec-iana"> | |||
| <name>IANA Considerations</name> | <name>IANA Considerations</name> | |||
| <section anchor="yang-modules"> | <section anchor="yang-modules"> | |||
| <name>YANG Modules</name> | <name>YANG Modules</name> | |||
| <t>The following registration in the "ns" registry of the "IETF XML | <t>The following registration in the "ns" registry of the "IETF XML | |||
| Registry" <xref target="RFC3688"/> was detailed in <xref target="RFC8407"/>. Thi | Registry" registry group <xref target="RFC3688"/> was detailed in <xref target=" | |||
| s document requests IANA | RFC8407"/>. IANA | |||
| to update this registration to reference this document.</t> | has updated this registration to reference this document.</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <dl spacing="compact" newline="false"> | |||
| URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template | <dt>URI:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template</dd> | |||
| Registrant Contact: The IESG. | <dt>Registrant Contact:</dt><dd>The IESG</dd> | |||
| XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. | <dt>XML:</dt><dd>N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.</dd> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | </dl> | |||
| <t>IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns" registry | <t>IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" registry within | |||
| within | the "IETF XML Registry" registry group <xref target="RFC3688"/>:</t> | |||
| the "IETF XML Registry" group <xref target="RFC3688"/>:</t> | <dl spacing="compact" newline="false"> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <dt>URI:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template</dd> | |||
| URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template | <dt>Registrant Contact:</dt><dd>The IESG</dd> | |||
| Registrant Contact: The IESG. | <dt>XML:</dt><dd>N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.</dd> | |||
| XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. | </dl> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | <t>IANA has registered the following YANG modules in the "YANG Module | |||
| <t>This document requests IANA to register the following YANG modules in | ||||
| the "YANG Module | ||||
| Names" registry <xref target="RFC6020"/> within the "YANG Parameters" registry g roup.</t> | Names" registry <xref target="RFC6020"/> within the "YANG Parameters" registry g roup.</t> | |||
| <artwork><![CDATA[ | <dl spacing="compact" newline="false"> | |||
| Name: ietf-template | <dt>Name:</dt><dd>ietf-template</dd> | |||
| Maintained by IANA? N | <dt>Maintained by IANA?</dt><dd>N</dd> | |||
| Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template | <dt>Namespace:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template</dd> | |||
| Prefix: temp | <dt>Prefix:</dt><dd>temp</dd> | |||
| Reference: RFC AAAA | <dt>Reference:</dt><dd>RFC 9907</dd> | |||
| </dl> | ||||
| Name: iana-template | <dl spacing="compact" newline="false"> | |||
| Maintained by IANA? N | <dt>Name:</dt><dd>iana-template</dd> | |||
| Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template | <dt>Maintained by IANA?</dt><dd>N</dd> | |||
| Prefix: iana-foo | <dt>Namespace:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template</dd> | |||
| Reference: RFC AAAA | <dt>Prefix:</dt><dd>iana-foo</dd> | |||
| ]]></artwork> | <dt>Reference:</dt><dd>RFC 9907</dd> | |||
| </dl> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="update-yang-parameters-registry-group"> | <section anchor="update-yang-parameters-registry-group"> | |||
| <name>Update YANG Parameters Registry Group</name> | <name>Update in YANG Parameters Registry Group</name> | |||
| <t>Also, this document requests IANA to update the RFC8407 reference for | <t>For the references of the "YANG Module Names" registry under the "YAN | |||
| the "YANG Module Names" registry under the "YANG Parameters" registry group | G Parameters" registry group, IANA has updated <xref target="RFC8407"/> to this | |||
| to point to the RFC number that will be assigned to this document as it contains | document, as it contains the template necessary | |||
| the template necessary | for registration in <xref target="tem-ietf"/>.</t> | |||
| for registration in Appendix B.</t> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="iana-maintained-modules-1"> | <section anchor="iana-maintained-modules-1"> | |||
| <name>IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | <name>IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | |||
| <t>IANA should refer to <xref target="sec-iana-mm"/> for information nec essary to populate "revision" statements and "identity" and "enum" substatements in IANA-maintained modules. These considerations cover both the creation and ma intenance of an IANA-mainatined module. In particular, the following should be n oted:</t> | <t>IANA should refer to <xref target="sec-iana-mm"/> for information nec essary to populate "revision" statements and "identity" and "enum" substatements in IANA-maintained modules. These considerations cover both the creation and ma intenance of an IANA-mainatined module. In particular, the following should be n oted:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>When an underlying registration is deprecated or obsoleted, a cor responding "status" substatement should be added to the identity or enumeration statement.</t> | <t>When an underlying registration is deprecated or obsoleted, a cor responding "status" substatement should be added to the identity or enumeration statement.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>The "reference" substatement should point specifically to the pub lished module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). When the | <t>The "reference" substatement should point specifically to the pub lished module (i.e., IANA_FOO_URL_With_REV). When the | |||
| skipping to change at line 3474 ¶ | skipping to change at line 4052 ¶ | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </middle> | </middle> | |||
| <back> | <back> | |||
| <references anchor="sec-combined-references"> | <references anchor="sec-combined-references"> | |||
| <name>References</name> | <name>References</name> | |||
| <references anchor="sec-normative-references"> | <references anchor="sec-normative-references"> | |||
| <name>Normative References</name> | <name>Normative References</name> | |||
| <reference anchor="W3C.REC-xpath" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC -xpath-19991116"> | <reference anchor="W3C.REC-xpath" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC -xpath-19991116"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0</title> | <title>XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0</title> | |||
| <author initials="J." surname="Clark" fullname="James Clark"> | <author initials="J." surname="Clark" fullname="James Clark" role="e ditor"> | |||
| <organization/> | <organization/> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <author initials="S." surname="DeRose" fullname="Steve DeRose"> | <author initials="S." surname="DeRose" fullname="Steve DeRose" role= "editor"> | |||
| <organization/> | <organization/> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date year="1999" month="November"/> | <date day="16" year="1999" month="November"/> | |||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="W3C" value="Recommendation REC-xpath-19991116"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC6241"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="R. Enns" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Enns | ||||
| "/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" initials="J." role="editor" surn | ||||
| ame="Schoenwaelder"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Bierman" initials="A." role="editor" surname="B | ||||
| ierman"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2011"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) defined in this do | ||||
| cument provides mechanisms to install, manipulate, and delete the configuration | ||||
| of network devices. It uses an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based data encod | ||||
| ing for the configuration data as well as the protocol messages. The NETCONF pro | ||||
| tocol operations are realized as remote procedure calls (RPCs). This document ob | ||||
| soletes RFC 4741. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6241"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6241"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8040"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>RESTCONF Protocol</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Bierman" initials="A." surname="Bierman"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2017"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document describes an HTTP-based protocol that provides a | ||||
| programmatic interface for accessing data defined in YANG, using the datastore c | ||||
| oncepts defined in the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF).</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8040"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8040"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7950"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2016"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>YANG is a data modeling language used to model configuration da | ||||
| ta, state data, Remote Procedure Calls, and notifications for network management | ||||
| protocols. This document describes the syntax and semantics of version 1.1 of t | ||||
| he YANG language. YANG version 1.1 is a maintenance release of the YANG language | ||||
| , addressing ambiguities and defects in the original specification. There are a | ||||
| small number of backward incompatibilities from YANG version 1. This document al | ||||
| so specifies the YANG mappings to the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF).< | ||||
| /t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7950"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7950"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC6020"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration | ||||
| Protocol (NETCONF)</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2010"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>YANG is a data modeling language used to model configuration an | ||||
| d state data manipulated by the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), NETCON | ||||
| F remote procedure calls, and NETCONF notifications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6020"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6020"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8791"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Data Structure Extensions</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Bierman" initials="A." surname="Bierman"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Björklund" initials="M." surname="Björklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2020"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document describes YANG mechanisms for defining abstract d | ||||
| ata structures with YANG.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8791"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8791"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8126"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs | ||||
| </title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Cotton" initials="M." surname="Cotton"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Narten" initials="T." surname="Narten"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2017"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use con | ||||
| stants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in the | ||||
| se fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their al | ||||
| locations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, | ||||
| that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).</t> | ||||
| <t>To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance des | ||||
| cribing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as whe | ||||
| n and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document | ||||
| defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification | ||||
| authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Consideratio | ||||
| ns is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of | ||||
| a registry.</t> | ||||
| <t>This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 52 | ||||
| 26.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8126"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7952"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Defining and Using Metadata with YANG</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Lhotka" initials="L." surname="Lhotka"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2016"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG extension that allows for defining | ||||
| metadata annotations in YANG modules. The document also specifies XML and JSON | ||||
| encoding of annotations and other rules for annotating instances of YANG data no | ||||
| des.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7952"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7952"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8792"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and RFCs</t | ||||
| itle> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="E. Auerswald" initials="E." surname="Auerswald"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2020"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines two strategies for handling long lines in | ||||
| width-bounded text content. One strategy, called the "single backslash" strateg | ||||
| y, is based on the historical use of a single backslash ('\') character to indic | ||||
| ate where line-folding has occurred, with the continuation occurring with the fi | ||||
| rst character that is not a space character (' ') on the next line. The second s | ||||
| trategy, called the "double backslash" strategy, extends the first strategy by a | ||||
| dding a second backslash character to identify where the continuation begins and | ||||
| is thereby able to handle cases not supported by the first strategy. Both strat | ||||
| egies use a self-describing header enabling automated reconstitution of the orig | ||||
| inal content.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8792"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8792"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8819"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Module Tags</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Hopps" initials="C." surname="Hopps"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Berger" initials="L." surname="Berger"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Bogdanovic" initials="D." surname="Bogdanovic"/ | ||||
| > | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2021"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document provides for the association of tags with YANG mo | ||||
| dules. The expectation is for such tags to be used to help classify and organize | ||||
| modules. A method for defining, reading, and writing modules tags is provided. | ||||
| Tags may be registered and assigned during module definition, assigned by implem | ||||
| entations, or dynamically defined and set by users. This document also provides | ||||
| guidance to future model writers; as such, this document updates RFC 8407.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8819"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8819"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8342"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" initials="J." surname="Schoenwae | ||||
| lder"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="P. Shafer" initials="P." surname="Shafer"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="R. Wilton" initials="R." surname="Wilton"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>Datastores are a fundamental concept binding the data models wr | ||||
| itten in the YANG data modeling language to network management protocols such as | ||||
| the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF. This document define | ||||
| s an architectural framework for datastores based on the experience gained with | ||||
| the initial simpler model, addressing requirements that were not well supported | ||||
| in the initial model. This document updates RFC 7950.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8342"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8342"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC2119"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</tit | ||||
| le> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="1997"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to sig | ||||
| nify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. T | ||||
| his document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents | ||||
| . This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Co | ||||
| mmunity, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8174"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</ti | ||||
| tle> | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/> | ||||
| <date month="May" year="2017"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protoco | ||||
| l specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that | ||||
| only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8341"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Network Configuration Access Control Model</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Bierman" initials="A." surname="Bierman"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The standardization of network configuration interfaces for use | ||||
| with the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) or the RESTCONF protocol requ | ||||
| ires a structured and secure operating environment that promotes human usability | ||||
| and multi-vendor interoperability. There is a need for standard mechanisms to r | ||||
| estrict NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol access for particular users to a preconfigu | ||||
| red subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. | ||||
| This document defines such an access control model.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document obsoletes RFC 6536.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="STD" value="91"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8341"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8341"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC3688"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The IETF XML Registry</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Mealling" initials="M." surname="Mealling"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2004"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document describes an IANA maintained registry for IETF st | ||||
| andards which use Extensible Markup Language (XML) related items such as Namespa | ||||
| ces, Document Type Declarations (DTDs), Schemas, and Resource Description Framew | ||||
| ork (RDF) Schemas.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="81"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3688"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3688"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC3986"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Berners-Lee" initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee | ||||
| "/> | ||||
| <author fullname="R. Fielding" initials="R." surname="Fielding"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Masinter" initials="L." surname="Masinter"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2005"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of ch | ||||
| aracters that identifies an abstract or physical resource. This specification de | ||||
| fines the generic URI syntax and a process for resolving URI references that mig | ||||
| ht be in relative form, along with guidelines and security considerations for th | ||||
| e use of URIs on the Internet. The URI syntax defines a grammar that is a supers | ||||
| et of all valid URIs, allowing an implementation to parse the common components | ||||
| of a URI reference without knowing the scheme-specific requirements of every pos | ||||
| sible identifier. This specification does not define a generative grammar for UR | ||||
| Is; that task is performed by the individual specifications of each URI scheme. | ||||
| [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="STD" value="66"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3986"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3986"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC5378"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." role="editor" surname="B | ||||
| radner"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Contreras" initials="J." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Contreras"/> | ||||
| <date month="November" year="2008"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The IETF policies about rights in Contributions to the IETF are | ||||
| designed to ensure that such Contributions can be made available to the IETF an | ||||
| d Internet communities while permitting the authors to retain as many rights as | ||||
| possible. This memo details the IETF policies on rights in Contributions to the | ||||
| IETF. It also describes the objectives that the policies are designed to meet. T | ||||
| his memo obsoletes RFCs 3978 and 4748 and, with BCP 79 and RFC 5377, replaces Se | ||||
| ction 10 of RFC 2026. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices | ||||
| for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improve | ||||
| ments.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="78"/> | <refcontent>W3C Recommendation</refcontent> | |||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5378"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5378"/> | ||||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6 | ||||
| 241.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 040.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 950.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6 | ||||
| 020.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 791.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 126.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 952.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 792.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 819.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 342.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2 | ||||
| 119.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 174.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 341.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3 | ||||
| 688.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3 | ||||
| 986.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5 | ||||
| 378.xml"/> | ||||
| </references> | </references> | |||
| <references anchor="sec-informative-references"> | <references anchor="sec-informative-references"> | |||
| <name>Informative References</name> | <name>Informative References</name> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA-MOD-NAMES" target="https://www.iana.org/assignme nts/yang-parameters/"> | <reference anchor="IANA-MOD-NAMES" target="https://www.iana.org/assignme nts/yang-parameters/"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>YANG Module Names</title> | <title>YANG Module Names</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA-XML" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/xm l-registry/"> | <reference anchor="IANA-XML" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/xm l-registry/"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>IETF XML Registry</title> | <title>IETF XML Registry</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="RFC-STYLE" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/stylegu | ||||
| ide/"> | <!-- [rfced] FYI- The reference [RFC-STYLE] was not cited in the | |||
| <front> | document (though it was in RFC 8407), so we have removed the | |||
| <title>Style Guide</title> | reference entry. Please let us know any objections. | |||
| <author> | --> | |||
| <organization>RFC Editor</organization> | ||||
| </author> | <reference anchor="IANA_BFD_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assignment | |||
| <date/> | s/iana-bfd-types"> | |||
| </front> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="IANA_BFD_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assignment | ||||
| s/iana-bfd-types/iana-bfd-types.xhtml"> | ||||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>iana-bfd-types YANG Module</title> | <title>iana-bfd-types YANG Module</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA_BGP-L2_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assignm ents/iana-bgp-l2-encaps/iana-bgp-l2-encaps.xhtml"> | <reference anchor="IANA_BGP-L2_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assignm ents/iana-bgp-l2-encaps"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>iana-bgp-l2-encaps YANG Module</title> | <title>iana-bgp-l2-encaps YANG Module</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA_BGP-L2_URL-Revision" target="https://www.iana.or g/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-bfd-types@2021-10-21.yang"> | <reference anchor="IANA_BGP-L2_URL-Revision" target="https://www.iana.or g/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-bfd-types@2021-10-21.yang"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>iana-bfd-types@2021-10-21.yang</title> | <title>iana-bfd-types@2021-10-21.yang</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA_PW-Types_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assig nments/iana-pseudowire-types/iana-pseudowire-types.xhtml"> | <reference anchor="IANA_PW-Types_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/assig nments/iana-pseudowire-types"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>iana-pseudowire-types YANG Module</title> | <title>iana-pseudowire-types YANG Module</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="Style" target="https://github.com/llhotka/iana-yang"> | <reference anchor="Style" target="https://github.com/llhotka/iana-yang"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>IANA YANG</title> | <title>IANA YANG</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization/> | <organization/> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date>n.d.</date> | <date month="Dec" year="2021"/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| <refcontent>commit 3a6cb69</refcontent> | ||||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS" target="https://www.iana.org/as signments/yang-parameters"> | <reference anchor="IANA-YANG-PARAMETERS" target="https://www.iana.org/as signments/yang-parameters"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>YANG Parameters</title> | <title>YANG Parameters</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization/> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date>n.d.</date> | ||||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA-TAGS" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/y ang-module-tags/"> | <reference anchor="IANA-TAGS" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/y ang-module-tags/"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>YANG Module Tags</title> | <title>YANG Module Tags</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="IANA_Tunnel_Type_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/as signments/iana-tunnel-type/iana-tunnel-type.xhtml"> | <reference anchor="IANA_Tunnel_Type_URL" target="https://www.iana.org/as signments/iana-tunnel-type"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>iana-tunnel-type YANG Module</title> | <title>iana-tunnel-type YANG Module</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IANA</organization> | <organization>IANA</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date/> | <date/> | |||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <reference anchor="ID-Guidelines" target="https://authors.ietf.org/en/co ntent-guidelines-overview"> | <reference anchor="ID-Guidelines" target="https://authors.ietf.org/en/co ntent-guidelines-overview"> | |||
| <front> | <front> | |||
| <title>Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts</title> | <title>Content guidelines overview</title> | |||
| <author> | <author> | |||
| <organization>IETF</organization> | <organization>IETF</organization> | |||
| </author> | </author> | |||
| <date>n.d.</date> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8407"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing | ||||
| YANG Data Models</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Bierman" initials="A." surname="Bierman"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of spec | ||||
| ifications containing YANG modules. Recommendations and procedures are defined, | ||||
| which are intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network Configu | ||||
| ration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF protocol implementations that utilize YAN | ||||
| G modules. This document obsoletes RFC 6087.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="216"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8407"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8407"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8675"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="I. Farrer" initials="I." surname="Farrer"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="R. Asati" initials="R." surname="Asati"/> | ||||
| <date month="November" year="2019"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies the initial version of a YANG module "i | ||||
| ana-tunnel-type", which contains a collection of IANA-maintained YANG identities | ||||
| used as interface types for tunnel interfaces. The module reflects the "tunnelT | ||||
| ype" registry maintained by IANA. The latest revision of this YANG module can be | ||||
| obtained from the IANA website.</t> | ||||
| <t>Tunnel type values are not directly added to the Tunnel Interfa | ||||
| ce Types YANG module; they must instead be added to the "tunnelType" IANA regist | ||||
| ry. Once a new tunnel type registration is made by IANA for a new tunneling sche | ||||
| me or even an existing one that is not already listed in the current registry (e | ||||
| .g., LISP, NSH), IANA will update the Tunnel Interface Types YANG module accordi | ||||
| ngly.</t> | ||||
| <t>Some of the IETF-defined tunneling techniques are not listed in | ||||
| the current IANA registry. It is not the intent of this document to update the | ||||
| existing IANA registry with a comprehensive list of tunnel technologies. Registr | ||||
| ants must follow the IETF registration procedure for interface types whenever a | ||||
| new tunnel type is needed.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8675"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8675"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9291"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." role="editor" s | ||||
| urname="Gonzalez de Dios"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Munoz" initials="L." surname="Munoz"/> | ||||
| <date month="September" year="2022"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines an L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) that can be | ||||
| used to manage the provisioning of Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) serv | ||||
| ices within a network (e.g., a service provider network). The L2NM complements t | ||||
| he L2VPN Service Model (L2SM) by providing a network-centric view of the service | ||||
| that is internal to a service provider. The L2NM is particularly meant to be us | ||||
| ed by a network controller to derive the configuration information that will be | ||||
| sent to relevant network devices.</t> | ||||
| <t>Also, this document defines a YANG module to manage Ethernet se | ||||
| gments and the initial versions of two IANA-maintained modules that include a se | ||||
| t of identities of BGP Layer 2 encapsulation types and pseudowire types.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9291"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9291"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC2026"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="1996"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This memo documents the process used by the Internet community | ||||
| for the standardization of protocols and procedures. It defines the stages in th | ||||
| e standardization process, the requirements for moving a document between stages | ||||
| and the types of documents used during this process. This document specifies an | ||||
| Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discus | ||||
| sion and suggestions for improvements.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="9"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2026"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2026"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8340"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Tree Diagrams</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Berger" initials="L." role="editor" surname="Be | ||||
| rger"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module t | ||||
| ree diagrams. The purpose of this document is to provide a single location for t | ||||
| his definition. This syntax may be updated from time to time based on the evolut | ||||
| ion of the YANG language.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="215"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8340"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8340"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8309"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Service Models Explained</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="W. Liu" initials="W." surname="Liu"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The IETF has produced many modules in the YANG modeling languag | ||||
| e. The majority of these modules are used to construct data models to model devi | ||||
| ces or monolithic functions.</t> | ||||
| <t>A small number of YANG modules have been defined to model servi | ||||
| ces (for example, the Layer 3 Virtual Private Network Service Model (L3SM) produ | ||||
| ced by the L3SM working group and documented in RFC 8049).</t> | ||||
| <t>This document describes service models as used within the IETF | ||||
| and also shows where a service model might fit into a software-defined networkin | ||||
| g architecture. Note that service models do not make any assumption of how a ser | ||||
| vice is actually engineered and delivered for a customer; details of how network | ||||
| protocols and devices are engineered to deliver a service are captured in other | ||||
| modules that are not exposed through the interface between the customer and the | ||||
| provider.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8309"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8309"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9129"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Data Model for the OSPF Protocol</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Yeung" initials="D." surname="Yeung"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="Y. Qu" initials="Y." surname="Qu"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="Z. Zhang" initials="Z." surname="Zhang"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="I. Chen" initials="I." surname="Chen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2022"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to con | ||||
| figure and manage OSPF. The model is based on YANG 1.1 as defined in RFC 7950 an | ||||
| d conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) as described | ||||
| in RFC 8342.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9129"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9129"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7407"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for SNMP Configuration</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" initials="J." surname="Schoenwae | ||||
| lder"/> | ||||
| <date month="December" year="2014"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a collection of YANG definitions for conf | ||||
| iguring SNMP engines.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7407"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7407"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8349"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)</titl | ||||
| e> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Lhotka" initials="L." surname="Lhotka"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="Y. Qu" initials="Y." surname="Qu"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies three YANG modules and one submodule. T | ||||
| ogether, they form the core routing data model that serves as a framework for co | ||||
| nfiguring and managing a routing subsystem. It is expected that these modules wi | ||||
| ll be augmented by additional YANG modules defining data models for control-plan | ||||
| e protocols, route filters, and other functions. The core routing data model pro | ||||
| vides common building blocks for such extensions -- routes, Routing Information | ||||
| Bases (RIBs), and control-plane protocols.</t> | ||||
| <t>The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Manage | ||||
| ment Datastore Architecture (NMDA). This document obsoletes RFC 8022.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8349"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8349"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC6991"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Common YANG Data Types</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" initials="J." role="editor" surn | ||||
| ame="Schoenwaelder"/> | ||||
| <date month="July" year="2013"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document introduces a collection of common data types to b | ||||
| e used with the YANG data modeling language. This document obsoletes RFC 6021.</ | ||||
| t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6991"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6991"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8969"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management wit | ||||
| h YANG</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." role="editor" surname="Wu"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Lopez" initials="D." surname="Lopez"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Xie" initials="C." surname="Xie"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Geng" initials="L." surname="Geng"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2021"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>Data models provide a programmatic approach to represent servic | ||||
| es and networks. Concretely, they can be used to derive configuration informatio | ||||
| n for network and service components, and state information that will be monitor | ||||
| ed and tracked. Data models can be used during the service and network managemen | ||||
| t life cycle (e.g., service instantiation, service provisioning, service optimiz | ||||
| ation, service monitoring, service diagnosing, and service assurance). Data mode | ||||
| ls are also instrumental in the automation of network management, and they can p | ||||
| rovide closed-loop control for adaptive and deterministic service creation, deli | ||||
| very, and maintenance.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document describes a framework for service and network man | ||||
| agement automation that takes advantage of YANG modeling technologies. This fram | ||||
| ework is drawn from a network operator perspective irrespective of the origin of | ||||
| a data model; thus, it can accommodate YANG modules that are developed outside | ||||
| the IETF.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8969"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8969"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8299"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." role="editor" surname="Wu"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Litkowski" initials="S." surname="Litkowski"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Tomotaki" initials="L." surname="Tomotaki"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Ogaki" initials="K." surname="Ogaki"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG data model that can be used for co | ||||
| mmunication between customers and network operators and to deliver a Layer 3 pro | ||||
| vider-provisioned VPN service. This document is limited to BGP PE-based VPNs as | ||||
| described in RFCs 4026, 4110, and 4364. This model is intended to be instantiate | ||||
| d at the management system to deliver the overall service. It is not a configura | ||||
| tion model to be used directly on network elements. This model provides an abstr | ||||
| acted view of the Layer 3 IP VPN service configuration components. It will be up | ||||
| to the management system to take this model as input and use specific configura | ||||
| tion models to configure the different network elements to deliver the service. | ||||
| How the configuration of network elements is done is out of scope for this docum | ||||
| ent.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document obsoletes RFC 8049; it replaces the unimplementab | ||||
| le module in that RFC with a new module with the same name that is not backward | ||||
| compatible. The changes are a series of small fixes to the YANG module and some | ||||
| clarifications to the text.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8299"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8299"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8466"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) | ||||
| Service Delivery</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Wen" initials="B." surname="Wen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="G. Fioccola" initials="G." role="editor" surname=" | ||||
| Fioccola"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Xie" initials="C." surname="Xie"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Jalil" initials="L." surname="Jalil"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to con | ||||
| figure a Layer 2 provider-provisioned VPN service. It is up to a management syst | ||||
| em to take this as an input and generate specific configuration models to config | ||||
| ure the different network elements to deliver the service. How this configuratio | ||||
| n of network elements is done is out of scope for this document.</t> | ||||
| <t>The YANG data model defined in this document includes support f | ||||
| or point-to-point Virtual Private Wire Services (VPWSs) and multipoint Virtual P | ||||
| rivate LAN Services (VPLSs) that use Pseudowires signaled using the Label Distri | ||||
| bution Protocol (LDP) and the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) as described in RFCs | ||||
| 4761 and 6624.</t> | ||||
| <t>The YANG data model defined in this document conforms to the Ne | ||||
| twork Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8466"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8466"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9182"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." role="editor" s | ||||
| urname="Gonzalez de Dios"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Munoz" initials="L." surname="Munoz"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Aguado" initials="A." surname="Aguado"/> | ||||
| <date month="February" year="2022"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>As a complement to the Layer 3 Virtual Private Network Service | ||||
| Model (L3SM), which is used for communication between customers and service prov | ||||
| iders, this document defines an L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) that can be used for | ||||
| the provisioning of Layer 3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN) services within a se | ||||
| rvice provider network. The model provides a network-centric view of L3VPN servi | ||||
| ces.</t> | ||||
| <t>The L3NM is meant to be used by a network controller to derive | ||||
| the configuration information that will be sent to relevant network devices. The | ||||
| model can also facilitate communication between a service orchestrator and a ne | ||||
| twork controller/orchestrator.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9182"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9182"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8199"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Module Classification</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Bogdanovic" initials="D." surname="Bogdanovic"/ | ||||
| > | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Moberg" initials="C." surname="Moberg"/> | ||||
| <date month="July" year="2017"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The YANG data modeling language is currently being considered f | ||||
| or a wide variety of applications throughout the networking industry at large. M | ||||
| any standards development organizations (SDOs), open-source software projects, v | ||||
| endors, and users are using YANG to develop and publish YANG modules for a wide | ||||
| variety of applications. At the same time, there is currently no well-known term | ||||
| inology to categorize various types of YANG modules.</t> | ||||
| <t>A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of | ||||
| YANG modules, assist in the analysis of the YANG data modeling efforts in the IE | ||||
| TF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG- related discussions b | ||||
| etween the different groups.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms | ||||
| to support consistent classification of YANG modules.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8199"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8199"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8519"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)</titl | ||||
| e> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Jethanandani" initials="M." surname="Jethananda | ||||
| ni"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Agarwal" initials="S." surname="Agarwal"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Huang" initials="L." surname="Huang"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Blair" initials="D." surname="Blair"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2019"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a data model for Access Control Lists (AC | ||||
| Ls). An ACL is a user-ordered set of rules used to configure the forwarding beha | ||||
| vior in a device. Each rule is used to find a match on a packet and define actio | ||||
| ns that will be performed on the packet.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8519"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8519"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC4252"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Ylonen" initials="T." surname="Ylonen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Lonvick" initials="C." role="editor" surname="L | ||||
| onvick"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2006"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The Secure Shell Protocol (SSH) is a protocol for secure remote | ||||
| login and other secure network services over an insecure network. This document | ||||
| describes the SSH authentication protocol framework and public key, password, a | ||||
| nd host-based client authentication methods. Additional authentication methods a | ||||
| re described in separate documents. The SSH authentication protocol runs on top | ||||
| of the SSH transport layer protocol and provides a single authenticated tunnel f | ||||
| or the SSH connection protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4252"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4252"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8446"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3</titl | ||||
| e> | ||||
| <author fullname="E. Rescorla" initials="E." surname="Rescorla"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Secu | ||||
| rity (TLS) protocol. TLS allows client/server applications to communicate over t | ||||
| he Internet in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, and m | ||||
| essage forgery.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document updates RFCs 5705 and 6066, and obsoletes RFCs 50 | ||||
| 77, 5246, and 6961. This document also specifies new requirements for TLS 1.2 im | ||||
| plementations.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8446"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8446"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9000"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Iyengar" initials="J." role="editor" surname="I | ||||
| yengar"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Thomson" initials="M." role="editor" surname="T | ||||
| homson"/> | ||||
| <date month="May" year="2021"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines the core of the QUIC transport protocol. | ||||
| QUIC provides applications with flow-controlled streams for structured communica | ||||
| tion, low-latency connection establishment, and network path migration. QUIC inc | ||||
| ludes security measures that ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability | ||||
| in a range of deployment circumstances. Accompanying documents describe the int | ||||
| egration of TLS for key negotiation, loss detection, and an exemplary congestion | ||||
| control algorithm.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9000"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9000"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7951"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Lhotka" initials="L." surname="Lhotka"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2016"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines encoding rules for representing configura | ||||
| tion data, state data, parameters of Remote Procedure Call (RPC) operations or a | ||||
| ctions, and notifications defined using YANG as JavaScript Object Notation (JSON | ||||
| ) text.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7951"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7951"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC5737"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Arkko" initials="J." surname="Arkko"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Cotton" initials="M." surname="Cotton"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Vegoda" initials="L." surname="Vegoda"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2010"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>Three IPv4 unicast address blocks are reserved for use in examp | ||||
| les in specifications and other documents. This document describes the use of th | ||||
| ese blocks. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it i | ||||
| s published for informational purposes.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5737"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5737"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC3849"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>IPv6 Address Prefix Reserved for Documentation</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Lord" initials="A." surname="Lord"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="P. Smith" initials="P." surname="Smith"/> | ||||
| <date month="July" year="2004"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>To reduce the likelihood of conflict and confusion when relatin | ||||
| g documented examples to deployed systems, an IPv6 unicast address prefix is res | ||||
| erved for use in examples in RFCs, books, documentation, and the like. Since sit | ||||
| e-local and link-local unicast addresses have special meaning in IPv6, these add | ||||
| resses cannot be used in many example situations. The document describes the use | ||||
| of the IPv6 address prefix 2001:DB8::/32 as a reserved prefix for use in docume | ||||
| ntation. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3849"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3849"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9637"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Expanding the IPv6 Documentation Space</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="N. Buraglio" initials="N." surname="Buraglio"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2024"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The document describes the reservation of an additional IPv6 ad | ||||
| dress prefix for use in documentation. This update to RFC 3849 expands on the ex | ||||
| isting 2001:db8::/32 address block with the reservation of an additional, larger | ||||
| prefix. The addition of a /20 prefix allows documented examples to more closely | ||||
| reflect a broader range of realistic, current deployment scenarios and more clo | ||||
| sely aligns with contemporary allocation models for large networks.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9637"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9637"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC5612"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Enterprise Number for Documentation Use</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="P. Eronen" initials="P." surname="Eronen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Harrington" initials="D." surname="Harrington"/ | ||||
| > | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2009"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document describes an Enterprise Number (also known as SMI | ||||
| Network Management Private Enterprise Code) for use in documentation. This memo | ||||
| provides information for the Internet community.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5612"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5612"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC5398"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Autonomous System (AS) Number Reservation for Documentation U | ||||
| se</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/> | ||||
| <date month="December" year="2008"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>To reduce the likelihood of conflict and confusion when relatin | ||||
| g documented examples to deployed systems, two blocks of Autonomous System numbe | ||||
| rs (ASNs) are reserved for use in examples in RFCs, books, documentation, and th | ||||
| e like. This document describes the reservation of two blocks of ASNs as reserve | ||||
| d numbers for use in documentation. This memo provides information for the Inter | ||||
| net community.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5398"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5398"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC2606"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Reserved Top Level DNS Names</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Eastlake 3rd" initials="D." surname="Eastlake 3 | ||||
| rd"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="A. Panitz" initials="A." surname="Panitz"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="1999"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>To reduce the likelihood of conflict and confusion, a few top l | ||||
| evel domain names are reserved for use in private testing, as examples in docume | ||||
| ntation, and the like. In addition, a few second level domain names reserved for | ||||
| use as examples are documented. This document specifies an Internet Best Curren | ||||
| t Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions | ||||
| for improvements.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="32"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2606"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2606"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC4151"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The 'tag' URI Scheme</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Kindberg" initials="T." surname="Kindberg"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="S. Hawke" initials="S." surname="Hawke"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2005"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document describes the "tag" Uniform Resource Identifier ( | ||||
| URI) scheme. Tag URIs (also known as "tags") are designed to be unique across sp | ||||
| ace and time while being tractable to humans. They are distinct from most other | ||||
| URIs in that they have no authoritative resolution mechanism. A tag may be used | ||||
| purely as an entity identifier. Furthermore, using tags has some advantages over | ||||
| the common practice of using "http" URIs as identifiers for non-HTTP-accessible | ||||
| resources. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4151"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4151"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8343"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for Interface Management</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="March" year="2018"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG data model for the management of n | ||||
| etwork interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augme | ||||
| nt the generic interfaces data model defined in this document. The data model in | ||||
| cludes definitions for configuration and system state (status information and co | ||||
| unters for the collection of statistics).</t> | ||||
| <t>The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Ma | ||||
| nagement Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document obsoletes RFC 7223.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8343"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8343"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7223"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A YANG Data Model for Interface Management</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="May" year="2014"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines a YANG data model for the management of n | ||||
| etwork interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augme | ||||
| nt the generic interfaces data model defined in this document. The data model in | ||||
| cludes configuration data and state data (status information and counters for th | ||||
| e collection of statistics).</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7223"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7223"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9132"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Si | ||||
| gnal Channel Specification</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Shallow" initials="J." surname="Shallow"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Reddy.K" initials="T." surname="Reddy.K"/> | ||||
| <date month="September" year="2021"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies the Distributed Denial-of-Service Open | ||||
| Threat Signaling (DOTS) signal channel, a protocol for signaling the need for pr | ||||
| otection against Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks to a server capabl | ||||
| e of enabling network traffic mitigation on behalf of the requesting client.</t> | ||||
| <t>A companion document defines the DOTS data channel, a separate | ||||
| reliable communication layer for DOTS management and configuration purposes.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document obsoletes RFC 8782.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9132"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9132"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9195"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>A File Format for YANG Instance Data</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Lengyel" initials="B." surname="Lengyel"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/> | ||||
| <date month="February" year="2022"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>There is a need to document data defined in YANG models at desi | ||||
| gn time, implementation time, or when a live server is unavailable. This documen | ||||
| t specifies a standard file format for YANG instance data, which follows the syn | ||||
| tax and semantics of existing YANG models and annotates it with metadata.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9195"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9195"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9244"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Te | ||||
| lemetry</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname= | ||||
| "Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Reddy.K" initials="T." role="editor" surname="R | ||||
| eddy.K"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="E. Doron" initials="E." surname="Doron"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Shallow" initials="J." surname="Shallow"/> | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2022"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document aims to enrich the Distributed Denial-of-Service | ||||
| Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) signal channel protocol with various telemetry attr | ||||
| ibutes, allowing for optimal Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack mitigat | ||||
| ion. It specifies the normal traffic baseline and attack traffic telemetry attri | ||||
| butes a DOTS client can convey to its DOTS server in the mitigation request, the | ||||
| mitigation status telemetry attributes a DOTS server can communicate to a DOTS | ||||
| client, and the mitigation efficacy telemetry attributes a DOTS client can commu | ||||
| nicate to a DOTS server. The telemetry attributes can assist the mitigator in ch | ||||
| oosing the DDoS mitigation techniques and performing optimal DDoS attack mitigat | ||||
| ion.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies two YANG modules: one for representing | ||||
| DOTS telemetry message types and one for sharing the attack mapping details over | ||||
| the DOTS data channel.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9244"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9244"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9362"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Si | ||||
| gnal Channel Configuration Attributes for Robust Block Transmission</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="J. Shallow" initials="J." surname="Shallow"/> | ||||
| <date month="February" year="2023"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document specifies new DDoS Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) s | ||||
| ignal channel configuration parameters that can be negotiated between DOTS peers | ||||
| to enable the use of Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 Constrained Application Protocol (Co | ||||
| AP) options. These options enable robust and faster transmission rates for large | ||||
| amounts of data with less packet interchanges as well as support for faster rec | ||||
| overy should any of the blocks get lost in transmission (especially during DDoS | ||||
| attacks).</t> | ||||
| <t>Also, this document defines a YANG data model for representing | ||||
| these new DOTS signal channel configuration parameters. This model augments the | ||||
| DOTS signal YANG module ("ietf-dots-signal-channel") defined in RFC 9132.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9362"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9362"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC8892"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Guidelines and Registration Procedures for Interface Types an | ||||
| d Tunnel Types</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Thaler" initials="D." surname="Thaler"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="D. Romascanu" initials="D." surname="Romascanu"/> | ||||
| <date month="August" year="2020"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document provides guidelines and procedures for those who | ||||
| are | ||||
| defining, registering, or evaluating definitions of new interface | ||||
| types ("ifType" values) and tunnel types. The original definition of | ||||
| the IANA interface type registry predated the use of IANA | ||||
| Considerations sections and YANG modules, so some confusion arose | ||||
| over time. Tunnel types were added later, with the same requirements | ||||
| and allocation policy as interface types. This document updates RFC | ||||
| 2863 and provides updated guidance for these registries.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8892"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8892"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC2863"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The Interfaces Group MIB</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. McCloghrie" initials="K." surname="McCloghrie"/ | ||||
| > | ||||
| <author fullname="F. Kastenholz" initials="F." surname="Kastenholz"/ | ||||
| > | ||||
| <date month="June" year="2000"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This memo discusses the 'interfaces' group of MIB-II, especiall | ||||
| y the experience gained from the definition of numerous media-specific MIB modul | ||||
| es for use in conjunction with the 'interfaces' group for managing various sub-l | ||||
| ayers beneath the internetwork-layer. It specifies clarifications to, and extens | ||||
| ions of, the architectural issues within the MIB-II model of the 'interfaces' gr | ||||
| oup. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2863"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2863"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC7224"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>IANA Interface Type YANG Module</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="M. Bjorklund" initials="M." surname="Bjorklund"/> | ||||
| <date month="May" year="2014"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document defines the initial version of the iana-if-type Y | ||||
| ANG module.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7224"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7224"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9108"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record Types</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="L. Lhotka" initials="L." surname="Lhotka"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="P. Špaček" initials="P." surname="Špaček"/> | ||||
| <date month="September" year="2021"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document introduces the YANG module "iana-dns-class-rr-typ | ||||
| e", which contains derived types reflecting two IANA registries: DNS CLASSes and | ||||
| Resource Record (RR) TYPEs. These YANG types are intended as the minimum basis | ||||
| for future data modeling work.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9108"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9108"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC9645"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>YANG Groupings for TLS Clients and TLS Servers</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen"/> | ||||
| <date month="October" year="2024"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This document presents four YANG 1.1 modules -- three IETF modu | ||||
| les and one supporting IANA module.</t> | ||||
| <t>The three IETF modules are "ietf-tls-common", "ietf-tls-client" | ||||
| , and "ietf-tls-server". The "ietf-tls-client" and "ietf-tls-server" modules are | ||||
| the primary productions of this work, supporting the configuration and monitori | ||||
| ng of TLS clients and servers.</t> | ||||
| <t>The IANA module is "iana-tls-cipher-suite-algs". This module de | ||||
| fines YANG enumerations that provide support for an IANA-maintained algorithm re | ||||
| gistry.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9645"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9645"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC4253"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="T. Ylonen" initials="T." surname="Ylonen"/> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Lonvick" initials="C." role="editor" surname="L | ||||
| onvick"/> | ||||
| <date month="January" year="2006"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>The Secure Shell (SSH) is a protocol for secure remote login an | ||||
| d other secure network services over an insecure network.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document describes the SSH transport layer protocol, which | ||||
| typically runs on top of TCP/IP. The protocol can be used as a basis for a numb | ||||
| er of secure network services. It provides strong encryption, server authenticat | ||||
| ion, and integrity protection. It may also provide compression.</t> | ||||
| <t>Key exchange method, public key algorithm, symmetric encryption | ||||
| algorithm, message authentication algorithm, and hash algorithm are all negotia | ||||
| ted.</t> | ||||
| <t>This document also describes the Diffie-Hellman key exchange me | ||||
| thod and the minimal set of algorithms that are needed to implement the SSH tran | ||||
| sport layer protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4253"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4253"/> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="RFC4181"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents</title> | ||||
| <author fullname="C. Heard" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Hea | ||||
| rd"/> | ||||
| <date month="September" year="2005"/> | ||||
| <abstract> | ||||
| <t>This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of IETF | ||||
| standards-track specifications containing MIB modules. Applicable portions may | ||||
| be used as a basis for reviews of other MIB documents. This document specifies a | ||||
| n Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discu | ||||
| ssion and suggestions for improvements.</t> | ||||
| </abstract> | ||||
| </front> | </front> | |||
| <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="111"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4181"/> | ||||
| <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4181"/> | ||||
| </reference> | </reference> | |||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 407.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 675.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 291.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2 | ||||
| 026.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 340.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 309.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 129.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 407.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 349.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6 | ||||
| 991.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 969.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 299.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 466.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 182.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 199.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 519.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4 | ||||
| 252.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 446.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 000.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 951.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5 | ||||
| 737.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3 | ||||
| 849.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 637.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5 | ||||
| 612.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5 | ||||
| 398.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2 | ||||
| 606.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4 | ||||
| 151.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 343.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 223.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 132.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 195.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 244.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 362.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8 | ||||
| 892.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2 | ||||
| 863.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7 | ||||
| 224.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 108.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9 | ||||
| 645.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4 | ||||
| 253.xml"/> | ||||
| <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4 | ||||
| 181.xml"/> | ||||
| <reference anchor="Err5693" quote-title="false" target="https://www.rfc-editor.o | ||||
| rg/errata/eid5693"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Erratum ID 5693</title> | ||||
| <author> | ||||
| <organization>RFC Errata</organization> | ||||
| </author> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <refcontent>RFC 8407</refcontent> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="Err5800" quote-title="false" target="https://www.rfc-editor.o | ||||
| rg/errata/eid5800"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Erratum ID 5800</title> | ||||
| <author> | ||||
| <organization>RFC Errata</organization> | ||||
| </author> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <refcontent>RFC 8407</refcontent> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="Err6899" quote-title="false" target="https://www.rfc-editor.o | ||||
| rg/errata/eid6899"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Erratum ID 6899</title> | ||||
| <author> | ||||
| <organization>RFC Errata</organization> | ||||
| </author> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <refcontent>RFC 8407</refcontent> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| <reference anchor="Err7416" quote-title="false" target="https://www.rfc-editor.o | ||||
| rg/errata/eid7416"> | ||||
| <front> | ||||
| <title>Erratum ID 7416</title> | ||||
| <author> | ||||
| <organization>RFC Errata</organization> | ||||
| </author> | ||||
| </front> | ||||
| <refcontent>RFC 8407</refcontent> | ||||
| </reference> | ||||
| </references> | </references> | |||
| </references> | </references> | |||
| <?line 3487?> | ||||
| <section anchor="module-review-checklist"> | <section anchor="module-review-checklist"> | |||
| <name>Module Review Checklist</name> | <name>Module Review Checklist</name> | |||
| <t>This section is adapted from <xref target="RFC4181"/>.</t> | <t>This section is adapted from <xref target="RFC4181"/>.</t> | |||
| <!--[rfced] For "I-D Boilerplate", would you like to point to | ||||
| to https://authors.ietf.org/required-content ? | ||||
| It seems more relevant than the broad page that | ||||
| https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html resolves to | ||||
| (https://authors.ietf.org/en/content-guidelines-overview). | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| * I-D Boilerplate: Verify that the document contains the required | ||||
| I-D boilerplate (see <https://www.ietf.org/id-info/ | ||||
| guidelines.html>), including the appropriate statement to permit | ||||
| publication as an RFC, and that the I-D boilerplate does not | ||||
| contain references or section numbers. | ||||
| Perhaps: | ||||
| * I-D Boilerplate: Verify that the document contains the required | ||||
| sections (see <https://authors.ietf.org/required-content>). | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <t>The purpose of a YANG module review is to review the YANG module for | <t>The purpose of a YANG module review is to review the YANG module for | |||
| both technical correctness and adherence to IETF documentation | both technical correctness and adherence to IETF documentation | |||
| requirements. The following checklist may be helpful when reviewing | requirements. The following checklist may be helpful when reviewing | |||
| an I-D:</t> | an I-D:</t> | |||
| <ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>I-D Boilerplate -- verify that the document contains the required | <t>I-D Boilerplate: Verify that the document contains the required | |||
| I-D boilerplate (see <tt><https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html></t | I-D boilerplate (see <eref | |||
| t>), including the appropriate statement to permit | target="https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html" | |||
| publication as an RFC, and that the I-D boilerplate does not | brackets="angle"/>), including the appropriate statement to permit | |||
| contain references or section numbers.</t> | publication as an RFC, and that the I-D boilerplate does not contain | |||
| references or section numbers.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Abstract -- verify that the abstract does not contain references, | <t>Abstract: Verify that the abstract does not contain references, | |||
| that it does not have a section number, and that its content | that it does not have a section number, and that its content follows | |||
| follows the guidelines in <tt><https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html&g | the guidelines in <eref | |||
| t;</tt>.</t> | target="https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html" | |||
| brackets="angle"/>.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Copyright Notice -- verify that the document has the appropriate | ||||
| text regarding the rights that document contributors provide to | <t>Copyright Notice: Verify that the document has the appropriate | |||
| the IETF Trust <xref target="RFC5378"/>. Verify that it contains the full IETF | text regarding the rights that document contributors provide to the | |||
| Trust copyright notice at the beginning of the document. The IETF | IETF Trust <xref target="RFC5378"/>. Verify that it contains the | |||
| Trust Legal Provisions (TLP) can be found at: </t> | full IETF Trust copyright notice at the beginning of the document. | |||
| <t><tt><https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/></tt></t> | The IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP) can be found at: <eref | |||
| target="https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/" | ||||
| brackets="angle"/></t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Security Considerations section -- If none of the modules in the do | <t>Security Considerations section: If none of the modules in the | |||
| cument falls under the exceptions in <xref target="sec-sec-cons-sec"/> (e.g., us | document falls under the exceptions in <xref | |||
| e YANG data structure), verify that the section is modeled after | target="sec-sec-cons-sec"/> (e.g., use YANG data structure), verify | |||
| the latest approved template from the Operations and Management | that the section is modeled after the latest approved template from | |||
| (OPS) area website (see <tt><https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-gu | the Operations and Management (OPS) area website (see <eref | |||
| idelines></tt>) and that the guidelines therein have | target="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines" | |||
| been followed.</t> | brackets="angle"/>) and that the guidelines therein have been | |||
| followed.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>IANA Considerations section -- this section must always be | <t>IANA Considerations section: This section must always be present. | |||
| present. For each module within the document, ensure that the | For each module within the document, ensure that the IANA | |||
| IANA Considerations section contains entries for the following | Considerations section contains entries for the following IANA | |||
| IANA registries: </t> | registries: </t> | |||
| <dl> | <ul> | |||
| <dt>XML Namespace Registry:</dt> | <li>XML Namespace Registry: Register the YANG module | |||
| <dd> | namespace.</li> | |||
| <t>Register the YANG module namespace.</t> | <li>YANG Module Registry: Register the YANG module name, | |||
| </dd> | prefix, namespace, and RFC number according to the rules | |||
| <dt>YANG Module Registry:</dt> | specified in <xref target="RFC6020"/>.</li> | |||
| <dd> | </ul> | |||
| <t>Register the YANG module name, prefix, namespace, and RFC | ||||
| number, according to the rules specified in <xref target="RFC6020"/>.</t> | ||||
| </dd> | ||||
| </dl> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>References -- verify that the references are properly divided | <t>References: Verify that the references are properly divided | |||
| between normative and informative references, that RFCs 2119 and | between normative and informative references, that RFCs 2119 and | |||
| 8174 are included as normative references if the terminology | 8174 are included as normative references if the terminology defined | |||
| defined therein is used in the document, that all references | therein is used in the document, that all references required by the | |||
| required by the boilerplate are present, that all YANG modules | boilerplate are present, that all YANG modules containing imported | |||
| containing imported items are cited as normative references, and | items are cited as normative references, and that all citations | |||
| that all citations point to the most current RFCs, unless there is | point to the most current RFCs, unless there is a valid reason to do | |||
| a valid reason to do otherwise (for example, it is okay to include | otherwise (for example, it is okay to include an informative | |||
| an informative reference to a previous version of a specification | reference to a previous version of a specification to help explain a | |||
| to help explain a feature included for backward compatibility). | feature included for backward compatibility). Be sure citations for | |||
| Be sure citations for all imported modules are present somewhere | all imported modules are present somewhere in the document text | |||
| in the document text (outside the YANG module). If a YANG module | (outside the YANG module). If a YANG module contains "reference" or | |||
| contains reference or "description" statements that refer to an | "description" statements that refer to an I-D, then the I-D is | |||
| I-D, then the I-D is included as an informative reference.</t> | included as an informative reference.</t> | |||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>License -- verify that the document contains the Revised BSD | <t>License: Verify that the document contains the Revised BSD | |||
| License in each YANG module or submodule. Some guidelines related | License in each YANG module or submodule. Some guidelines related | |||
| to this requirement are described in Section 3.1. Make sure that | to this requirement are described in <xref | |||
| the correct year is used in all copyright dates. Use the approved | target="module-copyright"/>. Make sure that the correct year is | |||
| text from the latest TLP document, which can be found at: </t> | used in all copyright dates. Use the approved text from the latest | |||
| <t><tt><https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/></tt></t> | TLP document, which can be found at: | |||
| <eref target="https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/" brackets="angle" | ||||
| /></t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Other Issues -- check for any issues mentioned in <tt><https://w | <t>Other Issues: Check for any issues mentioned in <eref | |||
| ww.ietf.org/id-info/checklist.html></tt> that are not covered elsewhere.</t> | target="https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist.html" | |||
| brackets="angle"/> that are not covered elsewhere.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| <li> | <li> | |||
| <t>Technical Content -- review the actual technical content for | <t>Technical Content: Review the actual technical content for | |||
| compliance with the guidelines in this document. The use of a | compliance with the guidelines in this document. The use of a YANG | |||
| YANG module compiler is recommended when checking for syntax | module compiler is recommended when checking for syntax errors. A | |||
| errors. A list of freely available tools and other information, | list of freely available tools and other information, including | |||
| including formatting advice, can be found at: </t> | formatting advice, can be found at: | |||
| <t><tt><https://wiki.ietf.org/group/netconf></tt> </t> | <eref target="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/netconf" brackets="angle"/> | |||
| <t> | and | |||
| and </t> | <eref target="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/netmod" brackets="angle"/> | |||
| <t><tt><https://wiki.ietf.org/group/netmod></tt> </t> | </t> | |||
| <t> | <t>Checking for correct syntax, however, is only part of the job. | |||
| Checking for correct syntax, however, is only part of the job. | It is just as important to actually read the YANG module document | |||
| It is just as important to actually read the YANG module document | from the point of view of a potential implementor. It is | |||
| from the point of view of a potential implementor. It is | particularly important to check that "description" statements are | |||
| particularly important to check that "description" statements are | sufficiently clear and unambiguous to allow interoperable | |||
| sufficiently clear and unambiguous to allow interoperable | implementations to be created.</t> | |||
| implementations to be created.</t> | ||||
| </li> | </li> | |||
| </ul> | </ul> | |||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="tem-ietf"> | <section anchor="tem-ietf"> | |||
| <name>Template for IETF Modules</name> | <name>Template for IETF Modules</name> | |||
| <sourcecode markers="true" name="ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <!--[rfced] We assume these warnings and errors for the template | ||||
| modules are as expected (from pyang with the ietf option). Please | ||||
| let us know if any updates are needed. | ||||
| - Appendix B | ||||
| ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang:1: warning: unexpected latest revision "date-revis | ||||
| ion" in ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang, should be "2023-07-26" | ||||
| ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang:52: warning: RFC 8407: 3.1: The IETF Trust Copyrig | ||||
| ht statement seems to be missing or is not correct (see pyang -ietf-help for det | ||||
| ails). | ||||
| ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang:60: error: bad value "date-revision" (should be da | ||||
| te) | ||||
| ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang:71: error: bad value "date-initial" (should be dat | ||||
| e) | ||||
| - Appendix C | ||||
| iana-template@2023-12-08.yang:1: warning: unexpected latest revision "date-revis | ||||
| ion" in iana-template@2023-12-08.yang, should be "2023-12-08" | ||||
| iana-template@2023-12-08.yang:57: warning: RFC 8407: 3.1: The IETF Trust Copyrig | ||||
| ht statement seems to be missing or is not correct (see pyang -ietf-help for det | ||||
| ails). | ||||
| iana-template@2023-12-08.yang:68: error: bad value "date-revision" (should be da | ||||
| te) | ||||
| iana-template@2023-12-08.yang:80: error: bad value "date-initial" (should be dat | ||||
| e) | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <sourcecode name="ietf-template@2023-07-26.yang" type="yang" markers="true | ||||
| "><![CDATA[ | ||||
| module ietf-template { | module ietf-template { | |||
| yang-version 1.1; | yang-version 1.1; | |||
| // replace this string with a unique namespace URN value | // replace this string with a unique namespace URN value | |||
| namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template"; | namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template"; | |||
| // replace this string, and try to pick a unique prefix | // replace this string, and try to pick a unique prefix | |||
| prefix temp; | prefix temp; | |||
| skipping to change at line 4528 ¶ | skipping to change at line 4442 ¶ | |||
| contact | contact | |||
| "WG Web: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/> | "WG Web: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/> | |||
| WG List: <mailto:your-wg-name@ietf.org> | WG List: <mailto:your-wg-name@ietf.org> | |||
| Editor: your-name | Editor: your-name | |||
| <mailto:your-email@example.com>"; | <mailto:your-email@example.com>"; | |||
| // replace the first sentence in this description statement. | // replace the first sentence in this description statement. | |||
| // replace the copyright notice with the most recent | // replace the copyright notice with the most recent | |||
| // version, if it has been updated since the publication | // version, if it has been updated since the publication | |||
| // of this document | // of this document. | |||
| description | description | |||
| "This module defines a template for other YANG modules. | "This module defines a template for other YANG modules. | |||
| Copyright (c) <insert year> IETF Trust and the persons | Copyright (c) <insert year> IETF Trust and the persons | |||
| identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. | identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. | |||
| Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or | Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or | |||
| without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject | without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject | |||
| to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License | to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License | |||
| skipping to change at line 4550 ¶ | skipping to change at line 4464 ¶ | |||
| Relating to IETF Documents | Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). | |||
| All revisions of IETF and IANA published modules can be found | All revisions of IETF and IANA published modules can be found | |||
| at the YANG Parameters registry group | at the YANG Parameters registry group | |||
| (https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters). | (https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters). | |||
| This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see | This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see | |||
| the RFC itself for full legal notices."; | the RFC itself for full legal notices."; | |||
| // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX/YYYY with actual RFC number and remove | // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove | |||
| // this note | // this note | |||
| // replace 'date-revision' with the module publication date | // replace 'date-revision' with the module publication date | |||
| // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | |||
| revision date-revision { | revision date-revision { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "What changed in this revision."; | "What changed in this revision."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC XXXX: <Replace With Document Title>"; | "RFC XXXX: <Replace With Document Title>"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| // RFC Ed.: Update with the RFC number and title | // RFC Ed.: Update with the RFC number and title | |||
| // of the RFC that defined the initial version of | // of the RFC that defined the initial version of | |||
| // the module and remove this note | // the module and remove this note | |||
| revision date-initial { | revision date-initial { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial version"; | "Initial version."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "RFC YYYY: <Replace With Document Title>"; | "RFC XXXX: <Replace With Document Title>"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| // extension statements | // extension statements | |||
| // feature statements | // feature statements | |||
| // identity statements | // identity statements | |||
| // typedef statements | // typedef statements | |||
| // grouping statements | // grouping statements | |||
| // data definition statements | // data definition statements | |||
| // augment statements | // augment statements | |||
| // rpc statements | // rpc statements | |||
| // notification statements | // notification statements | |||
| // DO NOT put deviation statements in a published module | // DO NOT put deviation statements in a published module | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section anchor="tem-iana"> | <section anchor="tem-iana"> | |||
| <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | <name>Template for IANA-Maintained Modules</name> | |||
| <sourcecode markers="true" name="iana-template@2023-12-08.yang"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| <sourcecode name="iana-template@2023-12-08.yang" markers="true"><![CDATA[ | ||||
| module iana-template { | module iana-template { | |||
| yang-version 1.1; | yang-version 1.1; | |||
| // replace this string with a unique namespace URN value | // replace this string with a unique namespace URN value | |||
| namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template"; | namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template"; | |||
| // replace with the assigned prefix | // replace with the assigned prefix | |||
| prefix iana-foo; | prefix iana-foo; | |||
| skipping to change at line 4660 ¶ | skipping to change at line 4572 ¶ | |||
| // replace with the registry name and the URL of the IANA registry | // replace with the registry name and the URL of the IANA registry | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "Registry Name (URL)"; | "Registry Name (URL)"; | |||
| // replace 'date-revision' with the module publication date | // replace 'date-revision' with the module publication date | |||
| // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | |||
| revision date-revision { | revision date-revision { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Indicates the list of changes per Section 4.30.3 of RFCAAAA."; | "Indicates the list of changes per Section 4.30.3 of RFC 9907"; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "URL of the latest version of the module | "URL of the latest version of the module | |||
| (if any) list the authoritative event (e.g., RFC) that | (if any) list the authoritative event (e.g., RFC) that | |||
| triggered the update to the YANG module"; | triggered the update to the YANG module"; | |||
| } | } | |||
| // replace 'date-initial' with the module publication date | // replace 'date-initial' with the module publication date | |||
| // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | // the format is (YYYY-MM-DD) | |||
| revision date-initial { | revision date-initial { | |||
| description | description | |||
| "Initial version"; | "Initial version."; | |||
| reference | reference | |||
| "URL of the published initial version of the module | "URL of the published initial version of the module | |||
| RFC IIII: RFC Title"; | RFC IIII: RFC Title"; | |||
| // RFC Ed.: Update with the RFC number and title | // RFC Ed.: Update with the RFC number and title | |||
| // of the RFC that defined the initial version of | // of the RFC that defined the initial version of | |||
| // the module and remove this note | // the module and remove this note | |||
| } | } | |||
| // identity statements | // identity statements | |||
| // typedef statements | // typedef statements | |||
| } | }]]></sourcecode> | |||
| ]]></sourcecode> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| <section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments"> | <section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments"> | |||
| <name>Acknowledgments</name> | <name>Acknowledgments</name> | |||
| <t>Thanks to Jürgen Schönwälder and Ladislav Lhotka for the | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Jürgen Schönwälder"/> and <contact | |||
| discussion and valuable comments. Special thanks to Ladislav Lhotka | fullname="Ladislav Lhotka"/> for the discussion and valuable comments. | |||
| for sharing more context that led to the design documented in | Special thanks to <contact fullname="Ladislav Lhotka"/> for sharing more | |||
| <xref target="RFC9108"/>.</t> | context that led to the design documented in <xref | |||
| <t>Thanks to Italo Busi, Benoît Claise, Tom Petch, | target="RFC9108"/>.</t> | |||
| Randy Presuhn, Martin Björklund, Acee Lindem, Dale R. Worley, Kent Watsen, Ja | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Italo Busi"/>, <contact fullname="Benoît | |||
| n Lindblad, Qiufang Ma, Mahesh Jethanandani, Robert Wilton, and Thomas Fossati f | Claise"/>, <contact fullname="Tom Petch"/>, <contact fullname="Randy | |||
| or the comments.</t> | Presuhn"/>, <contact fullname="Martin Björklund"/>, <contact | |||
| <t>Lou Berger suggested to include more details about IANA considerations. | fullname="Acee Lindem"/>, <contact fullname="Dale R. Worley"/>, <contact | |||
| </t> | fullname="Kent Watsen"/>, <contact fullname="Jan Lindblad"/>, <contact | |||
| <t><xref target="sec-tags"/> is inspired from <xref target="RFC8819"/>.</t | fullname="Qiufang Ma"/>, <contact fullname="Mahesh Jethanandani"/>, | |||
| > | <contact fullname="Robert Wilton"/>, and <contact fullname="Thomas | |||
| <t>Michal Vaško reported an inconsistency in Sections <xref target="RFC840 | Fossati"/> for the comments.</t> | |||
| 7" section="4.6.2" sectionFormat="bare"/> and <xref target="RFC8407" section="4. | <t><contact fullname="Lou Berger"/> suggested to include more details abou | |||
| 6.4" sectionFormat="bare"/> of <xref target="RFC8407"/>.</t> | t IANA considerations.</t> | |||
| <t>Thanks to Xufeng Liu for reviewing the document, including providing YA | <t><xref target="sec-tags"/> is inspired by <xref target="RFC8819"/>.</t> | |||
| NGDOCTORS reviews.</t> | <t><contact fullname="Michal Vaško"/> reported an inconsistency in | |||
| <t>Italo Busi provided the examples of "case + when" construct.</t> | Sections <xref target="RFC8407" section="4.6.2" sectionFormat="bare"/> | |||
| <t>Thanks to Rich Salz and Michael Richardson for the SAAG review.</t> | and <xref target="RFC8407" section="4.6.4" sectionFormat="bare"/> of | |||
| <t>Kent Watsen contributed text to the security and IANA-maintained module | <xref target="RFC8407"/>.</t> | |||
| templates.</t> | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Xufeng Liu"/> for reviewing the document, | |||
| <t>Special thanks to Amanda Baber for the thoughtful and careful review of | including providing YANGDOCTORS reviews.</t> | |||
| the document.</t> | <t><contact fullname="Italo Busi"/> provided the examples of "case + when" | |||
| <t>Thanks to Qiufang Ma for the careful shepherd review.</t> | construct.</t> | |||
| <t>Thanks to Acee Lindem for triggering the discussion on data model vs. m | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Rich Salz"/> and <contact fullname="Michae | |||
| odule.</t> | l Richardson"/> for the SAAG review.</t> | |||
| <t>Thanks to Mahesh Jethanandani for the thoughtful AD review.</t> | <t><contact fullname="Kent Watsen"/> contributed text to the security and | |||
| <t>Thanks to Christer Holmberg for the genart review, Jean Mahoney for the | IANA-maintained module templates.</t> | |||
| check on RPC implications, | <t>Special thanks to <contact fullname="Amanda Baber"/> for the thoughtful | |||
| Ralf Weber for the dnsdir, Giuseppe Fioccola for the opsdir review, Joseph To | and careful review of the document.</t> | |||
| uch for the tsvart review, | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Qiufang Ma"/> for the careful shepherd rev | |||
| and Yoav Nir for the secdir review.</t> | iew.</t> | |||
| <t>Thanks Éric Vyncke, Mike Bishop, Roman Danyliw, Orie Steele, Ketan Tala | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Acee Lindem"/> for triggering the discussi | |||
| ulikar, Deb Cooley, and Gorry Fairhurst for the IESG review.</t> | on on data model versus module.</t> | |||
| <dl> | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Mahesh Jethanandani"/> for the thoughtful | |||
| <dt>The author of RFC 8407:</dt> | AD review.</t> | |||
| <dd> | <t>Thanks to <contact fullname="Christer Holmberg"/> for the genart | |||
| <t>Andy Bierman</t> | review, <contact fullname="Jean Mahoney"/> for the check on RPC | |||
| </dd> | implications, <contact fullname="Ralf Weber"/> for the dnsdir, <contact | |||
| <dt/> | fullname="Giuseppe Fioccola"/> for the opsdir review, <contact | |||
| <dd> | fullname="Joseph Touch"/> for the tsvart review, and <contact | |||
| <t>YumaWorks</t> | fullname="Yoav Nir"/> for the secdir review.</t> | |||
| </dd> | <t>Thanks <contact fullname="Éric Vyncke"/>, <contact fullname="Mike | |||
| <dt/> | Bishop"/>, <contact fullname="Roman Danyliw"/>, <contact fullname="Orie | |||
| <dd> | Steele"/>, <contact fullname="Ketan Talaulikar"/>, <contact | |||
| <t>email: andy@yumaworks.com</t> | fullname="Deb Cooley"/>, and <contact fullname="Gorry Fairhurst"/> for | |||
| </dd> | the IESG review.</t> | |||
| <dt>Acknowledgments from RFC 8407:</dt> | ||||
| <dd> | <t>The author of RFC 8407:</t> | |||
| <t>The structure and contents of this document are adapted from | <contact fullname="Andy Bierman"> | |||
| "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents" <xref target="RFC4181"/> | <organization>YumaWorks</organization> | |||
| , by | <address> | |||
| C. M. Heard.</t> | <email>andy@yumaworks.com</email> | |||
| </dd> | </address> | |||
| <dt/> | </contact> | |||
| <dd> | ||||
| <t>The working group thanks Martin Bjorklund, Juergen Schoenwaelder, | <t>Acknowledgments from RFC 8407:</t> | |||
| Ladislav Lhotka, Jernej Tuljak, Lou Berger, Robert Wilton, Kent | ||||
| Watsen, and William Lupton for their extensive reviews and | <blockquote><t>The structure and contents of this document are adapted | |||
| contributions to this document.</t> | from "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents" <xref | |||
| </dd> | target="RFC4181"/>, by <contact fullname="C. M. Heard"/>.</t> | |||
| </dl> | <t>The working group thanks <contact fullname="Martin Bjorklund"/>, | |||
| <contact fullname="Juergen Schoenwaelder"/>, <contact fullname="Ladislav | ||||
| Lhotka"/>, <contact fullname="Jernej Tuljak"/>, <contact fullname="Lou | ||||
| Berger"/>, <contact fullname="Robert Wilton"/>, <contact fullname="Kent | ||||
| Watsen"/>, and <contact fullname="William Lupton"/> for their extensive | ||||
| reviews and contributions to this document.</t></blockquote> | ||||
| </section> | </section> | |||
| </back> | ||||
| <!-- ##markdown-source: | ||||
| H4sIAAAAAAAAA+y9+3rbyJUv+j+eApv5zrbVISlLdrvb6suM2nZ3PMeWPbZ6 | ||||
| Otk9vWOQBCXEIMABQMlMx3mW8yznyU6ta60qgJTsZM5k72/7+5IWSaCuq1at | ||||
| 629NJpOkK7oyP0lHP2yKRV4WVd6my7pJTzfdZd20aVYt0tf5VZFf5+5TvUyf | ||||
| 1PPNKq+6Nn1cV11WVEV1kf7h9OyH9EnWZemL2rXSjpJsNmvyq3679KS0MUrm | ||||
| WZdf1M32JJ3N14n730l6fPQwqWdtXeZd3p6kXz6490WyWS8y+nR0/DBJFvW8 | ||||
| ylZu2IsmW3aTIu+WkyrvVvVi0izn8MasaCfHXybtZrYq2rZwQ92u3fPPnp5/ | ||||
| n1Sb1SxvThJo8iSZ11WbV+3GNd41mzxxg76fZE2eucG/XOdN1rm3aSFeZFV2 | ||||
| kcPIR8l13by7aOqNG/DoLO/gI03erccoeZdv3TeLkySdpGdPzx+/PPse/nz9 | ||||
| 9I3+7Va4XmHjSdJ2rvk/ZmVduTFu8zZZFyfpz109H6dt3XRNvmzdX9sV/9E1 | ||||
| xbwbp/N6has4Tt16rLL12nX9S5JkuHXQdZK6f8tNWdJinVaLbfpdkTerrMKf | ||||
| 6uYiq4o/4yBO0j9sVtlPbhot/javN1UH+/Ljm1P8Il9lRXkC67D95617FGbc | ||||
| Tt0Ykn5PL+pL999F+l29mWeLrGgGunvZZNVFjj80NZBgvii6ugk7/949NM9t | ||||
| /ytqejqTpv+5xoZ2jORfiyr9aTPQ/e822XVehL09viyqzHY2K8pyer3550t8 | ||||
| mLqo6ga27cqRDjz60/3H09dPH0/er7Pu8gRf9v+6rLnIu5P0suvW7cnh4fX1 | ||||
| 9fT6/tSN5PD89eHRo0ePDvXdCXw8OnLEH7XBB/T3L56nr9xz6XM33Y2jw/Tu | ||||
| 7+HzQfpv7mi6OaVH03uj6GWlhejfJKXl+Rf3/+4kl1nzbuczb7r8Kk+f5K/r | ||||
| No8ewhOUntVXOZyoFGYQPdHmTZG3RbWs+4MYubUbnTj2QoS8wJ1JBxYkgfeD | ||||
| VX92enY6efHyyeTs9MXTN71l5yVDZuMO5abM0zOY6W2Xx23QCfYxON9lVvZW | ||||
| YminC8cucK8zx4EuKjyrh1u3e5N11rjhdG7fDv103AbvmgiwrRQI4HV+Ubjj | ||||
| v/0HmMj7VTlpeDg0i9ffP568Of/D86e7pvGm27qdwBvhoybgGk6feu7wqdNw | ||||
| V8OEmAxOpoXRXMBg/Cb88bvvn/zxx9c7NwJWYjJbLiZwnbSpIbB/gB0JBxd9 | ||||
| nL6/7FalmegPrybPj2+e68V6Uh5P8mqerf8x52sHOPDV7nlPQK4Bxnm7zf7n | ||||
| 43vHR5Oje5Pjoykc4n+ABYh5yf4B+zV49dPkHJ64cffXbb5Z1NdFk//jEnw8 | ||||
| xuFvDRkgF9rJad1AcZbx9OJBXRTd5WYGIsFhWV7W3buMOg5WegItTV6dvna3 | ||||
| 1PnT1/svqle6kTf1fVuC8OM4P/3hVrfkeXbxD3NJrnBIk84NyTDo801V5eUf | ||||
| gX5vJN8On0UC+EekXDO83heWbT2ZeCVq13yNmtXVqr05fe1Z5SjB6UaTJ6Aq | ||||
| feTmgrYU/3L72VPb7RTUM1yBvDp02lbnVmByoeOdOOmxAQUzSSaTSZrNnECR | ||||
| zTuc+vll0YJyg9pium7qK/dWm16EOmVmdNXG6KrQQrvO58WymLMWN4901gXo | ||||
| rCvUWcdpUc3LzQJ+wzPjVAB82OkxRIrtNI2EVewTunFDm+eLTeNG5FTHdJEv | ||||
| 4b1xen1ZzC/xqwLmvXBtue1xHTn9ktYPvm9q0DOdslF0W5zFppVPbgdFu3T6 | ||||
| 9rK42JBCmr5qaqcf1iW0cZdVzANS11nJ1EfSYrUuUW3lQXeXWZduOtfDn+lg | ||||
| QCN+juGqqyqOYhjo1lPcm9OyrceuKfssq+n0pNPU09mWV8dtHCxstnDylxtD | ||||
| VsabeN24H9wT3WWOyw9b1bonWP+GZuAx1zKPn3Z2u3OviJxWxWJR5knymxRO | ||||
| QuN+m5PKjdSVp6h5Z82C9UJY74rXex6sN+7TMpvzcDdtnl67KwDaGX5hpcYC | ||||
| mD9uBOjuG6CHFqfJGwtNDO+t2dhff/1vbuoPjx8cffiAuwwN9HeaHvvy3oN7 | ||||
| Hz6MoeEm/49NgWRJC5M1TiXrYJqG9GlB51mVznL3hpvbAvvI3xPNQkNwSh23 | ||||
| WeXTgZNJ9A6dcOPR5sqDuI3xGTyaHvG4v3j0+T2eHv9yTyZ+7xh++cjjCr1h | ||||
| Q26sOCl39miouHzYmuM2jiTg5I51n9Ja7T5jOeFV3SkfSZmLUaNABkXl5s6b | ||||
| BW8cAqnK7jgd2C1eMBrHPet4SML54nHJpn7xyO09tnKqXfW74cOxWa/rpoMd | ||||
| ceJAV8xx57F3Whxo5rooS3kynZcFzGjXHHRFkKLyFqxOWUsMbAHL4qYy2+Ky | ||||
| CsvVVWJu6J7E380oiJZeZNWWvoUzj/MO2Cicl3rNbKPDdQsOErQxcvfCvCnw | ||||
| qRGc6g6PnuNmv6uvc7cuQC9uuRawQrU7nO+CgbTuv01OByZbZDMnCgEVGuZc | ||||
| uj6LDvbO9VTgF3bv9FTJMK5y4OIXuT0KsDXQB3DiooTNuSwuLt2ISjfCEl53 | ||||
| l8u6LMDmBQ/Teq3cWVltVvwQrwmtvF/P4J4LjhOt8bNKee+Y3sjKsr5u7ZLL | ||||
| khaOF1VFl7seqwticW4KFdB/ztcsmCDdwbvKyg0cnBoW1SldOMIVcFSnZG/d | ||||
| mVnAr0iRGR19ml4nxOqW0x0s4VJ4Gpgg3c69rMqtHZ8sXwZki+8TmQy8LcwM | ||||
| j5hbJzSg2P3ex8V6+9bkJRK4ax/5thh0U8Mo0jLbugnB4sgZEvrHX+C42JNg | ||||
| GTpy6h5TdzL8Zb1owzvd8YN608zzNmoPWrDMX+aXt8FMYklElsgd3WEpqqtx | ||||
| +1dwhRPXpAPiZZWeAOPIeL2ZlUV7mS+8lMUihuPc0/6wwt1a5GsYYIUHCuUB | ||||
| 2D1sk+gbBbvODWQFlOeIroIJ1B0cJWvl5V3Wu0TO+mV2hYcXLuy6WcGfwTXj | ||||
| pLYy95fTja/JQetRlDtyA+RU+LPIJNVybyDd0Jh//bXN5xPUClYrNySRrHiP | ||||
| nWzlvnST9qIVdICMI5KmRHOKBKqPlqZcM2d1l9PjodjHpzijSXQbd/iLrBwr | ||||
| SQPJ4GFH5vfedcWn6V1VX3se5m93GHopZu5Z7oaaeyHW/QjtwGs6Z2SFZkhu | ||||
| vN/ycOnMehPiSfqqBOHbjWpdOnkuHZ26fyP3VFNvLi5JMpCZwd2u75PfKCU9 | ||||
| TthB2OlvnJz5+BL8EW36poCRidCsEueyBsYLM5zzg0hXszwHmXGhIzYE44+T | ||||
| HPR/AiJwrX74QPbwSfpMlsc9lTcNLOXnDx/dH6eff3nv3jh9+OWjR7QhXzw4 | ||||
| ejild35EoqI9cofYXTR1WV9s+dfTBTCJDLYWhJN608GfKgBdwVbgGeu15fTy | ||||
| 4OgKa/FTGnhJ97Kthcbc3izhJIIfYpQ69RXFmzx9+/brxy+fPE2/e/rDs7M3 | ||||
| 375961TPC6BCvXqCKcwdSbmfmnfA0IDsUUrJ55sG2JUTFNbA3geGRDerPBid | ||||
| H3mP2GgHYyvcA63jWnQvv8u39LJ7pMmqFu+lZZ6hUBcMUMWV1s+8N77eXQkz | ||||
| EdaErxFlBeIi8EflUcfMo/zWase8v5dwHB2DK7pcqJ7bhovD0WDnxbhdCyht | ||||
| 67hhnMiA2FuQWbIJiExmgfyMCSh/nwFlO+nkst6UC7gmFjVIXO5Y5I2frJvc | ||||
| AFVK803oY6LZljVwyCbX3fi+eM9PL/MmB1qcbS7osgZuzAYpR41ufBPTWW9d | ||||
| o+6E5kBpdNNa5RloP8tN6di3u8Hfsxy1c0l4hhOzNIHsGlyfSzzlNchO7u/Z | ||||
| pii7iZsCviDUl97NpxfTcTpznPldCidynI5+OzrAbQYiazdLJ0wWyNTMoLra | ||||
| KUdusAVPbH6Zz9+hxQk86A0PNxjbEoTminka9OT+b1V0aJtyw342eXKbHtzD | ||||
| //Lm5RnY9Gt4TKhi/7rDuIDTOz0WFCs0QLi1kebdx6gdOfwr0EiU8khOci8h | ||||
| 19crAflBixJegeKK6EfBGO6ifASaiz4/3x4MMJuhOxoXdu4EPrgH7fFRLYzM | ||||
| SaSBObklRxmIdf2cWKLe5TO63oEnuD0Oli7S1/cp1AOv0HEyFD4yJDDCNR9F | ||||
| N/yI23paupeb/iUQHRk6ICD9gty/CIwKYp+JN1NNddy2jI0fOxlhKz++fraL | ||||
| mqr8GrgcNj96AqI2kMwbthiRrTy9S7wBrNQfPhzgjs0v6zSWTphPfXn0SJmF | ||||
| HV924Ra6DddwDqT7W9hUp9GqGgSNtfXKkZ/7OR7xomjnGwx3MXvCPGadwR1V | ||||
| sQKNc+d5R9trifLsxZPTSMqC6xjkC9BwO3eyoEFQY93xuOzCC0m4CbQyUd1v | ||||
| zyrToA3xpPMSxC1RbEM+DZtuDhUM7w039GD6cHoMS9fk9hZJV8yxWaHtClCk | ||||
| Zhu05KAtYYXnm5euaGTx+LaxzT/4qME8YFPwEhV/3oORO+luGReTZVOvJnUz | ||||
| afNyefdgJMOEM5vN3/UmtmcFWSggEXqXRekmqhmtNo4WfwtypBvUKm9BgxlZ | ||||
| VRy6QeEBmw45ONAEtdNuVk7sQo1QZN2iQuUSO/Niz02iw25eZIn1unhXgOyp | ||||
| 64vECosjMwcJrXPKiAgX7j4F2Wwe9l9tcb30zmpRETVCGl4B3sxhTE/CDqCB | ||||
| idPOHUuIyQQXFa4FvIZMswfhPh8Lgb2pneBbpRd55ahlDjdmKxL1ZbHW0zlF | ||||
| I/e5F+PT/w4aEHHHx15YAX3hDTAQXgNZ7Da203mrPpDqZDLi+7QAyYLsQWDd | ||||
| V3NfwdQhNxe0IS4gN673HR8muUOxSaQ04BEzUFTn9bogex/aooD1ud6RlL2Y | ||||
| adRQjSjUSTg55vAQnFzG5IuS2paatINEpRb0s2fun30B5T/4w20X/I59qY0b | ||||
| TrrjHO5Gv+LAKxZlBgkVOwn1PlC1yBRDHZLiSTzHqJOo2Q03Cv66k/Q04JQ4 | ||||
| yOELHy7gy6yVQYoksQVVtp4XeIBwS5ysxpJhz4E6Eq3z4Refk14xHCIgzz06 | ||||
| Bv0Dqf8kfQm3x84lglHzkhZ/Bq8ZnFm+8eUKWbgO5p2jvIzFRDKN0hKzQcm8 | ||||
| Iuc8eBpuICd5o/REC4CbgyrqzevqlXC2c5NqiyaOTG0g/dUn04m+ja5W6MMd | ||||
| fLAhNzlZI4CGpEtgrpuZTC79XuOe+Bobk278mmRAPAWPORZ0xNxopsYCtBcI | ||||
| WzmeHkFPsEHH99CGVLQqdIpKCMMy1jaawKbqTcGdzepvmAVNIvRPh8MPBn4c | ||||
| DpzbioZvhmRmoDuUpeiocy2vm/rC3YTtmNtxI/2T6wrZBV5VKcgvTgvwLi/S | ||||
| oJwoTodTtpHs/mQqiPR4IV5jceXumnwNsiwo3mQUz7vAHxEvHhG4b5+b6XWA | ||||
| 7nB31TnmhF6S/P08X+Os2HmONxCvP3nIZWbeFoAGS+o01Wtq68j6fTqaTqcj | ||||
| WEkQQWFpiGlyO1YXoQXw7t54ga5Fm5eFAKuoro68YN1ExOiduu6YQXbRZCvd | ||||
| A/7sV1UcyWyBJ2VTPd2pOLv7NnnkcPfRgO4YQ6euunlWlng8RjAAboS7HbHd | ||||
| T8z+cAW3A+Y+z/Z3uAGQmciWOnL2nh6QY8nQ95kbypos7U525W/QdUd/q0OC | ||||
| PpKbhMaH6/cJgzNe2RsHh4ITuH3oo/c1foZGvHadzfmjUjd95KuUPshGub+e | ||||
| nfUsz2SrTO/Q63ccy92q9QMuOZWU8DE8EVGQQ3y6fgI5gxkPLMYa/RmwwP4c | ||||
| q5hDZ1hfb8dmSPrtHRUn+CYSGpFMAR8cAGkTbQcW7tNmfll0OUmqd0FpOviU | ||||
| /XL0e3xrYrJxB/oVi4pkszBxCQsZqt9s81FJz72HB33H1+Y9WJPXZM8kriAC | ||||
| a5KcswUV0ijadPTixzfnozH9Nz17iX+/fvqvPz57/fQJ/P3md6fPn+sfCT/x | ||||
| 5ncvf3z+xP/l33z88sWLp2dP6GX3bRp8lYxenP5hRPby0ctX589enp0+H/W8 | ||||
| DLi+ZB1CK4/jPh0SYRLcYt89fvX//j9HD3h7jo/ABqCOnC8eoMMpr8bebkcf | ||||
| HVltk2y9zrMGmWNZwtkvuqwk5197WV9XuJuOuD77GVbml5P069l8ffTgW/4C | ||||
| Jhx8KWsWfIlr1v+m9zIt4sBXA93oagbfRysdjvf0D8FnWXfz5df/hBbEydGX | ||||
| //RtgtQTZR6lV07XMKF+SfJd7eTawLsHyxxwNgwGQDXYXRwkbszcOQWHTBc6 | ||||
| bOoKrtPWnR5vyTpJTtInvN0tWtDxt6L11xGH02TzuZM4cscLTuQ61BgPG42D | ||||
| 5lK1n4KdhkUrUMTkjrqHhqRE5FYYA+knl4U7b8BJcrz22vllviKe3GrkA4Qr | ||||
| lMsJR+Lw8EAOKUqUnWZlPX+nYg3yjsKnQWHgTUsaVCwtu2k7NaCA+3IL3bhl | ||||
| c9+OKGI6BW8O5C9BSIpbT9Q53J0qhkIfttFrF5g8BfzkKJaxLw4mqJzYMGvg | ||||
| Lnj22hzCYbtwCG1/CNpKEDzyOr/ImoV7oRVtmXZ0noc9j402QkuE4RQ6MBgT | ||||
| BFOBHditCzrX+bLiFQqlndPYIYomfjYvpXePDkig6b8r6hvrYEfHj8AoCfaG | ||||
| 4wOna5ddsS6jwJfgjS/Qp+i0tmTgxlWrbl4OyIApKZiU+FdoNF00kamPx6HG | ||||
| oWHv2smu6mJBO7d0fzdDLSTPi3f5dQHibWhVxt0DPbeqxceCm4E2Bt+4m9xT | ||||
| CBkoRCa06wzTklO5c4fGvdeiaUjYCS4dROiO1RY35iOEv83qxVYoy/uc1WoJ | ||||
| MXfA9iHi6KLi2CO6V6aRjT3qGy0nmRdaRp8Z8ifexC4u11K8nvvaJGsMSR8m | ||||
| LMaSYBRyy/SVbS68sR6s90IkB4YksAuKOjQiPPLcNF+51SpoXbNwN8S/zANW | ||||
| 8437ts2ZLrHV1odcDHkkwID2AwiPTlR5EngXfHi1V0XkAG0qCG6gkBn2k77L | ||||
| 3SknwcDzWAhDCoOx07tgzHMLkEZZsu5rnRQ795b1Bq6Qzh3UICBc404GIn1I | ||||
| 9HMCBOwSCwo9SZItx22K8kKkkKGDLqVIERu4GWyACJNn6hfQNtkcqh4Dx1vo | ||||
| 2SfmThHbtdhO0WxKMcah/jixoYXWTyZD5xtioe6j/jRlsG/Eff04bCoaDPwP | ||||
| OoM/dPBoRNv/HtrG5ugb5pdey4nrPdv4CZ/j2Uex8hI0XYodaue5W8GiNinU | ||||
| GrFrBETZLGjI7ZfMVBNWh7QfeiR0BO15ILCBIH1BeCkZQLeDrwvBhfFPoRhN | ||||
| BxZMZ3RssqExB1oX+mxY8XMrAIYeDsiMfFo+mFhGjUqz4wnXeVmyVsbJL4/r | ||||
| 9bYBL5YOmjvbEVxKZMenIggbIBYDraBRuoMxQgDdgoyG5w3cSNqdb1ESBsDs | ||||
| cJWRMAatOK0Ao0zBJvzXv/4V7Q9fS5pFB63luU+zcKvhWF0+gazZw2/xBQpM | ||||
| gjiYx07KqytcB5zm08z155d7lw3K8DGJd47ILTLFsdOcgm/m0ulUou4hfLRN | ||||
| 374dYSQPNMHBPOwupgAfpyS4b96+1QMuFnrxPzjR2A1/zgYH343uoPSgzXOw | ||||
| kDRIDIIjICWsVVo3kWYahyTXW2yg/JwMlCYckAZA72C70BYFDqI5knhVyxFy | ||||
| 7BMDb1bKShXPlxuSR6AVfAqn4LZtfinR7KHgsapbOFpzOmHcPgkb3hQyTQau | ||||
| BDlDhQ+XGh3fO3o4uXd/cnxvNNTaCDEYlnU98peCI7wU0+GCHaCl1Of/2TfM | ||||
| aZWJN9Cl8lT6K9vc1IqUjjZNdQK/n2DCW3vyflWeOP4OjZzoaL7i99iPO7Lf | ||||
| 2VBRsmzKL0js8y780rr5gh90OfxUdLzRa8+JHcgb2kRqmMcIDtP37t9J+r2b | ||||
| ueR26LNi+j48TN0oMHA9tgx/SBJzgIQDOBbwlHeWOJ5jAU9jdsliQ3hs26mc | ||||
| pijwLvHWolTsDXpOh0IMvKwXM2o5kRyd496X0Iq6LltSSk6r+KryR6VCxAmW | ||||
| T1Vl4cdHYz3pCZ70y+0ajSzh+bfR+9CeGyV5w7gZN5bM8doGZMU3eZ6KdMM0 | ||||
| OTEpfh8+gJcJMot4PJ5yo2Abbjvxoba/iRy5zGNALzRhmipG9AQ3uo0HTYRw | ||||
| XH1qV9N/tlhBnCLsXlOvOKZa03dkbCCaPCHrt6OhnmG+9d4GlN8Liral4alm | ||||
| GMiQCXB9v5kqyEFwSV6uOYSYhW1M2greVp0tlKVB2g/GFQjTbjkMA78v/iW2 | ||||
| /yfnwZsQLEjZNW7w7i5eg2DWH3BCNyNIZU6HeT9Oi2nuCIicNMSWQVgYUvzc | ||||
| 4j5b9r0c3lOMVoaKHNCKh9GXOgZaCLNDetJy5PCfJq9Fgxp0wLkFAgsmWtat | ||||
| N4kTSPyIxOitesEb0Qt+/U2oFpC91wcWoVSJ4/RGn1QSRZXw2S/PtrcEo1Ln | ||||
| 9ZpMMO6KLjHQg+XDzl9YRuu72x7o8SC/bhIuljp45d6XC7skwR9CMO7SKTrg | ||||
| 5ts8seY8t4x0jCTXEDLNNCmLJF79yShZCb0V56mqXBGsFVOirBZQKEYCNW4+ | ||||
| uY/JmDVFviy3umgUyavhMb3lCVJMbHKXeIafLa3py0Qkh4saUSAxGTCTey3Q | ||||
| 8BtvmiL3JQkhoMvvcE4lGOYMtPnwEYYdwEjg2GTldbZtfe4AverW+E8btvSi | ||||
| ARC7FQbMx4w6XGYQ7iQnBkJy9bjE5PgV0ABRj9NX1SHA+iHmhvnZQjJaMNeg | ||||
| i0T0kzQdPIr3bzyKoGAl8Qj9fukVwOQGYSN/co18tH+Kdohm2PjDigE5dZNh | ||||
| Elg1wTBCphHrpNKlzsPsXDngTNUcDkdaI+yID8KFPOq6ojs2g/BDdyQ4IIx4 | ||||
| g7uPA34GfKdeT1Bg4pVDCQpjFMWipTFV6Ruh27Lcjvn1B9Pj+1NwsakIPxjx | ||||
| TZ1TEpU/cMBP/uQUNlBe4ObFpTGrWIAnEtIDMeaQlWtzxIoOTPduJx8Phx+H | ||||
| ugNRRllqiKtJm01CtRhHphmwHPSH7kuM/cQ4vzR19IOq6HVDeGMJ6vEVherR | ||||
| pYR29fWmWbvz4w+Te87elpIzuuaUjoFYWYzp956upIjdMRLISzrxN+E/kESf | ||||
| nqR3/v1OOGDsEZNyXPtp9NI3Tm5ebcs8W6ZOm6jab0ZOVzzhfgDrY+xE/C9O | ||||
| VBq8rkff4tQwtgTzCf49wTAkymLhiPcqzxdIBTAIZvdb0aO/OIaIEzANO1L5 | ||||
| +pC6Z5n9u5uj9zFVygfwR9vv+oIAfB8QPhCJP3VKAJMfUflN6QYvTv/wkekG | ||||
| Q2kFp2nruoe0ZDSOgB7P8+J4QxBhJjDOCeWhpg8fjdAm4a5zmBKKODihdjPD | ||||
| NA47fRXs8fKw0tCUdCELe/I4iDKOhZGIG3kmJ3zJx1qH4coJSrkXBXgb2Pvx | ||||
| hkQkeRPi9XLIh5VUBXdo8IaQ5D3dt8AhYH3qjvG0W8cHVjGzCg8LBucleMla | ||||
| FyJ7Q/GLRw/hC5NMcgJajrtB5jl5V0NXZ4bRJcU81zw/jzwjTEue4OAeuPXR | ||||
| UOduZW/CFFraVAVwkFLySuM8UNcAxAqsyfUOVEfLAKyguiqauhLf4VNJ3QCh | ||||
| lIfA8kzGvpXn9//t1VkaTC+9+/z+mxcHshzHjx4ZrIXnx0PPH5vnHzx8iC7Z | ||||
| AA0yXjLGiuBUaXEKoTEYA1UcKXNEWQaShIQuCcSEE/ybTOW1AwuCAA6VORs8 | ||||
| KXYd2kLKIBQDDNK7yiwehVlBdvS58/YOH5YeMXnZtTpv6rb1LkTubUoJr+yj | ||||
| rBt32Nd1tdD43x3QGPg4h52HoVfk1j6B2CtLGqidS2M06JoidB19Y7yZJkYL | ||||
| F6HYVf1+DBnqpDfLVwcmGZC2FbjL/DLHI+cbBK95nnfBk42NWjFSaRbSW0yM | ||||
| MoVBYgwIB4jxTInr0dGXxxR162kxfvzYPH5MWBHJkzw8vSgI6e5IC09JOO55 | ||||
| NaNYTNyhIzwVPBCigo/fXR6WWYUAEINayNKlCOkAL7lYyApzr7zPpxhVgWi0 | ||||
| jRNcnheQFXX39PHzVk/m5xBxc0BBBWDTavJL8AVe+eD+RTCgQg0Y2OMpK/MQ | ||||
| lA8PW3Y5pTCUwJ8lcjprueDPgiul8I4flbq9YNdXRGNdi1x8cgn7mw5yvTvv | ||||
| mr00metBmAuFcE6TYWgVDvCM7vaq9o2Z9I+6cSL6yrGSYs6Xu5NwrOWZA+ue | ||||
| kXWJLwM1LWE0nrU4hlOQHo12wNegKEn8fBI+T4ETz85kLhKef9erTkf3QyP9 | ||||
| QSRdw/SRFEM/qLWaTcVLZ58lXY4w8iDDk+e2owmPXvLGqt5G6XomBh43ZoF3 | ||||
| PU7uvnnx7Or4wMJKYd79ckkZ9UQ3gR84iOQoBjSJyG3jPUF4CUDrVdJ3Dw76 | ||||
| A8U+VfaifRPFyLH+JRj/UNds4eA8OIZSZmOB1f05ks7Hc3E0HRh8thqVEDjv | ||||
| EhOB7NqJ3YwtTIzSDPBsbjlMGY16jDDhAYCNWv3Urod1PQ4uVOtt5eo9rLam | ||||
| Ycihsnc7dO6WdbJxnKiZE3gBZ0JSfCTIdcneVdmtMaKxzGtuzFZZ+O9pFIXf | ||||
| 4CRKicINVreSt4+jE9sgvrHafRHYaXGBKPKcOOouB70cZWKugX/eOzRDc1OQ | ||||
| v2NMY6HxRbcCPc2BiZHvsnYnGICKVhJ14j1sjJ3xY4VhZP78tRT4T3pgL2mf | ||||
| cYVwVTR0JQ7WwpT+gzELJjwy6xWAjmd8rUE4kyIoxG5pyZ+CF+6q6xmEwrdv | ||||
| 1dEM+XXey4zg54f1mtEapX+zz9++fQuxLRpIQb9LV5Sv76/BHUuLDlhN/RJk | ||||
| Q/iWNg3yw/H963xGRnmWZAGEghELnH52hToIHp0OuTdo7LRJiCCEXlK5MHQB | ||||
| FDvJ22slquInN1ZcIw15Fxg1CZrK2RQI5taibTbkVgKFeWZyJuRKy9+DlboA | ||||
| 3sOjdtycfFCigphsLVks8UAW7bs2aApd9dNEQk8Y06o/ViJ5M1TAwi9opP4O | ||||
| UocpvdZk4NEB6xaeMdQoiqtsvqVoraZqB6bFbeyaHBnyLD4HjcNN8pBb987Z | ||||
| fh/BfA1s/13yv9BN0KznoyDhUgNG1zWwRVwB7uUya1aA0ADmBVSiXE+X2VUB | ||||
| MYk3LcO+gd6wx2YZJKlmeDH2L4Ov0oAjzd9jxO5VjqZ/5CxBzCwjh3SXuYmT | ||||
| s5Y4zE7RiDIPtyW2kOAAe8SSavfht2GHxkphElJvBjzZwSRFuLJcko0+N94q | ||||
| 59K5Xi/RwMnYGLjBnQrw++nOpiPRX7TlgB3rlAONSz2T0y/AkvSzmwxAFf0y | ||||
| JQPV6OuVApLk344C0coDMtogVc6CS9gyrUE6HJeeXhUkoE1mGXzci2CZSLrT | ||||
| z5y/9EsIVPYzQ5H9ItmZgw0n3hQBUc2CsAWiX9YHz0FbRMJ34Js3v8NOHhx/ | ||||
| fvzLOD1//ob6fPDg4S90nv71x2eP8btH9+7d+4XAUSEOGnpJuJfVBpPlINgS | ||||
| GID6tc6NehyCc0b6JmvfZ6ePnfb9M3k2jn5JFKsWL/w8I/ebk9qwdgcvOVK0 | ||||
| wWf0qI6JrqMbJCnsGWgTomnDFeAtRU4e83f2UCMDwJYc8o/5cYiV6m80uiCY | ||||
| YE/gJ/jfs9g36K9vEE+vB+7DuxyAi/p9CY1gKBFNAqutjOjJA1YdLDuxuU7v | ||||
| IfDNx0ZmJvzfdBeEORRtP4vXvZvIOA8Bgpf+gtNIY+fbIhihiclDHS5fZpuy | ||||
| A8Hm1K370LR7McD+TnWbcrUpKwKUVCgPsQoZKya4eWFD8sRsGVM+1DCY0BCJ | ||||
| qHECud1chZVD6D0algBbUHYb0gQzGMZQ9gcAbW94GMHqdoFKSZKjmgmyemiI | ||||
| w0SQXlQxm+RpfLo2CTZqSN7fbEXeHsracHrjSXILwgtc6X6lfZ9jaIRWrhYU | ||||
| Trr0aQXEvDiqsvnqhPd34vSj7QR2Nx/B+2icHXjC0fUouHt8KKf3IkMDOxZE | ||||
| kxNIIBhzQkpFt3lloxaglQERkIU/TmRZuosf9alLus+3bEaFl4ek0Gn6EuRh | ||||
| uodx8HDg4emRP29VvWuVB8h/OsJdU5mzx01usafNgMDKZ1MXVLdRTitCko8E | ||||
| dBQChNE6g/4SNM/IL/k820gbvEBix4GO8Rq0wJ7uKKcXOYZLuf/IyaMNhlb2 | ||||
| ci0LtTE0rSFmxYHN3jaSWA6S3p6DUAZzd7lpEzK+sYo658sLp8t3ETMXmLyb | ||||
| 5dhMFfBdE4t/fBDyF973fe6nZBf57+cHySBD+EO9oWOTg6vVAl/dhqbwJOy6 | ||||
| o4ILajdBIUcYoKmPIyjmK4amiC0NH7Vw42m3kPqW1OsKQ8mb/AqS5x0T6Bxd | ||||
| NFaJwxaKGuVMN5gWvIfQgCgUZXYNuSjnkr433jWSHSsJY9/HYJGp9DkotDa6 | ||||
| LX9FTuqzBImZDHGw27GvgQMp7OvV40N2zJmd+zgu5tpICY8hbOYTOMeupvaw | ||||
| j8SYVj+JfSSee6SD3IMZh/ICIw4k+1zRZvjR8U/C45/+HeUBt4Jyjw/vBwd8 | ||||
| mcGFVzO8DSTldAsM9Nh9UQe3NK8DEq7X4u0+EGqyqPN/O1HvohW9mKG6hNt8 | ||||
| NOBhGsZA6N3N0j/WCWj3twLY+Sz1a8RZP5iytWMBxmmORptqEp+R6NjRsFgQ | ||||
| 8QsMXZOvCt+jJovtXXe3ZVzxgI4/q+v2PO2eZ2DuR3hyNkkYG1vvMt91GiHA | ||||
| afgef+0TGvOdZgY3ka+hAps7B3nTTUhDar9FHdPeAhlFIqFOwyJotk1uNcJ0 | ||||
| 1wiRsM5qexvcTECLOicDj2Dou8Pbl/cqd6XgweWjhaZcDWmtG+Xhh0OqGGQu | ||||
| vnqM14ZHWZa454OAjoY1zh1WFda8LYogOv+oXITSitg+/AUZga8z6Sl6ufWM | ||||
| Tm0KmnuC/XW6bI7x4MkIlw2pUHyqVLZgl9UXVm6CkVvIYcayWtPklIxoY7aV | ||||
| M78xaD6qfBRtuwkR8pMuWjXsExzEPiOW6czRzQtrzxPMPn/WVJSIdXthJwnn | ||||
| /GpCGEZhaSAKZ34OORamiEiliFqwE/i0v3UDvoTFMnjJWWKScNHEHi8Wo+/A | ||||
| ek+49TuQu9JLyAG/LMRkaEAsGFkpCmi5QZ+wYs8xVLm7h7sDtfeKc6MN8iVN | ||||
| 8P1J+h2ae0GaEp8RWMsgqjIoPxCWjdF4pgcP/ScwoWE0Jtj43LDAEImD9UNt | ||||
| g7Eax//qwMJHU4GJ/nghtwNdZDoXqP5QcMA1R9DruV/edKlEiApg+x1K2w29 | ||||
| iT5rN0n2JEbKDhCMXM5QE7OaY5K1XGei5TqJkHid7z/88ktEgJGynybMbKBm | ||||
| qaLVJUHABr+uRVDBpH5+OQwTLIEZe1uXkxSjCduQgbYH4cdgwhQHhqkWFDEF | ||||
| GH7WEU4FDBaeuZ0G8eqA3IZPhONnb1BC6YJiJpccw146j8+9Rou/SR8fQlcO | ||||
| E4d34IwCUqe44WOES3naELmNG4pqOIgLwvtmzoFqH4MdEgxtZ27FzhQkK3km | ||||
| +Njm2oFF9XlkYs9nK/4CCsUwOXIqC8zJRNHocYkza/YktCfR0WK7khnG4Agg | ||||
| ACBQATjRzB4j34RPqabgaU02lqDvXqmJEi6vrT2BKI+bCdNq5VDZWVoZVYbe | ||||
| JWQhOLFpfGL5qCd8kCQvDl5icMcQ1z7EroURBDJiFFkm+f8XECTm6RbIJKKS | ||||
| pwiKAXv19D3iFF0EtEIIlXXbFpoGL8/n8rxfboFUpSgdTdXHnZ7loN20jH6q | ||||
| L0vIDq97TGy4FuApT/B2Bj/7ONw4Ax7RSRZcxE43guVbJyIJlGG+rIYVK3gb | ||||
| LdZruwPiwmvxN+H753Zf/OIqrPeZbJVIJHQjBHuzf7Mzw/OCjYYlvfaZ+zgc | ||||
| hGARkkLVhQg5EkQBndwQb4KJwh9Dvz/zffMLxS1AIMrrZ1LuUZat6tCd5TTG | ||||
| E7LjP3v65ocpPwRlqdOzw9Ov2IQpg8ahIbQK9KvENU0+do4BfJS5pzDGY/Cq | ||||
| Ip+juwZ/CRZhqIqqvoLLMZVFgAZlFV70IFv/KU3/cHhmHsWZyfOvMJXcryHL | ||||
| LyeaZj1IclRsWKar+df7CQrpPl98KlHxjRoud9Df34e2GBPRZKL2cIz/D+X9 | ||||
| p1MegSmqNB3l2jYYhfw91ctyoyKLnk3a85cwaV0ILEPVqiTNOgAzsjYWC7Mr | ||||
| peK05mQugfEExWbCYLNIVRtQY8jsAcEeVngxuIgwjDN9r4+yo/AZ0iC+7/sV | ||||
| u4qai3jMGgyGcLpOF7HFHrs4T3hq13ZoGv8Zq6vgdmZFk09YUQ7x1DVNPnpN | ||||
| uYVgVYN8Yd/ZTesah70/E99ZfyXtYuxMigd7yI2rFtHhYFNJnxIhAjwgxGfm | ||||
| xYFlIz3033x5m3PAtuATSjgX7kooS5UXjdnE42JwQTQQgopWQrW4lg5uTHJn | ||||
| DTGZd6SoJuA6UrHFZZODWu2jRVCa/aHofreZ6WXy9UCN89XsTw8ePvzyEBtm | ||||
| AwbvjHRm+5FMDhn0AKQTe0GQf04moN9BhYkVlFXArD8u+bkb+gfUCaxQrRGn | ||||
| bI2afuTQYlCRW4/M5ErcdmDnYakk5ZDLomsHszN9naQx27ZwIMkIp5ZOlin9 | ||||
| d/Iuz9eTOcPAu88YlRunT4aQfhJIBo+6J7sRwaJnK8W93kcv03308vjpm7On | ||||
| 54dlMTMEgzYCrPBkc7vsXvz+VeZG2o8rD+yiuIoS+OsWcbAylI/+O8JIYx9q | ||||
| DatIpcqDesIJz93HD+K6tAD5BdUO/CJFi5gixKy+DVaAT1+2/zE5e/b4kDv+ | ||||
| 9mMW1wCZPX2vWYXIYEDMNLUq7jTLOcShre/Q+rFpk0rFhMW7YNge6ItRvnx4 | ||||
| NF0Dtj3Y3LACsYVpyf3AhpiRwTfbx4OkuxupKm/IIswR4UNYYGCaUhQyhRuD | ||||
| ak6+QAfeDZQVImAgaAEZsg22CQ+Cp2pf5+N25/12xSs1tAiANomEQhF6wZSS | ||||
| PbtkcWRYKRhaRNc53jTwR59yfsSkf8lYZCPoRyZTqCyA0kxCEIYefyAv2Kpo | ||||
| qp4YO0EtWIYCoTOlDVZ/oIKTKTKBvNpWhXuHMnuogaZeN+CHTZA7mOwWUBy4 | ||||
| xDVwjwOCaFhhhpuoTOqqoRnUy9izcRehOzW982YAK4/mkQS/kJkTRQFcXWWH | ||||
| u9KJ2in40569ApcMVLHI20OurdMmMVpQuirew6nndX/26uoBNuX+eDjwPmwA | ||||
| /JQM/GTDyPtpQd2l32YWh9GZQllxd+1ox27T0AKEypujiW4+5TwW1DYBxFcz | ||||
| nLisC0TEhyXfXMdTSQiR8bDhyGZI8fs8wpAcOXqmlVHK4k2DrN24KePNEDX8 | ||||
| s5sXdk/xuh6OP1xdn39x/wvvgLn/JSC9jE2+/qOH8PvUdQ1c5SnhzUBGwhkF | ||||
| x94/fvDF/X29wloVAwUwPn94dEwNu8Wtq3pVb9z6UhIEtQ0Jtm/O2oObWh+e | ||||
| 1/1HX1Lzr+VtSw23XZ7jh/co395W8DNkGRWb0qp/IB2aSvBBgUjOhjP1J+Hg | ||||
| eOgUNLMa/HqJVbcVZglGGE8ucVODR0aCfi8fzrtBCy5V/kbxoM4bqAAXYSpz | ||||
| vpqXaSAmDbNe3STmOAfJzw0z1QXKI04OxvQFPDmJYtF4sFlIFg7yER5Od4G6 | ||||
| KnRP7OwGeaAUBfjGovXjRIOubSMSKZCC9Xm1WYkfnityw3WQ2PlGe+3ug1Xd | ||||
| cbEGW7IcWSvWDSraS+/eXyNROAUuobyFGuoG5VcFnAcoY90UoN7F4U3qpPQt | ||||
| 4o4nEe6fqsaspUl2tRv0S3DKm8fJbV9mKM9gzAPnEaApnddi1yLwVjDWG8NA | ||||
| n0ZF9nwNrAEnhXsU1SB2TljjGEzYFJdjCveJKXGlXHB7xzm3gd0jpnzFHlRX | ||||
| DAE9ZnMnVxG4Yq9etijje7xamMbvvam4IloAAgKbXeMYRWXh7Fl40GwKxHaF | ||||
| aut1Azg8FPcRvDKUPmv8qdAApclX+XWAhgZ7NssJ14MYn3fqWKErctA4NUa9 | ||||
| fS2MbnAeXoGh+JNx6usiJpgXQf4h8Ge4zqZkk/AF0Kz/zuvnVfEfGy70FWE7 | ||||
| 2vrlXFNvTDZieqkCt38B9cEzMAnn3h4a5O4/kNx92rMDLipmKpPpKlCsEIsG | ||||
| YkQxKmMlmHyMqpJIPTCyEIiXCpfQ7tUuwNRqEibOx7CkqnjSrZQooCheR3it | ||||
| tJuLCzZYk2WA65iZ7gXFFlNKSoqslZgLQhqgHBU4bBCMa/BtOV1lWGfp1bZL | ||||
| kB/wzl4UVTx+hu8dTbHR2HMegkXtawRc4yMYWhUhJCZ27B4ugQTEp0/HHO0s | ||||
| bkI/qtwtqYCeJXYgyFXnube44ILaun54v1sQWzkcOVeLgIWJcPDD2Ain5jH+ | ||||
| ExHc6HcFIOcVnHW6gZD808T279Q7Kn7JVefwhMCwJSO0MJXSuoaQ/CHiJ/G+ | ||||
| RkIXzbhBbIbY9CtRCfD49ku5NAyXqYAjElURzM+wJeZItnYEhX3A1df6E4Mj | ||||
| IaslZjqDq1eAg/SEmlVlTiIJpsJJngU6RYKiNp1stec2hOhsqm1xFD8AfnFX | ||||
| Fok61bR8aXYXuvRe4LcBZOnlV+LhkesM8PDqrwSPeaDnWdZ8dM/unbjnmfYM | ||||
| OozbrRSnhJ/SjTuV94+/YtDo4XHAffKx43DvxONwX8k37FwKltgvlCJYR4/h | ||||
| evhZyWhTqR2Sjg6XJ7jdHl0bsfrMfGfwgO9Bpo12Dn8COETMOEU3UmuJu0eJ | ||||
| DfU6OUWMc3Pl9lWRFRXujgoGkwop0MQCXIKKlLQbWLMJtnOrpYGMa4OjXzPz | ||||
| lQgCykYpqV2TI0xq+4FohZzrxxu+cwzuyPgj1Q5iQCsb/Zsa1vocZLKycRzn | ||||
| wYbYSiYC52K3RiJB5pumwfUCGLDyQOth8TDx22iUPYlMS0JX2gfzkTVYo52k | ||||
| D5IB5TXsbjaY/L5GRxySaaEIBMF1xBHFW/cGmZ3FzDXx6zjy5LZ3QMY9sUSl | ||||
| Qf1RIDITr3CMWGNcxybRZqzgjVywSCOd4zLRuoEGXoYhTURy+2J6NFXhjRU8 | ||||
| e28b3Ct1hka7dB0hQRWeSscSONopsAfqQqVTkNyw6PyK6cY364Rgx3uwjgjV | ||||
| imK0h8j0lzfTdLAJRu/BbmjC7yooyBcgFPigc1EcHSmrxMFWMtKPWJdcB315 | ||||
| 88MA8FfPwjECHGRB1XS022FCCdyji5pim8cKpD7QcgyUSQFhYD7E0FZ5HK0L | ||||
| LKh5HQ68aGFtcH0B8lRaAUp75tmBkUtCJtFTNbyWIYX5jnAYDx8Y7FR4kVxd | ||||
| WjDXVoxTBTvxFTyoNNTI9z7JmouJewxqnb/LNT7m9Luz79Og3MdRRM8S3Omn | ||||
| t1s7LhasGbsLziyH7CyDcWRS7w0OFD0vexoZzxPFW0O7AcCeEkhUmcPj7gRz | ||||
| MsiYsy/dyrYRGwQZzUhVKAa4Bn9UwCm/znx086aoF/5rynxACytC9M9BO9Vf | ||||
| Y1y5SIgz+kuWAPD1hM4SRYNKboAkC/mhTNnQpjkRayiP0CUK1hWRR0xr08EN | ||||
| EKrRwsyEscX+AjM8AMWstivQVgIFG8b1+LIoOafIg2N50dC9gdiDnpkkEDgv | ||||
| tZPx0AQhDo3M1R4VEEm03qO7ARIp+opZHYosq9p5EGZBNi6IGKVAEUjPj3h7 | ||||
| rP9KnBWALAYDMWzVNYaZvCqmtO6KhgBtrqDJC0D6bLlpsnKavCGeBXHCI5Do | ||||
| JrA2oxt6UM0ZN92HvpJBdrWqq6AB9epCz3y3LqCmK4H1Gy3HX8tji4ykrgKb | ||||
| 5XSJicMJ92fu5SHCwisjaxoKERCkeI+kaCN8KKknQed0WJN4Ssc8Lqitcqde | ||||
| 4hafjUzoHvYF7xxHIpkjnCqfhImw0mliO0W7jqbLMEOCqgxUOJ2TpmlhseMR | ||||
| HssEq8lQSXXJKCA7er+2MOKvaolg5mdKk/GExTrtEYvMj5HflAqzmKWmuKt4 | ||||
| 9hS8I5yCtOgnJK21aEq+oOqA4gqIbDYAyWKG4NVojAojGhEAkQFpwmNOSpms | ||||
| oD32OFHYuPuaCuUlhKIITdtYKnKq2q4Ex4TMCVgG1stTyaIAZG54GMMlM+TS | ||||
| 2BqGtGlNyq1kygO2NtzpfwGLLWso7t9fZL0gyskxnL8kfzmZmH8n4Uf32bXA | ||||
| +fb07y8Iu5LqP3gAIl4A8XdLD2BifvTA+0le8kL9xXG7GXAcN3p9oKjsA/dS | ||||
| +w8eQCdBvpjMttgFY36ZB8iCo4MUxcM/sPVdDA3y15P0N7JtVBT0m5FfOqEy | ||||
| iDQq229GZVqOPkjZtkrTWPQFjOnowUWA54aC6jA3GF7KuQwuIocD7nY79gbO | ||||
| ZFQsJyzoj+SCG4GsbZUTwBMLQIG5rIHaVR1JOOG59Bl2qOfg6DJEqWMsawtp | ||||
| Sb7YXD1SczPLoGvIg0ljFl20HIQFZ5FwwjGzvOKK9xJ+QnpV4jGR0j4m0jxb | ||||
| sx9IXeakWcvCeD5qbiHmSnxShUfpO2n8DtnlIzeAnXSwFf5t0dqAHcMrMu14 | ||||
| SXiloDSyQerApzCxU9NE/StjSVuoq0kywI3hipOEGz2BJp2IlxrIr8b/JGzL | ||||
| tAhxTe5mxEWLOGCDy5P4ThQpOLELEviw0M/Baiw0KCRkBgrIncHc19m2rLMF | ||||
| Ocy6pgC4EIkLp/LqqlaIlwmgVupVjuwuvvIyORkoOgxuFmI/JmqwCAY4FtDs | ||||
| nXMU5MhEkfzomtpVftIIc34ZAJ+wwmiVAoUCp+534ASRGkWeTobnYOwtGYmo | ||||
| NPjArZTsehfX0zfgennnVhmNdCQwSUIftOyRlI3R/aaRsWkdiEWaFjTAmlPD | ||||
| AKPFbgGL0jqZqWCJhXcv9hzzvqDPcDLTXtoV+W3iNsS2I3vB+7Sk9hJsD0Pw | ||||
| CP2OLN5zGuoEpHQnE8CFyv4PGQOmW7FUm/iEq8He7XvkqFi46zHjMgrMoIIK | ||||
| 2Qg+Iso3FuRALfC3KTWvyjQaUKTa22LDGswiHUiJHhpdqyDQXaOlhbngNnYo | ||||
| jPKyxkITXAsmCjeiKBxH2lhdw+CUoyS0Y1Th5nM47F8DTwEuF5qVfzUW9jR3 | ||||
| 6jQ7lI0lGr5Ns6/Cz7Po8zwu4uglG5B6xFsA/89Thh4n/Ld0hiszM317tQof | ||||
| tz+lZDobTaeHOPhv0juzO6bupDWhmy95qlS41D79IYn/+mBHNd89qvn+Uc0H | ||||
| RmU9JLvX6xNHjF6Bv8aGZyEpx5TrK/YTDFPQyT8WuewigX3bP7D1A4v4YXc3 | ||||
| 893dzKNuwr3ctY97uv+roib4GFyWIEPmBIpZBwzV/QpGXQZ+blPSYsisg9Fl | ||||
| zZaE2pJtE8SFutZESLD1HyQ9jpDyds0gF+//f+4R8IkWsEEXk6C/4UXGtQo3 | ||||
| PXBZBieOFFJwB/50SVbsFjNmBCWgpUlZh6glrEnWub10d0T+d+Euwzwv5hI9 | ||||
| UszugFi0mwPecpLW96qTdF/+nSc5zEJn2Z8/hX/+eefg/hM4qTePfzk9Cu3j | ||||
| Pn4bTw2BZS4F6D46fonYckiuRYeDwfZAKcs/rjhdaDdAiRkDOG0T4NeYJlp7 | ||||
| 2Jbt1oogVJIwbesl2JNSzoZnzO/ZloweFOBHVqTEcgxO0iJ8vQUZwSn+eV40 | ||||
| Trkg3afVgrYYzQjoeG569SoD2AyoU1hm79Fg5CNQbSfhutjiYYz7t1ATtMSr | ||||
| 1zOOsdWpXLVT7+DyoOZLNIgBMPMiJR8kLvxlvSblPnHkcAElcDmfAUOdONKR | ||||
| HHceLloKkn1PWAkZGubRBuDeGieDcbQoew6SQzRtyllB/nwJdSyahGxdgmY7 | ||||
| PBic4Azjn0qddTs0bfFUUS4SxvBGGN5acjYu5ewjxyDBAN9/7q6DDTRxF9uD | ||||
| mkQ/3X88dZOfvAf3sqM4k+NkopV+48fwlHAuoWvIls7fd20UzbCkciSc2Djn | ||||
| h6i8tH/ZTRYbNIZhSs4+YjPGqNlUsPrkYcaqnydgkCoFKHjpq7sEBgNhDBYO | ||||
| lAwjkpzR1DXDCVpLlWFwjGjJDak5WVKsDejxyIPaHYTozKLqOdrndjAaqF5z | ||||
| vbXdln7Bz5V+5f0YmQSEDYSFpoTuYwic9qT5WxrrR6wiGvm5r09at/Gnz5mm | ||||
| cN/1eGbMJieYEHmFXsfAkhTUPwoHKD3zOIP32CRKnT2AHJhXj53mut50J7ea | ||||
| 6aiAZwmGVcljeNNx5tA8vuLLEdqwNxrH5zyOl5vu9gOp8eGPGwm9s3MogTTb | ||||
| Sv6jnl8fHrgCR3/PIpX0tH28/oL158akLZ/O3Lf4TaNIuaAdKxmicLHqNkak | ||||
| ODxEVbp+h8ZoQsOFwU3abtXpIHCdyKToq2SGIs1hsTzBAP0lIJ4Fn34G1903 | ||||
| d/Lu8t6dX0aR0gBjcpMLpBw3qJd2QMBwaUCXCJsGXo+8ySsdoBUKYSf2jQY+ | ||||
| uDUw4xiMOiMjkfUjRliqZDHHSwN33zBsGRXwcf7RByPZQByDOAjAWvGz1q+b | ||||
| 6cNouWX6ksqcY4mGAQ+XJ79eGKeSKFcNXmzmGhRG9iqThr136GY8Qc4IWe4N | ||||
| NDR3aSsKC1mZysLidRUbe7LLeip2Meldrtzvpejg82IGBaw5R1oKs6KbJB2V | ||||
| GTiopUBh7MajFLIAEw3QA6AMOdR/EbW1CxvWcodc/VuuxLdv7xwezi+ztSO8 | ||||
| nx8c/3KH6iqdigEenCHg/LNmdwtNxsXqr/IEpBKTabmgEgoYpVeJgIoSkVl2 | ||||
| CIGasHcMbagQ7aBOehEcblieMPwjUUeiIHgzJch+qrtRvxFfREbjSWRAI4oU | ||||
| AJO8DxyQvHbw7+ui7tghALh54katWhJxp8SU7uMQE85DGVNpZ0jdlaaBmVS1 | ||||
| nBzGYBCiz+cbugc9YKqMxftG8tUaSnehxsWUaTqQ+WgIxmTTFLzSFM2wlxCT | ||||
| p07SxDNFcdaFMAgMClAW6K4h9nsjbQlwsWMCdQXBJT5KR6VJLheT2/YtQCkQ | ||||
| CI+9zEAgumk37KpqO2jMT6Sen4Fab3i3pHW/iWA2925wTYw+N8zo5n0ZMQD8 | ||||
| zv3AqEssvzMax7vDX8B/aVtHY94wjMUaJfu2TEKksuZCYe8ydQiQu6ytMdfH | ||||
| rxe7CdCVMCOFqFnZeqL9kw/80bT6plDwJnqEoyg8jcB6YUo4ch5kxUk0gDbA | ||||
| v9dX8WLa+tHOKU4fwFlWWhULo1IANMBPlhwvfDJwbtg0+0qw9Hq7yQd2ZB+t | ||||
| kcYsEDEUPIvblzh5De5j4c49HFsbPo52B4gIg/vIXLZRfsjgoHziOJ0j+5Bf | ||||
| UYoqIVukuYmjjIbDz372b989+OaOE9Xu/JKocdvdgI3j/osJRF07Vj4BHOH+ | ||||
| +gzELkPtz/9wsi8YA/wECVLaBypzKIteeJoNkpioYcX+9TEKHNaPjhdejGBm | ||||
| TnrL3OaucoxtVRmbsw2CWqb+wpBx4euwIBMy2E+qTVmadOcEH2CfIZQDYfFz | ||||
| hcGZ8hYY1uJGwM6GLzP54YjyBsp0cBtD6303bHic3snfn/SaPnBtC4ycOzCY | ||||
| vJPyNaXczXB+5Dfus+Yn1Iq84XOJMDLTtcKXMN01eN8OxUWIUKFGcuZ4Mgyo | ||||
| QpUvUL3FYajrhIex656lmpjGOdcAjEBNIG4Ra9KAyYEBQis8xr4GM0M/KOlk | ||||
| RrrVJZEhUFhtiYELIr268RQYBSZ8jGuehyvRIjrdK7fbFKtppVrNEgYps5iT | ||||
| 0OJj6LR+EzUH7UgGKUdo4YKKn5ikGpBec/TV0vrGGaXQCp/Y6S13KBLGwGwT | ||||
| Lr8W3rNFTXPQZeemJoXheK4JnhvlWGJ517KeObZqMjxFsmRNGOd8MERZEw5K | ||||
| jcdvvu9RGrQCM/oKEGpzuZy2ceDxjTOFdvZOlgb88cL3AJ1DQx8vf6d9+Rsa | ||||
| +ujl64dkY+HKv0Us52HicHYI5sjYziFTCtfxSYRNLxmdI7eCDx/wDDb8QdOt | ||||
| UOE3odNp6hNFiHWgk80dQTDd17UbQRXk8UjkCaZZQ6ggKHrEGxacHgkJq8hH | ||||
| YDhYg7BkQ4gAACNvffhgMnMaHY4I41KgGZIxuUgdiEMksjrximznqiKnUdGk | ||||
| jEVzXMFFvXHsaIR1/wj+dlnWmJs9Wdfg+PAdEBGLzoLhpiVAXEE7pJpRLQcp | ||||
| 5ibD5sQAFaqLjqhZyxdmblJdVmI7OgxHop/fT937Yq0c3C2TE0ekJkc0Nftj | ||||
| 2ScLvQwBTaKnTkriWis8oZj7jgoLD4TgGniAU09aVGuzCZD0OF4RTz6ZYJZC | ||||
| drilNACCVoYDwdDstKnmR7GEmtw/voI1dp5h4cfSDgm4LeXSUiaL3NDcvmnN | ||||
| M3pTCQyIVOItaZ5Puaps3IDpLDzszKpVL0Fi41MywjA1UVK8XnlgMQK8IcN3 | ||||
| mYgdzvRK4+tbf4IqFBBl1mFwKi2t7rjHqMY7juU6BassIZY1qKC0gPRr4JJD | ||||
| ImJCBsZISjQC4a7BLodCYu3dY7EmRcbxzFFCL/Ual8okyx4jJXrCKwua8e32 | ||||
| XuaT0rf+GjANnDDLUU4mZWHbPG2LDktCt6lUUpFZ32adii+m35ZQYk+I96m7 | ||||
| TXeSof9v0ri7NYfPaKaHP1yfbruRvU4YOYmSfPfI09AePTpZZqsCc0fI/vrb | ||||
| dHTn6sGmOSnWVw8mGzBetJ0Trdk0bOyBbK8dkd7CQ3V/kv8YOeGyZswsbmeK | ||||
| 9l6w8IJ+EdQdReoy68QNosGZnvcGVbPk/LQay5MPRgX4qSgXc0REgLH2cd59 | ||||
| IN6OY0bgfnyf44aKRg7YQbC8TsyZ+cRiiRSX2D8VxUnewaMYCMSpE78J0C2r | ||||
| WBVW6cGmG1FQn2SLpqwswvnb0M1Jq6W5SIPJx/CeLEmKZqeWw8EXEPUaDTbN | ||||
| LqAsWKeV/XzDyJDL0mc1kV2vCBeY4qNHoOiTKEMHLpR8g/S09O3bO5/defuW | ||||
| XZSI6ya8SssVuq8oO6CAS6um6sv2vMpq2RomPtwTg5k4ntIat1EzikPVBTWI | ||||
| wib8GlPaDh11wDKaM/I+XK5Zx2LPdW+pIxcR7vfhsq4PYcUBKunws0M65uKI | ||||
| 6R+3dHRWp/K8o0cGV4xL/BhSwX8vYFjAOXnkPsFWDQkalo4tq4+Uzmxqz9V3 | ||||
| LBQ+9edFFRGK/qdNR4mmx/0R20ysqH35EqlC0apQfoQqBipc+iL3yj/lbFvn | ||||
| EO4niodbdg8G0hLQiaMrc8wx1YolzWwBljRWMyn/SoGR2FLIt4isZ58lGZMP | ||||
| lE4G8Y1LNLgHuPCPlGZow+uWjmrgrYQf0XEIkB3HIy7hiXH9PBL99QitPWh6 | ||||
| 4rUcAeAEHkHE9hjFoB4acXbkHYB7wu0ons4gVshX3XXd+wo61C/ZxyfYFNLt | ||||
| sW/c8flnZ49fvn799PG5fIdzZfiKo/S/fZPecR2ZgK1+wNWHfe3vbd017iaG | ||||
| IW/mK5zFDT3i8UhTAV6pQDCJS28I5ky8V+/ZbUdxFGjbwPIrbgEJAsk9u2n+ | ||||
| 6/aNv4RB9PdSJn7GxW2WRdP2b1QxP5f8FDZI0yLNAi+VORg4WXPm+kNiQCEi | ||||
| RpZCVExNsPmUoo6Q+Tzx4RrPi2U+386hTIqGNIWcihPTPOeXpBZRB/VWsQlU | ||||
| S6gnB+2Q1O220N0loEHB+aaTVs/aGvKfR5KOSB31zC4CXYQX9ogT40aesePx | ||||
| NW2datKoaji4ch4tGa7dDkgDrB2OhW4BYj1bSgUHhAfwCU65Bu/YGfBoGSy9 | ||||
| QD4I8jEPNhyUrijbkyERVbBJyEhnc1S4DagnPs8D14qI/314qKBFCzvV69tD | ||||
| 8ACyJW3P39r7cId6tnERbbapldwYpWcgCY6tAuQnpaQiU8hT4JPVXqIwN/aK | ||||
| +Ihx9OpU/M0DsfgzKSeh9edbMDyLYrUzeA3hs7Xu/M+lIDPbfwAljLN+DLKi | ||||
| 1pv0Vy0FowSQHi1vpNfd4gHFYTryAGKyIew72Q8822SFGH7zDNHrlyMY78NH | ||||
| j45O0seUyE5cCCwJaKob9a+IpV88v8RDtcZ2F35Cn0RU+6mtfXC/rREVkogI | ||||
| B3CK60YNQmAAFUd216OrmgjDn0Kpn3ZXOBXaYxsM+6YvDjxikUCk+TGxlckg | ||||
| qi19PUQQwkJPiEcdMTU/plAODi/LulNZD+snXtYlOmlZOMOa4RRcyKC5ozD7 | ||||
| Kb5Y8V5VeN4gAyEM7B6Qz1khZibN0Q3rTUP1RjsSz7tilXNVdJ60v2pDoUFl | ||||
| eUbtUxRXbtK/p5526prldi+4K/Lo7xDFZpy+yCG9FYtSSpc2RTolEXQHPqRn | ||||
| tEKFGXstIJOeADMcCybjXYSTjHUcH335EKFzcbX0Ht207N5sGW6BSYfrxTHP | ||||
| G1mEw9Hu25uc/QErN2xeqMnXx7PhU8NQwngvjtnPQQfFjsVwIxw1tMEAp1z3 | ||||
| 6e5PPxwgsEonFkkoKNwUXXgbAYY2Qwl7O91dIBggdqxukS8OTmIYovGuSoxj | ||||
| Aj0dwIw9fTKB0i1tDcY/DdTBAq9pBCwZTLVFgDXCHsFNBsT4jMI5McpA8R3M | ||||
| vs2pXtXHbVloltuzZTt2y2/VTz+k1/lM7MlulcqgYE2wf5rIIoY+5F5WWiCI | ||||
| VFhYiK8mLCqY3f4GcYL4ui+wKWCr2hTnbOPQi+GGvVsgwL3QsB6x2Vsj71A7 | ||||
| sHA/oZX48WVWNK3ZrR3Bf/0d+94Ql/ILcw/jOTBBYGjg8xUG6PfzBjSxx/V6 | ||||
| 2yCnQ9Mu1ptK03BDWk0iWITQ2kfiJ1AHokGWlvFT1P63iL4aKOA4CgShB/Dc | ||||
| PoxWUDCVr9le9bKodNlJKmUkrq+vp4DZOnWH6JDYG64G1iuZqGe3VWnKnAHw | ||||
| rmPBiGDngmNMR9WvMRmYwAXX86t4VGh0RXgmG8tKbSAaWgg5f6Za255QRj+Q | ||||
| NBCZIsv3KdzLtA97yIzyMYDB+J3xdVmYI3vJ4Jyu+x3NkuULHuAxkf3PCM9k | ||||
| VKJar7Y8tu88rJ/Mm9H2BvLCiHmYHWWqm4hQXQAXKS6Kikw25qQgfGDHEK3g | ||||
| d6O0rysntawRxAogrdlainFCAK4FXny+Wdytu+BbitoXkdtw0BAtbZVVFQJm | ||||
| iWt8cBEd85E1DLlEsIQxQJ8sjnmFjjn67cHm4ZdXxSAIRWk3q1XWFH9mNDq2 | ||||
| yK2cHMPzVP0CElQzDiXgiCfCnO+3PAX5XJzHuIkYoUuqLkdnKs48TIxAv/Ac | ||||
| 4XiwRrcMpmQs8XiAXnNyUg+xMnhMZHa4QFiTRkg9iAH/9ddnTya+8gEC5DFP | ||||
| 7udaQ05/G0rsEXpCyJKNWTwSe/X943tH9yb3Hk2OH+yzQz8DyT3zPJQFTp8j | ||||
| QY+henTv+Ab1yCtHHz/L9oZpspMBF7y1z+khPUeD3fVA28QWmPg4q4U392Mo | ||||
| LVhou873J/e+mBx9foN3Td9wMkOMvgvj9n5vqW+ZTrC3E7xcPJJb9Otl/n5C | ||||
| Ck30w8YRX/TVou4ciU6c5rgQjTba6vS2ujDZf/8xyO17sjT0cfCpsCGDGF4i | ||||
| Fjmed7yCzOOkQId6tkZGUVgTMlNUl8fWywahXYTos2iyJZKaOP/H5D+liwRr | ||||
| OKNyrh2gcIeeUCjkEFyzRjfmQQAWA+H4oOvllnxC2zkNj4bYEOwEDYisMU+g | ||||
| ex6OJ94UbHnryfeDT3n5IqAUMUVQGQJfMFrkgH4xbIK/wlYgt7gR+0amrFyP | ||||
| LTfyqbxWYIjhbUtNUke4DjhP4JyEzuJi3QEH4qH2ifSjedONHOnYcaSjyfH9 | ||||
| XRzpUxmScBE3qwmcgcmf6yqf1Mulu1UHHqlqfCD8BawmN7yMjwy+fOnknvb+ | ||||
| cfjlqqg2bt3jrwkPovc1nMFix29ODy53/wbBsDf/9vBB+FuVVbteMz/Fb5Wc | ||||
| ND3pMmXrQGHRVWAdGmClQqDlrCSrC/oEpNiRepHfcHiDIOka2vdYzU6JaBzD | ||||
| WYj9aYhB/8H928ug8Yb4P/fkP8o9CcZDLaidnnrllUGZffaOUWw/mKibAK4A | ||||
| mS9cbxQpFFQ8mZlqS0UVKUMCgYowYJ25REi78sxxm3dsWURDC+ZUkNr/mb16 | ||||
| MAQIi9uaMpUmUo8AS1GqXxRts1ljaMbSrVGZ5k1TNxTP/pmTCRrKTaXQHlbF | ||||
| JC7SRgMB6rTTOd5RfF7j1LeafZga1xDVZbcdxKW3upx0jhZzjwDPAcAcUasL | ||||
| 4+7J+yoDQitA0A0Nga6+H90ZKN3gpFL8gCUWZCOw3tSt5MWpy00KTaWph/iR | ||||
| mfkno5zrMFTnlEYDTRjg4qBmD8sfYNgnHykgBEDqETIusoVI8KOPUiK8AYu9 | ||||
| LjUUpc4gKdwwDzruYMoEQFf0bngMWW/58cW88p7tJ3A8MkZaitHvMoihBSFi | ||||
| 4Ikrqp3nY2D/0Uqvafr1j6/PxEVFY/725GtfQiz/dodi1XstzmRaBrZ/zoKx | ||||
| Eog9t2ZAm6Y6AWfaCZq02pP3q/KkapHB3qDjuSGZgj3EHHauEJ7sIaPvR40I | ||||
| v59UeQdxzBNMHMjKSVnP3yUf9yqO7uPeMYETgmNgk+pvtUFSNzflSDqx9UWL | ||||
| ojEIUTtyqJBL7q8JN4j6o/D9A+T1DGzYUCYPLGfXVAwBzLoy/Nk2rPbAQVLD | ||||
| ow+By7ji5cgU2BmF/mzpIa7SILboZ5MnrRY6wLHKypmKiWx3htBxX7OJooy9 | ||||
| W1w3wZCqyBEeogGuuyDMlzolyJsfXz8Xu4/3jBn6FQuyme5h1crHiUdYSG7z | ||||
| OCH6KPENjAcLONN4oFbogyOoAm7Gs7e2UTyavQ/bsWBqS72ePEfgFRREjHtY | ||||
| SSzCZtnhfPMx/z7gf8wCRba4gmShqU1yGAJmFnCJS4lr4nB+zOgU7pOlF8UV | ||||
| wp4xIDLlxNHfFFpNd6+7Ea7TGuJqQUXxR4Zxh9jfOwAk7C28hcd3Dql9aLYa | ||||
| FAkwWtClWpB9cKViHsGi4g2HC6uhn6TShmOC4QDm8QAAClUUdM0gcpcWV4x2 | ||||
| DMOIx0Mzvc5aPoLYCFRXw7hilBUhksnjHQV5Dv3VcS3hulDNN1M6Oj178eSU | ||||
| zxlDlpFB3bVbGtcXJweB3j0wem/E4aMf7AaWFHUa+UK3gMz+fvkZUJnT2yJo | ||||
| VWobCVUimdvNDDHY0HQi6GVdXWPRTUprpQJ8sxzS7tpUAenZOq4dQtQ2St9z | ||||
| Q4JcQA6rm+w4Uo6o4KZAJDLyE6CZ3A87LDNImZlLkhLxLEx9V2LNkMKfriES | ||||
| lwZSzT1eAcRBZGJZjw/SqQHkk0zWIdhziULIJEmerx4klrLIBQ9PMHlFcNU2 | ||||
| GagORBO5UzWTkXM+bC6jtJNZ+fo8oKihobaB5KhTY6RvpDGdLs4Cyr1n4A2i | ||||
| +9HRLB1lJApkP8VqlS/A1wpAAdmG4kYGplZUfnIFuTzr+XzT+BpSPOFZXWMZ | ||||
| CWjnmmulq8MekMPBQ7aFShdzCujo0mZT8ZYBr/eqJq7Km9wifAUF6E1WFld2 | ||||
| C3IZx8pqUF2kdBf+BbP2roMvDzBHBZL83LH6E6HqfQUzazDYEWp3XZt9DCpi | ||||
| +DAkxRegNuKkOXOfhLXVyZxrJxeUwcNdIUxQjtb0uayIhTOPMspZN5OMQJMA | ||||
| x0sF2YVfjui/Rw/5j/vHBKgBrXD64cHQ8WOzriY+mhLuXMUCK8un6tVDwtdC | ||||
| IZyx+j3Ab02opMVTqjfC+itZD5ZX+Qfr9GY/m5SeB4C+96SCKMVqthyZjll2 | ||||
| hM8NQMVxNTRmn1JuBYMsoFsONwRNVsMKqyBoOtiLUO6OAwh7MMA3AdUGAdhx | ||||
| /HWAfkVLYpi8lGvh5XM0YgsYhZwbXBU8iHxhFlP4U2hiD2vn+SXeB28RTJLI | ||||
| gDTv4HjG66XZg4BwGyDuWq/w6DsC2m005rTitC33hka2hQ3aUpzI0jCAH/sY | ||||
| fsGt+61eGN5iC+Lht3iwnf6+Gp2v2qorJKskDxNDV2WcaNTAhkfS7khVPs24 | ||||
| k8Wioq6Cct9DGlHQeJ8TS6wfsUqQuVEBM072ecWl8ChQEN0L6jhjhdJznTFG | ||||
| EPdrA4nFWDBxGEYkTf0VGzMPpk9br3vA7szw+6mNECIIJjz7k//Y1BgZO6hB | ||||
| u3mbFCE0WVEPY7aoQaAZpJFHzcAs3JZJSAizIfVsmYZMZV0imsDo7jgq1ULD | ||||
| eD4psk5yFK4N5rkp94UAWfxGk9JXlNUVROOYtkILmi/TYQPDpewtSMG9oig9 | ||||
| tV6L5EJMA6mHYMZ2YvQiXxHobJcL1Azi2RFam1wRI16XURCOFfAH6aJYXz2U | ||||
| fFbx6EQHsMq7E/uYDdpmUrnz873Jo2yyPJ18f/Lv018+uxODwk+n0+ho7ibs | ||||
| DtOsoEiixoHQc4at+mQWqaLElUsji6yGs3ODvbgnsqASQf9n7AT1e4uNiP1G | ||||
| A+HQQU1hnM7oaDpdZe8NvqPfkWzy59PJ//jjL/yH26B/n/zR7o15ePqX6fQv | ||||
| P//P97//ZfrZX6Y//8/VC/zD/VU+d3/dcjv74tE4AExoVZyRSDi2AqEiqnXP | ||||
| BiDfnEjR5vHbvoKWa8etT1vMUTT1YiyDCJAoZlIbULkZqpj0n0kJ2OstCGHR | ||||
| ztfh7gNaxZdm82n8o3vT6cP7oxu2Bi+Xp16CoAvmu8KEno+MgEFZVYBWMQq2 | ||||
| kQRG2SGNEcRX8ZLk10aDnJCRINkMsiPgFVq5yyzTNO5b9qWjB3dsv7g4kPH4 | ||||
| d5Agd6YmUPUCeEn2A/+5JgnIl7L34Hf/o2v9hJVd8DjjryqD7ZrUR08pAJ8N | ||||
| ZMFwXAOYsX4V9jfSH79t5WNWzn3zVY+af6ygJ6/TwjuUD72pkKTo2mpNkv/M | ||||
| O/HYSKB590BqqOvnaIviK48ZDIYvmg2LhQsSLTGdsiWTATcu0iIDwtnGGW7M | ||||
| Vmo0P0fShIAqIdfhGCW4DCh93V2ClIAYfAmtTG2SbM8HxIn5wbnHsVGKNhaQ | ||||
| Zysbij7WQoRHjkCcFJ7FvEyJ+ViQEU7yhQyEPb8R06MFqQyl9rN/dtM0UuNm | ||||
| /VXweeEkPZuf7K+oxx8zhE/vsD8Ho2f2sRv8TWepgCC63FJGpQNZ7iXw8Nyt | ||||
| 6kKclVlHRPX7F8/HKAkZPWSdAXoDlqbS8Ao0sX6FyVGO3P/lzcuzMZlnovuX | ||||
| 6xvjoJZ0yWOdZpK9EFaA/bnsy72J9DLsTIUFap/TlhGDYiYSN8oFfNnzJc4G | ||||
| Jx41ONeNfDgEzoNTJTOzoI4qTXPLlojV3IgcTALe4E09DcFw7MGucMs648ug | ||||
| bQJOBDslnum/+TBg356yPoG6fQs7qZUEB8RhRImBthq7Qmbr4bfARQjPGYlB | ||||
| 8A0h4gnuHNoZspUZifvAl6bEeqyQ4Y0lsunnkamcgCC7c0HlVE7rGsB6OBZX | ||||
| jWsCvsu3Y+/U8IhddzEpadN2B9CKL9qIxm9Tue6c1Tad3YDljgDAXTNauY5j | ||||
| RPicu3UG057Kk5Q25PR1mEVV6zGb+6rxGbVTL8POsWo2tKJIdfEjU0AMYcRk | ||||
| zlzD3NMqV+Q+n25wq4kZCD+9aNGt12UX6F9gR6Zty5iu6HsB7aKrMOtEHpY9 | ||||
| v2s2/MADKndQ/HezRrvNbNuRUxkXIIR4FgoqWj8y7omsBuxvsECbZMYslh7V | ||||
| WooOYo1uNyWDNQfusmVRYh4hutzgcFNoFLYi+qZidUc9cv6GxjjjRoKtH/PI | ||||
| HSNaZYGBBo4QgTt7FiVQQZhNpxPJrinZRUOSefBIv5FkpLvgtSM9wCDP8WVx | ||||
| lwqHqNGa0KUPbjpl0EIOOhinb+mhos0Oz9WTsLg0AupfVJgXCYugFTM5cRdV | ||||
| On4lyHdXdx8H0UA5UgW6wRY8uQdUi/xbF0SERaUYOn4Gv5IKMUAz8xJAHiKM | ||||
| 8SXiNwrsXhuxtDjllq7ezm8xG//z94owzeVf/fYTRaGT1vEMPA04qSYP7V4D | ||||
| COh6GausGc7+NiZosV33mfzeWpcney870mXK7OIoFLugj0hoGr7ZtIHjoAGe | ||||
| Gd9tsgtIx3Go5et806LZFFSJXhTEs75/zLi3iMSJKUHCfhjvNrbmRWsrYBNE | ||||
| 0e1Zbi0vlVmnmjDt6Y7BuTsehuPtR2wDdpJfPS8U6cwagQOrixpHqKEbjSND | ||||
| y2Mp/lO77x/1PQNAvxxGAHmkUVxBv1FsTiJLuEn0wwMEXRfrTOMdybRrvHsi | ||||
| MmJOBwVTSXURyfjm+0yzNIO+g1AZmwyvxhCFXsHlENyHMUGyAYqP0++KXLJK | ||||
| JLZ1U1U5QLJBcty8htKfomkB77ltRrH1BsaabWSOM7VQKo9NYtO075JTCs11 | ||||
| WeVjQ9VfzYUKyWnYRww5CNP9B9JYB8YfHOMfBE6FgxUa+UGLt2jCof+KskqJ | ||||
| WGlIOEIiD4vsR6TThqnwsCduOiECoIcNZBlBg4ExICLsumiDW9WETSu4r9Kr | ||||
| UjGqP3AvrddYBhAdS+4G4QI5BPIbDN4LNCi0mBiNKJZhoKrAkDXURC1qHeve | ||||
| eoP5t2IUa4HtI4iQFSxFU88gCiTzCrEEjz8uORI7TAkmcA8eoN9UDhQeJnqO | ||||
| 7D5XzRbL0Hn1NqpmJXD0d5v1/BDVt3EKf1KNrHFQFGosldhSEpps3BVKeWVp | ||||
| a6fhLyBK9WZH2xyNBL2TFIswUwaBCgvH7feLA+FMNR9NkVkx2ohrRsQrhwXF | ||||
| oYwUhCwgnODYgEjaOmy2cQE7wLRk5NdhSjJYKjIVpLj6q0leYyMZVR3Ch91S | ||||
| qVVElmBnn1Jir9+lrzH/qb31NgdWyDM8jvyfFx6pUJdzBwX6mC2KajMYhsQJ | ||||
| M0hMhoowWM6LkZtusSk2wsdC/FC4ByzFxO3Oh4+9FmRe/rBLiH9ckvEzWByh | ||||
| cPzwflXy3wR3SR+IAPhvCS6kjxxyQCbgz9JlnglKz2e6sPTJF82AT0Bb/q+J | ||||
| ZJR/lvq/4vptn8FBpj/Y1WLvv14Jwo+5/8Z/5wswu+X1JxtLK29L3q+wolwQ | ||||
| DCnb67r+3fmL5+kMEQhQrfHwV6useee0bi7/0Hrafft29PXsW0YG/PrQ/fn2 | ||||
| LbE5A9tNpkmDAOu43e98qQPCmOERDlcUwmVTG5M/ziRO8T0dSMzB3GLxcusm | ||||
| 9p6MkyZaigyxmo1HSCOq/+lqBtomsiCv6/Oy+SIdXIgDWAtp6+20Z+7tKDwf | ||||
| wrQgfA3Ml9CO4qLaKiApcndCvAjigmFsGh+rL5L0yO9awY5vPaYnTFkDCeYC | ||||
| I7RsAdsBSZ1kjihgJJCYetD3eIkFMSV47UNYCaPV9gHKY5IGnyTq3bBvXguP | ||||
| ozfVt+wFf1lpokOpVtELG9CYAbRy7QwaELNK9n4i5+EWo39GEG49QGbzpiru | ||||
| RugTNuonaIHqIua0i5P7MB1B7oklJ3Ssuo2xYFHInSNyF1d7xxWyOGsvhutE | ||||
| uwCc9Ki+p+a0siwM0f6mvlI/jJ70fE4FaGE/tnzjCyhfRSYRHS7I0h7aiQYR | ||||
| XlJ2ebnqaX+ycdYLzkjjfpnfeSGn13gWDywYA9mfSUIWQHxarghycG8jGJsJ | ||||
| 7kdJJDIaMB0NrvgFhGfsZzZcCb6xvnkfGiYi+ljCyqmv+WVRLsJAfLSO+YKK | ||||
| 2hO0wrcAwYb5WmxUwabiKuMECk5RGZ0k+Pi7FZUuvfbHnAQBBAWaRmpGEAlB | ||||
| kDdbV5NXSJ3uznysqRWsCkIqxVp+9fkNonwhRCMGdUrZ8kqD1iiohHMDPFOP | ||||
| kpjIzOuZZHSyKVwZ3Vn5tsbbBuFO8VyCuw7U+gvOBefiZE7BE8BO5iYhVZgu | ||||
| hqd3EKZCkbHeT/66AfWxaeM4FP8EKIXq+/RfL+u6DQIASrL21umvEH3iwwU+ | ||||
| 9N+dQfx871337fC7H3oJVGIB2TWPfVPYNc7BMfiufyTWObzI7QDxgJbvo97p | ||||
| DkG/IOP4SdZyjQClxFzrhlWKDLwNuZanT0+ZNlg4bIO+uTYc+RjADhnY07Z4 | ||||
| TTtmCmB0kiIC7WgqT2sDQ6V+x1AGjp18YlcYrdK+Vmw4vP2ZYv4OkhJqGPsq | ||||
| Rd5kwDpLRm0utyLpCL/WPG1IuSIni7vUcVfvWkP+gTopJDnHZ68DF5oDfNY2 | ||||
| zObKruqCsVV5lplcJqYuvDo2sX9h6v4BRGokiBiSEYm78nAOtOZUmJh3Bntg | ||||
| SdBnSQnm6k0XKypqn5kXub6Wz8T09bD2Psbl4jB9CZVgjkboZZdyVgq2tyRE | ||||
| aeCc7ENDvs55UllJy+l79cKeGF47yi0jyxlHAE/IDY96gUhw2oYUEGtxAEHj | ||||
| 1G4HVfeqrZEPQVeSQ5I3GEsBVI7K9Us5KUP+AZi+HqWP0xhZW6RD/ckKI2uL | ||||
| 0MqtFcbeuGnqLXMc97zjJkXtb+3rbDsOPBbI0ECXqLUUxh7z23CfoBV1pI+4 | ||||
| 83yZNSvWU3eMAvUkHohMqzeGN7ljEcAIRJKUWG9NeRJrrC+3S6Abtoj8UDrs | ||||
| p1jUg8r0/5Xm9I+wJgwNHV9uucat4PS5lwjgUI6RKXluta99Zc/Dbji3lU3n | ||||
| 0IaAFGPZnJnVB7BcH6bQoI3R31XYrMil0AY7meWW6w17GhQACUWhYHiacD3Z | ||||
| iEQRxD2+QZGMc5z0YZQFQArABFmOZaQxgz8giPLlOYXR9Zfp6LBYnvh07+AT | ||||
| fMByvHH+y3AOjDcHVDXFjJW+PAOrNQBla02fopcit5Xl61sLsmC1pgOnJhRe | ||||
| FavErjHTiiSLYIDGQoKpaBB2R4SeWh3oTaPkZpSK3b2gPOB7Mj0OHn+KoWDj | ||||
| ZKQpiwKhiOFlNstLDqChHDsSuVhTDfLb4xRnrVW4nPR7Y8+NuPzVS2MtC71t | ||||
| 4WZ8KITZE0L21yHwo/QtsgfZCbovoQLeXDNeDAQMv2gSuzm3EIcnvwZcT4HV | ||||
| LgWIZFf9wDT9N8gixcW9aLIKkzS1TccTnITQ5j3QHhJS4VC/LziEzffFQh2G | ||||
| pTO4zapovRRr7dCrHJKhi3YlsbxddnGB0ZhLZMJXxQJQ/knBlgqz9QaG0x7g | ||||
| KiHJib83XCu10aHOgOUwZe20+FVvS+2qei6vQApOyCQBFE0+Uoiq7judbblE | ||||
| 4re+nKGhmxAUhEenGxARMNMoOK2BcxftHHLIfShLw6D44ME0zUmGvgFaMeot | ||||
| nPOGib0sZg14vSUkEPvaWralYMDIMTDpnhduThBcDPcCutFlXq55TG3obfQn | ||||
| NxqbjJ0wmzarvDUTI7kV1TEzd46mwjsH02al1pvW9A2Kx53ydT+3UgwDKMwL | ||||
| vAAFogsANFBC5mCRIJogWyyi3RQShrIgnNsagsBXKYYeEQt/1pHquiWDUVs0 | ||||
| 4lzmmDauLoIpk1G9CtTXCGQSGlliTBPobpS+B2MNGSFIhFBTYjg+IowNsB1q | ||||
| wKApntrkvpAMdmc86JzJnbXxQfLNS712ioW3uWa2YTm/IJzI8rKZOa7HTXm8 | ||||
| Aa/UfGi0Nw6y+36IECvqAj6mF1JwtQ5UNePnjveNj585iqxBMjP5eQASz8k+ | ||||
| oCZ4OBYelcHWi1rRiC0/b53M0eirgR7kSOzqRGO6PLweKM+oCLCDg1Xsx5y8 | ||||
| DqfoXzcZuRRVzF8Vldr62fZrzf+BAdg6oyi6gRPjUWJBHbNXCttonZmnFxNH | ||||
| bIAIVKCZ8rS8t2bYDWFGoqzMFIsmBV2CNQbcHsIMRORDmyUdIHc0OxAYPVC3 | ||||
| zaW9qxbdaLkCr5Sg3/oZkk2GFsKXcffGKavfeitq4KXVwyK5ftA/9NeSbnAQ | ||||
| qq0irAWsHqciJhj224ADb9Oy7yYhp0BcbLEnfDU+4VkgSdArOKFb2Kjp6IeD | ||||
| jKRWoK6QpSJehreeixIsUiENJpCjMaqnNcKvJzDihe4eJpsZWcYoCaQmjzjb | ||||
| +33NRwG2wXBJlI4oE7pXU9QENxmrE/UIGi2gNhoXU1wDuEezF3Sd4T3tS/eC | ||||
| 8wymF/t1gHznl4i0o2Onkl0Iq7SixG1VQ/QZaMZ3DbcIWrHYtEVZm13hCx/7 | ||||
| mp1gqBNAi0Qsxur/ODBTjZycskEUmgLo1oxrQ4wXF4o9Q7yYC4XRkV1AlXjn | ||||
| 4mEuJiAEzTlUQmtcaD4M54YpEyiqq7qEvHatUA6XmNIQmh/oOLmbZgJ2UNMo | ||||
| IvfANmupOze0poseO2Ctym9mVPPIq1X9Ss2DahVLin0/aUAZWmcURrhYEL1b | ||||
| VxZZHEHQ7pSt+MLWfZA5VlTbPDSLs3WS7c++ZK1I1gKc6knIxtKdGrPk0PyH | ||||
| YyNI+YCRh1p5oaFIGGQ4VMyPT7pPiNReQ9nBVIsfXmBPfLS65JoT6dbJwFN/ | ||||
| z+rBPOWq1QMksGP3TWx/yBy6HXzQseVDYBfDkhQm03FxMu5Qw4IsB6nZ5AkX | ||||
| SOHrifq7Zx9quUkM//L+g/sfPjCOOUgDme0m8J+kc1IJRjjJKu8wUYYWV0py | ||||
| qr1nxBIFF/2GhsSjUZswXm3rcbvK5otRrxifr3i+27Y0sm46qnHufsb2v0nv | ||||
| QImdYtmdhD1B7Vb/kp+jPBV4/sQSttiAkh7/BP+C1Ok0tYnIUV3UmOTc+rxQ | ||||
| 7K4oQC4mQ+RCEAxEaFVq4STA4xk4G2ELB5D0SAJEucLXHCYUf0jLFW5jTTuO | ||||
| j3DDGNwNuXN1SRYPTPIYMSaiYyYba9RA5iIlRKELCjIaqRpiuBNGjgoBSTYO | ||||
| UircYiSnuU4lUUlA0KChWZ4OAqsBeI6upy+ixPw2V1BP4YhaBke0tAjupF8k | ||||
| HpRVexQHGAODtthIDTMNQrSFYWBtHto4Cq24NvcqyG/6qDcGbvuPxtLD8KCA | ||||
| CMyBNsskphc8rcy++/f7mCNV8SzfmANEq/cSg0puHFlY9D0WwlAvcyI90agf | ||||
| WBhjlzIkoC9WFBr1iAWBGUAdgpys5trhmLYQL8xPRuKPwa+DOyG17dHfmC2V | ||||
| LvyampvWELxKchK/M3gLeN5NkdY9qdSvgeICDkdRI+X17mO6jG2iPE9TTRTq | ||||
| pucVwXYQYvGSy1OTGwg8IcNJ1C1r9LRO9buMdDlm59FlIdcDI1v5qKYJ8N1R | ||||
| MFR7K7KJASjXKHAoCY3gepy4YzJxzB/wsZgmzDnU2fpjSMYbsD1tGWu00POK | ||||
| WAMU1+SfCYAC5Vl2ALBZK0SiJBEuuOaY8wgGLn/8le4nBNuR7O6j6RHZHLzU | ||||
| N9qLp0ttsaGCrYmrrfuWbz+pdevuSLdOjL4mD8K3X/H1ZYvi+mvYPLv8qoem | ||||
| Fu1AiKwGjZ9Qv+qv6uGsfdzt37v6caYn0TDMzY+Xekhr5nIfqO5qcTYhk+K2 | ||||
| ziy4QdAjQX425BgiGpFZVPmEuoTUrGnZzBKr9oD5Ee36DaOOwQfvSxIO7qlc | ||||
| CHLffWN5pjFhWPCpbP4uuxC75zWcaJiemupMp6xfx2m//ZPQUu10lCTN04bD | ||||
| acI7MRvPa0SadfO5EpyQ+NB7YizaKHwv1kJY8ejxnp0qhnDpaHODveLui9in | ||||
| xPZ974mQ4PWRPYqjIR4dV1riEn+o3eHOjlZbOffpn0gF1hRxeLI1FBB2x6Y0 | ||||
| Uv4wYSO/KrIhSfQVgoELAPwX0+N7MQb82Hv9Rgtpph+pjsP2EbyEW6uo7Lai | ||||
| gOaS+Wufyx+idswBCXj1yLW+Jt9BgYfJzyUyhClML+eEIayo1AGk7bzE0kkm | ||||
| cF6sjAFeAjTWckUccPWpFUPn33rIezDXS1xFkqaRhVNCT8HgQXWjvZBiAu+r | ||||
| cDBjEmjViA15b6gqAPETuoLPCuWakbgX60tMgYDXB5cJlhwDwwxQIl5uMCae | ||||
| mam5aGqN6h2bLZd0ceLZltClEFRXXO1BFXnCLJfSwdGC2kHOgmgVcct4mm5J | ||||
| 723yCzTpEqPzLnQxX3FMKzkwdN8U/F8W26tfrNC7YbhtyRoTLMj5hDtHDATj | ||||
| DR24yLpKRJKt2y0p40syht2/fot968qYpWf/PQuCRFfjAQuOtREOuxSC7FI0 | ||||
| fXEMP0wBwGc717RTQEuyQK6KTiwEPgMC7QNsE9gZqywN4/UjK28M+vriLMew | ||||
| VQ5XzYZ5jl0KPTS0P+wnvITMeA29EXN76oN6LZ/RAYUvRGHKPzV1dXGS3g2S | ||||
| M2yAuHsjL5cHLJTYAOT5u826jYKC6VtrgwhsD0EvR/e+GnwstEiYsQp+QX+0 | ||||
| mac3GaknwMPZuxMerf/TD5EeRE3fjnvXUGN7SSoY0f1ryJtmNTtvh3FWdGdR | ||||
| XULDrD/8jJseBK1walYrPtBNhSCtE+0IdIsfW8bs0JFE53KwmuIt0k36Zryh | ||||
| jGYY7UaGgMPWcWgKJIW7SHQfC1p+uKpKos6XLYo5YRFLTmVqPRtTsyt8Pyxs | ||||
| 6hV61YOACm6iGgzmmpohmjKQJu1kYFlpxHNKg+XmA3fZjReNNqrCNkzSB/og | ||||
| iIpEMOzxQxo5hRvZOXpx0+N1qs31R7PU9XI82uRfZ0b71/1H2xaOmqcpq9Fz | ||||
| nof9mFWP6GDez/zG4J8usLr40hRpaops7djYm7oolj1HJRRD7i5zn1GuJGch | ||||
| 51EpYnHYBuNofwRvkoYFvVublYycryRTO4pB3mpKpeCkLkd6lTVYOBMA4Maa | ||||
| qoLivIEhJUOb/5Yg58dcjt5/bxHapwOCJEpSADXnSAbnQ5D3YUSKsd2OAxOT | ||||
| Y3EXENFO4UECv6EAXmJexeylOM6FuAZ5TbA44olWLrWRJ90llenmcIcJQEyy | ||||
| rZTNinLtAAkI8v5gaREmT7XIilmS2XjQjutSw84aTbiKjbmmah4qGmRO4NkM | ||||
| hSPdZj48DApSMPYs7RxnRrnDGs8Yz1zOzMfMf3DqctIr1eiH574qwIEbTt02 | ||||
| xQmCJjBraEXHehABSJRlLXiLp4coYbnf37IOwmz5KTZEpymdLvCq4NHy8QRA | ||||
| 8vAOaktKtxiijN50iTDkZnyUtcX1Uy8cM4eJRBxEeAy+Zqw7ZAQrJvLAyrH+ | ||||
| etEv+JD6AHSpIhrGy1AxQoW2gyel4gJ6C4c8ECHdmDCvGyYAjUiMPPieYRYE | ||||
| h+am8byu23x4CTFRCL58l1M5QwwM1WVDZcGjbrF9ZB+VU+TaJT+J75tsAshu | ||||
| 6DTj6BZzMvNQKUiYdHtZrJWP9QtS9StASQ49MkKn/2l4f68AlPiFOZPJ0xZI | ||||
| Df93vu3dFW80Bcs7BdgilJXW6p31F40LZAVot+a+Iecd3uwcqiknxO0ZXo8s | ||||
| aITmNbSs3a5utQklHjhFal6hcei8JSGUZcszAkZ0Q3NXcIx+pqmMfMggGAWY | ||||
| kwj8/SSDdND4GsGGk4lYWgfEf4N/G/fB6DceXO1v6VcsvK/+95lxP6MD/nFW | ||||
| h+vsMMjdoH/xAQ77MsP/YLsPRz0873Svnd0ohi/NMUfVkBFl6jUpZx5RBo3Z | ||||
| HAs/UB5Oq1sr1EbDpiTQYZAZQaGqND3tKOmc8VrpoJABoQ0Af8LipCyBMTtD | ||||
| pM5eNFpvWHIJ2Vp4JMdFb0KgIkXubn3wliDSrjIGU8L5oUMxVH7TFdieMcIK | ||||
| 0xAoWYv9t72lQv52TevpBkAXCCWDx/VCgbNCI0F1PRKAKxAfKGcqgJvDGybu | ||||
| UxhQMC3Snwhpqe29x3etyL0DlQnPJZmhqp2UUl0gaOlW1TMI9cCFUGlNuXZr | ||||
| 4w00+vsWdxC2Qibz1jgPJOdPbF2U02t8MHRvtxtEZKJ7gcyRfUKGfo15APXc | ||||
| JqsoyFB3Kszzp0hzJiW8DYEMXLsz9gNgwMpqRtps/8hBn4+D2YPyJDKSRE6M | ||||
| 99WshB5nhdaZL4Jkkj1biK4XTI1qdcdYktaQR8lpQNmsQzjchVgckYi0hSab | ||||
| 51a5JmebTwDGxaIKdj49m9DT4Da9jRRi4vOpAGMcNYa1IkHcBshErmt4ScFq | ||||
| 9ooJIA6Em6qF7/BQHmgj4DeMCbZXw4i9cGoE1Raqmi78dl0TpnvYErsl4jSi | ||||
| gEEj5KGBOLe0829yQgdoh7n4g+nx/enxhz4lDUin/UJOAdSSpaF8IThrrEz3 | ||||
| GMc4qOQaoOzqDVybMn9eABSrU9APyORF2y8UE/QM7fjHl4KpJFb6pc2SQGEt | ||||
| W0AKAJDVpvUwyNCifkn0j7WafazflB2oWMwRIT08E/PR3wYqq49bZWYYkzkj | ||||
| Cw8siwQim8rKaPgBGblfVVYq3eLVKzKxkuLQVRlOSqcE3bZ/rxlJgg6J+CYm | ||||
| jPnXbXhAmCCEC9Ifk3WOGNr2PhzE12XZZkhu72fk9JkRY1h71c97QsLlDmel | ||||
| iq7P1BxS5ryVlhY+1EzTuwZ7ydvDKQbtABMfOG08UqzF5tcXFuiSziTqgqE4 | ||||
| COCbnzYZigM3igqLIgRApAWNQSPkGgnzNshBQ/e8vOADlOL4XOvysqTE7dcU | ||||
| q4ywxZnEEko0N6TorvjcCHYnNcuE+iSuNmo8dAuMCpBkWbzwyZyDlx6YYbD4 | ||||
| MQW6mRq+ggMjJ0uAhsQB6o9ciGi+A5Gg9XDk9gT6kyPmkT1ig6YVWJAixVmC | ||||
| mZ2r9JP+oHKRD6YVqrNwU5x3p3YQzJ2k7C4J6NzKTkBDG0nOIDA98c+LoaM/ | ||||
| fpVlAayes25xAuCed2Q/Hhwb08XQ7Y1GYpBnKUIv31IMueMkVMa3R3mjx8ON | ||||
| hL5g8aYbcXfwuhQjQbiFDC/LlkKtFsx3HMauSTynYb3xjtPjkNlJB27swYaB | ||||
| 0SOEF4QMz7toZaAhDHPsIYlhWiiYvXdOZkBi4Ki9dJ8vrgGgD04Nw3RdUpIA | ||||
| /IhiLdSVFiDRcDGi91gjnE5aF6e85iXX/ITjwuhCJNSS5T7yS9FIz9SaS3Jq | ||||
| D/+GnHSOtTYBwQ/y1F4teluinNfY1pSe5V5jMjVFI/0CkdyENyFTl5giFP6O | ||||
| jFnR6zFyoyzY/CIBb3GerQQ6OzY3rENQkpO6KbyNccWuOwxIW5t8JO6Z9h/s | ||||
| c5tGzjlmFUnZEJym5uMTbcxyDPIjInS9/XoiYvM3o1nWAGvclvk3I1rW9O7/ | ||||
| NT8YocHjM84Sb4N4O7/aQdyrKN5B3DP+8wfBbwy+Ao9jCp2GsCCIFrYikaf1 | ||||
| UtvR2FegCV5zWBe8aXFD84Icpiagn2hYckfJxENJcAybNIPEwgp9eUiI7aYQ | ||||
| hHAA1mJAUkxC887kVM6CV5SpuuEFBZV8J7cLzkXkfZmcHUl0C6irPoioURBd | ||||
| GuJgG5L7LOhJK6r1sdj2urev+FWBXys6WFdUx93JQe/Zf2KMtVErWvgJ/1HK | ||||
| ht/OWVMsBAlCadWd8qKGqh6O24Rzib3cKHddOZkgm0lY1meYt+2XiYSPseFX | ||||
| 3o1uctHZbePL6EG/E88PrPtjAdLwnEJjdbaKytt64zn+C5WjKE55xGNSVeiL | ||||
| 42NIe7JOAfyHGYhyNjDiozfCqCVVqs4NVY4Ofd9kiRxpYe6ttzEChDEkVJG+ | ||||
| pm/LxPPFiBAicj0A7gWYYNGQWbbftqB40DCoYduglC8D+qCZQZRkmff2nCxM | ||||
| RE2AQcJCGhVzUlsL8z66IvjGd7czRLNDqkUhaVxM2Df0SBffnxl3H4Vb9L7a | ||||
| wQxb+ixRrsyCiefFfocKDsVS5lV0SeE/vQhhuIakA9AMSn4iHBNaAm5Hm+Gz | ||||
| JhAQjmiEAxihARQ9IDWIYabaRaYFb/FoyUSLk+CDBQh9MArK4roqWhuQAp1G | ||||
| jFZv/djExxWTLB6GduxpwKezjJjoBtETGa/Ge1/NAV27azYL5Gi7OL6AyYST | ||||
| 0hb9RojQTM98hDJL5KpavX76+OWLF0/Pnjx9EtAzEwVa8JFdHGKFdH+Kelsn | ||||
| W5MKahhzCwjlACxKyUfiEF2RDxQ7Y4vbJCsnUW8DVzNbtOXecQcdihaZoGwE | ||||
| X1TGfiZ8kSUEydntX+QS5U62yswfRwq793H7dOSGNS9C/Dc8sSwydKCD5kPL | ||||
| roZH3jaTPhxqLiYFwMQv4dnCg2nj5clEcZHNtwGy3N0ZBsXicA4kX5mjv7FN | ||||
| ja4TCQnlZxUG/K2Cs28lMCFbXEF6PVRMEQECti9YRz7KO1d6SqOJusCQIrjF | ||||
| fYlhJD20yxqGLro1HkBWoZBS+88AoWOYheQWeMvEXR3dgdc6WJSwk7EhXYDR | ||||
| 1xt1QBasrYPNnGhjh2Dd6iL5o5m+ffv1Rd59+/ZtQGC+Aw8vvYNYWExXNKHd | ||||
| mwDQZoZe6aux0KXJVOvytWKkQDG/Sou7ICyQ1S3QeTrbilwG3FC2g/XsoRCk | ||||
| Xms+fet2bfnn8brrtcdJWHFj/Yb4QdPKKYbxS37XjkmwlR/1C6n97YNnD6il | ||||
| 1zlqW5LRlHv+6nlA5GwwHtPEMHjjN/WBLOeYkqxGJ28r7ev9adrnLnljvEwI | ||||
| mt23OnHj4m3ufNR9JxDgmMogojBev0Jxlo+CcPrGRxVd5iKKRan+IyuZaaly | ||||
| jKdCe0MaxcRapCG+M3pRlIZapRggjGEXn5I7hQPcT9LHEhZ3JiyPMcqgJfmx | ||||
| dwVI9KHGQ9JC96x63qCgLA5tQ2i6ErFjb3qkd3iZJMhNU0nO4wkmfbcn71fl | ||||
| SdWeQCMn5t0wF3JE3+BXgz419qX18uk9Tod/rm9LGjS7G8tDpXHL7nUwconJ | ||||
| YtBHl7WcNYTvfEiMoy3YQODNDVZPeekGGYkIZB6WyksoRAJF+J0UyzXyTqu/ | ||||
| c8WwZ4SeQRGungWxqhERNUVMMFJFAZqzQKUSKAua/reOgse2EbayMCobtllD | ||||
| 5aG8k1AwmBjN5+R/OVr5MNAEMX5taCh4JyIwloR7bZv4JKEEt4SGAP7XW7D/ | ||||
| gsOF76BGYoyI9lLB0wFGZN08u7fu5Xd5vvb3qN9iSGLkY+OPjD8xn0QaPTX/ | ||||
| E2lm101g9I0d94GNHJZaQKoGWDD4XbE9+zQBf9+yvE8eGHujowekoKJ0MTlR | ||||
| y3cj+/P/1961NLdxJOk7fkUH5mBiBgAfomgJ8mhNkZJMD0lpSdryhMNhN4Em | ||||
| 2SaIxqABUlyH5r4/YyP2vMc57c2x/2srn5VV3Q1SssczuyFFKEIiu6vrmZWP | ||||
| L79EYde566YJJv+DjgSrdJWD4bSzJ7pZWPtCPPaMlOuZZ2J6gsI6oLngD+D7 | ||||
| /HJwhOVL7j9PPlTg/LJdZbPhYVe99nz1Eem5SfPk0r/jW+G6pb3kJiOVcLGJ | ||||
| H4ojHKBr0MYMXJlXllWZGMPQGR2kLkmlClLxWLGDJgyrfjVjCL/vKdHoylI7 | ||||
| Al63MRG5xDxYD2NgFF+sgWJpmtY+luuFPvnpQHQeeFBcY9fMhOa9IPRehSWE | ||||
| U0tz4nBZ3lhARAL0GZXyQ/KVSm2su3saklV2o7TSrq1iROUDF5P8L4u6j0s6 | ||||
| vzKq3+vz2WRxxbut7esA/d4AJ9D+FqBBz9cmbmt1XUDC1qAcGNTA6Ko7u5Kf | ||||
| 1bWCIECLjlB0q1PzscpAWXdmXol9pYEEXxU2pK8M7XwiAzZksaacIpmCxi8L | ||||
| pwUv2okUPICNrSUuJbQGYlixdzZ8zUlWL0NQ4o668ZNjyaN23VFAiITimEov | ||||
| gjTKY3RDn8+A1KKMw5Yw87McGXFg96d5EOMEUTt2onoBIDtlug4RmS0vNEvi | ||||
| ys+RDbO+U9CidkyaRk+D59HG+3XvSuABB5LLfST+W8JNhSW6SxuWZ2GvWeAV | ||||
| z2/J/gblSTZ5+TI+iZ8iJQBygytTrzHroRUlV9QDJA6AskM6kKmzID1BcSr0 | ||||
| BuIxynXU1pkJWRbwM6G03y/O82GY2gvTKYQGY/g1LKeHLAvTp5wwfmcN9i20 | ||||
| s7wAXVh9LhCC/C0aQPZ23tWwvrBwQ2W+GZzhkTmFfQ8uUebxpQXrK3IbqgXi | ||||
| qRRrWBn/hTCNvZNKUkUuT0ouNElqlnWLn2xgHUTPhQVlY2UzidsTPjXCTFPl | ||||
| TMxkpCTEkD23hvmQXXc6Fi8p5SLHOrjsv41SV0OC/GW3vdDIM6VYTYFg3wd0 | ||||
| 9gZCmxlWqUwSnnSqlKHnqeSqQVLyzZvBWKGae9Wx5UQz5OBgV2rmloRZQIiV | ||||
| Ja1liSTqB4wyYeNK+islP4X2l+vatqslVqM8aUvRGVZZNUuPnWC/sghy43v1 | ||||
| X8Bv1tRoEUQWHfsqKKtNdRl8/2fToe87x7f1oTATGJ8Nsuqr5csYzA7085xJ | ||||
| ffR6x1YRUydeXKyAbrIGVuvtoYmEV8ocqAwMyE4NkyDeodVRVQSDMiUpe3hQ | ||||
| iKg0VyUOnG8ihQAyoxLJF/Swn4UlpCt+dIE2UN/Iv22RskFWprkcTOq3+b2Z | ||||
| sYDWPQWtpwTG0FRyHc78fexZs6N5oxCwLVJDBydKhfMsj7Tr0okQeLsTOEPB | ||||
| 5E42/uTr/e3DfsOwa+m3/TGRinhReV6MpXBRuG0KYTBxO0Xuk5XD7Z2DjkcL | ||||
| rL975yFKLDR559EoepTBzfEQYWqHEYVb2WNCsDwkgtXZhrnKift6BdMd5oyn | ||||
| vS6YWDZoR7e/mUf0PAcrmHNBVk9CRfVCPXUTLrCPWZI5xOvGcVCYCRMl9bm0 | ||||
| wafsU0QXncWTEeS42wQruuM8NZwOqWuivbwVzdFCBpYoi88JGx6TlACYTBeG | ||||
| FxbTAvzOjDPaLEVdz9kYd+a2JVEhAVhb37xMcN8n4SlPSmKTEvXWkWlsmkOk | ||||
| J/NVYfRTtHAMuRaHfnyA+5r/jNsv5I2csfBR8AYpKSK87PpENbly5bmi3apL | ||||
| GkoPzY4w1au4oUFTnowlLaSJ4yoHlQU0RDn8Pd4GdTOOKizQIqhFL1i9ldcK | ||||
| euK77quJ4qA6VQgyLBU7BolpkxIOT4SJrOtTzU3qlhfIRus2AW+kdfDmDX6R | ||||
| aRxmUr/GRNo9p9v6esjnpje8Yh/PLADMmxxaJyDGSsLzi0kAGfOVZFTdt52z | ||||
| NYkBhBy96k0OYKNx0glvPMuoYOA6iqW4SYMaPKbVmwLRVamwLlbyLMu5EsTZ | ||||
| geh7lZegIRB0E3ozvhYZKwhUd+RMcrPtkYPCXsTaVPi9rgbX93q79tFKz8gA | ||||
| J1Jpt0fVuDxJz0tOtJq7f75rtX76CW6oR+uPgRCcTivWA2ASBLxTWfdB4Bc0 | ||||
| 4DNndfWx4av0tmUg15gm5/WmVAKGmnzoNnsXfhyp/fRz9+HrPG2hqMG0pxxR | ||||
| nvm1Mvb2OeOBuP2xZ0QLIqUHSYx5Mw3G3KrhFHKzpbAIcnRQCyII/du1RE9d | ||||
| X0kNO6GgKybEXMwLcA8StWCsSEIZZbI7mDwW6e5m6KgM/NrstmYx10QfGzis | ||||
| L+bzaTlYXTVMsavwtvwArxVxT2dv8b+rqyQKxeegQze8r/A/9jDDPwdmfhCE | ||||
| 6dlX3Y+w1SWPoadWH1xdRVGMgtZJ2u2F24WzUhE0GposZUdjz+AElOTfwf8b | ||||
| 4eaxqaZ0fSstKclmOssxkQxOKJJPKu+ktiUi0C0c5YjIAd4+3E7anrGSrgA8 | ||||
| CO3WLDuH7aoF9PA+qzyW6GM//QTN9U62Xx4zFwUpkjDU7VPY+MM5ZUkea0Zy | ||||
| q/WCqSDcpiyZqwm/YSjQGIMoTYRUFFoaRy0PzkAtqXZrwBOhb7Vrabk43/vT | ||||
| x6DqRjA8xB3OPClKG/mNyZpc0tba5hpOxlOJTpUefK6weHekFlNWCt+rj3BA | ||||
| ST9/vP4AktSLmf7/8UP88HbTtIlPVatneEkjTOc905f6HiwfmdKHNPXB9H9j | ||||
| c5OT7PkHD7aI0gT2EW6sAyjLRN5QBQ2Cab5Du4eiMbChr/jB0pc04U2a2yQS | ||||
| SLQmXTIsa6jpiUOqhezLbptWqBARIwI0zEdTyERb6ELFqIrfo2MIB5FT7puD | ||||
| /cDZQhEdDA4i7AAE56Jkby4fv2lazpkEV8vThR3FV00/c8nk47ybYhKWmGUj | ||||
| MRX11PU2vuxFsXrIpgobhI8ew4YDdgd/bYPXBylqOAB2sPcMlzTQF1Mp+ogb | ||||
| 390W4uqTydJEKdyLe6ronmBEYyU/g390fOrwyWIycQKCfz3H//Ej0Yr5XABa | ||||
| Ydc/P6KNR1sPeAsG/VXgvdugpGlsffqQDx+awoaw1X/P6zlorzOvAyWCIi+a | ||||
| jV2M/eC9OYjviXQVkCipHSaZLI1KFjOvhCkgAf3gz49yYMkE0BVjU23kmyHU | ||||
| V/6Ynd7SgSJgPJ0BGMG0mC6UVo6Qp/icdLbLzD9jcBaDy+fq1KkAUiNUPgAi | ||||
| Bbusocd+coxpm6JcERyvlMJ+6OMjvlIsDOpDlpxjcKuMnejh1xtOryjESiDj | ||||
| tF0PuRQhFbQI18pgs9Xep7W5lMyyEoDwUNMeVUWu+RgZMtwiziNOO08BSAvb | ||||
| w5zwHHhtYSQRFC+nPCBr7HXmRx/FbLvkslQNXPHdQQIsSlGzvFe+EqgwX7kO | ||||
| jbP6Sa5LIhQGEM6yNAK3LvAl4D7Sh+i4CCsIw21x2Zu7qmhK37x4wjWBcYz8 | ||||
| g+dGz6rMMJhBJesZxLCopSMphQ0TR4Mk+8aLAFzg2IJRxdhlHIUOGy+xhBMZ | ||||
| fIQ9PNTkEwyZE8/B1OYzmgaOV3iaREPlMvTnM29IM/DViBuWgI5aNrwoPGmE | ||||
| n5t0boTgrS81DocBkrZm5M+TGuMKuNEYLooSp45WP9z38wTRP0iX8aHEeiFP | ||||
| ca4guKiSAONE9fOg9dAa50DqQoFf0QxWr/LARAQRDAaZJt2M2KKl61gP3bL5 | ||||
| RkJaInC3d/tZLEvwYW7Px32u0ok7DzgjrIdgXOdMBZOcIdnzePtD0osnauLf | ||||
| KNRXht3BEAGFrYmhDZQQkuK+ByKYYl/Nw/4GPO8VWKnO2zQbIOOlrECIqfAM | ||||
| EjxGVlPwru5Iud5JEBFueOfx+toj9467jTJQT8HRcHaduRufyVXcsUacTSF3 | ||||
| sG+HaLz7VOKNQzmqsKFK45/C86a5hsh2Re5hsAX8YQQKwkhOKtG4sW3qJ6zG | ||||
| H+4LO3AxTShGwInIejyUJWiWGd+Ua1ZSjcS1xwGaW3Oq9VzmEydSc6bckMuD | ||||
| 6gvAc5L0K5c94nZs2Y5w15CwcUbYBA0inhtz/1PnSeMRlaRmRsLpCKwPOvhl | ||||
| zcmPdSUs+WS2kmdm9pcjjZTAUT8N/rIogNbN/fspzsPuq5NjZwmAzwgmXPIV | ||||
| vBezv96hz1gUENjbqehCjH/SBW0b4eXUB3DqUDEjVkbR0HEnvpTCGri00NpN | ||||
| Xsb5HR5KxEmpo2Je9rTDbSlSSZoI535xyNkPK527fXS6mHMFRX6MT5sqoa73 | ||||
| 57SQ2Rms6fCWvamdMH04GCvW2SYrq1ycKrGIKH7oXEHoNpqlzEqFG2g4d4tc | ||||
| YsI3/5w87vorihLp0QJDsYKpw/WDjQt5RBdQvGtMVg05H2I2k2adBi8HDvXh | ||||
| BloAXTchdlBT1UR2myGRWzuOpZlof9Fp4Misp8cl53RCIRsW8OhrWfGHmFX/ | ||||
| Do6VUAZzvrNML1a02Mc3x/snxAPgDMEMi8a7Lm5zFrgzXFz3rXSlqObrW6cK | ||||
| TqQnqaF8ery1CXJb5RfxR0CxD/LqhINtPriG3Bwli+K/wNZRP6venUHTEis0 | ||||
| pRNk/IKoql8csvxSKU9qNXh+gR31UktdKNXqzZZ+sj0ui26dmDcLGwwvlETV | ||||
| oZLHPlTYyPXfPLj6mSX5RjKt9kU3zMBCLZX1Ebqw5/5wYLDMMu0ZBTZx8+F5 | ||||
| gBxKSMKCWkVCadWgwtop+Opon+aUHIsYi6S55utuiAlbwTj9lEqCsR4V9kny | ||||
| SoA0nWTz3u4sPavsw+YLSLOwPRRR2RI8zA9HLediokTOS98xQgNfr92cfddx | ||||
| OeSkp5mmcjDlsp5bASN5UByqeeWsZYyNXjDXFktMoQBfzKG8tZlKlGzAWEyD | ||||
| YYHONmDtmWQlB7bB81E+J82NizUGB7VxBhqOJR41SBwaCR4fPVcsPp30gU8q | ||||
| dZv7iGxQmAAqXmaRmPBbrgoj/hN1JYhBy5KDq38FnVt6J6iT0vJ5QCPuoxij | ||||
| QpUxL1FsOwVqmnNGqTFDPUwU9/0ZVZnhZQn9IvHBWEx786KH8cwQgIm8lYWz | ||||
| JDAYxB7OigdVikChOlDrTUHxT7plFZWEKRluv7nF7kvFOyhKN0i+PYYb5jvv | ||||
| b8BrZ72/Zq4esu/JnCcKljNl20AqnnFa6xUQFG/gauAWfBXaxCNs+FYMZitA | ||||
| tS69jZLEaPs46d8c7McOWd9I5AjcW9I6qloWUM2+Dcl0ZKCXMLX4+pu6s/GD | ||||
| y2XnEvlW5QSwiQsEjhkWC/DRUDKe9CC+mlSc3nEpmUsQWeIBEkhEHd5OIN1B | ||||
| FJa54noZ5EA4NWt0oWe/5sM+3q2+VrahDAgG97XWqtPyNl4WdYLiTCoKYNLL | ||||
| ZTcWmIFlcGMtvWrcERtwXO77Zy9f9/Y3vndfgBp3/MPXb3roNucfk4080lde | ||||
| 7NIv+kkbf/Di1Sv4QVujc3lcPVVEDcpQBtvCoNRzhyNMOcHAeBjKBaj+gNFy | ||||
| 8w5IsHRiqMIEhvBGMm7tnjEBjftOTC5Jc4zfwV4JZ2BlwnoCc3/3TlwlVNci | ||||
| mJXvgRLv+6PnX3/I9Bj+i7FQXDZdDiSEQQCyO8W91YN6iL4EwEvxUUA7b5z2 | ||||
| KWcLd1mYkkEIPbhXFGvR4Kpk1AWWXry6eif1cyWEI7cefmMYfgP7qS/DL3m7 | ||||
| NXVKDGESgSoS9NAtXV5UKyz1n1bZyTl9QweO3ybNMQQ5cEYVHdoUXS7k9SFH | ||||
| J3tXDTNFqQg0/YCC9KG6ObERDjO56MjELaNLuckFiFiMWX5+LpWpUk1iLqp2 | ||||
| RuSGdXM7dHIkG99275zw4y+29/cB0QJUNnN2LetE+q1sQgOSAJZsi54GneKZ | ||||
| 5WLCVrWbgjwc5aXb6re8MflKtEEdL0CXzYsJr4BHgtthoKbGu7RWu1WESSDx | ||||
| y94TZ+u6h8abXDZ2ct9z6NUGtSnRUQyDLK08VLMOllr1NvbBgEwZkzCFtBlp | ||||
| 6CKmw23yiJ2Q+to1nyobvwVs+eiFE+1CqysV1U9yV5qckzx3u8jbasu76nlN | ||||
| +SSJp4EmFCiJxPvbTlS9Q0+ZgSogfNjUfmraR4VMILdjpqB2DwQRDg9znIsM | ||||
| AN8lDyk29nD7gxQYLeh6D4o5+UFxMx51gUhvvAptJbBkpQ1aJKQiMk+HMF8F | ||||
| 6UPk/2urqtfukP8FvxlNmlhA5FfrBd/Cs2I/dtdnVH93f3pkTWvV6Mo6RoNt | ||||
| 7KEMsTZ4I9EBjJ5jOyv5mcQvOnC9Q3B05pmq6tRr6bCUSoJm6p62lJ1X4MDz | ||||
| aXpcMErphoQRgHnT/H046tGzUnnY7w68xWgj4QVixA8YJGp/kHPEO2xZg+Qo | ||||
| DHS+r8mKtFNzPy6xRdyIODkC3kGztiE85pSt8RgsfQH93cxy9C+h16FDLZNd | ||||
| jAYgakJESej72KeJ9FJXNRpCFNpbFC5OvoxxTPO0vIzc+OJPMAXlhI3TvWCn | ||||
| xh9IlrEMpBmYhYc/f0jaD9ze7g1PIXVHu9meX8yyrKe/gUoL6JCHVFqIevhf | ||||
| mdqYJUY4sUM++LVFlafB27m58RC4GCs92JoXm8HXy/ztSfHCGU/twFtK4BRM | ||||
| NXJPzIuzyhMUB6vs7pRZ+M4ZmFpMKOYQrBUbY7/uVrfLP7zIhpewKU1wzRrY | ||||
| 1Q0OsCP1LPHJVB1RIMBLvZnqDTvTpED9NliREkSu66mxxMTgX+4kRU1T8nCm | ||||
| KVT8Bez3HiU5ZeMSahDlYzBH7NfKLLuErEmIi3EJ6HF2nU7mXgBhsrAHmFEs | ||||
| DZ0p8hsKWgZgTmd3wu8wexdKBhbjfHibrPitudl/KCD6R+sbWxRATehap3ys | ||||
| bSfFk11Ur4pZx2hBpOxgjGxikTUggGfgejPKmqhpHgplVJc7dIbtiRUSCoej | ||||
| 5GnEYY+rql1EUrhcO+GtYb9iLK9u8CluiT9o0xb9IXj/QZE+xLaDnoY55ZXQ | ||||
| vmsHCPCkYkM2afsVGxLh9O5Nd0op0t1skPA1YSPJ6DPQJuC+vmcjNrYJbiKW | ||||
| 4+DhdM8xLRjaiTIqr62ZADmdvnymjfN5kFi0sYdyj33ltaETshSG0WWaDbfm | ||||
| 7qzk8yDjCZPV3FXaSZzQcRstV3ZUBaCwedmkR3alauWE2JprJC36JquiFk5t | ||||
| JFs7HUVRGExG3Y4xfmbZXSPrrLjIjEysbBKOYek2Os3cewML8E+8eNxY23jQ | ||||
| W1/vbXzK+UqRtww01iMfhjo6QjinUz2O9w5fvEo2ttYlgUy1S3lNMgRubm76 | ||||
| 4F3oF7PzVRI9OEhMF+h5QOQqKdfuekVfxGji7uuxe743m/UAnvG572sfXsXv | ||||
| orOjMpq1R82jweQq8s7rToFzooGEEcaNqICc8cJ6vtetTXxh6yHtALjfHm9u | ||||
| rQ2cqT7DO+FZTnYdPPVaxidvHwfB4es8xfXcPTxOVo6/3iFc7hcnJ6+P3TXA | ||||
| gL8j1IzLTuNU37ML9d8OtRv4c6/OyGt/t2Vee7R0mdc2exsP715mv4AgTnTp | ||||
| fuNdi51dMpyN3trD3oO199q13X+KsXHPl4wNVrL3YL15bBKAk5eWb/P1tUcD | ||||
| kroELEfQh9uwO2MMgeIcRJu1usPxVe4uZQPtxgzkhPKWCebQ5kV+fpEQ8xjC | ||||
| iumnTEUmarv6XSm5HP1AI3flOAUxMo9Cz53eL+LY8/muxpW+8mp/t1PRb8W2 | ||||
| AsPubIHcJiF/CuLY2INOwPzvYRIojhDcDtHauZ37ANcuXjl7L3hwf7L+mNYv | ||||
| XD1cu80Ha+sgooaLGWBltwGvNs8w58QrRRy+T14zcNY15raU6dT6Y5AO61v1 | ||||
| narfTDWdActr4NQy3EqY/kTp9dARzlyIUhyoJ5BC1hLnSJJPAWuNj0M6FPYJ | ||||
| Wb7zs/mAfv6ktptTNw08bZhIBcG3dFouqBzu32EKaZufBDsurN57X4W2vL8u | ||||
| 8htsrA8SaiLSqHkVZtyrvmR7Y1z//8W2hV37f3bTJnF+gxgdpUmFNXnSeSX2 | ||||
| RXaGxpqiDJVao8sExAKe/DAMWBOMQ6VwzxthnBLNR4IOROuznVe7z5Nnz1/u | ||||
| HR4/bcG5tHki9wywW8AZ7Wfkfjdwib4UK0aXSA2qyj7csv4Vj3mj3FJVIm1q | ||||
| KaL1W99iX+Cp3uvto+2D5yfPj46/c5OGtlReSgSGozejEaHPbPhFWhxonaka | ||||
| d0R91CgaOLxvx84BEqHIsnEkfBtfNF5mRpYxI2y57OluNTpgXOVSKaDyxYaF | ||||
| OhHHryTFege8pAmrJZqGG9bOYB9FfK33nv0tQl9gmCajgAKnOMNiUBhjIHrT | ||||
| jrDXfQL9QGKZnnyqx6/18gkM7xOwdiUgwQ3scbQF4ZvoVwxcnFrHJgAkVbQ3 | ||||
| oW7GuhyYKW1Zz6+cQFLQUFQIR/7YFyg4Qu0oKfT9Wgk4pIOIywAL1VKtRzrG | ||||
| 1tzUo2WjGyY8A7MVva6/XBGevCAIGFTpkT/whFuYsWJcRL5AG7gn3Xe/WuoN | ||||
| lFxKkxRpnLR8Wpp3NQIuyHLRw6IKhTksHN7g3Dq9NAnoJvHNEe92N3rN+Wpp | ||||
| Mpm+ZHnZTho0GDpRwsTcQhBzyOsXBcyi6F4qKhAARPAjISmgeThxFyQlVd9g | ||||
| xhAzu7GjE/vmsU79KGwZ7BpxyUmCFwVDW4KOWYymAlvQSZF0Efa6ccg1DZp1 | ||||
| Byz12wsdyiCZS06MMd5EzIGmZXAPXaQj9u3x8ZChqctbjlgXMAWKLEOku5xg | ||||
| con1OARZapap9o6TX8+y1JRqtg9AUjdmSrlGQISADotISRwqYLkFnCGfEp6h | ||||
| 6hMcN3cqCyRBlOCKp9p02ds5CMM7Vprlqw8p66tJe5tjIgIuSUsTDnGfBTXp | ||||
| G/en375HN70iRAhC67NMWV1zLUj8QKMHcGi+5djBdx1kDkdikPEYP8VnXn3w | ||||
| rgmfoYuEjtcyS2oh0zd+3elK7jFfRvrR3cGDdd3+DMpEf4+GLv3waVtOacOB | ||||
| plICZYQxZEyMEhJJbgUFV2sRZp0+wN/BSU6F4DHNhdAKrdDNjBXiZUnFkAoB | ||||
| G4F2sIfZ6C3NtADK7mtOhhjmc5ujgM7t8W2Mpb3t85Zq3bHzFWKNkhcHEoZo | ||||
| WvMlc2m2b/oBAXp6ucGpTjgThXBw6D0MulMDlchkv8I+p8qUCbHTyybOLsHo | ||||
| FOlp1BNsYu1RVJ1aqA+t31ch/lY/Bfhl94GeXK49JX/5buDzbvFlnVlICoAI | ||||
| TS4JEfY+9tc0vP2t3cTf6U3LNzbVQFOyGwHdA/UHWS/PD3ed7fJXw/R/f/vo | ||||
| uc3RMxYShqg+2kh320i/2Ej6za2kCC3UChW7O6wjukwqgCMGXvWC0Jk7O8VZ | ||||
| 14SXrT2DTag9Y7Rsllb1ujkBrOS1HVuLAtKJr7SGiN15olhXFHN8tM48MrmY | ||||
| d5lIlUbDJI572EhVeyEwd+5hJFVaqLGaPlpJv4mVVHU3GEsJL+xfYim1xFT6 | ||||
| aCk1W0ooWpzk/2gmfTSTPppJH82kj2bSP42Z9AvtpA82lKp2Uut3SS3uz2dw | ||||
| vUNmRcv8HEdtgwMtBKATa3NICAEZRL852G8d8W/azBL5YOvRI2YJpH0ikS/E | ||||
| JG+ufQq5hScRdxkuRklwd5vA4WdVa++aXWAbIZpZUsG+OtobJFD2DOlaa2qe | ||||
| IbuJRPo4Gsufcd1BHXzopCDMzd7z45eM0najHSSHq1xm3e8g9zk0VCaYz6t8 | ||||
| Kn3lOa/ddMLAECE1sLG6ifdFDIL5T/z8ozkYrALHyFsyJ8snBaPWZlLqpiSc | ||||
| E5wRmJIn7zElf43N7WD5l0xNQNFYw07bOoTvBPS0MBVbaxvACV6htG02qft+ | ||||
| 2qBJN8TKhjHOB+ZN+Rf3sLyBg71ruuMmXyNL8YBwrzT/vNMHBBbYdn9atlPx | ||||
| gv0KnYqb1E6J1GrsmDhriGKeZZ6fY92nyUv0WrSE4GTpTjCZXCw9QmRaK94D | ||||
| SbwHPCHcnY6UudEX+IsB2wMytFtKZXzO9h/SL+J6kuK3mmSAuEpnt60ztPNC | ||||
| Qau0Oc/6y+lvbbKAMjwYWMEVw7ADKIJ+GxNrmMqzAYBD5eU0xov/ZedIYH7l | ||||
| TWQEpaRZRvnAqLz6KvWUFMYI2Sjb1hIdAG7OIvQnpu5NDHPzfhm4ycEr83vm | ||||
| c5lYpSyc/LLJv9HFckM2m9JXxq5Ro2N/k2JiQO0xFHRGUfu9GMf1SjE3TJty | ||||
| qWqc3E81Fm9BK56BD1NDk6VqaJMi/qvo4ZYY6r3VcHeKPIyHOUu8VwUxOzKx | ||||
| nJ1DMzAaRfuNbPR54TbaT4PkGiXsH9tr7XeoVlXEkvGzDn6Rk9UiO97Xv3oS | ||||
| zozt0oersh+sxv4OKkdqvSsnCQ6YuZJIdeNKkrYYqhe7Z+4fJZbgiAuVwgiV | ||||
| E0fAhBGdmBpCQgJqKlrN7P+Um72fbBN1hFB4k5eOauL64QBhaTCagFEuh2IQ | ||||
| o8VQrOlQl3W6vILa4kmoD1ZE9LtS58ndkUfPj+nfwrsaVLTSRa2ftX5rz0yR | ||||
| dhrzxrkGcA5MA0hsU0qXZ3l5CW65njPFTtPhJQyITwJnoO1AWh3kzDAGz5ey | ||||
| JKd/OtWzTKbD5vqjdUlnPEHZh8XaCBttd+WMPkBca/yfeOdynhJdRtnwYgJy | ||||
| NWC3Qgz26MIbnKhwy6yLjydY0n6MJRzKGIW+CUoyAm8MShzqGmfMw43X21VW | ||||
| BSiU8qxwttOMlAc3je7yVJL1YP8G6oYgEdkXDe2cmnZWgHHthx8+C5CtThdE | ||||
| ZGsO+KqzYtXvpP7F/Gr89IcfOt2AwjfknPL3FWXtXuWSVB9xbcm9EnDlxT2U | ||||
| rcZNiHdYLxk8VrJTSDsrfTKdVB2omS9fkcA7PuK2Jc2coJvmUQS2pdF3zUjy | ||||
| eSmni5tg1zR+2hxN97n3n34d304xvZ0h8v8QefGW7osLZvg2ayXDc5IMRHw6 | ||||
| 0wXFVjk5LNhZyOUJ+XlKCWLJJvBQnMxA2pOx9fDBp4/AwE++Nt2KdWKkqoNX | ||||
| uSVqYKiDI9I/SYFA7xBy1ERRlL5Yo1FD++h6eg39pSSFlZP91x3JADwrFphe | ||||
| odnfZj3m8H6W+TVx29eJ/IwWxq2ELESDbNYNQu63iWEUjexWf3c5ZaY0Vkr2 | ||||
| Fris8oBAB/6CMg3/cNq9BBJKK7i1xEanW9kSRrCifIcL+cznjcEjnNuMewXC | ||||
| Tz6jVLSp2nv6ym/4lVevjztwE6bJTXZa5nXSJr/M/dyi0bVaTBlGL3dHz+9/ | ||||
| kDyhtDAnCW/efIJHk7uA0Uup4aWHps4nZtZpbq8e1nSxWoOyv3HsTYpkpFjO | ||||
| V/kGogWFAsQlEn1wn0USL+mFHg4JFVWYhW0jPqnVEhiAn0WtfDW2B/6BQXJk | ||||
| 3Sr2NjT+Gf+81V7fv7kuF13q+sZJXDLRpPxRSTqEbCrmy0KBhKfFRxzwMHh3 | ||||
| jq7ukb8YaoShuTaI7RzUM+B3zRHhrPtmfgNbxzPkEXfyWZUxr/RmUZlsrK8/ | ||||
| Ntwpj9Y/3eRSXmwiQfGJmjbE+T2Hy3JSjItzYQISzUw2d8Qq5jcZZfEiOby0 | ||||
| yk1oLgLHaOzlahjfTRPWrxZeu0j6JKR5OdZ2xzBUPm8eXNfMiH5imM95zwce | ||||
| FgTGuGOPpVFhSp1Um4yZbBTLN3NDiAfJweMBBNtIel0YHuuVsyC0QDy+l1w8 | ||||
| jxZDGprUrytlwk1BJysWZUAqF3Iuy8i4vjZkh6fIzCx1v3XxoU+g+95AvS8k | ||||
| UJrnZAh0hPbjGZDg0YQaYjaYMJ11U0JHQQBQsgTJArmZ+E7B+32lWMxL4fAy | ||||
| S9yhepiBzhyuemmmBfhF6quSaykr9kGlMjVOo2OKPdHvLBE4x2Tq1kDP9D7d | ||||
| uvfXeo84gv/seJc7IU24qUGBbeUTKJCLU4X/QLDSXizMvO8Xmi1iVfSZ2JR4 | ||||
| 3vBsSnz3QX+9D27YS15XYVtODDWX00Bvs3RmjzaeENV+MNzah2rzht/12ncI | ||||
| FldvZb63nYJjhAOBBn5NfecVRbnLckFylkhRqOQxOAnw51cUJKQx3aXlqm0k | ||||
| Sm6ixASkm1OkG4hScKvr5jhRc22HzVmMkquZ51R8qBFrrTp6zHPCYsQzTwMC | ||||
| 1FBHD83xgJE+bZn7kXcUNAhSloI8XIgnY3J8HKlUPyhv3bZ9y01ks1kxQw4M | ||||
| KvDqWj+bZVlQX4zYaD2/rS0BpMdfTDP6FVFtIYdM9z67oE4tm2RzqEYmWwAl | ||||
| 5+j+77p5Ma/u2BmQQ0Az0YUgMpVQEe514QqHVfmxOBVZSeTfP6KCJmy3QlCN | ||||
| Sz4GBwtBYoLFkWUUw0yOjlYKwK2Dkn5awE4BuKfW9ixmff62aIPqfQYUne2G | ||||
| MAW5bdwoM1MV2gH76XAMIoGKtVLpLLiFYGigAFq2ZRXWYfVRAWgRt9wIPUgh | ||||
| ZBYsNU/qifyhbtkIEBviYZOzHJ17NkDFXAOf9ja2KB+/JWiM4DHM90R1Xm7Q | ||||
| 9f76E9gHq6tCg8EaN5FghMAzX4viq6ND8o7Cu6Y26L0jau0lX2XDncMhuVs0 | ||||
| 7QFprfCqFA117UlTXFzULCdIpgFRXwePYFdwHubIJKA1SOFnT7Aqc/RwDrzy | ||||
| 0cPwM/+wFAFWuxsq5sIcUtwXAJ1ThCzCHmmF1YVxz1DM+LZYzHo35z0iynv+ | ||||
| dpqiqHrzEs2HTvKGW8Uwnc6ijcgPKRicRPBBaBjFE7zCz9B3XdtvslMAVaLc | ||||
| cGIDTFbwxlxmMy89bs5XbedWn9JOd2/vO+noXv/syknFeTGwT30urz9laUME | ||||
| 8vAxfMwQ3umfoJ0M/vO5qTX7tGbruDOUz0oo/Ad3yTDzd4QBwpnATuX1inND | ||||
| Lx4DDqfXlHXarWg+97Bc8aWX+YQbNf41elWqL6jIa9WkWqOvVetVcfWCkEKK | ||||
| rpqAG51n13ugVoad5DMGnYFC89Q6g6QQohNZpbLDKRCHtEDP30cTNMqQNHws | ||||
| viiBwsqnj7IR2r2nCw0bLkjDY0YO+MlpPoEwJ1yEzpjASZZrH/4DeCGKZwy5 | ||||
| ih4Ee9BnCVM7XczKBUnzrjBv/qgkoWy0sI6E1lupVdtB6enGyqioofQ+1Mlz | ||||
| HUOuQ1UZN/tDRXbr/H1SVpxYMgdMZS8O6V1eaf79yr00O+XoxNm2/PXYpuKx | ||||
| K/XPA22CmmC9PI72R6H1sHP35VPQfuKWfY8SI4DjfAJcei3Vve8uMaLHnspQ | ||||
| 9Ad6gKG51T+7P3xdkYZp4AFE8gR1JqgFBZNFguQTOME9mfFPrBDAYViH+Yj8 | ||||
| tdhaJlUKXbMr0JHewUFvd7cT8OEEbTdT4rypIKBRab0HPw5MwyD57IgHA3Fl | ||||
| 3X/JCeDcn3qaHjuPjAipK6OBggIh8kaCVeoBNNE6+vkxZXhoIcI1CCdJGrqT | ||||
| Noi/tGxSYDXeZ1LqKrHTb8SBEP9ccQTxL0BbcPNT+TkeOa42HvwCHcW+nnjl | ||||
| 91K8Of75bDqs/AxOjdJ9xb/cfYVciNPFnMuzhg+hzVuRLkBqEqEaq1psQ+KX | ||||
| aLQEcmzUaC26icnANpQMzGu09rF/rEZre1JRS/Q8KSCpor1KgP5Jg0IozCjb | ||||
| 0sIhRdSYlRF23QoWBaOPB1rdPV5m8b23s314SP9cd7P+MHmTAo0MppDszvJr | ||||
| qDi9gIDBg7U1emy/cK04CYWF7Ha2k8dra4835TLIxoPkD+vJ5sZmsvFwM3kI | ||||
| b7UCxQ6G/bncMKzPfYge1ARw+kXKUPJ/XRvSEOAHakOgCFEDH7WhD9OGPrzu | ||||
| WiKq6PsUXqvTibBI1geqQ+h+jgusoVMus2qCPOE9XvdVBwF8buhN2eNDL1fr | ||||
| IxiwaEks9Z/Rp3F7PG2cgjnnVAjsqVH74DWrVvKpWzLv+hPf8Wf2I0/7zfeA | ||||
| jkMrB8BPoWcmd1SfIr0oZNSSBg7ROeDeRMH/z6fE7nFaSMkyiJynUsRhCnyk | ||||
| KlEerBHruls/ACo3qrhmnupWKgtjJVhjIJ3cdujreA3X4Bo5Vu++3SGFVl73 | ||||
| iMuleMdAdwxXgEXA32MBfi0F2UyprWq3hJ1dpkcE1gD/hXp01T77B9sVfmHe | ||||
| R0V/l9SqudvDy0lxM85G5/TYTwMaSTb6Y/ssHZdZ+x1D39LJJXp7v/z5v2dO | ||||
| yCXHw4uf/za5+fk/xyMe+H7qdINxep3sXxTzy1TgBPA65IEuylJUBlBIUdZQ | ||||
| zAIxbMjkCxEU/VLUXotu7qS8SFHjvSpmXBT+LRfFHHv8KZd6Dgo7QwO2Mmw/ | ||||
| GtnePB0XyTMnjbvJs2xS/Pxfc+BgdXpENzlxsvx1Nh9eYPTjyA3iFpIUysWF | ||||
| UzgOwDc/SZ79+PPfZpdjdyt33by6q24/n4yyq26ymwKYoQ8+znF2203+BEfU | ||||
| KaNl5l7+0t3m8ODpOHXv/Wu+OHPSxDUJzV5k5UXyZQZTkgLbquvYUXEK2t4b | ||||
| UDgnpB+dXBRX7uZ5UZSlO32K4tC5xWHuFws3KLdyEIV0IkDygSQLE2dzFJTH | ||||
| qamuRW0xJWZ6Xr57R1HWcoqxf8ZNQs7Eo/XHMsMHuZOQ4+Tr9H/+4xKgkRxi | ||||
| xnisFq0Y3ia2YHvpJOhWfwPHB//alAIWnMoVLd03i7PMzdp+vkgozYExjhF8 | ||||
| wYesCFYm6T27r3ZOXh0d83ta9lW2g6emI6iUL6XXBjx48geMuLVxrhAPFXfv | ||||
| CAKjx+n43wjDBPORjfGn6WwEyAJZs+Pt7ZfcC2rDbBWPi0Og1FuFMyj8VXTG | ||||
| uspDwi9JzVYP2/YV7LDkWQpiTLpDqOc5YEeh7WE6w/qDHPaMcXHRoP1W9luS | ||||
| G3ACeXqRzUbBUP2b5vDQqyFK3wgTujkYP5xcOzli6xz4FmuOUt0gt3cberRz | ||||
| MSPQ0RfFGMSjrynvRCEou/SaO82Z29bua8Uku/XDxgid6+vR6x0MoPE1WbIw | ||||
| cWrwm8zO+2hSjvJZN3mZOyV1Os2SF3kxHBZjP5PFFJ7wny3ccxdOSkEivQ6s | ||||
| vDZdg0/BIv65cBL1MPcfc9vHNxUM/Od/n+XD5OvbyfDSicCD/BJY2MuLYgpi | ||||
| yO0XJ9gmt+Pcff/VLHeb19k6AIT5k5Mik+QkHaeLcX4J6TK72amzWgsUftCH | ||||
| l04Zvk1epPnsYgHxDaVMfX5stv+JKjdiS8Dhh4yBbRC/z3Ks3ej+++fFVQrx | ||||
| o9L9G+MqA/jK7ee37ucQrSohvtJqRXcdSSvfLAycki8V1Ei7ngL5ZSXMgagB | ||||
| CxknLaL9MoTES6UJovGGsXGZ9oO9Z950bAd4825yKtisnX5y0E++cNY9G+HU | ||||
| xzAKx+dYL6JC7qEvF5nc1kU2uXFix8lyjuBH9yts3tkk+zE5WYx/TC+75sqo | ||||
| XDt/0sC2XGMwOvfbcZ5eJfuL6dwLtXwm3sdrQcmXHqylQk2iyVFKwv8CX2WM | ||||
| WTNGAgA= | ||||
| <!--[rfced] We have the following questions related to terminology | ||||
| usage throughout the document. | ||||
| a) Should "IANA-maintained modules" be "IANA-maintained YANG modules"? | ||||
| We made this change in the Abstract and Intro already, but should | ||||
| this carry throughout the text? | ||||
| b) We note that <CODE BEGINS>, <CODE ENDS>, and some other bracketed | ||||
| terms (e.g., <b>) used in running text also appear in quotes (i.e., | ||||
| "<CODE BEGINS>") in some instances but simply bracketed in others | ||||
| (e.g., <get>). Please review and let us know if/how these may be made | ||||
| consistent. | ||||
| c) We note that templates in this document use a mix of filler numbers | ||||
| for RFCs (e.g., RFC IIII, RFC XXXX, FFFF). We suggest updating to use RFC | ||||
| XXXX throughout. Please let us know any objections. | ||||
| d) Please review the use of module/model when it appears without YANG | ||||
| and confirm that these instances appear as intended. For example, (a) | ||||
| uses "modules" and (b) uses "models" in the following: | ||||
| Original: | ||||
| (a) Modules that require immediate support for the NMDA features | ||||
| SHOULD be structured for NMDA. | ||||
| but then: | ||||
| ...as either an existing model or a | ||||
| model created by hand or with suitable tools that mirror the | ||||
| current modeling strategies. | ||||
| and: | ||||
| (b) For published models, the model should be republished with an | ||||
| NMDA-compatible structure, deprecating non-NMDA constructs. | ||||
| e) We note that there may be some inconsistency in the double quotes | ||||
| around statement names. For example, these terms are not quoted at | ||||
| places in the text: | ||||
| import statement | ||||
| include statement | ||||
| normative reference statement | ||||
| XPath statement | ||||
| extension statement | ||||
| YANG statement | ||||
| YANG extension statement | ||||
| YANG conditional statement | ||||
| reference statement | ||||
| length statement | ||||
| module tag extension statement | ||||
| Please review and let us know if/how these should be updated to fit | ||||
| with the other statement names (that are generally quoted). | ||||
| NOTE 1: We have added some quotes to "revision" statement. Please review | ||||
| and confirm these changes. | ||||
| NOTE 2: We see that the quotes around require-instance statement were | ||||
| removed between RFC 8407 and this document. Please review and confirm | ||||
| this update is as intended. | ||||
| NOTE 3: We sometimes see the use of YANG statement. Should these simply be stat | ||||
| ement? | ||||
| "when" statement vs. "when" YANG statement | ||||
| "must" statement vs. "must" YANG statement | ||||
| f) Further, there are some similar terms that may benefit from | ||||
| quotation review. We see: | ||||
| when expression vs. "when" expression | ||||
| must expression vs. "must" expression | ||||
| "enumeration" data type vs. enumeration data type vs. enumeration typedefs | ||||
| present vs. "not present" | ||||
| anyxml vs. "anyxml" | ||||
| descendant data nodes vs. "descendant" axis | ||||
| user-ordered list vs. user-ordered "list" | ||||
| leaf-list vs. "leaf-list" | ||||
| false vs. "false" | ||||
| true vs. "true" | ||||
| "deprecated" vs. "status deprecated" | ||||
| --> | ||||
| <!-- [rfced] We have the following questions related to the use of <tt> | ||||
| element to mark certain terms in the XML file. | ||||
| a) Please review instances in which more than one term is enclosed in | ||||
| the <tt> tag. For example, should: | ||||
| <tt>"<b>" and "</b>"</tt> | ||||
| be made | ||||
| <tt>"<b>"</tt> and <tt>"</b>"</tt> | ||||
| and we see both: | ||||
| <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>" and "<CODE ENDS>"</tt> | ||||
| and | ||||
| <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</tt> and <tt>"<CODE ENDS>"</tt> | ||||
| b) Please review the use of quotation marks (both single quotes and | ||||
| double quotes) with these terms; specifically, should they be moved to | ||||
| outside the <tt> tag? | ||||
| For example, we see both: | ||||
| <tt>"<CODE BEGINS>"</tt> tag | ||||
| and | ||||
| <tt><CODE BEGINS></tt> convention | ||||
| c) Please review to ensure the usage of <tt> is consistent. It | ||||
| appears that there may be varying treatment of these terms. | ||||
| d) Please review the use of <tt><> with URLs. Should these instead use <e | ||||
| ref>? | ||||
| For example: | ||||
| Original: <tt><https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html></tt> | ||||
| Perhaps: <eref target="https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html" brackets=" | ||||
| angle"/> | ||||
| e) Other than CODE BEGINS / ENDS and URLs, we see the following uses | ||||
| of <tt>. Please confirm these appear as you intended. | ||||
| <tt>'//chapter[42]'</tt> | ||||
| <tt>"<b>" and "</b>"</tt> | ||||
| <tt><get></tt> | ||||
| <tt>'*'</tt> | ||||
| --> | --> | |||
| <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online | ||||
| Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> | ||||
| and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically | ||||
| result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. | ||||
| Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should | ||||
| still be reviewed as a best practice. | ||||
| --> | ||||
| </back> | ||||
| </rfc> | </rfc> | |||
| End of changes. 330 change blocks. | ||||
| 2813 lines changed or deleted | 1662 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. | ||||